This study aimed to investigate the test–retest reliability, mean, and individual responses in the measurement of maximal oxygen consumption (
O
2max) during a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) and the verification phase during cycle ergometry in women. Nine women (22
[...] Read more.
This study aimed to investigate the test–retest reliability, mean, and individual responses in the measurement of maximal oxygen consumption (
O
2max) during a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) and the verification phase during cycle ergometry in women. Nine women (22 ± 2 yrs, 166.0 ± 4.5 cm, 58.6 ± 7.7 kg) completed a CPET, passively rested for 5 min, and then completed a verification phase at 90% of peak power output to determine the highest
O
2 from the CPET (
O
2CPET) and verification phase (
O
2verification) on 2 separate days. Analyses included a two-way repeated measures ANOVA, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC
2,1), standard errors of the measurement (SEM), minimal differences (MD), and coefficients of variation (CoV). There was no test (test 1 versus test 2) × method (CPET vs. verification phase) interaction (
p = 0.896) and no main effect for method (
p = 0.459). However, test 1 (39.2 mL·kg
−1·min
−1) was significantly higher than test 2 (38.3 mL·kg
−1·min
−1) (
p = 0.043). The
O
2CPET (ICC = 0.984; CoV = 1.98%; SEM = 0.77 mL·kg
−1·min
−1; MD = 2.14 mL·kg
−1·min
−1) and
O
2verification (ICC = 0.964; CoV = 3.30%; SEM = 1.27 mL·kg
−1·min
−1; MD = 3.52 mL·kg
−1·min
−1) demonstrated “excellent” reliability. Two subjects demonstrated a test 1
O
2CPET that exceeded the test 2
O
2CPET, and one subject demonstrated a test 1
O
2verification that exceeded the test 2
O
2verification by more than the respective CPET and verification phase MD. One subject demonstrated a
O
2CPET that exceeded the
O
2verification, and one subject demonstrated a
O
2verification that exceeded the
O
2CPET by more than the MD. These results demonstrate the importance of examining the individual responses in the measurement of the
O
2max and suggest that the MD may be a useful threshold to quantify real individual changes in
O
2.
Full article