Next Article in Journal
The Effect of Swiss Chard Powder as a Curing Agent on Volatile Compound Profile and Other Qualitative Properties of Heat-Treated Sucuk
Next Article in Special Issue
Food Safety Knowledge and Foodborne Pathogen Awareness Among Food Truck Customers
Previous Article in Journal
Transcriptomics-Based Evaluation of the Effects of Polyethylene Microplastics on Pleurotus pulmonarius
Previous Article in Special Issue
Revisiting Key Performance Indicators That Evaluate Food Safety Management Systems: A Short Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Motivations for Voluntary Participation in the Food Sanitation and Safety Management System, Patterns of Non-Conformance Reports, and Recertification Improvement Trends Among Food Businesses in Taiwan

1
Department of Food Science, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung 912301, Taiwan
2
Continuing Education Program of Food Biotechnology Applications, College of Science and Engineering, National Taitung University, Taitung 95092, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2025, 14(21), 3784; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14213784
Submission received: 5 August 2025 / Revised: 15 October 2025 / Accepted: 27 October 2025 / Published: 4 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Evaluation of Food Safety Performance)

Abstract

This study investigates the motivations behind food businesses voluntary participation in certification programs and analyzes their non-conformance reports (NCRs). Health and nutrition food businesses lead in voluntary certification, averaging 5.65 NCRs per business, with common non-conformances primarily related to miscalibrated instruments. Meat processing businesses follow closely, with their main non-conformance being inadequate maintenance of environmental cleanliness. The primary motivation for seeking certification among these food businesses is driven by the requirements of international trade and export markets. Furthermore, from 2016 to 2023, businesses undergoing recertification demonstrated a significant reduction in NCRs, decreasing from an average of 11.17 to 5.17. Certification not only enhances food hygiene and safety management but also facilitates the efficient acquisition of export health certificates from the Taiwan Food and Drug Administration. Therefore, we encourage all food businesses to engage in certification programs to elevate their hygiene and safety standards and thereby contribute to food safety assurance.
Keywords: food safety; food sanitation and safety management system certification; second-tier quality control food safety; food sanitation and safety management system certification; second-tier quality control

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, S.-Y.; Lien, K.-W. Motivations for Voluntary Participation in the Food Sanitation and Safety Management System, Patterns of Non-Conformance Reports, and Recertification Improvement Trends Among Food Businesses in Taiwan. Foods 2025, 14, 3784. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14213784

AMA Style

Chen S-Y, Lien K-W. Motivations for Voluntary Participation in the Food Sanitation and Safety Management System, Patterns of Non-Conformance Reports, and Recertification Improvement Trends Among Food Businesses in Taiwan. Foods. 2025; 14(21):3784. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14213784

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Shin-Yu, and Keng-Wen Lien. 2025. "Motivations for Voluntary Participation in the Food Sanitation and Safety Management System, Patterns of Non-Conformance Reports, and Recertification Improvement Trends Among Food Businesses in Taiwan" Foods 14, no. 21: 3784. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14213784

APA Style

Chen, S.-Y., & Lien, K.-W. (2025). Motivations for Voluntary Participation in the Food Sanitation and Safety Management System, Patterns of Non-Conformance Reports, and Recertification Improvement Trends Among Food Businesses in Taiwan. Foods, 14(21), 3784. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14213784

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop