Examination of Various Abutment Designs Behavior Depending on Load Using Finite Element Analysis

Studies on dental implant abutments’ geometric design and material selection offer significant innovations and results. These studies aim to improve the abutments’ functionality and aesthetic performance, minimize microcavities’ formation, and ensure implant-supported prostheses’ longevity. For example, CAD-CAM fabricated custom abutments have been found to produce a better marginal fit and fewer microgaps than standard abutments. In an in vitro study, transepithelial abutments offered lower microgap values than titanium-based abutments and provided a better fit at the implant–abutment interface. It is known that studies to improve mechanical and biological performance with Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) material have been addressed. New materials such as PEEK and zirconia have offered significant advantages in biocompatibility and aesthetics. Along with those studies, different abutment designs are also important. Abutment geometry is optimized to improve stress distribution and minimize peri-implant bone loss. In implant and abutment connections with different angles, mechanical life performances may vary depending on static and dynamic load. These studies emphasize the importance of material research on different types of connections to improve dental implants’ durability, homogeneous load distribution, and reliability. The abutment parts used in implant treatment are insufficient to distribute the load homogeneously against chewing pressure due to their materials and geometry. Non-uniform load distribution damages the abutment and the prosthetic crown, accelerating the wear process. This study aimed to create different abutment designs to improve dental implants’ biomechanical performance and longevity. This study aimed to increase the mechanical durability of the implant–abutment connection by reducing stress concentrations in response to masticatory compression on the abutment in different directions and forces and to guarantee the long-term success of the implant system by providing a more homogeneous stress distribution. It aimed to apply different forces in the axial direction to these models in a simulation environment and to calculate and compare the deformation and stress load distribution. As a method, three-dimensional models of the parts used in implant treatments and forming the implant system were designed. Different abutment designs were created with these models. Taking the current material values used in implant treatments as a reference, finite element analysis (FEA) was performed by applying different axial loads to each implant system model in the ANSYS software (version 24.1). Comparative analysis graphs were prepared and interpreted for the stress values obtained after the applied load. This study evaluated the mechanical performance of different abutment models (A, B, C, D, and E) under a 100 N load using the Kruskal–Wallis test. The Kruskal–Wallis test showed significant differences between the groups (p < 0.001). The greatest difference was observed between models E and A (q′ = 6.215), with a significant difference also found between models C and A (q′ = 3.219, p < 0.005). Regarding stress values, the highest stress on the abutment was observed in Model B (97.4 MPa), while the lowest stress was observed in Model E (9.6 MPa). The crown exhibited the highest stress in Model B (22.7 MPa) and the lowest in Model E (17.3 MPa). The implant stress was highest in Model C (14.8 MPa) and lowest in Model B (11.3 MPa). The stress values for the cortical bone and cancellous bone were quite similar across the models, showing no significant differences. These findings indicate that the abutment design and material selection significantly impact mechanical performance. Among the implant systems created with five different abutment models, in which the existing abutment geometry was also compared, homogeneous and axial distribution of the load on the abutment was achieved, especially with viscoelastic and surface area increased abutment designs. Clinically, the inadequacy and limited mounting surface or geometry of the abutments used in today’s implant treatment applications have led to different design searches. It was concluded that the designs in this study, which are considered alternatives to existing abutment models, contribute positively to the mechanical life of the abutment material, considering the von Mises stresses and directions. This study brings a new perspective to today’s practices and offers an alternative to treatment practices.