Next Article in Journal
Multiphase SPH Framework for Oil–Water–Gas Bubbly Flows: Validation, Application, and Extension
Previous Article in Journal
XGBoost and Artificial Neural Networks as Surrogate Models for Vapor–Liquid Equilibrium in PC-SAFT
Previous Article in Special Issue
From Failures to Insights: The Role of Surge Tanks in Integrated and Continuous Bioprocessing for Antibody Production
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Removal of Ciprofloxacin from Aqueous Solutions by Waste-Pretreated Ganoderma resinaceum Biomass: Effect of Process Parameters and Kinetic and Equilibrium Studies

1
Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, Plovdiv University “P. Hilendarski”, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
2
Department of Chemical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
3
Department of Microbiology and Biotechnology, University of Food Technologies, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
4
Department of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
5
Research Institute at the Medical University, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2025, 13(12), 3920; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13123920
Submission received: 7 November 2025 / Revised: 27 November 2025 / Accepted: 3 December 2025 / Published: 4 December 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Bioprocess Technology, 2nd Edition)

Abstract

This study explores the use of the waste-pretreated biomass of the macro-fungus Ganoderma resinaceum as a biosorbent for removing ciprofloxacin from aqueous solutions. Batch experiments were conducted to evaluate the biosorption performance of G. resinaceum under varying conditions. Key operational parameters—including pH, biosorbent dosage, contact time, and initial ciprofloxacin concentration—were systematically assessed. Equilibrium was reached within 120 min. Equilibrium data were fitted to both Freundlich and Langmuir isotherm models, with the Langmuir model providing a better fit. Under optimal conditions (initial pH of 7.0, 120-min contact time, 1 g/L biosorbent dosage, and ciprofloxacin concentrations ranging from 4 to 20 mg/L), the maximum biosorption capacity was determined to be 18.4 mg/g. Kinetic analysis revealed that the biosorption process followed a pseudo-second-order model. Furthermore, the biomass was characterized before and after biosorption using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy. The FT-IR analysis of G. resinaceum biomass revealed the presence of hydroxyl, amino, and carbonyl functional groups, which play a crucial role in the binding and biosorption of ciprofloxacin molecules.

1. Introduction

Pharmaceuticals, particularly antibiotics, are increasingly recognized as contaminants of emerging concern (CEC) due to their persistence in the environment and their role in promoting antimicrobial resistance (AMR). These compounds enter aquatic environments through human excretion, agricultural runoff, hospital effluents, and pharmaceutical manufacturing discharges [1,2]. Ciprofloxacin (CIP) is a second-generation fluoroquinolone antibiotic. It exhibits broad-spectrum antibacterial activity, particularly against Gram-negative bacteria such as Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella, and Haemophilus influenzae, and it is widely used to treat respiratory and urinary tract infections, skin infections, infectious diarrhea, and typhoid fever [3,4]. However, it is associated with adverse effects on multiple systems in the human body and can accumulate in animal-derived foods, posing potential health risks to consumers [5,6]. The extensive use of CIP in both clinical and veterinary settings has led to its frequent detection in environmental compartments, including effluents from wastewater treatment plants, surface waters, sediments, and hospital wastewater [7,8]. The environmental presence of CIP contributes to selective pressure on microbial communities, promoting the emergence and proliferation of ciprofloxacin-resistant bacterial strains [2,9]. The reason for the increased concentration of CIP and other antibiotics in the environment is mainly due to their incomplete metabolism and improper elimination. In fact, a significant part of CIP is excreted unchanged, with approximately 65% eliminated through urine and around 25% through feces [10,11,12]. Drugs are introduced into the water and then end up in the wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). However, conventional WWTPs were not originally designed to specifically remove pharmaceuticals, resulting in incomplete elimination and subsequent release of these contaminants into surface waters [6,13]. CIP is highly persistent and exhibits poor biodegradability, resulting in low removal efficiencies (below 40%) during conventional biological treatment [14].
Several technologies, such as advanced oxidation [15,16,17], membrane processes [18,19,20,21], and electrochemical oxidation [22,23], have been explored for CIP removal. Despite their advantages, these techniques also present several drawbacks, including the formation of toxic by-products, as well as high operational and maintenance costs [24,25]. Adsorption is widely applied for pharmaceutical removal due to its simplicity, safety, and environmental compatibility; however, conventional adsorbents are often expensive [26,27].
Recently, low-cost biosorbents derived from microbial, macrofungal, and algal biomass have gained attention for their availability and functional surface chemistry, enabling effective removal of pharmaceuticals even at low concentrations [28].
The fungal biomass from Ganoderma species has shown considerable promise due to its abundance, low cost, and rich surface chemistry. This biomass has been applied in biosorption studies of dyes, metal ions, and herbicides [29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. According to our literature review, only one study has been published specifically addressing the removal of pharmaceuticals, particularly progesterone, using Ganoderma biomass and its biochar as biosorbents [36].
The aim of the present study is to evaluate for the first time the biosorption potential of waste-pretreated G. resinaceum biomass for CIP removal from model aqueous solutions in a batch mode.
The optimum biosorption conditions were determined as a function of pH, biomass dosage, contact time, and initial CIP concentration. Equilibrium and kinetics studies were also carried out.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reagents

All chemicals used in the study (ciprofloxacin hydrochloride monohydrate, C17H18FN3O3·HCl·H2O, NaOH, HCl, KCl, and NaClO) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) of analytical reagent grade and were used without further purification.

2.2. Biosorbent Preparation

G. resinaceum biomass was produced by submerged cultivation as described earlier in a previous work [37]. The fungal biomass investigated in this work is indeed a secondary by-product generated during mushroom cultivation for biotechnological production of polysaccharides and triterpenoids. After the recovery of these bioactive compounds the remaining solid fraction was separated from the liquid phase by centrifugation at 4000 rpm (MPW-260R) for 10 min, washed with deionized water, and subsequently dried at 80 °C for 24 h in a drying oven. To oxidize the pigments, the biomass was treated with 1% NaClO [38]. After oxidation, the biomass was again washed with deionized water, dried, and stored at 4 °C until further use.

2.3. Characteristics of Pretreated G. resinaceum Biomass

2.3.1. Scanning Electron Microscopy

The morphological characteristics of unloaded and CIP-loaded G. resinaceum biomass were examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Prisma™ E SEM, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with an Energy Dispersive X-ray (EDX) analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) for elemental analysis. The samples were loaded on an aluminum sample holder, and the images were obtained at 10 kV acceleration voltage and magnification 800× using an ETD (Everhart–Thornley) detector (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

2.3.2. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy

Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra of unloaded and CIP-loaded biomass were recorded at a 4000–400 cm−1 wavenumber range at a scan rate of 180 scans and a spectral resolution of 2 cm−1 using a Bruker Alpha II FT-IR spectrometer with a Diamond Crystal ATR (Bruker Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA).

2.3.3. pH at the Point of Zero Charge

The pH at the point of zero charge (pHpzc) of the biomass was determined using the solid addition method [39,40]. For this purpose, 0.01 M KCl solutions were prepared and adjusted to an initial pH range of 2.0–10.0 using 0.1 M HCl or 0.1 M NaOH solutions. Subsequently, 0.1 g of biomass was added to Erlenmeyer flasks containing 50.0 mL of the pH-adjusted KCl solutions. The suspensions were continuously stirred at 25 °C for 48 h. The final pH of each solution was measured using a pH meter (Tecnal® TEC-2, Technal Scientific Equipment, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil). The pHpzc of biomass was determined from the plot of ΔpH (pHfinal − pHinitial) vs. pHinitial.

2.4. CIP Analysis

CIP solutions of different concentrations were prepared by appropriately diluting a 100 mg/L stock solution with deionized water. All solutions were prepared daily. The CIP concentration in the solutions before and after biosorption was quantified using a UV/VIS spectrophotometer Ultrospec 3300 (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ, USA) at 274 nm by the calibration curve method [41].

2.5. Biosorption Studies

The effect of the following process parameters was investigated: the initial pH of aqueous solutions (4.0–9.0), mass of biosorbent (0.5–4 g/L), initial CIP concentration (4–20 mg/L), and contact time (10–120 min). The biosorption experiments were conducted in batch mode, in a series of Erlenmeyer flasks, each covered and sealed with aluminum foil to prevent decomposition of CIP. The pH values of the working CIP solutions were adjusted with 0.1 M HCl or 0.1 M NaOH. A measured quantity of biomass was added to 100 mL of each working CIP solution at the designated pH. The flasks were placed in a shaker at 150 rpm at a constant temperature. At the end of predetermined time intervals, the contents of flasks were centrifuged at 4000 rpm (MPW-260R) for 10 min, and the residual concentration in the supernatants was determined as listed above. The removal efficiency (%) of CIP on G. resinaceum biomass was calculated using the following formula:
R = C 0 C t C 0 × 100 ,  
where C0 and Ct are, respectively, the initial and at time t concentrations of CIP, mg/L.
CIP biosorption capacity (mg/g) in unit time was calculated from the following equation:
q = C 0 C t V W ,
where V is the volume of CIP solution (L); W is the mass of the biosorbent (g).
All measurements were performed in triplicate; average values are presented.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Biomass Characterization

3.1.1. SEM/EDX Analysis

The SEM micrographs of the unloaded and CIP-loaded biomass are shown in Figure 1a and Figure 1b, respectively.
The unloaded biomass shows an irregular, porous, and rough surface structure with folded and wrinkled areas. These features indicate a heterogeneous surface morphology that could provide a large surface area and multiple sites favorable for biosorption. The presence of cavities and fibrous structures suggests the complex composition of the fungal cell wall. In contrast, the CIP-loaded biomass showed a smoother and denser surface morphology with a noticeable reduction in surface porosity. The partially filled voids and compact texture suggest biosorption/deposition of CIP molecules on the biomass surface.
Figure 2 shows the EDX spectra for G. resinaceum biomass before and after biosorption.
The EDX spectrum of the unloaded fungal biomass (Figure 2a) displayed dominant signals corresponding to carbon (~0.28 keV) and oxygen (~0.52 keV), consistent with the organic composition of the biomass. A minor signal attributable to nitrogen (~0.39 keV) was also detected but not labeled due to its low intensity. After CIP biosorption (Figure 2b), the intensities of oxygen and nitrogen peaks slightly increased. A new signal at approximately 0.68 keV was assigned to fluorine, indicating the biosorption of CIP on the biomass.

3.1.2. FT-IR Analysis

FT-IR spectroscopy was used to elucidate the functional groups present in the G. resinaceum biomass before and after CIP biosorption (Figure 3).
The FT-IR of the unloaded biomass (A) shows distinct peaks, confirming the complex structure of the fungal cell wall. The broad absorption band in the range of 3500–3100 cm−1 likely corresponds to overlapping –OH stretching vibrations from polysaccharides and –NH stretching vibrations from amide groups in proteins [42], making precise identification of the functional groups difficult. Weak bands observed at 2922 and 2856 cm−1 can be attributed to asymmetric and symmetric deformation of –CH2 groups, respectively. The amide I band, associated with C=O stretching in carboxyl and amide groups, appears at 1631 cm−1, while the less pronounced band at 1524 cm−1 corresponds to the amide II band [31,42]. A weak amide III band, representing C–N bond vibrations, is observed at 1314 cm−1 [43]. Additional bands are seen at 1150 and 1027 cm−1 (C–O stretching of carboxyl groups and bending vibrations of –OH groups) [33,36]. Bands between 950 and 750 cm−1 are attributed to the anomeric configurations of polysaccharides, consisting of glucans with various glycosidic linkages, for example, (1 → 3)—α–glucans, (1 → 6)—β–glucans, and hetero–glucans [43,44]. Therefore, the FT-IR analysis of biomass revealed the presence of hydroxyl, carboxyl, and amino groups on the biomass surface, which are potential sites for CIP binding. After CIP biosorption, significant alterations were observed in the FT-IR spectrum (B). The broad O–H/N–H stretching band around 3300 cm−1 decreased in intensity and shifted slightly to 3281 cm−1. The peaks at 2922 and 2856 cm−1 exhibited minor shifts and a reduction in intensity. The bands at 1631, 1365, 1314, 1150, and 890 cm−1 also show significant reductions in intensity. Notably, a marked decrease was observed at 1150 and 890 cm−1, while the peak at 926 cm−1 disappeared entirely. These spectral changes indicate that hydroxyl, carbonyl, and amine groups on the G. resinaceum biomass surface play a crucial role in CIP biosorption.

3.1.3. Point of Zero Charge

The point of zero charge (pHpzc) refers to the pH at which the net surface charge of a biomass is zero [29]. When the pH of a solution is below the pHpzc, the biomass surface tends to carry a net positive charge. Conversely, at pH values above the pHpzc, the surface charge becomes predominantly negative. As shown in Figure 4, the G. resinaceum biomass exhibited a pHpzc of 6.1.

3.2. Biosorption Studies

3.2.1. Effect of Process Parameters on the Effectiveness of Ciprofloxacin Removal from Aqueous Solutions

The pH of the solution plays a crucial role in the biosorption process, as it influences both the ionization state of the biosorbate and the surface charge of the biosorbent. Many pharmaceuticals contain acidic and/or basic functional groups, allowing them to exist in anionic, cationic, neutral, or zwitterionic forms depending on the solution’s pH. Therefore, the pH effect should be examined for each specific biosorbent–biosorbate system [28,40]. In this study, the pH effect on CIP removal was investigated over a pH range of 4.0 to 9.0.
CIP is an amphoteric compound with two main pKa values: 5.90 ± 0.15 (for the carboxylic acid group) and 8.89 ± 0.11 (for the basic N-moiety) [45]. Consequently, it can exist as a cation—at pH < 5.90, a zwitterion—at pH between 5.90 and 8.89, and an anion—at pH > 8.89 (Figure 5).
The removal efficiency of CIP on Ganoderma biomass was found to be pH dependent (Figure 6).
The removal efficiency increased from 57.4% at pH 4.0 to a maximum of 70.2% at pH 7.0, then declined to 57.1% at pH 9.0. At pH values 4.0 and 5.0, electrostatic repulsion between the positively charged biosorbent surface and cationic CIP species led to reduced biosorption. As the pH increased beyond the pHpzc, the surface became negatively charged, promoting interactions with zwitterionic ciprofloxacin through electrostatic interactions. At pH values greater than 8.0, CIP becomes negatively charged, leading to increased electrostatic repulsion with the biosorbent surface and thus decreased removal efficiency. It should be noted that non-electrostatic interactions are also possible, such as the formation of hydrogen bonds between electronegative atoms (e.g., N, F and O) in the CIP molecule and hydroxyl groups (-OH) on the biomass surface; a similar conclusion was made by other researchers [46,47]. Mirizadeh et al. [48] observed the highest CIP removal by magnetic chitosan/microalgae biocomposites at pH values around 6. At pH values greater than 6.0, the biosorption remained significant due to hydrogen bonding between CIP and biosorbent oxygen atoms. Recently, Salah et al. [49] reported a decrease in CIP removal efficiency by Chlorella vulgaris and Synechocystis sp. biomasses at pH values above 5.9, which was attributed to prevailing electrostatic repulsion between the CIP molecules and the algal biomass surfaces. In their study, maximum removal was observed at around pH 3.0, where electrostatic attraction dominated the biosorption process.
The next studies in this research were conducted at pH 7.0.
The effect of biomass dosage on CIP biosorption was studied over a range of 0.5 to 4 g/L, as shown in Figure 7.
An increase in biomass dosage from 0.5 to 4 g/L resulted in a rise in removal efficiency, from 68.1% to 75.8%. This improvement can be attributed to the increased surface area and the greater availability of binding sites for CIP molecules at higher biomass concentrations. However, the biosorption capacity (uptake) decreased significantly, from 16.34 to 2.27 mg/g. This inverse relationship is likely due to the aggregation of biomass particles at higher concentrations, which can reduce the effective surface area and cause site overlapping or saturation [31,50]. From an economic point of view, all subsequent experiments were conducted using a biomass concentration of 1 g/L to minimize material costs while maintaining effective performance.
The effect of contact time on the removal efficiency of CIP by Ganoderma biomass was examined at three initial concentrations over time intervals up to 120 min. As illustrated in Figure 8, the biosorption rate increased rapidly during the initial phase, followed by a slower uptake as contact time progressed, eventually reaching equilibrium.
An increase in the initial concentration of CIP generally resulted in decreased removal efficiency. This trend is likely due to the progressive saturation and blockage of available active sites on the biomass surface. At a contact time of 60 min, removal efficiencies of 77.0%, 68.7%, and 57.9% were recorded for the 4, 12, and 20 mg/L concentrations, respectively. Equilibrium was achieved at 120 min, with maximum removal efficiencies of 78.8%, 70.2%, and 59.6% for the respective concentrations. It was also observed that the initial CIP concentration had no significant effect on the time required to reach equilibrium, except at the lowest concentration (4 mg/L), where equilibrium was attained more quickly, within 60–70 min. The present findings were in good agreement with earlier reports for various alternative biomasses [48,49]. Results of the present study indicated the efficiency of G. resinaceum biomass for rapid CIP uptake in short periods of contact time.

3.2.2. Kinetic Modeling

The biosorption kinetics data corresponding to CIP biosorption on Ganoderma biomass were fitted to Lagergren’s pseudo-first order and Ho’s pseudo-second-order models [50,51,52]. The linear form of the pseudo-first-order rate equation by Lagergren is given as:
l o g q e q t = l o g q e 2.303 k 1 t ,
where qt (mg/g) and qe (mg/g) are the biosorption uptakes at time t and at equilibrium time; k1 is the rate constant of pseudo-first-order kinetics (min−1)
The Ho pseudo-second-order equation can be expressed in its linearized form by Equation (4):
t q t = 1 k 2 q e 2 + 1 q e t ,
where k2 is the rate constant of pseudo-second-order kinetics (g/mg g)
By plotting log(qe − qt) versus t and t/qt versus t for different initial CIP concentrations, straight lines were obtained as shown in Figure 9 and Figure 10.
The kinetic constants, calculated from the slopes and intercepts of the plots for both models, along with their corresponding correlation coefficients (R2 values), are presented in Table 1.
The results indicate that the pseudo-second-order kinetic model provides a better fit for the kinetics of CIP biosorption, as evidenced by higher correlation coefficient (R2) values. Moreover, the equilibrium uptake values (qem) calculated from this model were much closer to the experimental values compared to those obtained from the pseudo-first-order model. These findings suggest that the biosorption of CIP onto Ganoderma biomass follows pseudo-second-order kinetics. The pseudo-second-order kinetic model is one of the most widely used models due to its high accuracy in describing the entire range of experimental kinetic data [53,54].

3.2.3. Equilibrium Modeling

Analyzing equilibrium data is essential for the practical design and optimization of biosorption systems. In this study, Freundlich and Langmuir adsorption models were used for the mathematical description of the biosorption equilibrium [55,56]. The Langmuir isotherm model assumes monolayer biosorption onto a surface containing a finite number of identical and energetically equivalent sites. In contrast, the Freundlich model is an empirical equation used to describe biosorption on heterogeneous surfaces, where it does not assume a maximum adsorption capacity. This model is more suitable for systems in which biosorption occurs on sites with varying affinities. The linearized forms of the Langmuir and Freundlich equations are typically expressed as follows:
C e q e = 1 q m k L + 1 q m C e ,
l o g q e = l o g k F + 1 n l o g C e ,
where qe—ciprofloxacin uptake at equilibrium (mg/g); qm—maximum biosorption capacity (mg/g); Ce—equilibrium concentration (mg/L); kL—Langmuir constant related to the affinity of binding sites (L/mg); kF—Freundlich constant ((mg/g)(L/mg)n); n—biosorption intensity (dimensionless).
By plotting Ce/qe versus Ce and logqe versus logCe, straight lines were obtained as shown in Figure 11 and Figure 12.
The corresponding model parameters were calculated and summarized in Table 2.
A brief comparison showed that the Langmuir isotherm model provided a slightly better fit to the equilibrium data than the Freundlich model, as indicated by their respective correlation coefficients. This may suggest that the biosorption of CIP occurs predominantly as a monolayer process, and the surface of G. resinaceum comprises both homogeneous biosorption sites and heterogeneous domains with varying affinities [31,53].
In comparison to other microbial and algal biomaterials reported in the literature, the maximum biosorption capacity of G. resinaceum (18.4 mg/g) for CIP removal demonstrates moderate performance. Raw microbial and algal biomasses, such as activated sludge and waste Chlorella vulgaris, have shown considerably lower adsorption capacities, typically ranging from 2.9 to 7.6 mg/g [57,58]. While some chemically modified materials, such as algal–bacterial sludge-derived magnetic composites [59] and algal biochar [60] have exhibited higher capacities (e.g., 81.6–300 mg/g range). The preparation of these biosorbents often involve additional processing steps that increase cost and complexity.

4. Conclusions

An eco-friendly and cost-effective biosorbent was developed through chemical pretreatment of waste G. resinaceum biomass. Its ability to remove CIP from aqueous solutions was tested under various experimental conditions. According to the Langmuir model, the maximum biosorption capacity was determined to be 18.4 mg/g. The biosorption process was relatively rapid, reaching equilibrium within 120 min. Kinetic analysis showed that CIP biosorption followed a pseudo-second-order model. FT-IR analysis identified –OH, –NH, and C=O groups on the surface of the pretreated biomass, suggesting possible interactions between these functional groups and the CIP molecules. Future studies will focus on immobilizing the biomass on different carriers and exploring its regeneration.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.K., Z.V. and V.G.; methodology, K.L., G.K., I.I. and G.A., software, G.K. and N.Z.; formal analysis, N.Z. and I.I.; investigation, K.L., G.K. and G.A.; resources, G.A.; data curation, K.L. and G.K.; writing—original draft preparation, K.L. and G.K.; writing—review and editing, Z.V. and V.G.; visualization, Z.V. and V.G.; supervision, Z.V. and V.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Segura, P.A.; François, M.; Gagnon, C.; Sauvé, S. Review of the occurrence of anti-infectives in contaminated wastewaters and natural and drinking waters. Environ. Health Perspect. 2009, 117, 675–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Macedo, H.E.; Lehner, B.; Nicell, J.A.; Khan, U.; Klein, E.Y. Antibiotics in the global river system arising from human consumption. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Nexus 2025, 4, pgaf096. [Google Scholar]
  3. Vardanyan, R.S.; Hruby, V.J. 33—Antimicrobial Drugs. In Synthesis of Essential Drugs, 1st ed.; Vardanyan, V.J., Hruby, V.J., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Boston, MA, USA, 2006; pp. 499–523. [Google Scholar]
  4. Shariati, A.; Arshadi, M.; Khosrojerdi, M.A.; Abedinzadeh, M.; Ganjalishahi, M.; Maleki, A.; Heidary, M.; Khoshnood, S. The resistance mechanisms of bacteria against ciprofloxacin and new approaches for enhancing the efficacy of this antibiotic. Front. Public Health 2022, 10, 1025633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Khalifa, H.O.; Shikoray, L.; Mohamed, M.-Y.I.; Habib, I.; Matsumoto, T. Veterinary Drug Residues in the Food Chain as an Emerging Public Health Threat: Sources, Analytical Methods, Health Impacts, and Preventive Measures. Foods 2024, 13, 1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kümmerer, K. Antibiotics in the aquatic environment—A review–Part I. Chemosphere 2009, 75, 417–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Larsson, D.G.J.; de Pedro, C.; Paxeus, N. Effluent from drug manufacturers contains extremely high levels of pharmaceuticals. J. Hazard Mater. 2007, 148, 751–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ekwanzala, M.D.; Lehutso, R.F.; Kasonga, T.K.; Dewar, J.B.; Momba, M.N.B. Environmental Dissemination of Selected Antibiotics from Hospital Wastewater to the Aquatic Environment. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Neyestani, Z.; Khademi, F.; Teimourpour, R.; Amani, M.; Arzanlou, M. Prevalence and mechanisms of ciprofloxacin resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from hospitalized patients, healthy carriers, and wastewaters in Iran. BMC Microbiol. 2023, 23, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Felisardo, R.J.A.; Brillas, E.; Romanholo Ferreira, L.F.; Cavalcanti, E.B.; Garcia-Segura, S. Degradation of the antibiotic ciprofloxacin in urine by electrochemical oxidation with a DSA anode. Chemosphere 2023, 344, 140407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Frade, V.M.F.; Dias, M.; Teixeira, A.C.S.C.; Palma, M.S.A. Environmental contamination by fluoroquinolones. Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. 2014, 50, 41–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhou, X.; Cuasquer, G.J.P.; Li, Z.; Mang, H.P.; Lv, Y. Occurrence of typical antibiotics, representative antibiotic-resistant bacteria, and genes in fresh and stored source-separated human urine. Environ. Int. 2021, 146, 106280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jia, A.; Wan, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Hu, J. Occurrence and fate of quinolone and fluoroquinolone antibiotics in a municipal sewage treatment plant. Water Res. 2012, 46, 387–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhao, X.; Li, X.; Pei, W.; Li, X.; Wei, Q.; Liu, W. Characterization, degradation pathway and microbial community of aerobic granular sludge with ciprofloxacin at environmentally relevant concentrations. Biochem. Eng. J. 2024, 205, 109255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mondal, S.K.; Saha, A.K.; Sinha, A. Removal of ciprofloxacin using modified advanced oxidation processes: Kinetics, pathways and process optimization. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 171, 1203–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, Z.; Manickam, S.; Wang, W.; Fu, L.; Bie, H.; Wang, B.; Sun, X. Hybrid advanced oxidation process for rapid ciprofloxacin removal: Coupling hydrodynamic cavitation with UV/H2O2. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2025, 120, 107475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Milh, H.; Yu, X.; Cabooter, D.; Dewil, R. Degradation of ciprofloxacin using UV-based advanced removal processes: Comparison of persulfate-based advanced oxidation and sulfite-based advanced reduction processes. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 764, 144510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Alonso, J.J.S.; El Kori, N.; Melián-Martel, N.; Del Río-Gamero, B. Removal of ciprofloxacin from seawater by reverse osmosis. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 217, 337–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, T.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Qiao, J.; Yang, X.; Li, T.; Wang, Y. Study on preparation of a pizza-like attapulgite-based composite membrane and its performance on methylene blue and ciprofloxacin removal. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2025, 359, 130521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Palacio, D.A.; Rivas, B.L.; Urbano, B.F. Ultrafiltration membranes with three water-soluble polyelectrolyte copolymers to remove ciprofloxacin from aqueous systems. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 351, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Njaramba, L.K.; Yoon, Y.; Park, C.M. Fabrication of porous beta-cyclodextrin functionalized PVDF/Fe MOF mixed matrix membrane for enhanced ciprofloxacin removal. Clean Water 2024, 7, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bueno, F.; Borba, F.H.; Pellenz, L.; Schmitz, M.; Godoi, B.; Espinoza-Quiñones, F.R.; de Pauli, A.R.; Módenes, A.N. Degradation of ciprofloxacin by the Electrochemical Peroxidation process using stainless steel electrodes. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 2855–2864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Emamjomeh, M.M.; Shabanloo, A.; Ansari, A.; Esfandiari, M.; Mousazadeh, M.; Tari, K. Anodic oxidation of ciprofloxacin antibiotic and real pharmaceutical wastewater with Ti/PbO2 electrocatalyst: Influencing factors and degradation pathways. J. Water Process Eng. 2024, 57, 104662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rajasulochana, P.; Preethy, V. Comparison on efficiency of various techniques in treatment of waste and sewage water—A comprehensive review. RET Resour.-Effic. Technol. 2016, 2, 175–184. [Google Scholar]
  25. Ghazal, H.; Koumaki, E.; Hoslett, J.; Malamis, S.; Katsou, E.; Barcelo, D.; Jouhara, H. Insights into current physical, chemical and hybrid technologies used for the treatment of wastewater contaminated with pharmaceuticals. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 361, 132079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Crini, G.; Lichtfouse, E. Advantages and disadvantages of techniques used for wastewater treatment. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2019, 17, 145–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Demirdağ, E.; Demirel, M.F.; Benek, V.; Doğru, E.; Önal, Y.; Alkan, M.H.; Erol, K.; Alacabey, İ. Efficient Removal of Ciprofloxacin from Water Using High-Surface-Area Activated Carbon Derived from Rice Husks: Adsorption Isotherms, Kinetics, and Thermodynamic Evaluation. Molecules 2025, 30, 2501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Velkova, Z.; Lazarova, K.; Kirova, G.; Gochev, V. Recent Advances in Pharmaceuticals Biosorption on Microbial and Algal-Derived Biosorbents. Processes 2025, 13, 561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Souza, P.S.C.; Santos, J.; Souza, A.R.; Spessato, L.; Pezoti, O.; Alves, H.J.; Colauto, N.B.; Almeida, V.C.; Dragunski, D.C. Biosorption of reactive red-120 dye onto fungal biomass of wild Ganoderma stipitatum. Desalin. Water Treat. 2018, 102, 280–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hanif, A.; Bhatti, H.N.; Hanif, M.A. Removal of zirconium from aqueous solution by Ganode6rma lucidum: Biosorption and bioremediation studies. Desalin. Water Treat. 2015, 53, 195–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Akar, T.; Cabuk, A.; Tunali, S.; Yamac, M. Biosorption potential of the macrofungus Ganoderma carnosum for removal of lead(II) ions from aqueous solutions. J. Environ. Sci. Health A Tox. Hazard Subst. Environ. Eng. 2006, 41, 2587–2606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yang, S.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Y. Biosorption of Cu(II) from Aqueous Solutions by a Macrofungus (Ganoderma lobatum) Biomass and its Biochar. NEPT Nat. Environ. Pollut. Technol. 2021, 20, 579–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Nettem, K.; Almusallam, A.S. Equilibrium, Kinetic, and Thermodynamic Studies on the Biosorption of Selenium (IV) Ions onto Ganoderma Lucidum Biomass. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2013, 48, 2293–2301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Maciel, G.M.; Marques de Souza, C.G.; Vaz de Araújo, C.A.; Bona, E.; Haminuik, C.W.I.; Castoldi, R.; Bracht, A.; Peralta, R.M. Biosorption of herbicide picloram from aqueous solutions by live and heat-treated biomasses of Ganoderma lucidum (Curtis) P. Karst and Trametes sp. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 215–216, 331–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rozman, U.; Kalčíková, G.; Marolt, G.; Skalar, T.; Andreja Gotvajn, A.Ž. Potential of waste fungal biomass for lead and cadmium removal: Characterization, biosorption kinetic and isotherm studies. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2020, 18, 100742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Abdelwahab, A.; Alenezi, K.M.; Humaidi, J.R.; Haque, A.; Mahgoub, S.M.; Mokhtar, A.M.; Shaban, A.; Mansour, M.M.M.; Mahmoud, R. Innovative eco-sustainable reishi mushroom-based adsorbents for progesterone removal and agricultural sustainability. RSC Adv. 2025, 15, 16690–16707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Brazkova, M.; Angelova, G.; Goranov, B.; Mihaylova, D.; Blazheva, D.; Slavchev, A.; Krastanov, A. Mycelial growth kinetics, antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of a submerged culture of the medicinal fungi Ganoderma resinaceum GA1M isolated from Bulgaria. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Food Sci. 2024, 13, e10320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Nacèra, Y.; Aicha, B. Equilibrium and kinetic modelling of methylene blue biosorption by pretreated dead Streptomyces rimosus: Effect of temperature. Chem. Eng. J. 2006, 119, 121–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mondal, M.K. Removal of Pb(II) from aqueous solution by adsorption using activated tea waste. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2010, 27, 144–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Darajeh, N.; Alizadeh, H.; Leung, D.W.M.; Rashidi Nodeh, H.; Rezania, S.; Farraji, H. Application of Modified Spent Mushroom Compost Biochar (SMCB/Fe) for Nitrate Removal from Aqueous Solution. Toxics 2021, 9, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rakesh, S.K.; Pankaj, P.S.; Amar, S.; Roy, R.K. A Simple UV Spectrophotometric Method Development and Validation for Estimation of Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride in Bulk and Tablet Dosage Form. Asian J. Res. Chem. 2012, 5, 336–339. [Google Scholar]
  42. Sangeetha, B.; Krishnamoorthy, A.S.; Amirtham, D.; Sharmila, D.J.S.; Renukadevi, P.; Malathi, V.G. FT-IR Spectroscopic Characteristics of Ganoderma Lucidum Secondary Metabolites. J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 2019, 38, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Qian, L.; Chen, C.; Lv, Y.; Li, J.; Cao, X.; Ren, H.; Hassan, M.L. Preparation and Electrochemical Application of Porous Carbon Materials Derived from Extraction Residue of Ganoderma lucidum. Biomass Bioenergy 2022, 166, 106593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wan-Mohtar, W.A.; Young, L.; Abbott, G.M.; Clements, C.; Harvey, L.M.; McNeil, B. Antimicrobial Properties and Cytotoxicity of Sulfated (1,3)-β-D-Glucan from the Mycelium of the Mushroom Ganoderma lucidum. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 26, 999–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Drakopoulos, A.I.; Ioannou, P.C. Spectrofluorimetric study of the acid–base equilibria and complexation behavior of the fluoroquinolone antibiotics ofloxacin, norfloxacin, ciprofloxacin and pefloxacin in aqueous solution. Anal. Chim. Acta 1997, 354, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Li, Z.; Hong, H.; Liao, L.; Ackley, C.J.; Schulz, L.A.; MacDonald, R.A.; Mihelich, A.L.; Emard, S.M. A mechanistic study of ciprofloxacin removal by kaolinite. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2011, 88, 339–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bajpai, S.K.; Bajpai, M.; Rai, N. Sorptive removal of ciprofloxacin hydrochloride from simulated wastewater using sawdust: Kinetic study and effect of pH. Water SA 2012, 38, 673–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Mirizadeh, A.; Solisio, C.; Converti, A.; Casazza, A.A. Efficient removal of tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, and amoxicillin by novel magnetic chitosan/microalgae biocomposites. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2024, 329, 125115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Salah, H.; Shehata, N.; Khedr, N.; Elsayed, K.N.M. Management of ciprofloxacin as a contaminant of emerging concern in water using microalgae bioremediation: Mechanism, modeling, and kinetic studies. Microb. Cell Fact. 2024, 23, 329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Fomina, M.; Gadd, G.M. Biosorption: Current perspectives on concept, definition and application. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 160, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sağ, Y.; Aktay, Y. Kinetic studies on sorption of Cr (VI) and Cu (II) ions by chitin, chitosan and Rhizopus arrhizus. Biochem. Eng. J. 2002, 12, 143–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ho, Y.S.; McKay, G. Pseudo-second order model for sorption processes. Process Biochem. 1999, 34, 451–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Guler, U.A.; Sarioglu, M. Removal of tetracycline from wastewater using pumice stone: Equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic studies. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng. 2014, 12, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wang, J.; Guo, X. Adsorption kinetic models: Physical meanings, applications, and solving methods. J. Hazard Mater. 2020, 390, 122156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Michalak, I.; Chojnacka, K.; Witek-Krowiak, A. State of the Art for the Biosorption Process—A Review. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2013, 170, 1389–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Park, D.; Yun, Y.S.; Park, J.M. The past, present, and future trends of biosorption. Biotechnol. Bioproc. 2010, 15, 86–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Fereira, V.R.A.; Amorim, C.L.; Cravo, S.M.; Tiritan, M.E.; Castro, P.M.L.; Afonso, C.M.M. Fluoroquinolones biosorption onto microbial biomass: Activated sludge and aerobic granular sludge. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2016, 110, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Al-Mashhadani, E.S.M.; Al-Mashhadani, M.K.H.; Al-Maari, M.A. Biosorption of Ciprofloxacin (CIP) using the Waste of Extraction Process of Microalgae: The Equilibrium Isotherm and Kinetic Study. Iraqi J. Chem. Pet. Eng. 2023, 24, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Oruganti, R.K.; Bandyopadhyay, S.; Panda, T.K.; Shee, D.; Bhattacharyya, D. Synthesis of algal–bacterial sludge activated carbon/Fe3O4 nanocomposite and its potential in antibiotic ciprofloxacin removal by simultaneous adsorption and heterogeneous Fenton catalytic degradation. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2024, 31, 67594–67612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Nguyen, T.B.; Truong, Q.M.; Chen, C.W.; Chen, W.H.; Dong, C.D. Pyrolysis of marine algae for biochar production for adsorption of Ciprofloxacin from aqueous solutions. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 351, 127043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. SEM micrographs of G. resinaceum biomass (magnification ×800): (a) Unloaded biomass; (b) CIP-loaded biomass.
Figure 1. SEM micrographs of G. resinaceum biomass (magnification ×800): (a) Unloaded biomass; (b) CIP-loaded biomass.
Processes 13 03920 g001
Figure 2. EDX spectra of G. resinaceum biomass: (a) Unloaded biomass; (b) CIP-loaded biomass.
Figure 2. EDX spectra of G. resinaceum biomass: (a) Unloaded biomass; (b) CIP-loaded biomass.
Processes 13 03920 g002
Figure 3. FT-IR spectra of unloaded (A) and CIP-loaded (B) Ganoderma biomass.
Figure 3. FT-IR spectra of unloaded (A) and CIP-loaded (B) Ganoderma biomass.
Processes 13 03920 g003
Figure 4. Point of zero charge of the pretreated Ganoderma biomass.
Figure 4. Point of zero charge of the pretreated Ganoderma biomass.
Processes 13 03920 g004
Figure 5. Ionic forms of CIP.
Figure 5. Ionic forms of CIP.
Processes 13 03920 g005
Figure 6. Effect of pH on the removal of CIP on G. resinaceum biomass (CIP concentration: 12 mg/L; biomass: 1 g/L; contact time: 120 min; temperature: 25 ± 0.2 °C).
Figure 6. Effect of pH on the removal of CIP on G. resinaceum biomass (CIP concentration: 12 mg/L; biomass: 1 g/L; contact time: 120 min; temperature: 25 ± 0.2 °C).
Processes 13 03920 g006
Figure 7. Effect of biomass concentration on CIP removal efficiency (CIP concentration: 12 mg/L; pH: 7.0; contact time: 120 min; temperature: 25 ± 0.2 °C).
Figure 7. Effect of biomass concentration on CIP removal efficiency (CIP concentration: 12 mg/L; pH: 7.0; contact time: 120 min; temperature: 25 ± 0.2 °C).
Processes 13 03920 g007
Figure 8. Effect of contact time on the removal of CIP on Ganoderma biomass (initial concentration: 4, 12, and 20 mg/L; pH: 7.0; biomass dosage: 1 g/L; temperature: 25.0 ± 0.2 °C).
Figure 8. Effect of contact time on the removal of CIP on Ganoderma biomass (initial concentration: 4, 12, and 20 mg/L; pH: 7.0; biomass dosage: 1 g/L; temperature: 25.0 ± 0.2 °C).
Processes 13 03920 g008
Figure 9. Pseudo-first-order model (pH: 7.0; biomass dosage: 1 g/L; temperature: 25.0 ± 0.2 °C).
Figure 9. Pseudo-first-order model (pH: 7.0; biomass dosage: 1 g/L; temperature: 25.0 ± 0.2 °C).
Processes 13 03920 g009
Figure 10. Pseudo-second-order model (pH: 7; biomass dosage: 1 g/L; temperature: 25.0 ± 0.2 °C).
Figure 10. Pseudo-second-order model (pH: 7; biomass dosage: 1 g/L; temperature: 25.0 ± 0.2 °C).
Processes 13 03920 g010
Figure 11. Langmuir isotherm model (initial CIP concentration: from 4 to 20 mg/L; pH: 7.0; biomass dosage: 1 g/L; contact time: 120 min; temperature: 25.0 ± 0.2 °C).
Figure 11. Langmuir isotherm model (initial CIP concentration: from 4 to 20 mg/L; pH: 7.0; biomass dosage: 1 g/L; contact time: 120 min; temperature: 25.0 ± 0.2 °C).
Processes 13 03920 g011
Figure 12. Freundlich isotherm model (initial CIP concentration: from 4 to 20 mg/L; pH: 7.0; biomass dosage: 1 g/L; contact time: 120 min; temperature: 25.0 ± 0.2 °C).
Figure 12. Freundlich isotherm model (initial CIP concentration: from 4 to 20 mg/L; pH: 7.0; biomass dosage: 1 g/L; contact time: 120 min; temperature: 25.0 ± 0.2 °C).
Processes 13 03920 g012
Table 1. Kinetic parameters for the biosorption of CIP on Ganoderma biomass.
Table 1. Kinetic parameters for the biosorption of CIP on Ganoderma biomass.
C0, mg/gqe,exp
mg/g
Pseudo-First-Order Kinetic ModelPseudo-Second-Order Kinetic Model
qem,
mg/g
k1,
min−1
R2qem, mg/gk2,
g/mg min
R2
43.152.560.06240.9243.330.05090.999
128.425.360.05290.9778.930.01870.999
2011.935.280.03890.98112.650.01300.999
Table 2. Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm parameters for biosorption of CIP on Ganoderma biomass.
Table 2. Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm parameters for biosorption of CIP on Ganoderma biomass.
Langmuir Isotherm ModelFreundlich Isotherm Model
qm = 18.4 mg/gkF = 3.59 (mg/g)(L/mg)1.65
kL = 0.229 L/gn = 1.65
R2 = 0.992R2 = 0.989
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lazarova, K.; Kirova, G.; Velkova, Z.; Angelova, G.; Zahariev, N.; Iliev, I.; Gochev, V. Removal of Ciprofloxacin from Aqueous Solutions by Waste-Pretreated Ganoderma resinaceum Biomass: Effect of Process Parameters and Kinetic and Equilibrium Studies. Processes 2025, 13, 3920. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13123920

AMA Style

Lazarova K, Kirova G, Velkova Z, Angelova G, Zahariev N, Iliev I, Gochev V. Removal of Ciprofloxacin from Aqueous Solutions by Waste-Pretreated Ganoderma resinaceum Biomass: Effect of Process Parameters and Kinetic and Equilibrium Studies. Processes. 2025; 13(12):3920. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13123920

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lazarova, Kristiana, Gergana Kirova, Zdravka Velkova, Galena Angelova, Nikolay Zahariev, Ivan Iliev, and Velizar Gochev. 2025. "Removal of Ciprofloxacin from Aqueous Solutions by Waste-Pretreated Ganoderma resinaceum Biomass: Effect of Process Parameters and Kinetic and Equilibrium Studies" Processes 13, no. 12: 3920. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13123920

APA Style

Lazarova, K., Kirova, G., Velkova, Z., Angelova, G., Zahariev, N., Iliev, I., & Gochev, V. (2025). Removal of Ciprofloxacin from Aqueous Solutions by Waste-Pretreated Ganoderma resinaceum Biomass: Effect of Process Parameters and Kinetic and Equilibrium Studies. Processes, 13(12), 3920. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13123920

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop