Abstract
This study establishes a multi-scale validation framework for Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations of building-induced pollutant dispersion, integrating wind tunnel experiments, the CEDVAL benchmark dataset, and field measurements from a thermal power plant that serves as a proxy for nuclear facilities. The RNG k-ε and Large Eddy Simulation (LES) models were evaluated across these validation tiers. Results demonstrate that both models effectively capture key flow characteristics, with LES showing superior performance in predicting roof-level velocity and turbulence intensities. A systematic overestimation of rooftop and leeward concentrations was observed, though predictive accuracy improved with downwind distance (e.g., FAC2 > 0.5). The RNG k-ε model provided the best balance between accuracy and computational efficiency for engineering applications, while LES is recommended for high-fidelity near-field analysis. This work provides validated methodologies for environmental risk assessment in nuclear power planning and emission control strategy development.