You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Horticulturae
  • Review
  • Open Access

8 March 2022

Evolving Consumption Trends, Marketing Strategies, and Governance Settings in Ornamental Horticulture: A Grey Literature Review

and
Department of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry, University of Florence, 50144 Florence, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Advancement in Propagation, Breeding, Cultivation and Marketing of Ornamentals

Abstract

Ornamentals are the most diversified products and fast-changing industry of horticulture. A new flower and ornamental plant market scenario is developing: remarkable opportunities are emerging, but more efforts are required by both public and private stakeholders to seize them and assure a high-value positioning. Our paper aims at filling the gap in the availability of integrated data sources and structured theoretically sound studies on new consumption trends, marketing strategies, and governance settings. Specific objectives are: identifying an innovative ornamental horticulture market data framework; evidencing evolving dynamics of competition in Europe and necessary adaptions of public and private action; defining a new action-research agenda, capable of stimulating the interest of businesses, researchers, and institutions. In terms of methodology, we carry out an innovative integrative review analysis of the wide and most reliable grey literature and statistics, using a comprehensive approach. Results show the emerging consumption dynamics and high-value consumer profiles characterizing the European market, expected to significantly expand and transform, according to the impact of globalization, climate change, urbanization, digitalization, and the affirmation of neo-luxury and sustainability-oriented consumption patterns. The evolution of marketing strategies and governance settings is also highlighted, together with the necessity of developing and integrating public and private initiatives for realizing high-value sustainable and transparent production systems and supply chains. Accordingly, relevant action-research directions are described. These findings are expected to improve the current debate on the competitiveness of the European ornamental industry and contribute to taking a step towards a synergic combination of new differential advantages and wider sustainability goals.

1. Introduction

Ornamentals are the most diversified products and fast-changing industry of horticulture [1]. They include a very big and hugely diverse group of whole plants or parts of plants that are grown usually for decorative purposes [2]. Building on Oxford Economics (2018) [3], we define Ornamental Horticulture as the set of the different sectors engaged in the ornamental horticultural activity: from firms that grow ornamental plants and flower to manufacturers of garden equipment and supplies, to the wholesalers and retailers, as well as floral designers and landscape and arboriculture professionals.
Nowadays, the world ornamental sector is characterized by a significant expansion of both production and consumption, that underpins the growth of international trade and globalization [4,5,6,7,8]. Consequently, major country markets have increased their interdependency and permeability. Accordingly, both flowers’ and plants’ supply and demand have increased their seasonality and mutability and caused higher volatility of prices [9,10].
From a global perspective, Europe represents one of the main markets for ornamentals, and it is expected to register, over the next decade, one of the highest performances of growth of both production and consumption, in line with the development of other mature producer countries, such as China, Japan, and North America [5,6,9].
Noteworthy, current expectations of the European ornamental demand have evidenced a perspective of unprecedented increase in purchases and price premiums, considering both private and institutional market segments [8,11,12]. As a matter of fact, the affirmation of neo-luxury and sustainability-oriented consumption patterns, together with the expansion of urban upper and middle classes, has generated a new need for both consumers and citizens to green their lives [13,14,15,16]. Accordingly, individuals and institutions have shown a higher willingness to buy and pay for flowers and plants and behave as attentive and responsible consumers in choosing sustainability and transparency [11,17,18].
These trends are confirmed by the early insights on the impact of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic [4,19,20]. Specifically, they highlight the strengthening of new consumer perception of flowers and plants as functional goods, with essential advantages for the environment and human well-being [11,21,22,23].
In light of the above, we consider the increase in new market opportunities for European domestic producers that show the power to drive processes of requalification and sustainability transformation of the European ornamental sector [24]. The good performance of European demand has also incentivized the growth and higher quality of imported productions, coming from exporting producer countries of Africa and South America [4,5]. This causes new relevant challenges for the competitiveness of high-cost domestic supply systems [6,10,25,26].
The seizing of new opportunities for the sustainable development of the European ornamental sector requires an increase in efforts from both private and public stakeholders. In other words, the enhancement and adaption of existing marketing strategies and governance settings appear essential to face the competition and also favor the realization of win-win approaches among different countries and stakeholders [10,12,27,28,29,30,31,32]. On this basis, the industry shows a gap in the capacity of prediction, planning, and coordination of relevant actors, thus evidencing a need for improving their knowledge and practices [25,33,34].
In this sense, market research plays a fundamental role [12,35]. Notwithstanding, in the European context, flower and ornamental plants’ marketing and governance systems usually receive limited attention from the scientific literature; in addition, the chronic outdatedness and fragmentation of relevant data and information affect the availability of official statistics and institutional sources [36]. As a result, the current economic debate is weak.
Our paper aims at filling the gap in the availability of structured and theoretically sound studies and integrated data sources on new consumption trends, marketing strategies, and governance settings. In particular, the following objectives are pursued: (i) identifying an innovative ornamental horticulture market data framework; (ii) evidencing evolving dynamics of competition in Europe and necessary adaptions of public and private action; (iii) defining a new action-research agenda, capable of stimulating interest from businesses, researchers, and institutions.
As far as methodology is concerned, we carry out an integrative grey literature review. Considering the abovementioned limits of official data and scientific research, the grey literature represents an essential source of information within the sector. Innovatively, the integrative review strategy allows us to overcome the dispersion of grey literature sources and to integrate and synthesize the most reliable and representative data.
We believe our findings give an innovative contribution to the information, enhancement, and coordination of decisions and actions of policymakers, businesses, and industry organizations operating in the European ornamental sector, and sustain the realization and fair remuneration of high-value sustainable ornamental supply chains, with multiple functions for the society and ecosystems [37,38,39].
Specifically, we illustrate the followed review methodology in Section 2. Results are presented in Section 3, Section 4 and Section 5. Lastly, Section 6 and Section 7 are dedicated to the identification of the new action-research agenda and the conclusions.

2. Methodology

The methodology of this paper is based on an integrative grey literature review [40,41]. We classify the grey literature as a non-systematic aggregate of material and research, produced by different organizations outside of the traditional academic or commercial publishing and distribution channels [42].
The panorama of the economic literature on the European ornamental horticulture industry is limited. At the same time, relevant official statistics are often poor and inconsistent. In light of this, we consider grey literature to be the main source of knowledge on the European ornamental horticulture sector structure and dynamics, although characterized by high variability and fragmentation of related institutional sources and documents, as well as dataset types.
In line with this, the adoption of a grey literature approach and integrative review strategy allowed us to select the most reliable and representative institutional sources and providers of grey literature. This led us to identify and review their most recent and comprehensive contributions valuable for the topic [40,43].
The review design does not follow any specific standard [41,44]. The sampling of sources was realized by adopting a purposeful approach, aiming at an inclusive selection of material [40,44].
As a first step, we identified a set of key terms to define the research topic (Table 1). We used the identified terms as keywords to conduct an online search of relevant grey literature. The research was realized by the means of the Google Search engine [45]. The web searching method combined with the key terms identified permits to include in the sample grey literature that is open or easy to access, thus enhancing the study replicability.
Table 1. Key terms for research topic definition and online searching.
As a preliminary result, we selected 10 institutions that are among the major providers of grey literature concerning the European flower and plant market (i.e., industry organizations, trade fairs, flower auctions, commercial services, governments, and other national and international institutions) and identified their official websites to gather relevant documentary materials and statistics (Table 2).
Table 2. Major institutional sources in the European ornamental sector.
Among the latter, we selected a purposeful sample of 58 secondary data sources. The adopted inclusion criteria are reported in Table 3. We added literature to the sample until achieving the saturation of information [46].
Table 3. Inclusion criteria and sample description.
The sampled grey literature was analyzed by the means of a comprehensive qualitative approach [40,41,44]. Accordingly, through the full-text reading of documents and the querying of datasets, we extracted the most relevant text parts and statistics. The extracted information was compared and integrated, based on criteria of logic and conceptual reasoning. The results were elaborated in a narrative synthesis form.

