Next Article in Journal
Key Intermediates for Building the ω-Side Chain of Prostaglandins with a Constrained Pentalenofurane Scaffold Linked to C-15 Carbon Atom to Diminish the PG Inactivation
Previous Article in Journal
Antioxidant Capacity of Some Extracts from Aronia and Lonicera Fruits
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Effect of Biological Preparations and Different Nitrogen Fertilization on Winter Wheat Crop †

by
Darija Jodaugienė
*,
Rita Čepulienė
and
Irena Pranckietienė
Department of Agroecosystems and Soil Sciences, Agriculture Academy, Vytautas Magnus University, Studentu Str. 11, Akademija, LT-53361 Kaunas, Lithuania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 1st International Online Conference on Agriculture—Advances in Agricultural Science and Technology, 10–25 February 2022; Available online: https://iocag2022.sciforum.net/.
Chem. Proc. 2022, 10(1), 38; https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCAG2022-12262
Published: 14 February 2022
Plant fertility and soil quality are determined by many environmental factors. Good-quality crops occur when plants are grown with optimal development, nutrition and formation of crop structural elements. With the intensification of agricultural production, the use of plant protection products and mineral fertilizers is increasing. This has led to a decrease in the humus content of the soil and to a deterioration of soil quality. One of the most effective measures to maintain soil fertility is fertilization with organic fertilizers. Recently, with the declining use of organic fertilizers, a partial solution to the problem may be fertilizers enriched with humus, amino acids, seaweed extracts and other plant nutrition activators. Microbiological products strengthen the root system, accelerate the process of photosynthesis, strengthen the plant’s immune system, increase resistance to adverse environmental factors and improve soil structure. Rising prices of energy resources and the EU ecological policy goals are forcing farmers to seek solutions to reduce production costs and energy resources. At the same time, new and efficient measures are sought to increase soil fertility and quality.
The investigations were carried out at the Experimental Station of Vytautas Magnus University Agriculture Academy, Lithuania, in 2019–2020, in Calc(ar)i-Endohypogleyic Luvisol, a semi-neutral (pHKCl 6.9), high phosphorus (232.6 mg kg−1 P2O5), mid-potassium-level (111.0 mg kg−1 K2O), mid-humus-level (2.39%) soil, in order to evaluate the effect of biological preparations on winter wheat crop. Treatments of the experiment: Factor A—biological preparations: (1) without spraying, (2) complex of fulvic and humic acids with microorganisms (biological preparation A) was sprayed (norm 1.0 L ha−1) in autumn, (3) complex of industrial biological waste (molasses) with microorganisms (biological preparation B) was sprayed (norm 2.0 L ha−1) in autumn. Factor B - nitrogen rates: (1) fertilized with N105, (2) fertilized with N165.
Available phosphorus content was significantly higher in the soil where was applied biological preparation B at both levels of nitrogen fertilization. Biological preparation A increased available potassium content in the soil where the higher amount of nitrogen rate was used compared with the control. The use of biological preparations did not have a significant effect on the germination of winter wheat but tended to promote the tillering of winter wheat and increase the number of productive stems. The use of biological preparations tended to increase the assimilation area of winter wheat leaves, the weight of 1000 grains, quantity of grain per spike, mass of grain per spike and significantly (p ≤ 0.05) increased winter wheat yield to compare with the control. Application of biological preparations significantly (p ≤ 0.05) increased the decomposition of winter wheat straw.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/IOCAG2022-12262/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.J., R.Č. and I.P.; methodology, D.J.; investigation, D.J. and R.Č.; data curation, D.J. and R.Č.; writing—original draft preparation, D.J.; writing—review and editing, R.Č. and I.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jodaugienė, D.; Čepulienė, R.; Pranckietienė, I. Effect of Biological Preparations and Different Nitrogen Fertilization on Winter Wheat Crop. Chem. Proc. 2022, 10, 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCAG2022-12262

AMA Style

Jodaugienė D, Čepulienė R, Pranckietienė I. Effect of Biological Preparations and Different Nitrogen Fertilization on Winter Wheat Crop. Chemistry Proceedings. 2022; 10(1):38. https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCAG2022-12262

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jodaugienė, Darija, Rita Čepulienė, and Irena Pranckietienė. 2022. "Effect of Biological Preparations and Different Nitrogen Fertilization on Winter Wheat Crop" Chemistry Proceedings 10, no. 1: 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCAG2022-12262

APA Style

Jodaugienė, D., Čepulienė, R., & Pranckietienė, I. (2022). Effect of Biological Preparations and Different Nitrogen Fertilization on Winter Wheat Crop. Chemistry Proceedings, 10(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCAG2022-12262

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop