Air

Road dust resuspension is widely recognized as a major contributor to traffic-related particulate matter (PM) in urban environments. Nevertheless, reported emission factors exhibit substantial variability. These discrepancies stem not only from the intrinsic complexity of the resuspension process but also from limitations in measurement techniques, which often fail to adequately control or characterize the influencing parameters. As a result, the contribution of each parameter remains difficult to isolate, leading to inconsistencies across studies. This study presents an experimental protocol developed to quantify PM10 and PM2.5 emission factors associated with vehicle-induced road dust resuspension. Experiments were conducted on a dedicated test track seeded with alumina particles of controlled mass and size distribution to simulate road dust. A network of microsensors was strategically deployed at multiple upwind and downwind locations to continuously monitor particle concentration variations during vehicle passages. Emission factors were derived through time integration of the mass flow rate of resuspended dust measured by the sensor network. The estimated PM10 emission factor showed excellent agreement, within 2.5%, with predictions from a literature-based formulation, thereby validating the accuracy and external relevance of the proposed protocol. In contrast, comparisons with U.S. EPA formulas and other empirical equations revealed substantially larger discrepancies, particularly for PM2.5, highlighting the persistent limitations of current modeling approaches.

Fine particulate matter (PM_2.5) poses substantial urban health risks that vary across space, time, and population vulnerability. We integrate a spatio-temporal INLA–SPDE PM_2.5 field with an agent-based model (ABM) of 10,000 daily home–work commuters in Indianapolis’s Pleasant Run airshed (50 weeks; 250 m grid). The PM_2.5 surface fuses 23 corrected PurpleAir PA-II-SD sensors with meteorology, land use, road proximity, and MODIS AOD. Validation indicated strong agreement (leave-one-out R² = 0.79, RMSE = 3.5 μg/m³; EPA monitor comparison R² = 0.81, RMSE = 3.1 μg/m³). We model a spatial-equity counterfactual by assigning susceptibility independently of residence and workplace, isolating vulnerability from residential segregation. Under this design, annual PM_2.5 exposure was statistically indistinguishable across groups (16.22–16.29 μg/m³; max difference 0.07 μg/m³, <0.5%), yet VWDI differed by ~10× (High vs. Very Low). Route-level maps reveal recurrent micro-corridors (>20 μg/m³) near industrial zones and arterials that increase within-group variability without creating between-group exposure gaps. These findings quantify a policy-relevant “floor effect” in environmental justice: even with perfect spatial equity, substantial health disparities remain driven by susceptibility. Effective mitigation, therefore, requires dual strategies—place-based emissions and mobility interventions to reduce exposure for all, paired with vulnerability-targeted health supports (screening, access to care, indoor air quality) to address irreducible risk. The data and code framework provides a reproducible baseline against which real-world segregation and mobility constraints can be assessed in future, stratified scenarios.

When it rains or snows over a city, water droplets capture airborne pollutants and transport them to the ground. Prolonged precipitation over the same area can remove a larger amount of pollution; however, rainfall systems vary in duration and tend to move rapidly across regions. Wet deposition sprinklers replicate this natural scavenging process. They can operate for extended periods as needed and can be installed at specific locations where pollution mitigation is most necessary. Despite encouraging experimental results and the widespread use of similar technologies in industrial sectors—such as mining, the construction industry, and waste management—very limited scientific research has focused on their application in urban environments. In particular, their use as an emergency measure during severe pollution episodes as a protective intervention for sensitive subjects, while awaiting the effects of long-term structural solutions, remain largely unexplored. In the present work, we systematically discuss the key elements required to design and implement a network of anti-smog cannons (ASC) to protect sensitive receptors from severe air pollution events in large cities. Based on this analysis, we established a generalized framework that can be applied to any urban context worldwide. We also examine the potential application of the proposed method to the city of Turin (≈850,000 inhabitants, north-western Italy), which is considered a representative case study for other cities in Western Europe. Our findings indicate that such a network is both technically feasible and economically sustainable for local government authorities.