3. The World and European Ornamental Sector

3.1. A Description of the Global Scenario

At the global level, the ornamental sector is expanding in both production and trade, with a consequent increase in market globalization and competition [4,5,6,15,30,48,49].
On the side of production, flowers and ornamental plants count for a total world value of about EUR 35.5 billion, corresponding to an area of 745,000 Ha [50].
As for trade, Rabobank (2022a) [4] evidences a steady increase in global export, at a compound annual rate (CAGR) of 3.9%. Considering the categories of cut flowers, foliage, and live plants, a twenty-year positive trend in export growth can be identified, which led to an aggregate world value of around EUR 18 billion in 2020 [5,51] (Figure 1).
Figure 1. The international trade of flowers and ornamental plants: the trend of world exports (000 EUR, 2001–2020). Source: our elaboration on [51] (data extraction: 24th January 2022). The identified product categories follow the Harmonized System Nomenclature [52], HS Codes: 0603, 0604, 0602.
In order to identify and describe global main flower and ornamental plant markets, we consider a recent classification elaborated by AIPH (2019b) [6]. The latter characterizes four homogenous geographical groups, consisting of the major production and consumption markets at the global level.
Each group includes flowers and plants producer countries that have in common the same market determinants, and report similar conditions of both demand and supply. Building on AIPH (2019b) [6], in Table 4, we present a framework of the current World ornamental market scenario.
Table 4. The World ornamental market scenario: a classification.

3.2. Relevant Insights from Europe

According to the presented market scenario, the European ornamental industry is transforming, with evolving dynamics of production and trade and the emergence of new strategic orientations [4,5,11,56,57]. Specifically, already since the biennium 2015–2016, the sector entered a period of profound change, determined by market globalization and the evolution of the socio-economic and bio-physical context [25,47,58,59].
In line with the above, in Europe, the flower and plant supply is expanding and structurally mutating, although the effects of climate change contribute to the higher instability and unforeseeability of prices and quantities [15,49]. Dynamics of change are affected by key determinant factors, such as globalization, demand growth, technological development, and favorable commercial policies.
To illustrate, from 2015, significant growth has been characterizing the European flower and plant production [60,61,62], covering an area of 60.000 Ha for a value of about EUR 11 billion [50]. In terms of value, the major contribution has been made by mature producer countries, i.e., The Netherlands, Italy, Germany, France, Spain, and the UK, which together cover a share of 70% (approx. EUR 7.7 billion) of the European total [50]. At the same time, new domestic producers have emerged, such as the cases of Baltic states, Malta, and Luxembourg, that significantly record percentages of growth between 14% and 15% [60].
Important current dynamics of recovery and qualification of European domestic productions are expected to maintain and even accelerate [4,30], flanked by continuing growth of the flower and plant trade [4,5,30,48,49,54,61,62,63,64,65,66].
In that regard, Europe is consolidating its position of attractive and accessible target destination for both domestic and exporting producer countries. Hence, intra and extra EU trade is expanding due to: the growth of production, the innovation of information and communication technologies (ICT), the enhancement of logistics, the actualization of free trade agreements (FTA) and preferential trade schemes (GSP), the expansion of mature demand markets, and the emergence of attractive North-Eastern and Middle Eastern destinations (e.g., Denmark, Poland, Russia, Turkey) [4,5,11,12].
The European flower and plant trade is characterized by its dominant role of high-quality low-cost imported productions, originating in the Southern countries of Africa (primarily Kenya and Ethiopia) and Latin America (primarily Colombia and Ecuador), mainly distributed by the Dutch wholesale market [4,5,48]. Nonetheless, a stable positive trend can be identified in the improvement of the European trade balance.
To that end, Figure 2 reports our elaboration of ITC trade map data [51] concerning the country group EU (27) + UK in order to evidence the performance of the trade balance in the period 2001–2020 for the categories cut flowers, foliage, and live plants. Figure 2 shows a consistent improvement of the balance during the considered period, leading to a total value of about EUR 191 million in 2020.
Figure 2. The European market for flowers and ornamental plants: EU (27) + UK trade balance (000 EUR, 2001–2020). Source: our elaboration on [51] (data extraction: 24th January 2022). The identified product categories follow the Harmonized System Nomenclature [52], HS Codes: 0603, 0604, 0602.
In light of the above, European market high internationalization increases its permeability to the political turmoil, economic turbulences, shocks, and crises occurring at the world or country level [54,66], with significant effects on its evolution dynamics and predictability.
To illustrate, among the latest developments affecting the European ornamental market, particular consideration is given to Brexit. On the one hand, the UK maintains its position as one of the major destinations in the European area. As a matter of facts, according to 2021 data, British consumers’ demand is very high and Great Britain leads the rankings of Dutch exports growth [11]. On the other hand, current institutional changes (e.g., regulations, fiscal regimes) are partially reducing the attractiveness of the destination (e.g., higher transport and administrative costs) and challenging the European flower and plant exporters and producers [49,65,67,68].
Messe Essen (2022) [11] outlines the high market uncertainty deriving from the forthcoming introduction of a UK policy for the “comprehensive and full monitoring of flowers and plants from The Netherlands”. This policy will come into force from the 1 July 2022 and will require flowers and ornamental plants to be physically checked at the border to be imported into the UK.
As a result, higher administrative and transport costs, as well as shipping delays, are expected to affect both the volume and value of EU exports to the UK and influence European traders’ and producers’ marketing strategies and governance systems. In addition, other similar effects could be generated by the decision of the UK government to look for trade agreements outside the EU, particularly with members of the British Commonwealth, such as Kenya [4].
Lastly, the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic serves as a game-changer in the European scenario, with breakthrough effects on the flower and plant market. In spite of the limited information available, a few relevant contributions already allow outlining major negative outcomes and positive long-term expectations.
In particular, despite the unpredictable market shock of spring 2020, determined by the sharp brake of trade and sales during the peak season, in the long run, the pandemic is working as an accelerator in the growth of the European flower and plant demand [11,69,70,71,72]. A rapid upturn of sales started in the second part of 2020 and accelerated during 2021 affecting a dramatic positive performance of the European flower and plant trade [4,73,74].
As illustrated in detail in Section 4 and Section 5, the impact of COVID-19 on ornamentals consumption and competition will drive the emergence of new spaces for growth and profitability of European traders and producers, based on major institutional changes and a with-no-precedent good mood of European consumers [11].

5. Emerging Competitive Dynamics in the European Ornamental Sector

5.1. The European Competitive Environment and Evolving Marketing Strategies

The presented evolving dynamics determine a situation of hyper-competition in the European ornamental sector, characterized by a mutable competitive environment, dominated by rapid or even unpredictable changes [57]. As a consequence, the whole flower and plant industry is required to increase its efforts for the adaption of its marketing strategies to pursue higher competitiveness and sustainability.
Specifically, involved business operators aim at increasing their sharing of resources, reducing their costs and risks, enhancing their predictive and planning capability, and developing sustainable competitive advantages [12,55,57].
The problem of costs reduction is particularly sensitive, also considering the significant increase in the costs of production and logistics in the European context [11]. As a matter of fact, a low availability of qualified personnel and a steep increase in land prices are contributing to a higher cost of inputs limiting the upscaling potential of localized systems and supply chains. In addition, the ongoing pandemic is furtherly worsening producers’ and traders’ costs, due to the shortage of labor and higher prices of raw materials (e.g., energy, potting soils and peat, and construction materials). As a consequence, the unprecedented good performance of flowers and plants purchases, in both quantity and price, demonstrates to be not always capable to improve the profit of the European ornamental businesses, thus requiring a change of their marketing strategies and organization.
In order to sustain the competitiveness of high-cost domestic producers and supply systems, businesses and institutions are enhancing their efforts to pursue sustainable differential advantages. In that way, they intend to: on the one hand, address the problem of small scale and increasing costs; on the other hand, afford the challenge deriving from imported productions, outstanding for quality standardization and convenience.
What comes of it is a shift in the competitive orientation of the European ornamental industry, passing from cost minimization to quality maximization [11,25,33,105].
In other words, the current evolution of competition in the European sector makes the adoption of differentiation strategies an increasingly valuable solution for the effective positioning of domestic productions and supply systems [12]. Hence, European operators are growingly developing differentiation strategies, combining them with the adoption of focalized approaches. Specifically, they often decide for one or a few high-potential markets to serve and specialize their activities to target the satisfaction of specific consumers’ needs.
In that regard, the development of effective marketing strategies appears an essential factor to target new high-value consumer profiles and emerging market niches. Specifically, we consider the selection of marketing levers should be intended to: (i) identify and qualify flowers and plants locality and territorial linkage; (ii) enhance and promote their specific functionalities for life quality and well-being, even by the integration of smart technologies and DIY; (iii) strengthen and communicate the commitment of businesses to the protection of the environment (e.g., reduction in CO2 emissions, circular economy, preservation of biodiversity and ecosystems; renewable energy, etc.) and the pursuit of higher social fairness (e.g., protection of intellectual property rights and varietal innovation; promotion of human and labor rights; fair distribution of value, etc.) [106].
As an essential aspect, product policies should be enhanced by considering the potential advantage of the qualification of flowers and plants as specialty goods and services.
To that end, specific quality attributes can be valorized, as, for example: the selection of native species and traditional varieties (also with reference to the valorization of underutilized or neglected landraces); the adoption of organic production methods and sustainable processing techniques; the valorization of both multifunctional species, e.g., bee-friendly wildflowers, edible flowers, dwarf vegetable, herbs, and principles of flower and plant design and arrangement [11,15,28,55,81,107].
To give evidence of the above, we consider the representative case of Germany, where since 2018, a large part of the ornamental production has been converted from major crops to seasonal and traditional species and varieties [81]. As a matter of fact, the increase in consumer recognition and remuneration of the value of flowers diversity and sustainability is driving a structural change in the orientations of both florists and floral designers, thus making them innovate their assortments and differentiate. Consequently, the latter have increased their need and demand for specialty crops and locally and sustainably produced flowers and plants, thus stimulating the expansion and diversification of the domestic production market [11,49,65].
In light of the foregoing, a growing number of quality standards are also adopted, together with the implementation of higher requirements of safety and sustainability [4,56,108]. In that regard, the creation of private and collective marks (e.g., geographical indications), the participation in voluntary certification schemes (e.g., GLOBALGAP, MPS-ABC, ISO, IFS), and the creation of eco-friendly talking packs can furtherly contribute to the enhancement of flowers and plants market value.
The described innovation in product policies is accompanied by the adoption of premium price policies and the adaptation of promotion and distribution strategies.
To illustrate, particular attention is given to the development of multi-channel distribution systems and the realization of seamless shopping experiences. Indeed, ever more traditional retailers use to improve their offer by combining the advantages of stationary trade (e.g., physical experience of goods and services, sociality, proximity, etc.) with the ones obtainable by online channels, such as higher convenience and personalization [54,80,81].
Besides that, producers’ and traders’ promotion strategies are increasingly valorizing the role and efficacy of new media marketing tools, sustaining direct marketing approaches and storytelling. Indeed, web and social media serve as trendsetters and main sources of consumer information in the European market. At the same time, according to some relevant studies, referred to the comparable US context, web marketing strategies (i.e., the use of web and social media, forum, blogs, and newsletters) are demonstrating both lower costs and higher returns, in terms of product and brand image and customer loyalty, with respect to more traditional approaches [109,110,111,112].
Lastly, public and collective promotion campaigns are demonstrating their potential in enhancing consumers’ awareness and feeding their desire. As a matter of fact, during the ongoing pandemic period, a growing number of initiatives have been taken, intended to stimulate flowers and plants consumption as a remedy against isolation and social distancing as well as essential goods for well-being and green living [11].

5.2. The European Competitive Environment: The Role of Governance

The described evolution of marketing strategies in the European ornamental sector goes hand in hand with the development of adequate organizational strategies and governance settings [4,9,56,57,63,65,77,81,112,113].
New threats and opportunities have emerged. European producers and supply chains are requested to improve their flexibility by the means of higher collaboration and investments. In light of that, flowers and plants growers, together with breeders and traders, are either creating or consolidating stable cooperative networks, and integrating supply chains, both at a horizontal and vertical level. To rapidly respond to the acceleration and diversification of demand, they must enhance their logistics efficiency [4,55,64].
In this regard, the case of European floral supply chains is of particular relevance. As a matter of fact, the latter are changing their structure [26,77,114,115], thus with consideration of processes of: (a) shortening, with the emerging role of new facilitators, aggregating different functions, and sustaining the connection of producers with final consumers; (b) decentralization, with reference to the emergence of diffused logistic hubs and virtualized networks at the international level [5]; and (c) specialization, with a view to the targeting of new high-value consumer profiles and emerging market niches.
Concerning these points, Rabobank (2017e) [77] describes the major changes that will affect the organization of the European floral supply chains during the next few years and classifies the chain typologies that are expected to obtain the highest share of the market. According to the study, by 2027, three different supply chains will consolidate in Europe, and cover each a 30% market share:
  • the specialist: targeting consumers who buy flowers and plants as a gift or for special occasions. It is centered on the role of specialist shops (florists, garden centers), auctions, wholesale markets, and growers, that are focused on the enhancement of specialty products and differential quality attributes;
  • the big-box: specialized in serving large retailer outlets. This chain includes growers, indeed large growing companies and associations, service providers, that play a dominant role in dealing with sourcing, logistics, payments, and quality control, and large-scale retailers, as super/hypermarkets, DIY, and discount stores. The focus is on the realization of sustainable cost and operational advantages, valorizing responsive logistics and economies-of-scale;
  • the e-commerce: targeting consumers buying flowers and plants online. It is characterized by short flexible connections between growers, digital marketplaces, and online retailers, committed to the pursuit of higher logistics efficiency, for assuring the satisfaction of a great number of small client-specific orders. Particular consideration should be also given to the entering into the market of new online retailers such as Amazon, or retailers with subscription models, such as Bloomon, or new logistical players, such as Post.nl.
Accordingly, with a view to improving their organization, business operators increase their investments and collaboration strategies [9,10,116].
In that way, they can easily specialize their activities, and synergically plan and act for the targeting of selected markets and the realization of high-value positionings, based on higher chains traceability, product quality and sustainability, and efficient distribution [114].
To that end, a central role is even played by digitalization and ICT [4,54,80,81,82,84,85]. What emerges is the relevant contribution that the use of new software and devices (e.g., systems for track-and-trace, big data management, etc.) can give to the enhancement of supply chain coordination and transparency, as well as the increase in the management of logistics.
In light of the above, the evolution of private actors’ organizational strategies should also be supported by the efforts of public administrations and policymakers, at both the EU and national level [6,54,65]. Increasing public actors’ attention and commitment should favor the adaption and innovation of mechanisms of support for the overall supply chains and the existing market structures, favoring the growth of private investments and the collaboration in the sector [12,89,90].
To illustrate, specific consideration should be paid to the importance of an effective adaption of the new CAP policy and related national programmes. As a matter of fact, until now, the sector benefited from little or no financial assistance within this framework, being eligible to receive sustain only through a few instruments linked to national rural development programmes (RDPs) [12,90]. AREFLH (2020) [12] affirms the opportunity to include ornamental horticulture among the mandatory sectoral interventions for EU Member States (Art. 40 of the draft regulation 2018/392 [117]), considering at least the countries that possess a sizeable production of flowers and plants.
Besides the abovementioned mechanisms, new EU and national policy measures, plans, and regulations can work, within or outside the new CAP framework, to give further support to flowers and plants producers and traders, with reference to the possible: (a) unification and standardization of certification schemes across Europe; (b) harmonization of labor, transport, environmental and plant products protection legislations among the EU Member States, as well as raising of social and environmental EU market requirements; (c) registration and marketing of flowers and plants origin labels and quality schemes; (d) definition of multi-actor action-research programs on key topics as pest management, climate change, innovative breeding, etc.; (e) promotion of education and professional training.
With a view to favoring these transformations, industry stakeholders should further increase their commitment and collaboration in order to sensitize and direct the ongoing political debate and obtain full recognition of the strategic role of the sector [12,89,90,94].
Significantly, the latter demonstrates a huge potential in contributing to the processes of social and ecological transition involving European countries, also related to the EU Green Deal implementation [86,88]. Accordingly, the emergence of high-impact concerted initiatives (e.g., the EU Action Plan Towards Zero Pollution for Air, Water and Soil, the EU Pollinators Initiatives, etc.) [93], as well as relevant pledges (e.g., 3 billion Trees Pledge) [92], give significant evidence of the growing public attention and social recognition flowers and ornamental plants are acquiring for their role in dealing with major social and environmental challenges (e.g., climate change, resources erosion, urbanization, margination, etc.). Moreover, the consequences of the current COVID-19 pandemic have been shown to further strengthen this trend [104].
Despite that, the political debate is still ongoing and new institutional arrangements have not yet been finalized. Noteworthy, programmes and legislations aiming at meeting the new EU goals of sustainability could determine the necessity of balancing the necessary expansion of ornamentals production, to respond to the growing demand, with the required reduction of environmental negative externalities (e.g., lowering greenhouse emissions) [12,32,37,38,79]. As a result, an effective innovation of governance systems, favoring public and private action coordination, will be fundamental for the qualification and sustainability transformation of European ornamental supply chains.

6. A New Action-Research Agenda for the European Ornamental Horticulture Industry Development and Sustainability

The planning and implementation of new effective marketing strategies and governance settings are based on the improvement of knowledge and capabilities within the industry and also at the institutional level.
In view of the above, we consider the advancement of scientific research as a critical condition. Accordingly, we identify a new action-research agenda. We designed the latter on the basis of the review analysis results, in order to improve the current debate and support the real needs of the industry. The agenda includes the following action-research directions.
  • Product innovation and multifunctionality
    Action research should favor the specification and implementation of new high-value quality and related product attributes capable of obtaining a price premium for the remuneration of producers and supply chains. In particular, the creation of innovative products with specific reference to the local provenance of flower and plant material, underutilized and neglected landraces, traditional crops, the sustainability of production methods, the socio-ecological functionality of varieties, and arrangement techniques should be further investigated.
  • Consumer analysis
    Advances in consumer analysis should sustain the action of high-cost producers and localized supply systems in identifying consumers’ attitudes and evaluating their willingness to pay in both private and institutional segments. In this regard, specific attention should be paid to the description analysis of new consumer profiles.
  • Quality-oriented marketing strategies
    Action research should sustain new valuable approaches to market segmentation and sustainable differentiation, favoring the identification and targeting of emerging niche markets, recognizing and remunerating specific quality attributes. Accordingly, future goals should evaluate the potential of creating product brands, adopting origin signs and certification schemes, enhancing products transparency, and consumer engagement.
    The institutional market segment should be also considered for the valorization of high-value products and services, with specific attention to floral design, landscaping, and urban greening.
    The pursuit of higher competitiveness of high-cost domestic producers and localized supply systems asks for in-depth research on the potential of direct or short distribution channels, also paying attention to the role of online trade and digitalization.
  • Collaborative Governance settings
    Research advances are needed to favor the innovation and reinforcement of governance settings, both public and private. On the public side, research should support the improvement and harmonization of policies, standards, and legislations, at both the EU and national level. To that end, particular consideration should be given to foster the recognition and remuneration of the strategic role of the ornamental sector in sustaining the realization of the EU Green Deal strategy goals and of the related EU and national agricultural, social and environmental policies, programmes, and regulations.
    On the private side, new forms of coordination, cooperation, and collaboration, at both the horizontal and vertical level, should be studied, discussed, and validated, for the enhancement of supply chains competitiveness, guaranteeing not only a generation but also a fair distribution of benefits, towards higher social, economic, and environmental sustainability.
  • Dedicated research observatories
    The construction of dedicated research observatories at the national or European level, committed to improving the availability of harmonized, updated, and reliable quantitative and qualitative data, is fundamental to support the new positioning of the ornamental sector and the implementation of effective marketing strategies and multi-actor governance models and the realization of participatory action-research.
    This could support the development of academic and institutional research, according to the hypotheses identified by this work, and, on the other hand, promote a more widespread ability to forecast and strategic planning among the various actors for the realization of new competitive objectives.

7. Conclusions

Our paper seeks to innovatively contribute to the advancement of market research in ornamental horticulture and to the improvement of public and private action and coordination for the enhancement of the industry-specific potential in economic, social, and environmental terms. As a matter of fact, whereas the relevant economic debate is limited and discontinued, we retain the development of scientific research as an essential lever, providing a reconnection of the academy and research institutes with the real necessities of the sector.
Therefore, our study contributes to filling the gap in the availability of structured and theoretically sound studies and integrated data sources on ornamentals’ new consumption trends, marketing strategies, and governance settings. To that end, this paper proposes an innovative data framework, presenting major changes occurring in the world and European market, and emerging big threats and opportunities, affecting the transformation of European competitive dynamics.
As a result, this framework can be fundamental support for policymakers, business operators, and industry organizations for the planning and combination of effective informed public policies and private strategies.
Furthermore, new supporting action-research directions are identified, capable of stimulating the interest of businesses, researchers, and institutions. Noteworthy, our study outlines the necessity of advancing research to sustain an increase in the efforts and collaboration of public and private stakeholders, towards a synergic combination of new differentiation advantages and wider social and environmental goals. To this respect, a prompt adaption and effective innovation of production and marketing strategies as well as governance settings are seen as unavoidable.
Specifically, on the public side, EU and national institutions should increase their attention and commitment towards the investigation and realization of collaborative governance systems, and the identification of a common strategic orientation. In that way, an effective adaption, integration, and harmonization of EU and national policies, programmes, and legislations should be favored, and new supporting measures and regulations should be provided to the sector (e.g., financial and technical assistance, quality and safety requirements, certification and quality schemes, etc.).
In that regard, we believe particular attention should be given to the ongoing political debate, concerning the implementation of the EU Green Deal strategy, and related Biodiversity 2030 directions, fostering a new strategic role for the ornamental industry. Accordingly, favorable adaptions of EU and national agricultural, environmental, and social policies, can boost ornamentals demand and support an adequate reorganization of production and trade. To that end, policymakers, together with citizens, and consumers, should be properly informed and sensitized, to recognize ornamental industry concrete multiple values and sustainability potential.
In line with that, on the private side, businesses and supply chains need to improve their planning capacity and investment policies. They should develop more collaborative strategic and governance approaches for the realization of win–win production and marketing strategies and effective communication initiatives.
As a result, we expect the European ornamental industry can increase its competitiveness and resilience, as well as affirm its unique role in the greening of the life of present and future generations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.S. and S.G.; methodology, S.G.; validation, S.S.; investigation, S.G.; resources, S.G.; data curation, S.G.; writing—original draft preparation, S.S. and S.G.; writing—review and editing, S.S. and S.G.; visualization, S.S. and S.G.; supervision, S.S.; project administration, S.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Volckaert, E.; Gobin, B. “Ornamental Plants and Floriculture” Soils, Plant Growth and Crop Production. Encyclopedia of Life Support System (EOLLSS). UNESCO-EOLSS Sample Chapters C 10. 2014. Available online: https://www.eolss.net/Sample-Chapters/C10/E1-05A-51.pdf (accessed on 2 February 2022).
  2. Yahia, E.M. Chapter 3—Classification of Horticultural Commodities. In Postharvest Technology of Perishable Horticultural Commodities; Yahia, E.M., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2019; pp. 71–97. ISBN 9780128132760. [Google Scholar]
  3. Oxford Economics. The Economic Impact of Ornamental Horticulture and Landscaping in the UK. A Report for the Ornamental Horticulture Round Table Group. October 2018. Available online: https://www.rhs.org.uk/science/pdf/The-economic-impact-of-ornamental-horticulture-and.pdf (accessed on 3 February 2022).
  4. Van Horen, L. A Mixed Bouquet of Development in Floriculture-World Floriculture Map 2021. RaboResearch Food&Agribusiness Rabobank, January 2022. Available online: https://research.rabobank.com/far/en/documents/179560_Rabobank_A-Mixed-Bouquet-of-Developments-World-Floriculture-Map-2021_vanHoren_January2022.pdf (accessed on 31 January 2022).
  5. RaboResearch Food&Agribusiness World Floriculture Map 2021. Rabobank: Utrecht, The Netherlands, January 2022. Available online: https://research.rabobank.com/far/en/documents/175926_Rabobank_Flower-Map-2021_20211230.pdf (accessed on 31 January 2022).
  6. Hendricks, J.; Briercliffe, T.; Oosterom, B.; Treer, A.; Kok, G.; Edwards, T.; Kong, H. Ornamental Horticulture, A Growing Industry? International Vision Project Reports. AIPH Horticulture House: Chilton Didcot, Oxfordshire, UK, September 2019. Available online: https://aiph.org/giic/international-vision-project-reports/ (accessed on 25 January 2022).
  7. Hendricks, J.; Briercliffe, T.; Oosterom, B.; Treer, A.; Kok, G.; Edwards, T.; Kong, H. Production and Markets, the Future of Ornamentals. International Vision Project Reports. AIPH Horticulture House: Chilton Didcot, Oxfordshire, UK, July 2019. Available online: https://aiph.org/giic/international-vision-project-reports/ (accessed on 25 January 2022).
  8. Coherent Market Insights (CMI) Floriculture Market. Global Industry Insights, Trends, Outlook, and Opportunity Analysis, 2019–2027. CMI Floriculture Market Report. August 2019. Available online: https://www.coherentmarketinsights.com/market-insight/floriculture-market-1586 (accessed on 4 February 2022).
  9. Van Horen, L. Flourishing Flowers, Promising Plants: Changes in Consumer Behaviour. RaboResearch Food&Agribusiness Rabobank, December 2017. Available online: https://research.rabobank.com/far/en/sectors/regional-food-agri/flourishing_flowers_promising_plants_changes_in_consumer_behaviour.html (accessed on 5 June 2021).
  10. Centre for the Promotion of Imports from Developing Countries of The Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs (CBI). What Competition Do You Face on the European Cut Flowers and Foliage Market? CBI Ministry of Foreing Affairs Market Information. 3 May 2017. Available online: https://www.cbi.eu/market-information/cut-flowers-foliage/competition (accessed on 3 February 2022).
  11. Löbke, A. Record Sales for the Flower and Plant Market. MESSE ESSEN Press Text. 25 January 2022. Available online: https://www.ipm-essen.de/press/press-texts/ (accessed on 27 January 2022).
  12. Assembly of European Horticultural Regions (AREFLH). Position Paper on the European Ornamental Plant Sector. AREFLH Position Statements. April 2020. Available online: https://www.areflh.org/en/aboutus/positions/position-statement-plants (accessed on 25 January 2022).
  13. Mattia, G. Il Neo-Lusso. Marketing e Consumi di Qualità in Tempi di Crisi; FrancoAngeli: Milan, Italy, 2013; ISBN 8820451727. [Google Scholar]
  14. Borsellino, V.; Schimmenti, E.; El Bilali, H. Agri-food markets towards sustainable patterns. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. MESSE ESSEN GmbH Press Media Center for IPM Essen. Green, Great, Gorgeous! Excellent Mood at IPM ESSEN 2020. IPM ESSEN 2020 Final Report. Essen, Germany, 31 January 2020. Available online: https://www.ipm-essen.de/news-en/ (accessed on 30 October 2021).
  16. Sharathkumar, M.; Peter, K.V.; Rajeevan, P.K. Ornamentals for greening. Acta Hortic. 2017, 1165, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yue, C.; Dennis, J.H.; Behe, B.K.; Hall, C.R.; Campbell, B.L.; Lopez, R.G. Investigating Consumer Preference for Organic, Local, or Sustainable Plants. HortScience 2011, 46, 610–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Isaak, M.; Wolfgang, L. Consumer Preferences for Sustainability in Food and Non-Food Horticulture Production. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bulgari, R.; Petrini, A.; Cocetta, G.; Nicoletto, C.; Ertani, A.; Sambo, P.; Ferrante, A.; Nicola, S. The Impact of COVID-19 on Horticulture: Critical Issues and Opportunities Derived from an Unexpected Occurrence. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. McBain, J. Post COVID-19 Consumer Landscape. Finding Opportunities Amid Upheaval. Lecture Presented at the Conference “AIPH Virtual International Conference. Recovery from Crisis—The Future for Ornamentals”. 15 September 2020. Available online: https://aiph.org/event/recovery-from-crisis/ (accessed on 4 February 2022).
