From Participatory Design to Transformative Resilience

A Special Issue of Architecture (ISSN 2673-8945).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 May 2026) | Viewed by 4126

Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Independent Researcher, Plymouth PL3 4HS, UK
Interests: socio-cultural identity; urbanism (including community regeneration); architectural pedagogy

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Architecture, Building and Design, Taylor’s University, Selangor 47500, Malaysia
Interests: sustainable urban development; urban design; urban heritage; housing development; urban architecture

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Architecture—Design & Built Environment, Beirut Arab University, Debbieh Campus, Debbieh Main Road, Beirut 11-5020, Lebanon
Interests: community-based and participatory design; environmental design; building performance simulation; climate resilience; post-crisis urban environments

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Architectural Engineering and Environmental Design Department, Arab Academy for Science, Technology, and Maritime Transport, Smart Village Campus, Cairo 12577, Egypt
Interests: urban education; human behavior within built environment; intelligent application in urbanism; serious games in urbanism; community development

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue will delineate, explore, and advance the capacity of participatory design to foster and reinforce spatialized transformative resilience. By critically reexamining and expanding the boundaries of participatory design, the Special Issue seeks to move beyond conventional frameworks, positioning transformative resilience, underpinned by participatory design, as a vital approach to addressing complex and evolving architectural and urban challenges. Transformative resilience is not merely endurance, it advances an agency open to ongoing evolution in response to challenges. This dynamic nature justifies referring here to “acts” of transformative resilience, reflected in initiatives such as climate adaptation, post-disaster or post-conflict reconstruction, and economic regeneration, all of which are increasingly imperative in the face of emergent and impending existential challenges. A diverse range of methods and tools is needed to ensure the sustainability of communities and places. Moving beyond laudable but well-discussed examples of participatory design addressing immediate needs and aspirations, this Special Issue will focus on three key forward-looking approaches in the context of (emergent/future) change:

-Enabling establishes a foundational base for transformative resilience by building academic, community, and/or public/private sector capacities, fostering decision-making structures and cultivating knowledge exchange. These enabling conditions can give rise to enacted practices.

-Enacting through the initial planning, implementation, and/or management of assets (i.e., buildings, infrastructure, landscapes, and places) and agencies (including cultural, economic, environmental, political, and/or social programs). Critical here is not just the role of conventional buildings, places, and activities, but equally the possibility of transformative resilience activated thorough design prototypes, spatial interventions, or experimental projects. While complete in their own right, such small-scale or pilot efforts allow architects, landscape architects, urban planners, and others to test ideas, engage communities, and adapt designs in real-world contexts, acting as a catalyst for full-scale implementation.

-Envisioning future possibilities for participatory design and transformative resilience, drawing insights from alternative discourses including anthropology, the arts, business, geography, history, law, medicine, and/or the sciences. This visionary outlook can build upon enacted experiences to inform long-term strategies and build resilient futures.

While we welcome all discussions, we value hearing voices from the Global South, voices that carry globally relevant insights and lessons in enabling, enacting, and envisioning resilient communities and places for both now and for future generations.

Note: In line with our efforts to include more diverse voices in academic research and encouraging equitable access to publishing opportunities, fee waivers or reductions will be considered for authors based on three factors: quality, originality, and the relevance of the submitted work (as determined by the standard peer-review process); prior research activity; and economic need.

Prof. Robert Brown
Dr. Camelia May Li Kusumo
Dr. Hiba Mohsen
Dr. Nancy Abdel-Moneim
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-anonymized peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Architecture is an international peer-reviewed open access quarterly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • change
  • dialogic
  • enabling
  • enacting
  • envisioning
  • participatory design
  • transformative resilience

