Next Article in Journal
Examining the Experiences of US Dentists during the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Implications for Policy and Practice
Next Article in Special Issue
A Failed Cross-Validation Study on the Relationship between LIWC Linguistic Indicators and Personality: Exemplifying the Lack of Generalizability of Exploratory Studies
Previous Article in Journal
What Is the Maximum Likelihood Estimate When the Initial Solution to the Optimization Problem Is Inadmissible? The Case of Negatively Estimated Variances
 
 
Psych concluded publication with Volume 6, Issue 1. It has been succeeded by Psychology International, which has a revised scope and a new editorial direction and is now published here. To preserve historical data integrity, the information on this webpage is retained but will no longer be updated.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Examining and Improving the Gender and Language DIF in the VERA 8 Tests

Faculty of Educational and Social Sciences, University of Education Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Psych 2022, 4(3), 357-374; https://doi.org/10.3390/psych4030030
Submission received: 12 May 2022 / Revised: 28 June 2022 / Accepted: 30 June 2022 / Published: 6 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Psychometrics and Educational Measurement)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine and improve differential item functioning (DIF) across gender and language groups in the VERA 8 tests. We used multigroup concurrent calibration with full and partial invariance based on the Rasch and two-parameter logistic (2PL) models, and classified students into proficiency levels based on their test scores and previously defined cut scores. The results indicated that some items showed gender- and language-specific DIF when using the Rasch model, but we did not detect large misfit items (suspected as DIF) when using the 2PL model. When the item parameters were estimated using the 2PL model with partial invariance assumption (PI-2PL), only small or negligible misfit items were found in the overall tests for both groups. It is argued in this study that the 2PL model should be preferred because both of its approaches provided less bias. However, especially in the presence of unweighted sample sizes of German and non-German students, the non-German students had the highest misfit item proportions. Although the items with medium or small misfit did not have a significant effect on the scores and performance classifications, the items with large misfit changed the proportions of students at the highest and lowest performance levels.
Keywords: IRT; RMSD and DIF; item misfit; VERA 8; proficiency levels IRT; RMSD and DIF; item misfit; VERA 8; proficiency levels

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Temel, G.Y.; Rietz, C.; Machunsky, M.; Bedersdorfer, R. Examining and Improving the Gender and Language DIF in the VERA 8 Tests. Psych 2022, 4, 357-374. https://doi.org/10.3390/psych4030030

AMA Style

Temel GY, Rietz C, Machunsky M, Bedersdorfer R. Examining and Improving the Gender and Language DIF in the VERA 8 Tests. Psych. 2022; 4(3):357-374. https://doi.org/10.3390/psych4030030

Chicago/Turabian Style

Temel, Güler Yavuz, Christian Rietz, Maya Machunsky, and Regina Bedersdorfer. 2022. "Examining and Improving the Gender and Language DIF in the VERA 8 Tests" Psych 4, no. 3: 357-374. https://doi.org/10.3390/psych4030030

APA Style

Temel, G. Y., Rietz, C., Machunsky, M., & Bedersdorfer, R. (2022). Examining and Improving the Gender and Language DIF in the VERA 8 Tests. Psych, 4(3), 357-374. https://doi.org/10.3390/psych4030030

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop