Next Article in Journal
In Vitro Comparative Study of the Viability and Adhesion of Wharton’s Jelly Mesenchymal Stem Cells on Different Scaffolds
Previous Article in Journal
Epidemiological Analysis of Monkeypox in Northeastern Brazil: Sex, Race, Age and STIs with SINAN Data (2022–2025)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Proceedings
Volume 136
Issue 1
10.3390/proceedings2026136112
proceedings-logo
Submit to this Journal
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Statement of Peer Review †

by
Giulio Malucelli
1,2,* and
Francesco Paolo La Mantia
2,3,*
1
Department of Applied Science and Technology, Politecnico di Torino, Viale Teresa Michel 5, 15121 Alessandria, Italy
2
INSTM Consortium on Materials Science and Technology, 50125 Florence, Italy
3
Department of Engineering, University of Palermo, 90128 Palermo, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
All abstracts in this volume are accepted by and presented at the 3rd International Online Conference on Polymer Science, 19–21 November 2025; Available online: https://sciforum.net/event/IOCPS2025.
Proceedings 2026, 136(1), 112; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026136112
Published: 16 April 2026
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 3rd International Online Conference on Polymer Science)
Versions Notes
In submitting conference proceedings to Proceedings, the volume editors of the proceedings certify to the publisher that all papers published in this volume have been subjected to peer review administered by the volume editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal.
  • Type of peer review: single-blind
  • Conference submission management system: Sciforum
  • Number of submissions sent for review: 281
  • Number of submissions accepted: 228
  • Number of submissions published: 111
  • Acceptance rate (number of submissions accepted/number of submissions received): 0.81
  • Average number of reviews per paper: 1
  • Total number of distinctive reviewers involved: 28
  • Peer-review process and regulations: The review process was conducted in a single-blind manner, with the entire procedure administered through the MDPI Conference platform, Sciforum. Evaluations were performed by experts in the field. Based on their feedback, revisions were made to each abstract, encompassing thorough examinations of the structure, content and writing. The final decision was made by the chairs of the conference.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Malucelli, G.; Mantia, F.P.L. Statement of Peer Review. Proceedings 2026, 136, 112. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026136112

AMA Style

Malucelli G, Mantia FPL. Statement of Peer Review. Proceedings. 2026; 136(1):112. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026136112

Chicago/Turabian Style

Malucelli, Giulio, and Francesco Paolo La Mantia. 2026. "Statement of Peer Review" Proceedings 136, no. 1: 112. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026136112

APA Style

Malucelli, G., & Mantia, F. P. L. (2026). Statement of Peer Review. Proceedings, 136(1), 112. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026136112

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop