Next Article in Journal
Characterizing the Performance of Ternary Concrete Mixtures Involving Slag and Metakaolin
Previous Article in Journal
Application of Ground Penetrating Radar to Estimate Subgrade Soil Density
Previous Article in Special Issue
Resistance Assessment of Service-Proven Aging Bridges Incorporating Deterioration-Load Dependency
Open AccessFeature PaperArticle

Co-Active Prioritization by Means of Contingency Tables for Analyzing Element-level Bridge Inspection Results and Optimizing Returns

College of Engineering, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Infrastructures 2020, 5(2), 13; https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures5020013
Received: 17 December 2019 / Revised: 17 January 2020 / Accepted: 24 January 2020 / Published: 29 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Structural Performances of Bridges)
An efficient prioritization of bridge actions such as preventive maintenance, rehabilitation, or replacement (MRR) that accounts for inter-element interactions will optimize a long-term return on investments (ROI) in terms of service life extension. What enables this return is the assignment of “Co-Active” elements. This study develops a methodology based on the concept of “Co-Active elements”. The word, “Co-Active”, is used to represent a small group of elements that act together to improve the Bridge Health Index (BHI). The Co-Active parameters for three major bridge groups in Georgia are presented. To illustrate how the Co-Active model works, 1439 in-service bridges’ Element-Level Bridge Inspection results from the state of Georgia in U.S.A., representing a concrete bridge group with six Co-Active elements, are studied. The analysis results indicate that the overall BHI improves by 20% over the subsequent 20 years when expansion joints are replaced. The effects of Co-Active elements on the BHI predictions are quantifiable and depend on factors such as the timing of MRR, the condition of bridge elements as well as the type of MRR. Furthermore, it is concluded that inter-dependent relationships among Co-Active elements are highly affected by Co-Active coefficients. They increase when the degree of dependency among elements increases. Finally, the proposed bridge Co-Active prioritization analysis accounts for a performance target and associated gaps and thus is able to identify critical elements that affect bridge service life the most. View Full-Text
Keywords: bridge; co-active; contingency tables; deterioration; health index; prioritization model; weight factors bridge; co-active; contingency tables; deterioration; health index; prioritization model; weight factors
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Oyegbile, O.B.; Chorzepa, M.G. Co-Active Prioritization by Means of Contingency Tables for Analyzing Element-level Bridge Inspection Results and Optimizing Returns. Infrastructures 2020, 5, 13.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop