Objectives. This study evaluated the performance of three intraoral scanners with different acquisition technologies in detecting early signs of tooth wear, using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) as the reference standard.
Methods and Materials. Three IOS were examined, including an active triangulation scanner, a
[...] Read more.
Objectives. This study evaluated the performance of three intraoral scanners with different acquisition technologies in detecting early signs of tooth wear, using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) as the reference standard.
Methods and Materials. Three IOS were examined, including an active triangulation scanner, a structured-light triangulation scanner, and a parallel confocal technology scanner. Ten extracted unrestored and caries-free premolars were placed in the maxillary left second premolar position of a dental mannequin and scanned at baseline, generating quadrant digital models. Micro-CT scans were also obtained at baseline. Wear was simulated by immersion in a 1% citric acid solution followed by brushing of the buccal surfaces. All specimens were rescanned with IOS and micro-CT. Micro-CT datasets were reconstructed into stereolithography models and compared with IOS models using mesh analysis software. Statistical analysis was performed in R using linear mixed-effects models to account for repeated measurements across teeth. RMS values and absolute errors relative to the micro-CT reference were analysed with device as a fixed effect and tooth as a random effect, with Tukey-adjusted pairwise comparisons. Repeatability was additionally assessed from the repeated scans using within-tooth variability.
Results. Significant differences were observed among the evaluated systems in the detection of changes related to tooth wear (
p < 0.001). The micro-CT reference showed the lowest RMS value, followed by Trios 3, Primescan, and Omnicam. Model-based analyses confirmed significant differences among the evaluated systems, while the magnitude and statistical support of pairwise contrasts depended on the specific outcome considered. Repeatability analysis showed that Trios 3 had the lowest within-tooth standard deviation and repeatability coefficient (0.0215 mm and 0.0595 mm, respectively), followed by Primescan (0.0290 mm and 0.0802 mm), whereas Omnicam showed the highest within-tooth variability and repeatability coefficient (0.0624 mm and 0.173 mm).
Conclusions. The parallel confocal and structured-light triangulation intraoral scanners produced RMS values numerically closer to the micro-CT reference than the active triangulation scanner. However, none of the evaluated intraoral scanners demonstrated quantitative agreement sufficient to be considered interchangeable with the reference standard.
Full article