Skip to Content
  • 4.5
    Impact Factor
  • 4.5
    CiteScore
  • 26 days
    Submission to First Decision
  • 4 days
    Acceptance to Publication

Advances in Respiratory Medicine

Advances in Respiratory Medicine (ARM) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal on respiratory medicine, covering allergology, oncology, immunology and infectious diseases of the respiratory system, published bimonthly online. It is the official journal of the Polish Respiratory Society (PtChP). Society members receive discounts on the article processing charges.
  • Open Access— free for readers, with article processing charges (APC) paid by authors or their institutions.
  • High Visibility: indexed within Scopus, ESCI (Web of Science), PubMed, MEDLINE, PMC, Embase, and other databases. 
  • Journal Rank: JCR - Q1 (Respiratory System) / CiteScore - Q2 (Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine)
  • Rapid Publication: manuscripts are peer-reviewed and a first decision is provided to authors approximately 25.7 days after submission; acceptance to publication is undertaken in 3.9 days (median values for papers published in this journal in the first half of 2026).
  • Recognition of Reviewers: Reviewers whose reports are timely and of high quality receive an APC discount voucher for a future publication in an MDPI journal. Become a reviewer.

Get Alerted

Add your email address to receive forthcoming issues of this journal.

All Articles (1,695)

  • Systematic Review
  • Open Access

Introduction: Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) reduces airway smooth muscle and may benefit severe asthma, but its role alongside biologics remains unclear. We assessed randomised and real-world evidence on efficacy and safety. Methods: We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library for RCTs and observational studies of BT in adults with severe uncontrolled asthma, analysing them separately. Results: Twenty studies were included (five RCTs, 15 observational). In RCTs, BT improved asthma-related quality of life (AQLQ;MD, 0.69; 95% CI 0.30–1.09), asthma control (ACQ; MD,−0.64; 95%CI, −1.10 to −0.19), and morning peak expiratory flow (MD, 20.62 L/min; 95% CI, 4.92–36.32), but did not improve rescue medication use or symptom-free-days. BT increased the risk of hospitalisation during the treatment period (RR, 3.50; 95%CI, 1.26–9.68), with no significant excess thereafter. Real-world studies showed improvements in AQLQ (MD,1.38; 95%CI, 0.97–1.80), ACQ (MD,−1.24; 95%CI, −1.86 to −0.62), and annualised exacerbation rates (MD, −3.79 exacerbations/patient-year; 95%CI, −6.98 to −0.61). Evidence suggested a possible, inconsistent corticosteroid-sparing effect; data on biologics and long-term safety were limited. Conclusions: BT improved asthma-related quality of life and control, mainly in trials without sham controls, but increased short-term hospitalisation risk. Real-world findings were similar but came from uncontrolled studies. BT is not an established alternative to biologics, but may suit carefully selected patients with severe asthma who cannot use or do not respond to them.

Adv. Respir. Med.

21 October 2026

PRISMA flow diagram of study screening and selection.
  • Feature Paper
  • Article
  • Open Access

Background/Objectives: We examined whether respiratory performance differed among broad stroke lesion-location categories. Methods: This exploratory single-center cross-sectional analysis combined pre-intervention assessments from 20 participants in an earlier trial with 60 subsequently recruited participants. The 80 patients were classified into frontal lobe (n = 27), basal ganglia region (n = 26), or brainstem (n = 27) categories. Peak inspiratory flow (PIF), strength index (S-Index), and five conventional respiratory outcomes were assessed. Holm correction was applied across seven outcomes. Linear models used type 3 heteroscedasticity-consistent (HC3) robust standard errors and the original six clinical covariates. Additional PIF analyses incorporated time since stroke, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), or modified Barthel Index (MBI), and restricted the sample to ischemic or first-ever stroke. Results: Only PIF retained an unadjusted group association after Holm correction (adjusted p = 0.008). The adjusted overall lesion-location association also survived correction (adjusted p = 0.009). PIF was 0.625 L/s higher in the basal ganglia region than in the brainstem group (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.282–0.967). This contrast persisted with additional clinical adjustment in the full cohort and in ischemic stroke. Evidence weakened in first-ever stroke; with MBI adjustment, the contrast was 0.381 L/s (95% CI, −0.067–0.829). Conclusions: Broad lesion-location categories were associated with PIF in this selected cohort. The findings remain exploratory and cannot fully separate anatomical associations from stroke severity, disability, unmeasured clinical factors, or measurement limitations.

Adv. Respir. Med.

20 October 2026

Two-stage participant selection for the exploratory cross-sectional analysis. Of 120 individuals assessed for inclusion, 30 were enrolled participants from the earlier respiratory-training trial and 90 were subsequently screened patients. Stage-specific reasons for non-inclusion are shown for 10 earlier and 30 subsequent individuals, with one reason counted per person. The earlier trial’s original screening denominator is not shown. Lesion-based non-inclusion in this analysis does not indicate withdrawal from the source trial. Two patients withdrew consent after providing informed consent but before study assessments. The final 80 participants comprised frontal lobe (n = 27), basal ganglia region (n = 26), and brainstem (n = 27) categories; these were anatomical groups, not randomized treatment arms.
  • Review
  • Open Access

Population-based lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) is expanding across Europe, including a publicly funded Polish programme starting in October 2026. Because screening-eligible individuals share substantial tobacco-related cardiovascular risk, LDCT also offers cardiovascular risk assessment without additional radiation. We conducted a narrative review of the PubMed literature published up to September 2026, prioritising guidelines, lung cancer screening cohorts and systematic reviews. We summarise the cardiovascular findings on non-contrast, non-electrocardiography (ECG)-gated LDCT: coronary artery, aortic valve, mitral annular and thoracic aortic calcification, ascending aortic dilatation, pericardial effusion, and pulmonary artery enlargement, as well as investigational cardiac volumetry, epicardial adipose tissue and artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted quantification. We grade each finding by reportability, defined downstream action and supporting evidence, and align reporting thresholds with the European Respiratory Society/European Society of Thoracic Imaging (ERS/ESTI) statement on incidental findings. LDCT cannot replace dedicated cardiac imaging or establish haemodynamic diagnoses. The prognostic value of coronary and aortic valve calcification and of ascending aortic dilatation is established, whereas the evidence for mitral annular calcification and pulmonary artery enlargement is more limited; observational data indicate that reporting these markers changes preventive management, but whether this improves cardiovascular outcomes has not yet been demonstrated. Standardised reporting, proportionate thresholds, and coordinated pathways linking radiology, pulmonology, primary care and cardiology are needed to translate incidental cardiovascular findings into scalable prevention and should be evaluated in implementation studies.

Adv. Respir. Med.

19 October 2026

Visual grading of coronary artery calcification (CAC) on lung cancer screening low-dose computed tomography (LDCT). Axial non-contrast, non-ECG-gated images. (A) No CAC. (B) Mild CAC: focal calcification in the left anterior descending artery (arrow). (C) Severe CAC: extensive calcifications in the left anterior descending and right coronary arteries (arrows). (D) Coronary stents in the right coronary artery and left anterior descending artery (arrows).
  • Systematic Review
  • Open Access

Background: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive fibrotic interstitial lung disease with high morbidity and mortality. Inhaled treprostinil showed pulmonary vascular and lung-function signals in pulmonary hypertension associated with Interstitial lung disease (PH-ILD) and was subsequently tested in IPF trials. Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of inhaled treprostinil in adults with IPF. Methods: PubMed, Google Scholar and the Cochrane Library/CENTRAL were searched for records published from January 2000 to 2026. A random-effects meta-analysis used the DerSimonian–Laird tau squared and inverse-variance weighting methods. Continuous outcomes were pooled as generic inverse-variance effects from reported estimates and 95% confidence intervals. Hazard ratios were pooled on the log scale. Safety outcomes were pooled as risk ratios from event counts. Results: The searches identified 1552 records. After deduplication, 379 records were screened and 85 full-text reports were assessed. Eleven reports were included in the systematic review. TETON-1 and TETON-2 were the two direct-IPF randomized trials within the coordinated TETON program eligible for primary meta-analysis. Inhaled treprostinil improved absolute forced vital capacity (FVC) change at 52 weeks compared with placebo (MD 111.28 mL, 95% CI 77.61 to 144.95, p < 0.001; I squared 8.5%). Clinical worsening was reduced (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.84, p < 0.001; I squared 0.0%). Acute exacerbation was lower in pooled analysis (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.91, p = 0.022), while all-cause mortality did not differ significantly (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.05, p = 0.086). Adverse-event discontinuation, cough and headache were more frequent with treprostinil. Conclusions: In direct IPF randomized evidence, inhaled treprostinil preserved lung function and reduced clinical worsening at 52 weeks.

Adv. Respir. Med.

8 October 2026

PRISMA flow diagram for study selection.

Highly Accessed Articles

News & Conferences

Latest Issues

Open for Submission

Journal Sections

XFacebookLinkedIn
Adv. Respir. Med. - ISSN 2543-6031