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

35 pages, 37618 KB  
Article
Strategic Visions and Transformative Resilience: Architectural Design, Implementation, and Functional and Socio-Cultural Outcomes of Saudi Vision 2030 in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
by Ashraf Mohamed Soliman and Salman Al Rasheed
Architecture 2026, 6(3), 158; https://doi.org/10.3390/architecture6030158 - 7 Sep 2026
Viewed by 245
Abstract
This study examines how Saudi Vision 2030 is reshaping architectural design and practice in Riyadh amid the challenge of balancing rapid urban development with local architectural identity. The study is framed by the concept of transformative resilience, defined here as the capacity of [...] Read more.
This study examines how Saudi Vision 2030 is reshaping architectural design and practice in Riyadh amid the challenge of balancing rapid urban development with local architectural identity. The study is framed by the concept of transformative resilience, defined here as the capacity of an urban system not merely to absorb disturbance but to deliberately reconfigure its structure, function and identity while sustaining cultural continuity. The research investigates Vision 2030’s impact across four analytical dimensions; design, implementation, functional performance, and socio-cultural context; and explores whether evaluative perceptions differ according to sociodemographic characteristics, including gender, age, nationality, educational level, professional background, and length of residency. A descriptive analytical methodology was adopted, employing a structured questionnaire. Instrument reliability was established with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.70. Data were collected from a stratified random sample of 384 residents and professionals in Riyadh (response rate 93.7%). Because the instrument records perceived rather than objectively measured performance, the two evidence streams are reported separately: the survey data establish social legitimacy and acceptance, while the case studies supply the physical, technical and documentary evidence base. To contextualise the survey findings, three projects were purposively selected and examined as representative case studies, supported by field photographic documentation. Quantitative results demonstrate a strong consensus regarding the positive influence of Vision 2030 on architectural development, with mean scores ranging from 4.07 (design) to 4.13 (functional and socio-cultural dimensions). The highest-rated item (mean = 4.23) related to strengthening sense of place. Inferential analysis, now reported with effect sizes, revealed statistically significant differences across all sociodemographic variables, with age being the most influential factor, although all effects were small in magnitude. Qualitative findings identify preserving architectural identity and heritage as the main challenge, while diversifying contemporary design approaches is the most frequently proposed future direction. The study concludes that achieving Vision 2030’s architectural objectives requires regulatory frameworks that embed local identity, supported by community capacity building and sustained institutional commitment to culturally responsive and environmentally sustainable design. The principal contribution is an operationalised assessment framework that translates transformative resilience from a descriptive narrative into a set of architectural indicators applicable to other vision-led urban transformations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue From Participatory Design to Transformative Resilience)
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 12773 KB  
Article
Fostering Transformative Resilience Through Participatory Design: A Case Study of Mohammad Amin Camp, Amman, Jordan
by Islam A. Alshafei, Samah Mohammed AlDweik, Mahmoud Ali Hassouneh and Abdellatif A. Jarrar
Architecture 2026, 6(3), 115; https://doi.org/10.3390/architecture6030115 - 17 Jul 2026
Viewed by 884
Abstract
This qualitative case study examines the feasibility of introducing transformative resilience in the informal settlement of Mohammad Amin Camp in Amman, Jordan. A participatory design approach was adopted, combining community workshops, focus-group discussions, semi-structured interviews, and spatial mapping to explain the urban challenges [...] Read more.
This qualitative case study examines the feasibility of introducing transformative resilience in the informal settlement of Mohammad Amin Camp in Amman, Jordan. A participatory design approach was adopted, combining community workshops, focus-group discussions, semi-structured interviews, and spatial mapping to explain the urban challenges faced by people living in the camp. Themes associated with data collection were the need for social spaces, better waste management, and greater mobility. The findings suggest that community-defined resilience priorities extend beyond physical infrastructure improvements to include social interaction, accessibility, environmental quality, and local ownership, highlighting the value of participatory design in identifying context-specific resilience needs. Guided by the Enabling–Enacting–Envisioning framework, this study translated community knowledge into actionable urban design strategies, illustrating how participatory design can foster transformative resilience through integrated environmental, social, and governance interventions. Key interventions include the creation of green spaces, improved pedestrian pathways, community gathering spaces, and integrated waste management and fire safety measures. The proposed interventions address immediate urban challenges while strengthening long-term resilience through enhanced social cohesion, environmental adaptability, and community capacity. This study illustrates that participatory, small-scale spatial interventions can inform grounded and context-specific urban regeneration, offering practical insights for planners and policymakers working in informal settlement contexts. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue From Participatory Design to Transformative Resilience)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 921 KB  
Article
From Engagement to Empowerment: Iterative Participatory Urbanism and Community Spatial Agency in the ECHO Project
by Filzani Illia Ibrahim, Bashira Mohd Bahar, Azim Sulaiman, Nik Syazwan Nik Ab Wahab, Meesha Lopez and Zati Syazwina Mohd Jamil
Architecture 2026, 6(3), 104; https://doi.org/10.3390/architecture6030104 - 1 Jul 2026
Viewed by 542
Abstract
Public housing in the Global South often prioritises the physical delivery of shelter at the expense of the social infrastructures needed to sustain collective life. In Malaysia’s Program Perumahan Rakyat (PPR), participatory efforts are frequently treated as brief consultative exercises that rarely reshape [...] Read more.
Public housing in the Global South often prioritises the physical delivery of shelter at the expense of the social infrastructures needed to sustain collective life. In Malaysia’s Program Perumahan Rakyat (PPR), participatory efforts are frequently treated as brief consultative exercises that rarely reshape governance relations. This paper reconceptualises iterative participatory urbanism as a process through which community spatial agency is progressively formed through repeated engagement rather than isolated events. Unlike conventional participatory planning or co-production models centred on discrete consultation or project delivery, this approach frames participation as an evolving governance ecology. Drawing on a 12-month embedded case study of the ECHO Project at PPR Sri Cempaka, Kuala Lumpur, the study combines focus group discussions, participatory mapping, co-design workshops, and longitudinal facilitation observations to examine how residents’ relationship to shared space changed over time. Findings reveal a shift from passive expectations of state-led provision toward collective coordination, informal stewardship, and emerging shared governance practices. Spatial agency emerged not through design interventions alone but through relational continuity, visible responsiveness, and evolving shared responsibility. The study contributes to participatory urbanism and spatial agency scholarship while offering a practical framework for housing authorities and urban practitioners to institutionalise community stewardship within state-led housing systems. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue From Participatory Design to Transformative Resilience)
Show Figures

Figure 1

33 pages, 44436 KB  
Article
A Participatory Decision-Support Framework for Heritage-Led Urban Regeneration: Integrating People, Place, and Behaviour in El-Mokhtalat District, Mansoura, Egypt
by Nanees Abdelhamid Elsayyad, Heba M. Hafez and Heba M. Abdou
Architecture 2026, 6(2), 96; https://doi.org/10.3390/architecture6020096 - 18 Jun 2026
Viewed by 711
Abstract
Historic urban districts are increasingly exposed to rapid urban transformation, resulting in the deterioration of heritage fabric, weakening of spatial identity, and disruption of everyday patterns of use. Although participatory approaches are increasingly recognised in heritage-led regeneration, many applications remain limited by the [...] Read more.
Historic urban districts are increasingly exposed to rapid urban transformation, resulting in the deterioration of heritage fabric, weakening of spatial identity, and disruption of everyday patterns of use. Although participatory approaches are increasingly recognised in heritage-led regeneration, many applications remain limited by the lack of analytical mechanisms capable of connecting community perspectives with spatial and behavioural evidence in a structured and practical manner. This study develops and applies a participatory decision-support approach based on the People–Place–Behaviour (PPB) framework within the historic district of El-Mokhtalat in Mansoura, Egypt. The study combines spatial documentation, behavioural observation, and stakeholder consultation to examine how everyday urban practices, adaptive reuse, informal interventions, and local perceptions collectively influence regeneration priorities within the historic environment. The findings indicate that regeneration priorities emerge through the interaction between spatial conditions, community perceptions, and behavioural patterns rather than through isolated physical conditions alone. Based on stakeholder consultations (n = 30), the analysis identifies a prioritisation gradient in which architectural conservation and environmental enhancement represent the most immediate intervention priorities, while adaptive reuse and public-space improvements remain dependent on contextual compatibility and local acceptance. The study also demonstrates the analytical value of behavioural evidence in revealing recurring spatial pressures, identity-related transformations, and everyday interaction patterns affecting the continuity of the historic urban fabric. By integrating participatory, spatial, and behavioural evidence within a unified evaluation process, the study proposes a context-sensitive analytical approach capable of supporting more informed and locally responsive heritage-led regeneration strategies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue From Participatory Design to Transformative Resilience)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop