Conservation through Collaboration: Regional Conservation Programs of the North Carolina Zoo
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. North Carolina Zoo
3. Land Conservation and Management
3.1. Overview
3.2. Land Protection
3.3. Land Management
4. Collaborative Conservation of Declining Amphibians
4.1. Overview
4.2. Population Augmentation
4.3. Habitat Management
5. Wildlife Rehabilitation
6. Outreach and Sustainability
6.1. Connecting People with Nature
6.2. Combating Habitat Loss and Degradation
6.3. Combating Climate Change
7. Recommendations for Zoos
8. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Barnoski, A.D.; Matzke, N.; Tomiya, S.; Wogan, G.O.U.; Swatz, B.; Quental, T.B.; Marshall, C.; McGuire, J.L.; Lindsey, E.L.; Maquire, K.C.; et al. Has the Earth’s sixth mass extinction already arrived? Nature 2011, 471, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dirzo, R.; Young, H.S.; Galetti, M.; Ceballos, G.; Isaac, N.J.B.; Collen, B. Defaunation in the Anthropocene. Science 2014, 345, 401–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pimm, S.L.; Jenkins, C.N.; Abell, R.; Brooks, T.M.; Gittleman, J.L.; Joppa, L.N.; Raven, P.H.; Roberts, C.M.; Sexton, J.O. The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection. Science 2014, 344, 1246752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ceballos, G.; Ehrich, P.R.; Dirzo, R. Biological annihilation via the ongoing sixth mass extinction signaled by vertebrate population losses and declines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, E6089–E6096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Wilkins, K.; Pejchar, L.; Carroll, S.L.; Jones, M.S.; Walker, S.E.; Shinbrot, X.A.; Huayhuaca, C.; Fernández-Giménez, M.E.; Reid, R.S. Collaborative conservation in the United States: A review of motivations, goals, and outcomes. Biol. Conserv. 2021, 259, 109165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raschke, A.B.; Pegram, K.V.; Melkonoff, N.A.; Davis, J.; Blackwell, S.A. Collaborative conservation by botanical gardens: Unique opportunities for local to global impacts. J. Zool. Bot. Gard. 2022, 3, 463–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mallinson, J.J.C. A sustainable future for zoos and their role in wildlife conservation. Hum. Dimens. Wildl. 2003, 8, 59–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tribe, A.; Booth, R. Assessing the role of zoos in wildlife conservation. Hum. Dimens. Wildl. 2003, 8, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bayma, T. Rational myth making and environment shaping: The transformation of the zoo. Sociol. Q. 2012, 53, 116–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Association of Zoos and Aquariums. 2021 Annual Report on Conservation and Science Highlights; Association of Zoos and Aquariums: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Association of Zoos and Aquariums Visitor Demographics. Available online: https://www.aza.org/partnerships-visitor-demographics?locale=en (accessed on 10 February 2023).
- Gusset, M.; Dick, G. The global reach of zoos and aquariums in visitor numbers and conservation expenditures. Zoo Biol. 2011, 30, 566–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Braverman, I. Conservation without nature: The trouble with in situ versus ex situ conservation. Geoforum 2014, 51, 47–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- North Carolina Zoo. North Carolina Zoological Park Land Use Plan; North Carolina Zoo: Asheboro, NC, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Geldmann, J.; Barnes, M.; Coad, L.; Craigie, I.D.; Hockings, M.; Burgess, N.D. Effectiveness of terrestrial protected areas in reducing habitat loss and population declines. Biol. Conserv. 2013, 161, 230–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gray, C.L.; Hill, S.L.L.; Newbold, T.; Hudson, L.N.; Börger, L.; Contu, S.; Hoskins, A.J.; Ferrier, S.; Purvis, A.; Schartemann, J.P.W. Local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Bender, D.J.; Contreras, T.A.; Fahrig, L. Habitat loss and population decline: A meta-analysis of the patch size effect. Ecology 1998, 79, 517–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fischer, J.; Lindenmayer, D.B. Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: A synthesis. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2007, 16, 265–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Devictor, V.; Godet, L.; Julliard, R.; Couvet, D.; Jiguet, F. Can common species benefit from protected areas? Biol. Conserv. 2007, 139, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lyons, K.G.; Brigham, C.A.; Traut, B.H.; Schwartz, M.W. Rare species and ecosystem functioning. Conserv. Biol. 2005, 19, 1019–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Winfree, R.; Fox, J.W.; Williams, N.M.; Reilly, J.R.; Cariveau, D.P. Abundance of common species, not species richness, drives delivery of a real-world ecosystem service. Ecol. Lett. 2015, 18, 626–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lachowycz, K.; Jones, A.P. Towards a better understanding of the relationship between greenspace and health: Development of a theoretical framework. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2013, 118, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mitten, D.; Overholt, J.R.; Haynes, F.I.; D’Amore, C.C.; Ady, J.C. Hiking: A low-cost accessible intervention to promote health benefits. Am. J. Lifestyle Med. 2018, 2018, 302–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoover, K.S. Children in nature: Exploring the relationship between childhood outdoor experience and environmental stewardship. Environ. Educ. Res. 2021, 27, 894–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jose, S.; Jokela, E.J.; Miller, D.L. (Eds.) The Longleaf Pine Ecosystem: Ecology, Silviculture, and Restoration; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Smith, D.C.; Reynolds, R.G.; Hagen, K. Snakes on a path: Ecology of a North Carolina Piedmont snake community. Herpetol. Rev. 2021, 52, 473–481. [Google Scholar]
- Patterson, T.W.; Cummings, L.W.; Knapp, P.A. Longleaf pine (Pinus palustris Mill.) morphology and climate/growth responses along physiographic gradient in North Carolina. Prof. Geogr. 2016, 68, 238–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perlmutter, G.B.; Plata, E.A. Lichens of Purgatory and Ridges Mountains: Further explorations in the Uwharrie Mountains of North Carolina, USA. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Lichenological Symposium, Bangkok, Thailand, 9–13 January 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Stuart, S.N.; Chanson, J.S.; Cox, N.A.; Young, B.E.; Rodrigues, A.S.L.; Fischman, D.L.; Waller, R.W. Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science 2004, 306, 1783–1786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Beane, J.C.; Braswell, A.L.; Mitchell, J.C.; Palmer, W.M.; Harrison, J.R., III. Amphibians and Reptiles of the Carolinas and Virginia; University of North Carolina Press: Chapel Hill, NC, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission. Gopher Frog Conservation Plan for North Carolina; North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission: Raleigh, NC, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Pugh, M.W.; Hutchins, M.; Madritch, M.; Siefferman, L.; Gangloff, M.M. Land-use and local physical and chemical habitat parameters predict site occupancy by hellbender salamanders. Hydrobiologia 2016, 770, 105–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Griffith, B.; Scott, J.M.; Carpenter, J.W.; Reed, C. Translocation as a species conservation tool: Status and strategy. Science 1989, 245, 477–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fischer, J.; Lindenmayer, D.B. An assessment of the published results of animal relocations. Biol. Conserv. 2000, 96, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Germano, J.M.; Bishop, P.J. Suitability of amphibians and reptiles for translocation. Conserv. Biol. 2009, 23, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Byrne, P.G.; Silla, A.J. An experimental test of the genetic consequences of population augmentation in an amphibian. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 2020, 2, e194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kronenberger, J.A.; Gerberich, J.C.; Fitzpatrick, S.W.; Broder, E.D.; Angeloni, L.M.; Funk, W.C. An experimental test of alternative population augmentation scenarios. Conserv. Biol. 2018, 32, 838–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Weeks, A.R.; Sgro, C.M.; Young, A.G.; Frankham, R.; Mitchell, N.J.; Miller, K.A.; Byrne, M.; Coates, D.J.; Eldridge, M.D.B.; Sunnucks, P.; et al. Assessing the benefits and risks of translocations in changing environments: A genetic perspective. Evol. Appl. 2011, 4, 709–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Roznik, E.A.; Johnson, S.A.; Greenberg, C.H.; Tanner, G.W. Terrestrial movements and habitat use of gopher frogs in longleaf pine forests: A comparative study of juveniles and adults. For. Ecol. Manag. 2009, 259, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Humphries, W.J.; Sisson, M.A. Long distance migrations, landscape use, and vulnerability to prescribed fire of the gopher frog (Lithobates capito). J. Herpetol. 2012, 46, 665–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Roznik, E.A.; Johnson, S.A. Burrow use and survival of newly metamorphosed gopher frogs (Rana capito). J. Herpetol. 2009, 43, 431–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Semlitsch, R.D. Critical elements for biologically based recovery plans of aquatic-breeding amphibians. Conserv. Biol. 2002, 16, 619–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tschinkel, W.R.; King, J.R. Targeted removal of ant colonies in ecological experiments, using hot water. J. Insect Sci. 2007, 7, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Molina-López, R.A.; Casal, J.; Darwich, L. Causes of morbidity in wild raptor populations admitted at a wildlife rehabilitation centre in Spain from 1995–2007: A long term retrospective study. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e24603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Demezas, K.G.; Robinson, W.D. Characterizing the influence of domestic cats on birds with wildlife rehabilitation center data. Diversity 2021, 13, 322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanson, M.; Hollingshead, N.; Schuler, K.; Siemer, W.F.; Martin, P.; Bunting, E.M. Species, causes, and outcomes of wildlife rehabilitation in New York State. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0257675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Long, R.B.; Krumlauf, K.; Young, A.M. Characterizing trends in human-wildlife conflicts in the American Midwest using wildlife rehabilitation records. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0238805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trocini, S.; Paciono, C.; Warrem, K.; Butcher, J.; Robertson, I. Wildlife disease passive surveillance: The potential role of wildlife rehabilitation centres. In Proceedings of the National Wildlife Rehabilitation Conference, Canberra, Australia, 22–24 July 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Randall, N.J.; Blitvich, B.J.; Blanchong, J.A. Efficacy of wildlife rehabilitation centers in surveillance and monitoring of pathogen activity: A case study with West Nile virus. J. Wildl. Dis. 2012, 48, 646–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yabsley, M.J. The role of wildlife rehabilitation in wildlife disease research and surveillance. In Medical Management of Wildlife Species: A Guide for Practitioners; Hernandez, S.M., Barron, H.W., Miller, E.A., Aguilar, R.F., Yabsley, M.J., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 159–165. [Google Scholar]
- Franzen-Klein, D.; Adamovicz, L.; McRuer, D.; Carroll, S.A.; Wellehan, J.F.X.; Allender, M.C. Prevalence of box turtle adenovirus in eastern box turtles (Terrapene carolina carolina) presented to a wildlife rehabilitation center in Virginia, USA. J. Zoo Wildl. Med. 2020, 50, 769–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dodd, K.L., Jr. North American Box Turtles: A Natural History; University of Oklahoma Press: Norman, OK, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Miller, E.A.; Schlieps, J. (Eds.) Standards for Wildlife Rehabilitation; National Wildlife Rehabilitators Association: Bloomington, MN, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Buckanoff, H.D.; Moseley, L.J. Post-release monitoring of hand-reared songbirds. J. Wildl. Rehabil. 2015, 35, 7–10. [Google Scholar]
- Zaradic, P.A.; Pergams, O.R.W.; Kareiva, P. The impact of nature experience on willingness to support conservation. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e7367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Potts, S.G.; Imperatriz-Fonseca, V.; Ngo, H.T.; Aizen, M.A.; Biesmeijer, J.C.; Breeze, T.D.; Dicks, L.V.; Garibaldi, L.A.; Hill, R.; Settele, J.; et al. Safeguarding pollinators and their values to human well-being. Nature 2016, 540, 220–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Flockhart, D.T.T.; Pichancourt, J.-B.; Norris, D.R.; Martin, T.G. Unravelling the annual cycle in a migratory animal: Breeding-season habitat loss drives population declines of monarch butterflies. J. Anim. Ecol. 2016, 84, 155–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loss, S.L.; Will, T.; Loss, S.S.; Marra, P.P. Bird–building collisions in the United States: Estimates of annual mortality and species vulnerability. Condor 2014, 116, 8–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Klem, D., Jr. Preventing bird–window collisions. Wilson J. Ornithol. 2009, 121, 314–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brown, B.B.; Kusakabe, E.; Antonopoulos, A.; Siddoway, S.; Thompson, L. Winter bird-window collisions: Mitigation success, risk factors, and implementation challenges. PeerJ 2019, 7, e7620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sheppard, C.D. Evaluating the relative effectiveness of patterns on glass as deterrents of bird collisions with glass. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2019, 20, e00795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benedict, R.A.; Billeter, M.C. Discarded bottles as a cause of mortality in small vertebrates. Southeast. Nat. 2004, 3, 371–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roman, L.; Schuyler, Q.A.; Hardesty, B.D.; Townsend, K.A. Anthropogenic debris ingestion by avifauna in Eastern Australia. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0158343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Foley, C.J.; Feiner, Z.S.; Malinich, T.D.; Höök, T.O. A meta-analysis of the effects of exposure to microplastics on fish and aquatic invertebrates. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 631–632, 550–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Dawson, T.P.; Jackson, S.T.; House, J.I.; Prentice, I.C.; Mace, G.M. Beyond predictions: Biodiversity in a changing climate. Science 2011, 332, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bellard, C.; Bertelsmeier, C.; Leadley, P.; Thuiller, W.; Courchamp, F. Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity. Ecol. Lett. 2012, 15, 365–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bernal, B.; Murray, L.T.; Pearson, T.R.H. Global carbon dioxide removal rates from forest landscape restoration activities. Carbon Balance Manag. 2018, 13, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Year | Egg Masses | Frogs Released | % Frogs Released | Mean SVL (mm) | Mean Mass (g) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2016 | 34 | 266 | 35 | NA | 5.7 |
2017 | 9 | 156 | 78 | 39.8 | 7.9 |
2018 (spring) | 3 | 41 | 42 | 38.8 | 7.4 |
2018 (fall) | 22 | 170 | 85 | 38.2 | 8.0 |
2019 | 19 | 162 | 81 | 37.0 | 7.2 |
2020 | 23 | 298 | 75 | 37.4 | 8.6 |
2021 | 16 | 459 | 70 * | 34.4 | 6.2 |
2022 | NA | 113 | 91 | 34.4 | 6.4 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Roznik, E.A.; Buckanoff, H.; Langston, R.W.; Shupp, C.J.; Smith, D. Conservation through Collaboration: Regional Conservation Programs of the North Carolina Zoo. J. Zool. Bot. Gard. 2023, 4, 292-311. https://doi.org/10.3390/jzbg4020025
Roznik EA, Buckanoff H, Langston RW, Shupp CJ, Smith D. Conservation through Collaboration: Regional Conservation Programs of the North Carolina Zoo. Journal of Zoological and Botanical Gardens. 2023; 4(2):292-311. https://doi.org/10.3390/jzbg4020025
Chicago/Turabian StyleRoznik, Elizabeth A., Halley Buckanoff, Robert W. Langston, Christopher J. Shupp, and Dustin Smith. 2023. "Conservation through Collaboration: Regional Conservation Programs of the North Carolina Zoo" Journal of Zoological and Botanical Gardens 4, no. 2: 292-311. https://doi.org/10.3390/jzbg4020025
APA StyleRoznik, E. A., Buckanoff, H., Langston, R. W., Shupp, C. J., & Smith, D. (2023). Conservation through Collaboration: Regional Conservation Programs of the North Carolina Zoo. Journal of Zoological and Botanical Gardens, 4(2), 292-311. https://doi.org/10.3390/jzbg4020025