Next Article in Journal
L-Theanine Extends the Lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans by Reducing the End Products of Advanced Glycosylation
Previous Article in Journal
The Effect of Lipids on the Structure and Function of Egg Proteins in Response to Pasteurization
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Pons-Gómez et al. Pomegranate Quality from Consumers’ Perspective: Drivers of Liking, Preference Patterns, and the Relation between Sensory and Physico-Chemical Properties. Foods 2024, 13, 2118

1
Sensory and Consumer Science Group, Postharvest Department, Valencian Institute for Agricultural Research (IVIA), CV-315, Km. 10.7, 46113 Valencia, Spain
2
Agricultural Experiment Station of Elche (AESE), CV-855, Km. 1, 03290 Alicante, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2025, 14(2), 220; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14020220
Submission received: 17 December 2024 / Accepted: 25 December 2024 / Published: 13 January 2025

1. Text Correction

In the original publication [1] there was a typo in the Abstract, ‘Illina’ should have been written as ‘Iliana’. Additionally, in both the Abstract and the Conclusions sections, in the sentences “‘H3/27’ was the most promising of the new varieties …” and “‘H3/27’ is the most promising of the newly evaluated cultivars”, the variety ‘H3/27’ should be replaced by ‘D27/12’. The sentences were modified to the correct forms:
‘D27/12’ was the most promising of the new varieties for having the well-appreciated internal properties of the ‘Mollar’ varieties and external and internal red colouration, which makes it much more appealing to consumers.
‘D27/12’ is the most promising of the newly evaluated cultivars.
Additionally, in Section 3.2.2, Preference Patterns when Tasting Arils, in the first paragraph of the Harvest 2 subsection, the sentence contained an error regarding the cluster descriptions. The clusters were mistakenly swapped. The corrected sentence reads:
“The Cluster 2 consumers gave this cultivar a high score, but the Cluster 1 consumers did not like it”.
Similarly, in the same section, in the second paragraph after Figure 8, there was another confusion between Cluster 1 and Cluster 2. The corrected sentence is:
“In addition, seed and its characteristics were found to be key: the group of consumers who preferred the more acidic cultivars (Cluster 2) did not perceive the presence of seeds and woody taste as negative”.

2. Error in Figure

In the original publication [1], there was a mistake in Figure S3 (Supplementary Materials). The figure was missing and Figure S2 was duplicated. The corrected Figure S3 appears below.
The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. Pons-Gómez, A.; Delpozo, B.; Bartual, J.; Besada, C. Pomegranate Quality from Consumers’ Perspective: Drivers of Liking, Preference Patterns, and the Relation between Sensory and Physico-Chemical Properties. Foods 2024, 13, 2118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure S3. Acceptance of aril appearance. At each harvest, different letters among varieties indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) according to Kruskal–Wallis test.
Figure S3. Acceptance of aril appearance. At each harvest, different letters among varieties indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) according to Kruskal–Wallis test.
Foods 14 00220 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pons-Gómez, A.; Delpozo, B.; Bartual, J.; Besada, C. Correction: Pons-Gómez et al. Pomegranate Quality from Consumers’ Perspective: Drivers of Liking, Preference Patterns, and the Relation between Sensory and Physico-Chemical Properties. Foods 2024, 13, 2118. Foods 2025, 14, 220. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14020220

AMA Style

Pons-Gómez A, Delpozo B, Bartual J, Besada C. Correction: Pons-Gómez et al. Pomegranate Quality from Consumers’ Perspective: Drivers of Liking, Preference Patterns, and the Relation between Sensory and Physico-Chemical Properties. Foods 2024, 13, 2118. Foods. 2025; 14(2):220. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14020220

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pons-Gómez, Ana, Bárbara Delpozo, Julián Bartual, and Cristina Besada. 2025. "Correction: Pons-Gómez et al. Pomegranate Quality from Consumers’ Perspective: Drivers of Liking, Preference Patterns, and the Relation between Sensory and Physico-Chemical Properties. Foods 2024, 13, 2118" Foods 14, no. 2: 220. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14020220

APA Style

Pons-Gómez, A., Delpozo, B., Bartual, J., & Besada, C. (2025). Correction: Pons-Gómez et al. Pomegranate Quality from Consumers’ Perspective: Drivers of Liking, Preference Patterns, and the Relation between Sensory and Physico-Chemical Properties. Foods 2024, 13, 2118. Foods, 14(2), 220. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14020220

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop