Next Article in Journal
Building Bridges: Developing and Implementing a New Transition to Adult Care Program for Youth with Complex Healthcare Needs at a Canadian Children’s Hospital
Previous Article in Journal
Tiny Beads, Big Problems: Water Bead Ingestions—A Case Series
Previous Article in Special Issue
Current Treatment Options for Children with Functional Constipation—What Is in the Pipeline?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Long-Term Bowel and Urinary Function Outcomes and Quality of Life in Patients with Anorectal Malformations: 20 Years of Experience

Pediatric Surgical Unit, Department Health Promotion of Mother and Child Care Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Children 2025, 12(8), 1042; https://doi.org/10.3390/children12081042
Submission received: 25 May 2025 / Revised: 21 July 2025 / Accepted: 7 August 2025 / Published: 8 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bowel Management in Paediatric Colorectal Disease)

Abstract

Background: Anorectal malformations (ARMs) are rare congenital anomalies requiring surgical correction and long-term multidisciplinary care. Despite advances in surgical techniques like posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP), patients often experience ongoing issues with bowel and urinary function and psychosocial well-being. Aim: To evaluate the long-term outcomes of bowel function, urinary function, and quality of life in patients born with anorectal malformation and treated at our center. Methods: A cross-sectional study evaluated 55 ARM patients treated at the University Hospital of Palermo between 2002 and 2020. Data on clinical characteristics, surgical management, bowel and urinary function, and quality of life were collected using the following validated tools: Rintala Bowel Function Score, PedsQL Family Impact Module, Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Score, and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Questionnaire. Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher’s exact test and ANOVA. Results: Excellent bowel function was observed in 44% of patients, particularly those with low-type ARMs. A bowel management program (BMP) was required in 62% of cases, though 44% of these patients, especially adolescents, showed poor adherence. BMP non-adherence significantly correlated with lower quality of life and worse bowel function (p < 0.01). Bladder dysfunction was noted in 24% of patients, mainly younger ones. Conclusions: Tailored BMPs and transition care are important for long-term success in ARM patients. Adherence to BMPs improves continence and quality of life, highlighting the need for continuous, multidisciplinary follow-up from childhood into adulthood.

1. Introduction

Anorectal malformations (ARMs) represent a diverse spectrum of congenital anomalies affecting the distal gastrointestinal tract. These malformations disrupt the continuity and functionality of the anorectal and perineal anatomy, requiring surgical correction and long-term multidisciplinary care. ARMs, with an incidence of approximately 1 in 4000 to 5000 live births, are frequently associated with other congenital abnormalities, particularly those involving the genitourinary system [1]. The condition’s complexity underscores the necessity for tailored clinical management strategies to optimize outcomes for affected individuals. Advances in surgical techniques, particularly posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP), introduced in the early 1980s, have significantly improved the anatomical and functional reconstruction of ARMs [2]. However, despite these advances, many patients continue to experience long-term complications, including fecal and urinary incontinence, constipation, and psychosocial challenges. Such challenges often extend into adolescence and adulthood, necessitating comprehensive follow-up and the implementation of bowel management programs (BMPs) to improve quality of life and social integration [3,4]. This study investigates the clinical outcomes, bowel function, urinary function, and quality of life of patients with ARMs treated at a tertiary care center. By evaluating long-term complications, adherence to BMPs, and psychosocial impacts, we aim to contribute to the growing body of literature focused on improving the care and support provided to this unique patient population. Our findings emphasize the role of bowel management and multidisciplinary care in meeting the changing needs of ARM patients from childhood through adulthood.

2. Materials and Methods

In November 2024, we conducted a retrospective study by a cross-sectional survey on patients born with anorectal malformations (ARM) who were treated at the Pediatric Surgery Unit of the “Paolo Giaccone” University Hospital of Palermo from 2002 to 2020. Demographic data were collected for each patient, and clinical records were used to gather information on the type of anorectal malformation, associated anomalies, type of surgical intervention, and postoperative complications. The type of malformation was classified using both the Krickenbeck classification and the International classification [5,6] (Table 1 and Table 2).
All patients who had completed toilet training by the time of the study were contacted by phone and were given questionnaires, sent via email, to evaluate the age at toilet training, the need for a bowel management program, adherence to therapy, bowel function, quality of life (personal or familiar), and urological symptoms in terms of bladder dysfunction. The parents were invited to complete the questionnaires on behalf of the young patients who were unable to provide responses independently. All patients with complete data were included. Bowel function was assessed using the Rintala Bowel Function Score, a questionnaire consisting of seven questions with values ranging from 0 to 3 for each question, except for the question on evacuation frequency, which has values from 1 to 2, resulting in a total score of 20. The Rintala Score is the only validated questionnaire in the literature, even for a population of healthy children. Patients with a score between 18 and 20 were considered to have “excellent” continence; those with a score between 13 and 17 were considered to have “good” continence; those with a score between 8 and 12 were considered to have “fair” continence; and those scoring below 8 were considered to have “poor” continence [7,8].
We decided to evaluate the impact of the condition on family quality of life in patients younger than nine years of age using the PedsQL 2.0 Family Impact Module. For patients aged nine years and older, we assessed quality of life related to fecal incontinence using the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life (FIQL) score. Parents completed the PedsQL Family Impact Module by answering 35 questions. This validated tool is designed to assess the impact of pediatric chronic conditions on the family. It includes eight subdomains: physical, emotional, social, cognitive functioning, communication, concerns, daily activities, and family relationships. Each question was rated on a 5-point Likert scale (from ‘never a problem’ to ‘always a problem’) [9]. The final score and the individual domain scores were converted to a scale from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates a lower impact of the child’s condition on family quality of life. Scores were grouped into four categories with thresholds indicating the degree of impact as follows:
-
75–100: Minimal Impact. The family experiences very low impact due to the child’s condition; overall family functioning is good.
-
50–74: Moderate Impact. The family faces some moderate effects related to the condition, with physical, emotional, or social limitations for parents and relatives.
-
25–49: Significant Impact. The family is significantly affected, with evident problems in physical, emotional, or social functioning impacting daily routines.
-
0–24: Severe Impact. The condition has a very serious impact on family life. Parents and relatives may face severe difficulties managing the situation.
In addition to the global assessment, a separate evaluation was conducted for each subdomain constituting the questionnaire.
The FIQLS comprises 29 questions used to evaluate four different aspects of quality of life related to fecal incontinence, including lifestyle, coping/behavioral adaptation, depression/self-perception, and embarrassment. Scores range from 1 to between 4 and 5 (depending on the domain), with lower scores indicative of poorer quality of life.
The final score and individual domain scores were converted to a scale from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates a lower impact of fecal incontinence on quality of life [10]. Scores were divided into four categories with thresholds indicating the degree of impact as follows:
-
75–100: Minimal Impact. Quality of life is almost normal; fecal incontinence has little or no impact on emotions, behavior, and lifestyle.
-
50–74: Moderate Impact. The patient experiences some discomfort and limitation; condition management is good, but there are some effects on emotions and activities.
-
25–49: Significant Impact. Quality of life is significantly compromised, with major limitations in daily activities, social relationships, and self-perception.
-
0–24: Severe Impact. The condition severely affects quality of life, with substantial limitations and severe emotional and social distress.
Finally, bladder dysfunction was assessed in all patients using the Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Questionnaire, a nine-question survey investigating the presence of bladder dysfunctions such as urinary incontinence, enuresis, and overactive bladder [11].
All patients enrolled for BMP underwent clinical evaluation to assess the presence of constipation or fecal incontinence. Constipated patients were managed with dietary modifications, laxatives, or enemas, based on individual clinical response. Patients with fecal incontinence were treated exclusively with enemas. Adherence to the prescribed treatment was assessed through self-reported information provided by the patients and/or their parents.
Despite the recognized importance of transition care for patients with congenital conditions reaching adulthood, our center lacks a standardized program where adult physicians manage these patients, leaving pediatric surgeons responsible beyond the pediatric age.
Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher’s exact test and ANOVA (for dichotomous variables), through a free software available online. Variables were considered statistically significant at the 5% level of significance (p < 0.05).

3. Results

From the review of clinical records, 77 patients born with anorectal malformations and treated at our center between 2002 and 2020 were identified. Of these, five died due to associated conditions, mainly severe congenital heart malformations, and another 17 could not be traced so they were excluded for incomplete data. Therefore, a total of 55 patients were included in the study and responded to questionnaires; of these, 29 (53%) were females. The average age of the sample was 12.7 years (4–22 years), with 11 patients (20%) aged younger than nine years and 44 patients (80%) aged nine years or older. Table 3 summarizes the types of ARM among the patients included in the study, classified according to the Krickenbeck and International classifications.
Twenty-five patients (45%) reported associated congenital conditions. Twenty-three patients (42%) underwent 3-stage surgery (colostomy–anorectoplasty–colostomy closure), nineteen patients (34%) underwent delayed primary PSARP, two patients (4%) underwent primary PSARP, and eleven patients (20%) underwent the cutback procedure. Only one patient still uses diapers due to a genetic syndrome associated with intellectual disability. Among the 54 patients who completed toilet training, the average age was 33 months (range 18–60 months).
Table 4 summarizes the average ages for toilet training according to the type of ARM (p = 0.00002, ANOVA test for the International classification).
Sixteen major and thirty minor complications were recorded. Among the major complications were the following:
Six cases of anal stenosis: four underwent surgical stricturoplast; two were resolved with anal dilation using Hegar;
Seven cases of neoanus mucosal prolapse were treated surgically;
One anastomotic breakdown requiring redo PSARP;
Two cases of abdominal obstruction: one due to fecaloma, treated conservatively; one due to adhesive bowel syndrome occurring nine years after the primary surgery, treated with exploratory laparotomy and visceral-parietal adhesiolysis;
Among the minor complications were the following:
Twenty-three cases of perineal rash;
Seven cases of perineal wound dehiscence treated conservatively.
From the collected medical history, 25 patients (45%) had issues related to constipation, while 9 patients (16%) were diagnosed with fecal incontinence. Among the 34 patients (62%) requiring a bowel management program, 15 (44%) reported non-adherence to prescribed therapies, and 11 (73%) of these non-adherent patients were aged between 9 and 18 years (p = 0.04, Fisher’s test).
Evaluation of the Rintala Bowel Function Score showed the following:
Twenty-four patients (44%) had “excellent” continence, (8 M/16 F);
Ten patients (18%) had “good” continence, (5 M/5 F);
Seventeen patients (31%) had “fair” continence, (10 M/7 F);
and four patients (7%) had “poor” continence, (3 M/1 F).
Table 5 summarizes the scores of all patients categorized by the type of ARM. Table 6 compares adherent and non-adherent patients to the BMPs with the Rintala Bowel Function Score (p = 0.02, Fisher’s test).
Analysis of the PedsQL 2.0 Family Impact Module revealed that
Five families (46%) reported minimal impact on family quality of life;
Four families (36%) reported moderate impact;
and two families (18%) reported significant impact.
Regarding the FIQL score, 27 patients (61%) reported minimal impact on quality of life, nine (21%) reported moderate impact, and eight (18%) reported significant impact. No severe impacts were recorded on either family quality of life or quality of life related to fecal incontinence. Table 7 and Table 8 summarize the quality-of-life data, either family or personal, categorized by the type of malformation.
Table 9 shows the correlation between adherence to the BMP and its impact on quality of life (p = 0.0093, Fisher’s test).
A differentiated evaluation of the subdomains revealed significant differences, particularly in the behavior and embarrassment domains, when correlated with adherence to BMPs. Non-adherent patients had an average score of 39/100 and 42/100 in the behavior and embarrassment domains, respectively, while adherent patients had average scores of 72/100 and 82/100 (p < 0.01 in both cases, ANOVA test).
Finally, 13 patients (24%) (4 M/9 F) exhibited symptoms of bladder dysfunction, nine (69%) of whom were aged 13 years or younger. Nine patients presented overactive bladder symptoms while four patients presented nocturnal enuresis.

4. Discussion

The advent of posterior sagittal anorectoplasty, described by Peña in 1982, modernized the surgical approach to this type of malformation, characterized by a spectrum of different clinical conditions. It allowed direct visualization of recto-urogenital communications, ensuring better anatomical and functional reconstruction [2]. Improvements in perioperative and postoperative care, as well as in managing associated anomalies, have drastically reduced the mortality rate of patients with ARMs. Today, an increasing number of patients face the long-term consequences of a congenital condition [12]. In recent years, scientific research has increasingly focused on the long-term problems faced by these patients, especially concerning bowel function and quality of life [3,4]. Brisighelli et al. reported that 44% of patients with low ARMs, classified according to the International classification, had excellent bowel function as assessed by the Rintala Bowel Function Score, while only 8% of patients with intermediate ARMs achieved similar outcomes [13]. Similar data were reported by Rintala in his population [7,8]. In our series, we recorded slightly better outcomes in patients with low ARMs, with 69% demonstrating excellent bowel function. Additionally, the percentage of patients with intermediate ARMs and excellent bowel function, also 8%, was confirmed in our population.
Many patients born with ARMs experience fecal incontinence, soiling, or severe constipation after surgery and completing toilet training. According to the literature, up to 79% of ARM patients experience constipation, and approximately 48% report episodes of soiling, requiring an appropriate bowel management program to achieve socially acceptable continence and maintain a good quality of life [14,15,16]. Similarly, in our cohort, nearly 50% of the analyzed sample suffered from constipation.
The complexity of ARMs significantly impacts fecal and urinary continence, as well as psychosocial aspects, which vary across different growth stages. Psychosocial difficulties can arise as early as childhood and tend to intensify with age, particularly if not adequately addressed. These challenges are often exacerbated during adolescence and the transition to adulthood, which are critical periods for emotional and cognitive development [17]. Numerous studies underscore the importance of incorporating quality-of-life assessments into the monitoring of these patients, serving as essential tools for a comprehensive analysis of their overall conditions [18,19,20,21]. A study by Trinidad et al. highlighted how fecal incontinence significantly impacts all analyzed quality-of-life domains, with the most significant impact observed in the areas of behavior/adaptation and embarrassment [22]. Our work revealed similar findings, especially among patients who did not adhere to bowel management programs.
ARMs are often associated with urological conditions affecting both the upper and lower urinary tracts. The close association with urological malformations necessitates neonatal screening for renal pathologies, though less attention is given to bladder dysfunctions that may manifest in early childhood or adulthood. According to the literature, urinary incontinence incidence across ARM types ranges from 1.7% to 41%, depending on the cohort [21,22,23]. Similarly, bladder dysfunction symptoms were observed in 24% of patients in our cohort.
This variability may be explained by the fact that urinary incontinence is less stigmatized in society, with readily available incontinence products reducing its impact on patients’ lives to the extent that it is almost considered a normal condition [11].
Patients with ARMs can develop complications such as fecal and urinary incontinence, constipation, ejaculatory or erectile dysfunction, and psychological problems, all of which affect their quality of life. Many of these issues become apparent later in life, especially during adolescence [21]. Therefore, extending the follow-up of these patients and establishing multidisciplinary teams to address the challenges that arise over time should be desirable. Our data show that dedicated BMPs for each patient improve outcomes in terms of quality of life and bowel function. Adolescents represent a high-risk population with a greater likelihood of loss to follow-up and lower adherence to BMPs, leading to deteriorated bowel function and poorer quality of life. Despite advances in pediatric surgery, many ARM patients experience persistent symptoms into adulthood, making the transition care into adulthood more important [20,24]. Transition care should begin around ages 12–13 and be completed between 18 and 21. The transition phase is not merely a transfer of care but a preparation process that includes educating patients and their families on long-term disease management [21]. A well-organized and continuous transition improves symptom control, therapy adherence, and patient satisfaction with care received [20,21,24].
The limitations of the study include a relatively small sample size, particularly for certain subgroups of anorectal malformations, and the absence of multivariate data analysis. Moreover, the adequacy to BMP is closely related to the compliance of both the patient and their families. We assumed that all information reported is reliable, without any intentional misreporting.
In conclusion, BMPs are fundamental in the long-term management of ARM patients to improve outcomes. While surgical interventions provide anatomical correction, BMPs are essential for ensuring functional success and improving quality of life. We should encourage the establishment of transition care programs to optimize specific needs that may arise during the shift from pediatric to adult care, focusing on medical management and psychosocial well-being.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.B.; methodology, F.B., F.G. and M.S.; investigation, F.B., F.G. and M.P.; data curation, F.B., M.P. and M.S.; writing—original draft preparation, F.B.; writing—review and editing, M.R.D.P.; supervision, M.R.D.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study due to the nature of retrospective studies.

Informed Consent Statement

All patients and parents provided consent for the use of personal data for research purposes.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available from the corresponding author upon request due to privacy.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. van de Putte, R.; Dworschak, G.C.; Brosens, E.; Reutter, H.M.; Marcelis, C.L.M.; Acuna-Hidalgo, R.; Kurtas, N.E.; Steehouwer, M.; Dunwoodie, S.L.; Schmiedeke, E.; et al. A Genetics-First Approach Revealed Monogenic Disorders in Patients with ARM and VACTERL Anomalies. Front. Pediatr. 2020, 8, 310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. deVries, P.A.; Peña, A. Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty. J. Pediatr. Surg. 1982, 17, 638–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kyrklund, K.; Pakarinen, M.P.; Rintala, R.J. Long-term bowel function, quality of life and sexual function in patients with anorectal malformations treated during the PSARP era. Semin. Pediatr. Surg. 2017, 26, 336–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wehrli, L.A.; Reppucci, M.L.; De La Torre, L.; Ketzer, J.; Rieck, J.M.; Cooper, E.H.; Judd-Glossy, L.; Peña, A.; Bischoff, A. Gastrointestinal quality of life and bowel function in adults born with anorectal malformation and hirschsprung disease. Pediatr. Surg. Int. 2023, 39, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pena, A. Anorectal malformations. Semin. Pediatr. Surg. 1995, 4, 35–47. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Murphy, F.; Puri, P.; Hutson, J.; Holschneider, A. Incidence and Frequency of Different Types, and Classification of Anorectal Malformations. In Anorectal Malformations in Children; Holschneider, A., Hutson, J., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2006; pp. 163–184. [Google Scholar]
  7. Rintala, R.J.; Lindahl, H.G.; Rasanen, M. Do children with repaired low anorectal malformations have normal bowel function? J. Pediatr. Surg. 1997, 32, 823–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rintala, R.J.; Lindahl, H. Is normal bowel function possible after repair of intermediate and high anorectal malformations? J. Pediatr. Surg. 1995, 30, 491–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Varni, J.W.; Sherman, S.A.; Burwinkle, T.M.; Dickinson, P.E.; Dixon, P. The PedsQL Family Impact Module: Preliminary reliability and validity. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2004, 2, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rockwood, T.H.; Church, J.M.; Fleshman, J.W.; Kane, R.L.; Mavrantonis, C.; Thorson, A.G.; Wexner, S.D.; Bliss, D.; Lowry, A.C. Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale: Quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis. Colon Rectum 2000, 43, 9–16; discussion 16–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Wehrli, L.A.; Harris, K.T.; Wood, D.T.; Wilcox, D.T.; Cooper, E.H.; Rieck, J.M.; McGuire, E.; Ketzer, J.; De La Torre, L.; Peña, A.; et al. Urological outcomes in adult females born with anorectal malformation or Hirschsprung disease. Pediatr. Surg. Int. 2024, 40, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Danielson, J.; Karlbom, U.; Graf, W.; Wester, T. Outcome in adults with anorectal malformations in relation to modern classification—Which patients do we need to follow beyond childhood? J. Pediatr. Surg. 2017, 52, 463–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Brisighelli, G.; Macchini, F.; Consonni, D.; Di Cesare, A.; Morandi, A.; Leva, E. Continence after posterior sagittal anorectoplasty for anorectal malformations: Comparison of different scores. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2018, 53, 1727–1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bokova, E.; Svetanoff, W.J.; Lopez, J.J.; Levitt, M.A.; Rentea, R.M. State of the Art Bowel Management for Pediatric Colorectal Problems: Anorectal Malformations. Children 2023, 10, 846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hashish, M.S.; Dawoud, H.H.; Hirschl, R.B.; Bruch, S.W.; El Batarny, A.M.; Mychaliska, G.B.; Drongowski, R.A.; Ehrlich, P.F.; Hassaballa, S.Z.; El-Dosuky, N.I.; et al. Long-term functional outcome and quality of life in patients with high imperforate anus. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2010, 45, 224–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Grano, C.; Aminoff, D.; Lucidi, F.; Violani, C. Long-term disease-specific quality of life in children and adolescent patients with ARM. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2012, 47, 1317–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Pelizzo, G.; Canonica, C.P.M.; Destro, F.; Meroni, M.; Rizzo, D.; Canazza, L.; Selvaggio, G.G.O.; Durante, E.; Zuccotti, G.; Calcaterra, V. Anorectal Malformations: Ideal Surgery Timing to Reduce Incontinence and Optimize QoL. Children 2023, 10, 404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tannuri, A.C.A.; Ferreira, M.A.E.; Mathias, A.L.; Tannuri, U. Long-term evaluation of fecal continence and quality of life in patients operated for anorectal malformations. Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. 2016, 62, 544–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Giuliani, S.; Decker, E.; Leva, E.; Riccipetitoni, G.; Bagolan, P. Long term follow-up and transition of care in anorectal malformations: An international survey. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2016, 51, 1450–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Acker, S.; Peña, A.; Wilcox, D.; Alaniz, V.; Bischoff, A. Transition of care: A growing concern in adult patients born with colorectal anomalies. Pediatr. Surg. Int. 2018, 35, 233–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cairo, S.B.; Gasior, A.; Rollins, M.D.; Rothstein, D.H. Challenges in Transition of Care for Patients with Anorectal Malformations: A Systematic Review and Recommendations for Comprehensive Care. Dis. Colon Rectum 2018, 61, 390–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Trinidad, S.; Garrison, A.; Encisco, E.M.; Canteria, R.; VanderBrink, B.; Strine, A.; Reddy, P.; Kotagal, M.; Rosen, N.; Rymeski, B.; et al. Long-Term Male Sexual Function and Fecal Incontinence Outcomes for Adult Patients with Hirschsprung Disease or Anorectal Malformation. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2023, 58, 1573–1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Chong, C.; Hamza, Y.; Tan, Y.W.; Paul, A.; Garriboli, M.; Wright, A.J.; Olsburgh, J.; Taylor, C.; Sinha, M.D.; Mishra, P.; et al. Long-term urology outcomes of anorectal malformation. J. Pediatr. Urol. 2022, 18, 150.e1–150.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Giuliani, S.; Grano, C.; Aminoff, D.; Schwarzer, N.; Van De Vorle, M.; Cretolle, C.; Haanen, M.; Brisighelli, G.; Marzheuser, S.; Connor, M.; et al. Transition of care in patients with anorectal malformations: Consensus by the ARM-net consortium. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2017, 52, 1866–1872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Krickenbeck classification.
Table 1. Krickenbeck classification.
Major Clinical GroupsRare Regional Variants
PerinealPouch colon
Rectourethral fistula
-Prostatic
-Bulbar
Rectal atresia/Stenosis
Rectovesical fistulaRectovaginal fistula
Vestibular fistulaH type fistula
CloacaOthers
No fistula 
Anal stenosis 
Table 2. International classification.
Table 2. International classification.
FemaleMale
High
  • Anorectal agenesis
    A: Rectal atresia
    B: With fistula
     Rectocloacal fistula
     Rectovaginal/high
  • Rectal atresia
  • Anorectal agenesis
    A: Rectal atresia
    B: With fistula
     Rectovesical fistula
     Rectourethral fistula
  • Rectal atresia
Intermediate
  • Anal agenesis
    A: Without fistula
    B: With fistula
     Rectovaginal low
     Rectovestibular fistula
  • Anorectal stenosis
  • Anorectal agenesis
    A: Without fistula
    B: With fistula
     Rectobulbar fistula
  • Anorectal stenosis
Low
  • At normal anal site
    Covered anus—complete
    Covered anal stenosis
  • Rectal atresia
    Anocutaneous fistula
    Anterior perineal anus
  • At vulvar site
    Vulvar anus
    Anovulvar fistula
    Anovestibular fistula
  • At normal anal site
    Covered anus—complete
    Covered anal stenosis
  • Rectal atresia
    Anocutaneous fistula
    Anterior perineal anus
MiscellaneousAnal membrane stenosis
Imperforated anal membrane
Perineal groove
Perineal canal
Anal membrane stenosis
Imperforated anal membrane
Perineal groove
Perineal canal
Table 3. Patients included in the study are divided by type of ARM according to the International and Krickenbeck classification.
Table 3. Patients included in the study are divided by type of ARM according to the International and Krickenbeck classification.
Type of ARMN° Patients (n = 55)%
Krickenbeck classification  
Perineal2545
Vestibular1425
Bulbar59
Prostatic59
Bladder-neck36
Imperforate anus without fistula36
International classification  
Low3360
Intermediate1222
High1018
Table 4. Median age at potty training according to the type of ARM according to Krickenbeck and International classifications (for the International Classification: p = 0.00002 with ANOVA) (n = 55).
Table 4. Median age at potty training according to the type of ARM according to Krickenbeck and International classifications (for the International Classification: p = 0.00002 with ANOVA) (n = 55).
Potty Training Age in Months (Range)
Krickenbeck classification 
Perineal30 (18–60)
Vestibular30.7 (18–48)
Bulbar37.6 (26–48)
Prostatic40.4 (24–48)
Bladder-neck44 (36–60)
Imperforate anus without fistula42 (36–48)
International classification 
Low29.4 (18–60)
Intermediate36.6 (24–48)
High42.4 (26–60)
Table 5. Results of the Rintala Bowel Function Score divided by type of ARM according to the Krickenbeck and International classification (n = 55).
Table 5. Results of the Rintala Bowel Function Score divided by type of ARM according to the Krickenbeck and International classification (n = 55).
Type of ARMExcellent
(18–20)
Good
(13–17)
Fair
(8–12)
Poor
(<8)
Krickenbeck classification    
Perineal16441
Vestibular734 
Bulbar 122
Prostatic 14 
Bladder-neck 12 
Imperforate anus without fistula1 11
International classification    
Low23541
Intermediate1362
High 271
Table 6. Rintala Bowel Function Score results of patients requiring bowel management (p = 0.02, Fisher’s test) (n = 34 all patients on BMP).
Table 6. Rintala Bowel Function Score results of patients requiring bowel management (p = 0.02, Fisher’s test) (n = 34 all patients on BMP).
Adherence to BMPsExcellentGoodFairPoor
Not adherence01 (7%)11 (73%)3 (20%)
Adherence6 (32%)6 (32%)6 (32%)1 (4%)
Table 7. Results of the PedsQL Family Impact Module divided by type of ARM according to the Krickenbeck and International classification (n = 11 patients younger than 9 years).
Table 7. Results of the PedsQL Family Impact Module divided by type of ARM according to the Krickenbeck and International classification (n = 11 patients younger than 9 years).
Type of ARMMinimalModerateSignificantSevere
Krickenbeck classification    
Perineal31  
Vestibular211 
Bulbar    
Prostatic 1  
Bladder-neck 1  
Imperforate anus without fistula  1 
International classification    
Low41  
Intermediate111 
High 21 
Table 8. Results of the FIQL score divided by type of ARM according to the Krickenbeck and International classification (n = 44 9 years or older).
Table 8. Results of the FIQL score divided by type of ARM according to the Krickenbeck and International classification (n = 44 9 years or older).
Type of ARMMinimalModerateSignificantSevere
Krickenbeck classification    
Perineal1731 
Vestibular8 2 
Bulbar 14 
Prostatic121 
Bladder-neck 2  
Imperforate anus without fistula11  
International classification    
Low2431 
Intermediate216 
High151 
Table 9. FIQL score results of patients requiring bowel management (p = 0.0093, Fisher’s test) (n = 27 9 years or older).
Table 9. FIQL score results of patients requiring bowel management (p = 0.0093, Fisher’s test) (n = 27 9 years or older).
Adherence to BMPsMinimalModerateSignificantSevere
Adherence9 (64%)4 (29%)1 (7%) 
Not adherence1 (8%)5 (38%)7 (54%) 
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Baldanza, F.; Grasso, F.; Pensabene, M.; Sergio, M.; Di Pace, M.R. Long-Term Bowel and Urinary Function Outcomes and Quality of Life in Patients with Anorectal Malformations: 20 Years of Experience. Children 2025, 12, 1042. https://doi.org/10.3390/children12081042

AMA Style

Baldanza F, Grasso F, Pensabene M, Sergio M, Di Pace MR. Long-Term Bowel and Urinary Function Outcomes and Quality of Life in Patients with Anorectal Malformations: 20 Years of Experience. Children. 2025; 12(8):1042. https://doi.org/10.3390/children12081042

Chicago/Turabian Style

Baldanza, Fabio, Francesco Grasso, Marco Pensabene, Maria Sergio, and Maria Rita Di Pace. 2025. "Long-Term Bowel and Urinary Function Outcomes and Quality of Life in Patients with Anorectal Malformations: 20 Years of Experience" Children 12, no. 8: 1042. https://doi.org/10.3390/children12081042

APA Style

Baldanza, F., Grasso, F., Pensabene, M., Sergio, M., & Di Pace, M. R. (2025). Long-Term Bowel and Urinary Function Outcomes and Quality of Life in Patients with Anorectal Malformations: 20 Years of Experience. Children, 12(8), 1042. https://doi.org/10.3390/children12081042

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop