Background/Objectives: To compare the effects of different surface treatments on the color and translucency of three types of zirconia ceramics.
Methods: Ninety CAD/CAM-milled zirconia disks (10 mm diameter, 1 mm thickness) were fabricated from Cercon HT (3-YTZP), IPS e.max ZirCAD MT (4-YTZP), and
[...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: To compare the effects of different surface treatments on the color and translucency of three types of zirconia ceramics.
Methods: Ninety CAD/CAM-milled zirconia disks (10 mm diameter, 1 mm thickness) were fabricated from Cercon HT (3-YTZP), IPS e.max ZirCAD MT (4-YTZP), and Cercon XT (5-YTZP). Baseline CIE Lab* coordinates were measured using a digital spectrophotometer. The disks underwent one of three surface treatments: 50 µm alumina air-particle abrasion (AAA), Zircos-E etching (ZE), or 100 µm glass bead air-particle abrasion (GBA). Post-treatment CIE Lab* measurements were obtained, and color change (ΔE
00, CIEDE2000) and translucency change (ΔTP
00) were calculated.
Results: Regarding color change (ΔE
00), 50 µm AAA produced the greatest change, followed by ZE, while GBA caused the smallest change. Surface treatment and its interaction with material type were found to exert a significant effect, whereas material type alone was not significant. Cercon XT showed the highest numerical ΔE
00 value among the materials, although the difference was not statistically significant. All ΔE
00 values were below the clinical acceptability threshold (<1.8). No significant effects of surface treatment, material type, or their interaction were observed for translucency change (ΔTP
00) after surface treatment. Baseline translucency values (TP
00) differed significantly, with Cercon XT being the most translucent, followed by ZirCAD MT and Cercon HT, but these differences did not result in significant ΔTP
00 changes post treatment.
Conclusions: Surface treatments and their interaction with material type significantly affected zirconia color change, with 50 µm alumina air-particle abrasion producing the most pronounced effect. Material type alone did not significantly influence ΔE
00, though Cercon XT showed the highest numerical value. Translucency change (ΔTP
00) after treatment was unaffected by surface treatment or material–treatment interaction.
Full article