  21. Hall, C.R.; Knuth, M.J. An Update of the Literature Supporting the Well-Being Benefits of Plants: Part 4—Available Resources and Usage of Plant Benefits Information. J. Environ. Hortic. 2020, 38, 68–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. International Association of Horticultural Producers (AIPH). How Gardening Will Keep You Well during the Coronavirus Pandemic. Factsheets. March 2020. Available online: https://aiph.org/latest-news/gardening-will-keep-you-well-during-the-coronavirus-pandemic/ (accessed on 27 January 2022).
  23. International Association of Horticultural Producers (AIPH). How Flowers Can Help during the Coronavirus Pandemic. Factsheets. March 2020. Available online: https://aiph.org/latest-news/how-flowers-will-help-keep-you-well-during-quarantine/ (accessed on 27 January 2022).
  24. Havardi-Burger, N.; Mempel, H.; Bitsch, V. Sustainability Challenges and Innovations in the Value Chain of Flowering Potted Plants for the German Market. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Van Rijswick, C. World Floriculture Map 2016: Equator Countries Gathering Speed. RaboResearch Food&Agribusiness Rabobank, November 2016. Available online: https://research.rabobank.com/far/en/sectors/regional-food-agri/world_floriculture_map_2016.html (accessed on 23 May 2021).
  26. van Horen, L. Towards Smarter Floriculture Chains. Lecture Presented at the Conference “CROP Innovation & Business”, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 4 April 2017. Available online: https://www.cropib.com/storage/app/media/Programme_2017/Presentations/4b.%20Ornamentals%20-%20Lambert%20van%20Horen.pdf (accessed on 5 June 2021).
  27. Zarbà, A.S.; Di Vita, G.; Allegra, V. Strategy Development for Mediterranean Pot Plants: A Stakeholder Analysis. Qual.-Access Success 2013, 14, 52–58. [Google Scholar]
  28. Darras, A. Overview of the Dynamic Role of Specialty Cut Flowers in the International Cut Flower Market. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Karpun, O. Conceptual model of floriculture supply chain management. Intellect. Logist. Supply Chain Manag. 2020, 4, 41–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. van Horen, L. Flourishing Flowers, Promising Plants: Internationalisation Strategy. RaboResearch Food&Agribusiness Rabobank, December 2017. Available online: https://research.rabobank.com/far/en/sectors/regional-food-agri/Flourishing_flowers_promising_plants_Internationalisation_strategy.html (accessed on 6 June 2021).
  31. Lambrecht, E.; Taragola, N.; Kühne, B.; Crivits, M.; Gellynck, X. Networking and innovation within the ornamental plant sector. Agric. Food Econ. 2015, 3, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gabellini, S.; Scaramuzzi, S. Luxury strategies for agricultural products: A new sustainable governance model for the valorisation of the Tuscan flower supply chain. In Green Metamorphoses: Agriculture, Food, Ecology. Proceedings of the LV Conference of SIDEA Studies; Torquati, B., Marchini, A., Eds.; Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 413–423. ISBN 978-90-8686-347-1. [Google Scholar]
  33. Hall, C.R. Business Decisions to Help Me Outshine the Competition. The Association of Horticulture Professionals (OFA) Bullettin No. 932 March/April 2012. Available online: https://cdn.coverstand.com/4456/102937/102937.1.pdf (accessed on 2 February 2022).
  34. Di Vita, G.; Allegra, V.; Zarbà, A.S. Building scenarios: A qualitative approach to forecasting market developments for ornamental plants. Int. J. Bus. Glob. 2015, 15, 130–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Owen, J.S., Jr.; LeBude, A.V.; Calabro, J.; Boldt, J.K.; Gray, J.; Altland, J.E. Research Priorities of the Environmental Horticultural Industry Founded through Consensus. J. Environ. Hortic. 2019, 37, 120–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cardoso, B.F.; Rasetti, M.; Giampietri, E.; Finco, A.; Shikida, P.F.A. Trade Dynamics in the Italian Floriculture Sector within EU Borders: A Gravity Model Analysis. AGRIS-Line Pap. Econ. Inform. 2017, 9, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  37. Wani, M.A.; Nazki, I.T.; Din, A.; Iqbal, S.; Wani, S.A.; Khan, F.U. Floriculture Sustainability Initiative: The Dawn of New Era. In Sustainable Agriculture Reviews 27. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews; Lichtfouse, E., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; Volume 27, pp. 91–127. ISBN 978-3-319-75190-0. [Google Scholar]
  38. Dominguez, G.B.; Mibus-Schoppe, H.; Sparke, K. Evaluation of Existing Research Concerning Sustainability in the Value Chain of Ornamental Plants. Eur. J. Sustain. Dev. 2017, 6, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Floriculture Sustainability Initiative (FSI) 2025. FSI 2025 Strategy Summary for Approval by the FSI General Assembly. FSI 2025 Summary Strategy Paper. 2 February 2021. Available online: https://www.fsi2025.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/FSI-2025-SUMMARY.pdf (accessed on 3 February 2022).
  40. Snyder, H. Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 104, 333–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Torraco, R.J. Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Using the Past and Present to Explore the Future. Hum. Resour. Dev. Rev. 2016, 15, 404–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Farace, D.; Schöpfel, J. Grey Literature. In Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences; Bates, M.J., Maack, M.N., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2015; pp. 2029–2039. ISBN 9780203757635. [Google Scholar]
  43. Da Silva, R.N.; Brandão, M.A.G.; Ferreira, M.D.A. Integrative Review as a Method to Generate or to Test Nursing Theory. Nurs. Sci. Q. 2020, 33, 258–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Whittemore, R.; Knalf, K. The integrative review: Updated methodology. J. Adv. Nurs. 2005, 52, 546–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Bonato, S. Searching the Grey Literature. A Handbook for Searching Reports, Working Papers, and Other Unpublished Research; Rowman & Littlefield Publishers: Lanham, MD, USA, 2018; ISBN 978-1-5381-0063-9. [Google Scholar]
  46. Saunders, B.; Sim, J.; Kingstone, T.; Baker, S.; Waterfield, J.; Bartlam, B.; Burroughs, H.; Jinks, C. Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual. Quant. 2018, 52, 1893–1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. van Rijswick, C. World Floriculture Map 2015: Gearing Up For Stronger Competition. RaboResearch Food&Agribusiness Rabobank Industry Note #475. January 2015. Available online: https://research.rabobank.com/far/en/sectors/regional-food-agri/world_floriculture_map_2015.html (accessed on 12 March 2021).
  48. Hübner, S. International Statistics Flowers and Plants 2021; International Association of Horticultural Producers (AIPH) and International Flower Trade Association (Union Fleurs); AIPH Horticulture House: Oxfordshire, UK, 2021; Volume 69, ISBN 978-1-9164807-9-7. [Google Scholar]
  49. Kirchhoff, A. BGI Markt + Trend. Ausbage IPM 2020. BGI Service UG: Straelen-Herongen, Germany, 2020. Available online: https://bgi-ev.de/data/2020/01/BGI_Folder_MarktTrend_A4_2020_WEB.pdf (accessed on 6 June 2021).
  50. Hübner, S. International Statistics Flowers and Plants 2020; International Association of Horticultural Producers (AIPH) and International Flower Trade Association (Union Fleurs); Horticulture House: Oxfordshire, UK, 2020; Volume 68. [Google Scholar]
  51. International Trade Center (ITC) Trade Map. Available online: https://www.trademap.org/Index.aspx (accessed on 31 January 2022).
  52. European Commission Taxation and Customs Union Harmonized System-General Information. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/business/calculation-customs-duties/customs-tariff/harmonized-system-general-information_en (accessed on 1 February 2022).
  53. Altmann, M. Developments and Trends in the Flower and Plant Market for 2015/2016, Stability Is Not Enough: New Markets Are Important-IPM ESSEN 2016. MESSE ESSEN Press Text. Essen, Germany, October 2015. Available online: https://www.ipm-essen.de/press/press-texts/ (accessed on 27 May 2021).
  54. Kirchhoff, A. BGI Markt + Trend. Ausbage IPM 2019. BGI Service UG: Straelen-Herongen, Germany, 2019. Available online: https://bgi-ev.de/data/2019/01/BGI_Folder_MarktTrend_IPM19_WEB.pdf (accessed on 6 June 2021).
  55. MESSE ESSEN GmbH Press Media Center for IPM Essen. “We Gardeners Can Do Climate!”: Sustainability and Climate Change Were Defining Subjects at the World’s Leading Fair for Horticulture. IPM ESSEN 2019 Final Report. Essen, Germany, 25 January 2019. Available online: https://www.ipm-essen.de/news-en/ (accessed on 16 September 2021).
  56. Mamias, S. The Floriculture Supply-Chain: Characteristics & Prospects. Lecture Presented at the Seminar “Supply-Chains in the Agri-Food Sector as the UK Leaves the EU”, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 8 February 2018. Available online: https://unionfleurs.org/industry/ (accessed on 25 January 2022).
  57. Mamias, S. Opportunities for Market Diversification. Lecture Presented at the “Kenya Flower Industry Sustainability Conference”, Nairobi, Kenya. 6 June 2017. Available online: https://unionfleurs.org/industry/ (accessed on 25 January 2022).
  58. RaboResearch Food&Agribusiness World Floriculture Map 2016. Rabobank: Utrecht, The Netherlands, November 2016. Available online: https://research.rabobank.com/far/en/sectors/regional-food-agri/world_floriculture_map_2016.html (accessed on 23 May 2021).
  59. RaboResearch Food&Agribusiness World Floriculture Map 2015. Rabobank: Utrecht, The Netherlands, January 2015. Available online: https://research.rabobank.com/far/en/sectors/regional-food-agri/world_floriculture_map_2015.html (accessed on 12 March 2021).
  60. European Commission Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development (DG AGRI). Unit G.2—Wine, Spirits, and Horticultural Products Working Document. Horticultural Products. Flowers and Ornamental Plants-Production Statistics 2010–2019. DGAGRI-G2. 10 February 2020. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/info/food-farming-fisheries/plants-and-plant-products/live-plants-and-flowers_en (accessed on 3 January 2022).
  61. European Commission Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development (DG AGRI). Unit G.2—Wine, Spirits, and Horticultural Products Working Document. Horticultural Products. Flowers and Ornamental Plants Statistics 2006–2016. DGAGRI-G2. 23 November 2017. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/info/food-farming-fisheries/plants-and-plant-products/live-plants-and-flowers_en (accessed on 28 October 2020).
  62. Lariviere, V. Live Plants and Products of Floriculture Sector in the EU. Lecture Presented at the Parliament’s Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development (AGRI Committee), Brussels, Belgium. 12 December 2017. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/info/food-farming-fisheries/plants-and-plant-products/live-plants-and-flowers_en (accessed on 28 October 2020).
  63. Löbke, A. The Flower and Plant Market in 2019 (IPM Essen 2020). MESSE ESSEN Press Text. 30 October 2019. Available online: https://www.ipm-essen.de/press/press-texts/ (accessed on 30 October 2021).
  64. Altmann, M.; Löbke, A. IPM Market Description of the Flower and Plant Markets, Part 1. Best Economic Prerequisites for IPM ESSEN 2018. MESSE ESSEN Press Text. Essen, Germany, 7 December 2017. Available online: https://www.ipm-essen.de/press/press-texts/ (accessed on 12 June 2021).
  65. Altmann, M.; Löbke, A. IPM Market Description of the Flower and Plant Markets, Part 2. IPM ESSEN 2018 Focuses on Individualisation and Digitalisation. MESSE ESSEN Press Text. Essen, Germany, 14 December 2017. Available online: https://www.ipm-essen.de/press/press-texts/ (accessed on 12 June 2021).
  66. MESSE ESSEN GmbH Press Media Center for IPM Essen. Heat, Water Shortage and Rising Ecological Awareness: IPM ESSEN 2020 Shows Trends and New Products. IPM ESSEN 2020 News. Essen, Germany, 27 January 2020. Available online: https://www.ipm-essen.de/news-en/ (accessed on 30 October 2021).
  67. Wakefield, R. Growers and Traders Discuss the Impacts of Brexit on the Global Ornamental Horticulture Industry. AIPH News. 3 December 2020. Available online: https://aiph.org/latest-news/growers-and-traders-discuss-the-impacts-of-brexit-on-the-global-ornamental-horticulture-industry/ (accessed on 27 January 2022).
  68. Altmann, M.; Löbke, A. The Climate Influences the Turnover in the International Green Sector-IPM ESSEN 2019. MESSE ESSEN Press Text. Essen, Germany, 21 November 2018. Available online: https://www.ipm-essen.de/press/press-texts/ (accessed on 13 June 2021).
  69. International Flower Trade Association (UNION FLEURS). EU-Wide Survey Provides a First Estimate of the Brutal Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on the European Flower & Live Plants Sector (March–April 2020). Union Fleurs News. 16 June 2020. Available online: https://unionfleurs.org/news_events/eu-wide-survey-provides-a-first-estimate-of-the-brutal-impact-of-covid-19-pandemic-on-the-european-flower-live-plants-sector-march-april-2020/ (accessed on 25 January 2022).
  70. FloraCulture International-International Association of Horticultural Producers (AIPH). Coronavirus Global Impact Survey-Datasheet Revised Part 1. March 2020. Available online: https://aiph.org/latest-news/horticultural-industry-looks-to-the-future-in-the-latest-covid-19-global-impact-survey/ (accessed on 26 January 2022).
  71. FloraCulture International-International Association of Horticultural Producers (AIPH). Coronavirus Global Impact Survey-Datasheet Revised Part 2. May 2020. Available online: https://aiph.org/latest-news/horticultural-industry-looks-to-the-future-in-the-latest-covid-19-global-impact-survey/ (accessed on 26 January 2022).
  72. Van Horen, L.; van Rijswick, C. Floriculture Demand Collapses Dramatically Under Coronavirus Pressure. RaboResearch Food&Agribusiness Rabobank, March 2020. Available online: https://research.rabobank.com/far/en/sectors/fresh-produce/floriculture-demand-collapses-under-coronavirus.html (accessed on 31 October 2021).
  73. Van Tol, F. FCI—Reflecting on the Long-Term Impact of COVID-19. FloraCulture International-AIPH Issue: July-August 2020. Available online: https://aiph.org/covid-19/long-term-impact/ (accessed on 26 January 2022).
  74. Wakefield, R. Resilience and Positivity in the Face of Adversity at the AIPH Recovery from Crisis Conference. AIPH News. 17 September 2020. Available online: https://aiph.org/latest-news/resilience-and-positivity-in-the-face-of-adversity-at-the-aiph-recovery-from-crisis-conference/ (accessed on 27 January 2022).
  75. International Association of Horticultural Producers (AIPH). Sustainability. The Growing Global Population Places Increasing Demands on Our Natural Resources. Available online: https://aiph.org/ornamentals-production/sustainability/ (accessed on 3 February 2022).
  76. Van Horen, L. Flourishing Flowers, Promising Plants: Embracing Sustainability. RaboResearch Food&Agribusiness Rabobank, December 2017. Available online: https://research.rabobank.com/far/en/sectors/regional-food-agri/Flourishing_flowers_promising_plants_Embracing_sustainability.html (accessed on 5 June 2021).
  77. Van Horen, L. Flourishing Flowers, Promising Plants: Chain Organisation in European Floriculture. RaboResearch Food&Agribusiness Rabobank, November 2017. Available online: https://research.rabobank.com/far/en/sectors/regional-food-agri/flourishing_flowers_promising_plants_chain_organisation_in_european_floriculture.html (accessed on 5 June 2021).
  78. Corbellini, E.; Saviolo, S. L’Esperienza del Lusso. Mondo, Mercati, Marchi; Rizzoli: Milan, Italy, 2007; ISBN 8817095273. [Google Scholar]
  79. International Association of Horticultural Producers (AIPH). AIPH International Conference: The Path to Sustainability in Ornamental Horticulture. Available online: https://aiph.org/event/sustainability-conference-2021/ (accessed on 30 January 2022).
  80. Kirchhoff, A. BGI Trade Center IPM 2018. BGI Service UG: Straelen-Herongen, Germany, 2018. Available online: https://bgi-ev.de/data/2018/01/BGI_TradeCenter_2018_WEB-final.pdf (accessed on 5 June 2021).
  81. Altmann, M.; Löbke, A. The Green Sector is Characterised by these Currents-IPM ESSEN 2019. MESSE ESSEN Press Text. Essen, Germany, 21 November 2018. Available online: https://www.ipm-essen.de/press/press-texts/ (accessed on 13 June 2021).
  82. Wakefield, R. Horticultural Industry Looks to the Future in the Latest COVID-19 Global Impact Survey. FloraCulture International-AIPH Press Release. 29 May 2020. Available online: https://aiph.org/latest-news/horticultural-industry-looks-to-the-future-in-the-latest-covid-19-global-impact-survey/ (accessed on 26 January 2022).
  83. International Association of Horticultural Producers (AIPH). Global Impact of Coronavirus Pandemic on Garden Centres. April 2020. Available online: https://aiph.org/latest-news/global-impact-of-coronavirus-pandemic-on-garden-centres/ (accessed on 27 January 2022).
  84. Van Rijswick, C.; Fumasi, R.; van Horen, L.; Higgins, H.; Magaña, D. Coronavirus Concerns in the Global Fresh Produce Sector: Different Every Day. RaboResearch Food&Agribusiness Rabobank, March 2020. Available online: https://research.rabobank.com/far/en/sectors/fresh-produce/corona-concerns-in-the-global-fresh-produce-sector.html (accessed on 31 October 2021).
  85. International Association of Horticultural Producers (AIPH). Coronavirus Global Impact Survey on the Ornamental Horticultural Industry (Part 2). 2020. Available online: https://aiph.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Coronavirus-Global-Impact-Survey-Particpant-Comments.pdf (accessed on 27 January 2022).
  86. European Commission. A European Green Deal. Striving to be the First Climate-Neutral Continent. EU Commission Strategy, Priorities 2019–2024. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en#thebenefitsoftheeuropeangreendeal (accessed on 21 February 2022).
  87. Moonen, G. (Ed.) The New CAP Creating New Horizons. Journal n. 2/2021; European Court of Auditors: Luxembourg, 2021; QJ-AD-21 002-2A-N. [Google Scholar]
  88. European Commission. The CAP Reform’s Compatibility with the Green Deal’s Ambition. EU Commission News. Agriculture and Rural Development: Brussels, Belgium, 20 May 2020. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/info/news/cap-reforms-compatibility-green-deals-ambition-2020-may-20_it (accessed on 21 February 2022).
  89. Bruns, J.D. Let Us Plant and Tree Nurseries Be Part of the European Green Deal. FloraCulture International-AIPH EU, 31 May 2020. Available online: https://aiph.org/floraculture/news/let-us-plant-and-tree-nurseries-be-part-of-the-european-green-deal/ (accessed on 21 February 2022).
  90. International Flower Trade Association (UNION FLEURS). STATEMENT: Situation of the Ornamental Sector—COVID-19 Crisis. Union Fleurs News. 24 March 2020. Available online: https://unionfleurs.org/news_events/statement-situation-of-the-ornamental-sector-covid-19-crisis/ (accessed on 21 February 2022).
  91. European Commission. Biodiversity Strategy for 2030. EU Commission Strategy. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/strategy/biodiversity-strategy-2030_en (accessed on 21 February 2022).
  92. European Commission. 3 Billion Trees Pledge. EU Commission Environment. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/3-billion-trees_it (accessed on 21 February 2022).
  93. European Union Assembly of Regional and Local Representatives. Concerted Action Needed to Green the EU’s Communities. European Committee of the Regions Press Release. 27 January 2022. Available online: https://cor.europa.eu/en/news/Pages/concerted-action-needed-green-communities.aspx (accessed on 21 February 2022).
  94. Baccino, F. Le Affinità (elettive) tra New Green Deal e Florovivaismo. Terra e Vita, 15 September 2021. Available online: https://terraevita.edagricole.it/featured/le-affinita-elettive-tra-new-green-deal-e-florovivaismo/ (accessed on 21 February 2022).
  95. Centre for the Promotion of Imports from Developing Countries of The Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs (CBI). Through What Channels Can You Get Cut Flowers or Foliage onto the European Market? CBI Ministry of Foreign Affairs Market Information. 9 May 2017. Available online: https://www.cbi.eu/market-information/cut-flowers-foliage/channels-segments (accessed on 3 February 2022).
  96. Betjes, J.; Vallen, J.; Luca, E.R.; Tufano, G. Con RoyalFloraHolland Verso il Futuro Grandi Opportunita’ di Sviluppo per I Produttori Agricoli. Lecture Presented at the RoyalFloraHolland and Veiling Rhein-Maas Meeting “I Fiori di Roma”, Oasi di Kufra, Sabaudia, Latina, Italy. 25 November 2017. Available online: https://www.royalfloraholland.com/en (accessed on 25 May 2021).
  97. Byczynski, L.; Benzakein, E. Fresh from the Field Wedding Flowers, 1st ed.; Fairplain Publications Incorporated: Lawrance, KS, USA, 2014; ISBN 0977978133. [Google Scholar]
  98. Needleman, D. What Happened to Traditional Floral Bouquets? The New York Times Style Magazine. 20 March 2017. Available online: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/20/t-magazine/traditional-floral-bouquets.html (accessed on 3 February 2022).
  99. Prinzing, D. Slow Flowers: Four Seasons of Locally Grown Bouquets from the Garden, Meadow and Farm, 1st ed.; St. Lynn’s Press: Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2013; ISBN 0983272689. [Google Scholar]
  100. Centre for the Promotion of Imports from Developing Countries of The Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs (CBI). What Requirements Should Your Cut Flowers and Foliage Comply with to Be Allowed on the European Market? CBI Ministry of Foreing Affairs Market Information. 4 May 2017. Available online: https://www.cbi.eu/market-information/cut-flowers-foliage/buyer-requirements (accessed on 3 February 2022).
  101. Hall, C.R.; Campbell, B.L.; Behe, B.K.; Yue, C.; Lopez, R.G.; Dennis, J.H. The appeal of biodegradable packaging to floral consumers. HortScience 2010, 45, 583–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Hall, C.R.; Dickson, M.W. Economic, Environmental, and Health/Well-Being Benefits Associated with Green Industry Products and Services: A Review. J. Environ. Hortic. 2011, 29, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. European Network for Rural Development (ENRD). Green Economy Opportunities for Rural Europe. EU Rural Review No. 23; Thorpe, E., Ed.; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  104. Schouten, M. EU Action Plan: Towards Zero Pollution for Air, Water and Soil. European Committee of the Regions, ENVE Commission, Opinion No. CDR 3178/2021, Adopted. 27 January 2022. Available online: https://cor.europa.eu/en/our-work/Pages/OpinionTimeline.aspx?opId=CDR-3178-2021 (accessed on 21 February 2022).
  105. Ronco, R. La Filiera Florovivaistica nel Veneto. Veneto Agricoltura: Legnaro, Padova, Italy, December 2002. Available online: https://www.venetoagricoltura.org/upload/pubblicazioni/PDF%20Economia/SC36.pdf (accessed on 3 February 2022).
  106. Lufkin, B. Why Are Flowers so Expensive? BBC Worklife Economics. 8 May 2019. Available online: https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20190507-why-are-flowers-so-expensive (accessed on 28 January 2022).
  107. Joyce, D.C.; Turner, C. Developing a Commercial Floriculture Activity in a Research Environment and a Supply Chain Context. Acta Hortic. 2007, 755, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. International Trade Center (ITC) Standards Map App. Available online: https://standardsmap.org/en/identify (accessed on 3 February 2022).
  109. Stebner, S.; Baker, L.M.; Peterson, H.H.; Boyer, C.R. Marketing with More: An In-depth Look at Relationship Marketing with New Media in the Green Industry. J. Appl. Commun. 2017, 101, 7–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Paniagua, J.; Sapena, J. Business performance and social media: Love or hate? Bus. Horiz. 2014, 57, 719–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Weinberg, B.D.; Pehlivan, E. Social spending: Managing the social media mix. Bus. Horiz. 2011, 54, 275–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Yao, B.; Shanoyan, A.; Peterson, H.H.; Boyer, C.; Baker, L. The use of new-media marketing in the green industry: Analysis of social media use and impact on sales. Agribusiness 2018, 35, 281–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Hall, C.R. How to Market Yourself in a Questionable Economy. The Association of Horticulture Professionals (OFA) Bullettin No. 929 September/October 2011. Available online: https://cdn.coverstand.com/4456/81472/81472.1.pdf (accessed on 2 February 2022).
  114. Malindretos, G.; Moschuris, S.; Folinas, D. Cut-Flowers Supply Chain and Logistics. The Case of Greece. Int. J. Res. Manag. Bus. Stud. 2015, 2, 15–25. [Google Scholar]
  115. Allegra, V.; Bellia, C.; Zarbà, A.S. Direct Sales as a Tool for Competitiveness for Smes in the EU. The Case of Farms “Ornamental Floriculture and Nursery Products”. Qual.-Access Success 2014, 15, 19–24. [Google Scholar]
  116. Serra, G. La Filiera Della Qualità nel Florovivaismo: Qualità-Valore-Servizio-Convenienza-Scelta. Lecture Presented at the Conference “La Qualità Totale nel Florovivaismo”. Baveno (Verbano-Cusio-Ossola), Italy. 2009; To be submitted. [Google Scholar]
  117. European Commission. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council COM(2018) 392 Final 2018/0216 (COD); European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 1 June 2018; Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2018%3A392%3AFIN (accessed on 21 February 2022).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.