- Article
Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model for Prediction of Immunoglobulins Exposure in Pregnant Women
- Million A. Tegenge
Background: Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling is applied to address clinical pharmacology issues including dose selection and exposure assessments for special populations (e.g., pediatrics, and renally or hepatically impaired patients). The objective of this study was to evaluate the predictive performance of a PBPK model for dosing assessment of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and anti-D immunoglobulin (anti-D Ig) products in pregnant women. Methods: A minimal PBPK (mPBPK) model that incorporates pregnancy-specific physiological parameters and allometric scaling approaches was developed and evaluated for predicting the exposure of IVIG and anti-D Ig in pregnant women. The concentration versus time data were obtained from the published literature. Results: The IVIG (n = 22) and anti-D Ig (n = 29) concentrations were predicted using the mPBPK model with an average fold error of 1.17 and 1.22, respectively. A total of 100% and 95% of IVIG concentrations were predicted within the 0.5–2-fold and 0.5–1.5-fold prediction error ranges, respectively. For anti-D Ig, predictions fell within the 0.5–2-fold and 0.5–1.5-fold ranges for 93% and 76% concentrations, respectively. A mPBPK model-based simulation following administration of 0.5 g/kg IVIG in 100 virtual nonpregnant and pregnant subjects revealed that the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) was 15% lower and trough concentration (Ctrough) was 8% lower during the third trimester of pregnancy compared to nonpregnant subjects. In contrast, with flat dosing, Cmax and Ctrough were 32% and 26% lower in pregnant subjects, respectively. Overall, the model demonstrated reasonable predictive performance, and bodyweight-based dosing regimen is an acceptable approach that results in minimal change in exposure of IVIG in pregnant women.
19 November 2025


![The observed and model predicted IVIG and anti-D Ig concentrations in nonpregnant and pregnant subjects. (A) IVIG concentration profile obtained from Church et al. 2006 [24] and mPBPK fitted curve (orange) and (B) external validation of mPBPK model with PK data from nonpregnant subjects obtained from Ensom et al. 2011 [26]. (C) Anti-D Ig concentration following intravenous administration obtained from Bichler et al. 2003 [25] and mPBPK fitted curve (orange). List of PK studies of IVIG and anti-D Ig is shown in Table S1.](/_ipx/b_%23fff&f_webp&q_100&fit_outside&s_470x317/https://mdpi-res.com/antibodies/antibodies-14-00099/article_deploy/html/images/antibodies-14-00099-g001-550.jpg)


