Next Article in Journal
Molecular Characterization and Expression of Four Aquaporin Genes in Impatiens walleriana during Drought Stress and Recovery
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Extra Virgin Olive Oil Polyphenols on Beta-Cell Function and Survival
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Different Nitrogen Forms and Exogenous Application of Putrescine on Heat Stress of Cauliflower: Photosynthetic Gas Exchange, Mineral Concentration and Lipid Peroxidation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Anti-Aging Potential of Extracts from Washingtonia filifera Seeds
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 10
Issue 1
10.3390/plants10010153
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study of Bio-Pharmaceutical and Antimicrobial Properties of Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Leathery Exocarp Extract

by
Hazem S. Elshafie
1,
Lucia Caputo
2,
Laura De Martino
2,
Shimaa H. Sakr
1,3,
Vincenzo De Feo
2 and
Ippolito Camele
1,*
1
School of Agricultural, Forestry, Food and Environmental Sciences (SAFE), University of Basilicata, Viale dell’Ateneo Lucano 10, 85100 Potenza, Italy
2
Department of Pharmacy, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, Italy
3
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Zagazig University, 44511 Zagazig, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2021, 10(1), 153; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10010153
Submission received: 28 December 2020 / Revised: 7 January 2021 / Accepted: 11 January 2021 / Published: 14 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research of Bioactive Substances in Plant Extracts)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) fruits are important sources of vitamins and minerals and widely used in the dietary supplement industry. An aqueous extract of its leathery exocarp (LEP) was obtained by a solid-phase micro-extraction method. The antifungal activity was examined against the phytopathogenic fungi, Fusarium oxysporum, Phytophthora cinnamomi, Penicillium digitatum and Botrytis cinerea, and the antibacterial activity was evaluated against Escherichia coli, Xanthomonas campestris, Bacillus megaterium and Clavibacter michiganensis. The antimicrobial assays showed, in some cases, a promising antimicrobial effect compared to the synthetic drugs. The possible anti-acetylcholinesterase and antioxidant activities of the LEP extract were investigated by the Ellman’s assay and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) test, respectively, and their results showed that the LEP extract has an effective anti-acetylcholinesterase inhibitory effect and an antioxidant activity. Thus, the LEP extract could be valid as a candidate for further studies on the use of pomegranate in neurodegenerative diseases as a food preservative and a suitable substitute to control several phytopathogens.

1. Introduction

Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) is consumed worldwide either as fruit or juice [1,2]. In many countries, the fruit, peel and root of pomegranate are widely used for herbal remedies [3,4]. Fruits are important source of vitamins and minerals and widely used in the dietary supplement industry [5,6], whereas peels account for 50% of the whole fruit and are rich in phenols and flavonoids [7].
Pomegranate fruits are rich in biologically active substances [5,8,9], such as acids, sugars, vitamins, minerals and phenolic compounds, which are considered strong antioxidant agents [10,11]. Hence, pomegranate extracts have several biological properties among them, anti-inflammatory, anticancer and antioxidant [5,6].
Recently, there has been a great interest regarding the role of dietary antioxidants in neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [12]. Although pomegranate is rich in antioxidant polyphenols and oxidative stress may play a key role in neurodegenerative disease, few in vivo and in vitro studies analyzed its activity as a potential inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) [12,13,14]. In AD transgenic mice, a dietary supplementation with 4% of pomegranate attenuated the oxidative damage and reduced the activity of AChE, restoring its normal levels [12]. Furthermore, an ethanol extract of pomegranate leaves or peels showed good AChE inhibition activities [13,14].
Pomegranate fruits also showed a promising antimicrobial effect against some human norovirus infections, such as the influenza virus, due to the effect of the polyphenol fraction of pomegranates [15,16]. In addition, Johann and coworkers [17] reported that a P. granatum extract exhibited an effective antifungal activity against Paracoccidioides brasiliensis.
The pomegranate leathery exocarp extract (LEP) is rich in hydrolysable tannins and phenolic compounds, which are multiple esters characterized by antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties [18,19,20], moreover the peel extract has been proposed as a safe antioxidant agent [3,21]. Phenolic compounds having remarkable antimicrobial activity, such as flavonoids and tannins, could be used as natural microbicides against several phytopathogenic microorganisms [22,23,24,25]. In addition, punicalagin isolated from pomegranate peels showed a strong antimicrobial activity against Candida albicans and C. parapsilosis [26], and the combination of punicalagin and fluconazole showed a synergistic activity. A pomegranate extract was able to inhibit significantly the growth of serious human pathogenic bacteria such as Clostridia and Staphylococcus aureus [27].
Recently, there has been a growing interest in antioxidant substances as natural preservatives in the food industry and as a coadjutant in the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases [12,28]. On the other hand, there is also a necessity to find out new natural substitutes for chemical antimicrobial agents for different human and phytopathogenic microorganisms [29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. Hence, the main objectives of the current research are to investigate some biopharmaceutical and antimicrobial activities of the pomegranate leathery exocarp (LEP) extract as follows: (i) antibacterial activity against some common human and phytopathogenic bacteria, both Gram-negative bacteria (G−ve) Escherichia coli Migula and Xanthomonas campestris Pammel and Gram-positive bacteria (G+ve) Bacillus megaterium de Bary ITM100 and Clavibacter michiganensis corrig. (Smith); (ii) antifungal activity against Fusarium oxysporum von Schlechtendal, Phytophthora cinnamomi Rands, Penicillium digitatum Sacc. and Botrytis cinerea Pers; (iii) a possible anti-acetylcholinesterase effect and (iv) a possible antioxidant activity.

2. Results

2.1. Antibacterial Activity

The LEP extract significantly inhibited the growth of X. campestris and C. michiganensis at the two tested concentrations (5 and 10 mg/mL) equal to tetracycline (160 µg/mL) and kanamycin (50 µg/mL), as illustrated in Figure 1. Regarding B. megaterium, the higher concentration of the LEP extract (10 mg/mL) showed a promising bactericidal effect slightly lower than kanamycin, whereas the lower tested concentration (5 mg/mL) showed a moderate activity equal to tetracycline (Figure 1). On the hand, only the higher concentration of the extract (10 mg/mL) showed a significant bactericidal effect against E. coli equal to kanamycin, whereas the lower concentration of the LEP extract (5 mg/mL) showed also a higher bactericidal activity against E. coli than tetracycline (Figure 1). In general, the LEP extract showed promising antibacterial activity compared to the two tested references, mainly taking the harmful side effects of the use of synthetic antibiotics into account.

2.2. Antifungal Activity

The results of the in vitro antifungal activity assay demonstrated that the LEP extract was less active against F. oxysporum and B. cinerea compared to the two fungicides used as a positive control (C+ve) (Figure 2), whereas the LEP extract showed the highest significant fungicidal activity against P. cinnamomi equal to cycloheximide (0.1 µL/mL). It was also observed that the LEP extract showed the highest significant fungicidal activity against P. digitatum compared to both C+ve references (Figure 2).

2.3. Anti-Acetylcholinesterase Activity

The LEP extract was tested for AChE activity using Ellman’s colorimetric method. The results showed a good inhibitory activity with the concentration required for achieving 50% inhibition of the enzyme (IC50) value of 133.0 µg/mL. Moreover, at a concentration of 250 µg/mL, the inhibition percentage (99.0% ± 4.1%) was comparable to the used control (galanthamine) (Table 1).

2.4. Antioxidant Activity

The antioxidant activity of the LEP extract was assessed by the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assay. The inhibition of DPPH was dose- and time-dependent, as shown in Figure 3. The IC50 values ranged between 19.77 µg/mL after 15 min and 14.74 µg/mL after 45 min of exposure. These results were comparable to the antioxidant reference “vitamin C” (1.95 µg/mL after 45 min).

3. Discussion

The antimicrobial activity of the LEP extract confirmed the previous results [6], showing the antibacterial effects of different pomegranate peel extracts against other pathogenic bacteria such as Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, E. coli and Yersinia enterocolitica both in vitro and in situ. Orak and coworkers [36] studied the antibacterial activity of pomegranate peel extracts against S. aureus, E. coli and Salmonella enteritidis and the antifungal activity against Aspergillus parasiticus, showing that all tested extracts showed promising antibacterial and antifungal activities against all tested bacterial and fungal strains. In addition, food-borne diseases caused by S. aureus and L. monocytogenes have been inhibited effectively by pomegranate peel methanolic extracts [15].
Furthermore, the peel extract has been successfully used in improvingCapsicum shelf life against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides due to the polyphenol constituents such as punicalagin, catechin and rutin [37]. The notable antimicrobial effect of the LEP extract could be related to the high content of polyphenols—in particular, flavonoids and tannins [3,6,15,22,24]. On the other hand, the observed antimicrobial activity of the studied LEP extract may be also correlated to the polysaccharides, as reported by Miguel and coworkers [6]. The possible mechanism of the antimicrobial effects is correlated to the chemical structure of the phenolic compounds. Their lipophilic nature enables them to penetrate easily into the pathogen cell membrane and also to interfere with enzymes responsible for energy and protein production in the microorganism’s cells, hence causing cell death [38]; instead the antimicrobial activity of the polysaccharides might be related to their chemical structure and ester sulfate groups [39].
Meanwhile, functional foods are potential sources of compounds that can prevent and/or treat many diseases, such as neurodegenerative, by inhibiting acetylcholinesterase (AChE). Few previous studies have reported the anti-acetylcholinesterase activity of pomegranate peel extracts, even if their healthy and antioxidant proprieties are well-documented [13,14]. Moreover, the activity of acetylcholinesterase was measured in the cortex and hippocampus of mice, and in both cases, the treatment with a pomegranate extract promoted a significant reduction in the activity of AChE [40]. In our study, the LEP extract showed a promising activity compared to the positive control. In our study, the LEP extract showed a good activity compared to positive control. In fact, the extract, at concentration of 250 µg/mL, inhibited at 99.0% the enzyme and galanthamine reached maximum activity (inhibition of 94.2%) at the highest concentration of 10 μg/mL.
Our sample was more active than the water fraction of an ethanolic extract of pomegranate peel tested by Sakivin and coworkers [14]. In fact, at the same concentration (100 μg/mL), the ethanolic extract inhibited the enzyme by 27.9% compared to 44.2% in the case of our studied aqueous extract. However, further work is needed to identify the molecule(s) responsible for this activity.
Regarding the antioxidant activity, Elfalleh and coworkers [41] reported a half maximal effective concentration (EC50) value of 11.48 μg/mL for an aqueous pomegranate peel extract in agreement with our results, which proved that the choice of the aqueous extraction method is characterized by being simple and economical; therefore, it is preferred in various biological applications, especially in the pharmaceutical and food industries. On the other hand, Nagappan [42] reported that any plant species showing promising bioactivity in an aqueous extract is considered as a valuable health resource for poor communities.
Moreover, our experiments showed that the antioxidant effect was very fast, and it was seemed that there was not an influence of the reaction time on the radical scavenging activity. In fact, L-ascorbic acid also reacted very rapidly with DPPH [43], and its reaction was completed within three min, thus confirming the fast kinetic behavior of this compound. The LEP extract showed a similar behavior after 15 min; the IC50 value was 19.77 µg/mL. The available literature reported that different pomegranate peel extracts exhibited various degrees of antioxidant activity [44], whereas the water extract at 75 and 100 mg/mL showed a lower antioxidant activity compared to other extracts having the same effect. Thus, the waste products of pomegranate (peel and seed) with high antioxidant activity could be useful as natural preservatives in the food industry [28].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Chemicals

Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) type VI-S from Electrophorus electricus (electric eel), EC 3.1.1.7, 245 U/mg solid, 5,5′-dithiobis (2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB) and acetylthiocholine iodide (AChI) were all purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Ascorbic acid was purchased from Fluka, Buchs, Switzerland.

4.2. Plant Material

Pomegranate fruits (cv “Wonderful”) were collected following a randomized design in an orchard located in the province of Foggia (Apulia Region, Italy) during the seasons of summer/autumn 2018. The fruits were initially dried at 50 °C in room temperature for 48 h.

4.3. Extraction

The leathery exocarp peels of 3 fruits of pomegranate were sterilized using 3.0% sodium hypochlorite and then washed with sterile distilled water. The sterilized peels were left to air-dry under a laminar flow at room temperature overnight. Then, 50 g of the dried materials were suspended in 25-mL sterile distilled water and homogenized in plastic-porous bags by using a metal push rod. The suspension was agitated by using a shaker (Digital control 711D, Padova, Italy) for 24 h at room temperature, then was filtered by using a Whatman® filter paper (Φ 8 cm, 75 GR/M2) purchased from Sigma Aldrich company (Darmstadt, Germany) and centrifuged at 8944× g for 10 min at 5 °C (IEC-Micromax RF, Thermo, Sparta, USA). Finally, the extract was stored at −20 °C for future use. The supernatant was membrane-filtered (0.45 μm; Minisart, Darmstadt, Germany) and concentrated under reduced pressure at 45 °C. The dried sample was resuspended in distilled water and adjusted at 10 mg/mL.

4.4. In Vitro Antibacterial Activity

The bactericidal activity was evaluated by the disc diffusion method [45] in King B (KB) medium against G−ve bacteria E. coli and X. campestris and G+ve ones B. megaterium and C. michiganensis. All tested bacteria were conserved in the collection of School of Agricultural, Forestry, Food and Environmental Sciences (SAFE) and re-activated on nutrient agar media at 30 ± 2 °C. Briefly, twenty µL of suspension were inoculated at the two following concentrations (10 mg/mL and 5 mg/mL), and the plates were incubated at 30 ± 2 °C for 48 h. Tetracycline and kanamycin were used as positive controls (C+ve) at 160 µg/mL and 50 µg/mL, respectively. The diameter of inhibition zone was measured. Then, the antibacterial activity was expressed as the growth inhibition percentage using the following Equation (1) [32]:
Growth   inhibition   ( % ) = 100 − [ ( G c − G t ) G c ] × 100 ;
where Gc is the average diameter of bacterial grown in the control plate in mm, and Gt is the average diameter of inhibition zone in mm.

4.5. In Vitro Antifungal Activity

The tested phytopathogenic fungi were F. oxysporum, P. cinnamomi, P. digitatum and B. cinerea. The fungi were maintained as pure cultures at 4 °C in the mycotheca of SAFE and recultivated on potato dextrose agar (PDA) at 22 ± 2 °C. The LEP extract was mixed into a PDA medium at a concentration of 10 mg/mL. Then, 0.5 cm of the fungal disc were inoculated in the Petri dish and incubated at 22 °C for 96 h. Azoxystrobin at 1.0 µL/mL and cycloheximide at 0.1 µL/mL were used as C+ve. The fungitoxicity was expressed as the growth inhibition percentage following Equation (2), as proposed by Zygadlo and coworkers [46]:
Growth   inhibition   ( % ) = [ ( G c − G t ) G c ] × 100 ;
where Gc represents the average diameter of fungal mycelium in PDA (control), and Gt represents the average diameter of fungal mycelium on the treated PDA dish.

4.6. In Vitro Anti-Acetylcholinesterase Activity

AChE inhibitory activity assay was performed according to a previously described spectrophotometric method [47] with minor modifications [48]. Briefly, in a total volume of 1 mL, 415 μL of Tris-HCl buffer 0.1 M (pH 8), 10 μL of different concentrations of extract dissolved in methanol and 25 μL of AChE solution (0.28 U/mL) were incubated for 15 min at room temperature. Seventy-five microliters of a solution of AChI (1.83 mM) and 475 μL of DTNB were added, and the final mixture was incubated for 30 min at room temperature. Absorbance was measured at 405 nm by a spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific Multiskan GO, Monza, Italy). Galanthamine was used as the C+ve. Bi-distillated water, instead of the extract or galanthamine, was used as C−ve. The inhibition rate (%) of AChE activity was calculated by comparison with the C−ve following Equation (3):
AChE   inhibition   % = [ ( A 0 − A 1 ) A 0 ] × 100 ;
where A0 is the absorbance of the control without the sample, and A1 is the absorbance of the sample.

4.7. Antioxidant Activity

Aliquots of the LEP extract were dissolved in methanol to have the final dose range from 12.5 to 100 µg/mL. The antiradical activity was determined using the sTable 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radical (DPPH) according to the Brand-Williams and coworkers method [49], with some modifications [50]. In its radical form, DPPH has an absorption peak at 517 nm, which disappears by the reduction of DPPH with antiradical compounds. For preparation of the standard curve, different concentrations of DPPH methanol solutions (10–60 µg/mL) were used. One milligram of extract was dissolved in 1 mL of DPPH solution (60 µM) to prepare the stock solution. An aliquot of MeOH solution containing different amounts of the extract was added to a DPPH solution (7.6 × 10−5 M), which was prepared daily and kept in the dark to have a final volume of 1 mL in a straight-sided cuvette. Methanol alone was used as the blank, whereas 1 mL of DPPH solution (60 µM) was used as the control. Absorbance at 515 nm was measured using a Thermo Scientific Multiskan GO spectrophotometer (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Vantaa, Finland) after 15, 30 and 45 min. The tested doses of the extracts were 12.5, 25, 50 and 100 µg/mL. The DPPH concentration (µg/mL) in the reaction mixture was calculated from the following calibration curve, analyzed by linear regression (r2: 0.9993):
Absorbance (λ515) = 0.0008 + 0.0118 × [DPPH]
The scavenging capability of the tested extract was calculated using Equation (4):
DPPH   scavenging   activity   % = [ ( A ( λ 515 ) C − A ( λ 515 ) S ) A ( λ 515 ) C ] × 100 ;
where A(λ515)C is the absorbance of a control with no radical scavenger, and A(λ515)S is the absorbance of the remaining DPPH in the presence of a scavenger. The IC50 value was defined as the dose of the sample that reduced 50% of the initial DPPH. Ascorbic acid was used as the standard.

4.8. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were carried out in triplicate. Data of each experiment were expressed as the mean ± SD and statistically analyzed by two-way ANOVA using SPSS software (ver. 13, Prentice Hall, Chicago, USA, 2004), followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test, at the significance level of p < 0.05 or p < 0.0001.

5. Conclusions

The global interest in scientific research is to find out new substances from natural and non-synthetic sources, thus providing them for pharmaceutical manufacturing and food preservation without any harmful effects on human health. Therefore, in this research, we employed the obtained extract by using distilled water, which was an innocuous natural solvent supplied for the food industry. The findings of the current study regarding the antimicrobial, antioxidant and anti-acetylcholinesterase activities of the LEP extract, such as an, are promising for the pharmaceutical and/or food industry. In addition, the waste products of pomegranates could be suitable to be utilized as natural preservatives in the food industry because of their antimicrobial and antioxidant properties.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.S.E. and I.C.; methodology, H.S.E., S.H.S., L.D.M. and L.C.; investigation, H.S.E., S.H.S. and I.C.; resources, I.C.; data curation, V.D.F. and I.C.; writing—original draft preparation, H.S.E., S.H.S., L.D.M. and L.C.; writing—review and editing, V.D.F. and I.C. and supervision, V.D.F. and I.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ammar, A.; Turki, M.; Hammouda, O.; Chtourou, H.; Trabelsi, K.; Bouaziz, M.; Abdelkarim, O.; Hoekelmann, A.; Ayadi, F.; Souissi, N.; et al. Effects of pomegranate juice supplementation on oxidative stress biomarkers following weightlifting exercise. Nutrients 2017, 9, 819. [Google Scholar]
  2. Panth, N.; Manandhar, B.; Paudel, R.K. Anticancer activity of Punica granatum (pomegranate): A review. Phytother. Res. 2017, 31, 568–578. [Google Scholar]
  3. Li Destri Nicosia, M.G.; Pangallo, S.; Raphael, G.; Romeo, F.V.; Strano, M.C.; Rapisarda, P.; Droby, S.; Schena, L. Control of postharvest fungal rots on citrus fruit and sweet cherries using a pomegranate peel extract. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2016, 114, 54–61. [Google Scholar]
  4. Derakhshan, Z.; Ferrante, M.; Tadi, M.; Ansari, F.; Heydari, A.; Hosseini, M.S.; Oliveri Conti, G.; Sadrabad, E.K. Antioxidant activity and total phenolic content of ethanolic extract of pomegranate peels, juice and seeds. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2018, 114, 108–111. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Akhtar, S.; Ismail, T.; Fraternale, D.; Sestili, P. Pomegranate peel and peel extracts: Chemistry and food features. Food Chem. 2015, 174, 417–425. [Google Scholar]
  6. Miguel, M.G.; Neves, N.A.; Antunes, M.D. Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.): A medicinal plant with myriad biological properties—A short review. J. Med. Plants Res. 2010, 4, 2836–2847. [Google Scholar]
  7. Altieri, F.; Cairone, F.; Giamogante, F.; Carradori, S.; Locatelli, M.; Chichiarelli, S.; Cesa, S. Influence of ellagitannins extracted by pomegranate fruit on disulfide isomerase PDIA3 activity. Nutrients 2019, 11, 186. [Google Scholar]
  8. Fischer, U.A.; Carle, R.; Kammerer, D.R. Identification and quantification of phenolic compounds from pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) peel, mesocarp, aril and differently produced juices by HPLC-DAD-ESI/MSn. Food Chem. 2011, 127, 807–821. [Google Scholar]
  9. Lee, C.J.; Chen, L.G.; Liang, W.L.; Wang, C.C. Anti-inflammatory effects of Punica granatum Linee in vitro and in vivo. Food Chem. 2010, 118, 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  10. Schwartz, E.; Tzulker, R.; Glazer, I.; Bar-Ya’Akov, I.; Wiesman, Z.; Tripler, E.; Bar-Ilan, I.; Fromm, H.; Borochov-Neori, H.; Holland, D.; et al. Environmental conditions affect the color, taste, and antioxidant capacity of 11 pomegranate accessions’ fruits. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 9197–9209. [Google Scholar]
  11. Quattrucci, A.; Ovidi, E.; Tiezzi, A.; Vinciguerra, V.; Balestra, G.M. Biological control of tomato bacterial speck using Punica granatum fruit peel extract. Crop Prot. 2013, 46, 18–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Subash, S.; Essa, M.M.; Al-Asmi, A.; Al-Adawi, S.; Vaishnav, R.; Braidy, N.; Manivagasam, T.; Guillemin, G.J. Pomegranate from Oman alleviates the brain oxidative damage in transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Tradit. Complement. Med. 2014, 4, 232–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Bekir, J.; Mars, M.; Souchard, J.P.; Bouajila, J. Assessment of antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-cholinesterase and cytotoxic activities of pomegranate (Punica granatum) leaves. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2013, 55, 470–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Šavikin, K.; Živković, J.; Alimpić, A.; Zdunić, G.; Janković, T.; Duletić-Laušević, S.; Menković, N. Activity guided fractionation of pomegranate extract and its antioxidant, antidiabetic and antineurodegenerative properties. Ind. Crops Prod. 2018, 113, 142–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Al-Zoreky, N.S. Antimicrobial activity of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) fruit peels. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2009, 134, 244–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Su, X.; Sangster, M.Y.; D’Souza, D.H. In vitro effects of pomegranate juice and pomegranate polyphenols on foodborne viral surrogates. Foodborne Pathol. Dis. 2010, 7, 1473–1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Johann, S.; Cisalpino, P.S.; Watanabe, G.A.; Cota, B.B.; de Siqueira, E.P.; Pizzolatti, M.G.; Zani, C.L.; de Resende, M.A. Antifungal activity of extracts of some plants used in Brazilian traditional medicine against the pathogenic fungus Paracoccidioides brasiliensis. Pharm. Biol. 2010, 48, 388–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Romier, C.B.; Van De Walle, J.; During, A.; Joly, A.; Rousseau, C.; Henry, O.; Schneider, Y.J. Inhibition of inflammatory mediators by polyphenolic plant extracts in human intestinal Caco-2 cells. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2009, 47, 1221–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yaidikar, L.; Thakur, S. Punicalagin attenuated cerebral ischemia-reperfusion insult via inhibition of pro-inflammatory cytokines, up-regulation of Bcl-2, down-regulation of Bax, and caspase-3. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2015, 402, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Singh, B.; Singh, J.P.; Kaur, A.; Singh, N. Phenolic compounds as beneficial phytochemicals in pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) peel: A review. Food Chem. 2018, 261, 75–86. [Google Scholar]
  21. Romeo, F.V.; Ballistreri, G.; Fabroni, S.; Pangallo, S.; Li Destri Nicosia, M.G.; Schena, L.; Rapisarda, P. Chemical characterization of different sumac and pomegranate extracts effective against Botrytis cinerea rots. Molecules 2015, 20, 11941–11958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Machado, T.; Pinto, A.; Pinto, M.; Leal, I.; Silva, M.; Amaral, A.; Kuster, R.; Netto dos Santos, K. In vitro activity of Brazilian medicinal plants, naturally occurring naphthoquinones and their analogues, against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2003, 21, 279–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Elshafie, H.S.; Caputo, L.; De Martino, L.; Gruľová, D.; Zheljazkov, V.D.; De Feo, V.; Camele, I. Biological investigations of essential oils extracted from three Juniperus species and evaluation of their antimicrobial, antioxidant and cytotoxic activities. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2020, 129, 1261–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Elshafie, H.S.; Gruľová, D.; Baranová, B.; Caputo, L.; De Martino, L.; Sedlák, V.; Camele, I.; De Feo, V. Antimicrobial Activity and Chemical Composition of Essential Oil Extracted from Solidago canadensis L. Growing Wild in Slovakia. Molecules 2019, 24, 1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Elshafie, H.S.; Amato, M.; De Feo, V.; Camele, I. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of Chia (Salvia hispanica L.) essential oil. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2018, 244, 1675–1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Endo, E.H.; Cortéz, D.A.G.; Ueda-Nakamura, T.; Nakamura, C.V.; Filho, B.P.D. Potent antifungal activity of extracts and pure compound isolated from pomegranate peels and synergism with fluconazole against Candida albicans. Res. Microbiol. 2010, 161, 534–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Bialonska, D.; Kasimsetty, S.G.; Schrader, K.K.; Ferreira, D. The effect of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) by-products and ellagitannins on the growth of human gut bacteria. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 8344–8349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Naveena, B.; Sen, A.; Vaithiyanathan, S.; Babji, Y.; Kondaiah, N. Comparative efficacy of pomegranate juice, pomegranate rind powder extract and BHT as antioxidants in cooked chicken patties. Meat Sci. 2008, 80, 1304–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Droby, S.; Wisniewski, M.; Macarisin, D.; Wilson, C. Twenty years of postharvest biocontrol research: Is it time for a new paradigm? Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2009, 52, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Elshafie, H.S.; Camele, I.; Sofo, A.; Mazzone, G.; Caivano, M.; Masi, S.; Caniani, D. Mycoremediation effect of Trichoderma harzianum strain T22 combined with ozonation in diesel-contaminated sand. Chemosphere 2020, 252, 26597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Elshafie, H.S.; Camele, I.; Racioppi, R.; Scrano, L.; Iacobellis, N.S.; Bufo, S.A. In vitro antifungal activity of Burkholderia gladioli pv. agaricicola against some phytopathogenic fungi. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13, 16291–16302. [Google Scholar]
  32. Elshafie, H.S.; Racioppi, R.; Bufo, S.A.; Camele, I. In vitro study of biological activity of four strains of Burkholderia gladioli pv. agaricicola and identification of their bioactive metabolites using GC-MS. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2017, 24, 295–301. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Elshafie, H.S.; Viggiani, L.; Mostafa, M.S.; El-Hashash, M.A.; Bufo, S.A.; Camele, I. Biological activity and chemical identification of ornithine lipid produced by Burkholderia gladioli pv. agaricicola ICMP 11096 using LC-MS and NMR analyses. J. Biol. Res. 2017, 90, 96–103. [Google Scholar]
  34. Gatto, M.A.; Ippolito, A.; Linsalata, V.; Cascarano, N.A.; Nigro, F.; Vanadia, S.; Di Venerea, D. Activity of extracts from wild edible herbs against postharvest fungal diseases of fruit and vegetables. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2011, 61, 72–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sanzani, S.M.; Schena, L.; De Girolamo, A.; Ippolito, A.; Gonzàlez–Candelas, L. Characterization of genes associated with induced resistance against Penicillium expansum in apple fruit treated with quercetin. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2010, 56, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Orak, H.H.; Demirci, A.S.; Gümüş, T. Antibacterial and antifungal activity of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.cv.) peel. Electron. J. Environ. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 10, 1958–1969. [Google Scholar]
  37. Nair, M.S.; Saxena, A.; Kaur, C. Characterization and Antifungal Activity of Pomegranate Peel Extract and its Use in Polysaccharide-Based Edible Coatings to Extend the Shelf-Life of Capsicum (Capsicum annuum L.). Food Bioprocess Technol. 2018, 11, 1317–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gruľová, D.; Caputo, L.; Elshafie, H.S.; Baranová, B.; De Martino, L.; Sedlák, V.; Camele, I.; De Feo, V. Thymol Chemotype Origanum vulgare L. Essential Oil as a Potential Selective Bio-Based Herbicide on Monocot Plant Species. Molecules 2020, 25, 595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Kantachumpoo, A.; Chirapart, A. Components and antimicrobial activity of polysaccharides extracted from thai brown seaweeds. Kasetsart J. (Nat. Sci.) 2010, 44, 220–233. [Google Scholar]
  40. Morzelle, M.C.; Salgado, J.M.; Telles, M.; Mourelle, D.; Bachiega, P.; Buck, H.S.; Viel, T.A. Neuroprotective effects of pomegranate peel extract after chronic infusion with amyloid-β peptide in mice. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0166123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Elfalleh, W.; Hannachi, H.; Tlili, N.; Yahia, Y.; Nasri, N.; Ferchichi, A. Total phenolic contents and antioxidant activities of pomegranate peel, seed, leaf and flower. J. Med. Plants Res. 2012, 6, 4724–4730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Nagappan, R. Evaluation of aqueous and ethanol extract of bioactive medicinal plant, Cassia didymobotrya (Fresenius) Irwin & Barneby against immature stages of filarial vector, Culex quinquefasciatus Say (Diptera: Culicidae). Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2012, 2, 707–711. [Google Scholar]
  43. Sendra, J.; Sentandreu, E.; Navarro, J. Reduction kinetics of the free stable radical 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH·) for determination of the anti-radical activity of citrus juices. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2006, 223, 615–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Negi, P.S.; Jayaprakasha, G.K. Antioxidant and antibacterial activities of Punica granatum peel extracts. J. Food Sci. 2003, 68, 1473–1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bhunia, M.C.; Johnson, B. Purification, characterization and antimicrobial spectrum of a bacteriocin produced by Pediococcus acidolactici. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 1988, 65, 261–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zygadlo, J.A.; Guzman, C.A.; Grosso, N.R. Antifungal properties of the leaf oils of Tagetes minuta L. and Tagetes filifolia Lag. J. Essent. Oil Res. 1994, 6, 617–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ellman, G.L.; Courtney, K.D.; Andres, V., Jr.; Featherstone, R.M. A new and rapid colorimetric determination of acetylcholinesterase activity. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1961, 7, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Albano, S.; Lima, A.S.; Miguel, M.G.; Pedro, L.G.; Barroso, J.G.; Figueiredo, A.C. Antioxidant, anti-5-lipoxygenase and antiacetylcholinesterase activities of essential oils and decoction waters of some aromatic plants. Rec. Nat. Prod. 2012, 6, 35–48. [Google Scholar]
  49. Brand-Williams, W.; Cuvelier, M.E.; Berset, C. Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 1995, 28, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lee, S.K.; Mbwambo, Z.H.; Chung, H.; Luyengi, L.; Gamez, E.J.; Mehta, R.G.; Kinghorn, A.D.; Pezzuto, J.M. Evaluation of the antioxidant potential of natural products. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen. 1998, 1, 35–46. [Google Scholar]
Plants 10 00153 g001 550
Figure 1. Antibacterial activity of the leathery exocarp (LEP) extract. Bars with different letters indicate mean values significantly different at p < 0.05, according to a one-way ANOVA combined with Tukey’s B post-hoc test. Data are expressed as the mean of three replicates ± SD.
Figure 1. Antibacterial activity of the leathery exocarp (LEP) extract. Bars with different letters indicate mean values significantly different at p < 0.05, according to a one-way ANOVA combined with Tukey’s B post-hoc test. Data are expressed as the mean of three replicates ± SD.
Plants 10 00153 g001
Plants 10 00153 g002 550
Figure 2. Antifungal activity of the LEP extract. Bars with different letters indicate mean values significantly different at p < 0.05, according to a one-way ANOVA combined with Tukey’s post-hoc test. Data are expressed as the mean of three replicates ± SD.
Figure 2. Antifungal activity of the LEP extract. Bars with different letters indicate mean values significantly different at p < 0.05, according to a one-way ANOVA combined with Tukey’s post-hoc test. Data are expressed as the mean of three replicates ± SD.
Plants 10 00153 g002
Plants 10 00153 g003 550
Figure 3. Antioxidant activity of the LEP extract. Values represent the percent of 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) remaining after 15, 30 and 45 min. **** Values are significantly different at p < 0.0001, according to a two-way ANOVA combined with Tukey’s post-hoc test. Data are expressed as the mean of three replicates ± SD.
Figure 3. Antioxidant activity of the LEP extract. Values represent the percent of 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) remaining after 15, 30 and 45 min. **** Values are significantly different at p < 0.0001, according to a two-way ANOVA combined with Tukey’s post-hoc test. Data are expressed as the mean of three replicates ± SD.
Plants 10 00153 g003
Table
Table 1. Anti-acetylcholinesterase activity.
Table 1. Anti-acetylcholinesterase activity.
SampleConcentration (µg/mL)AChE Inhibition Activity (%)IC50 Values
(µg/mL)
LEP extract25099.0 ± 4.1133.0 ± 1.2
10044.2 ± 0.4
5014.5 ± 0.8
25n.a.
Galantamine1094.2 ± 1.40.4 ± 0.2
AChE, acetylcholinesterase; LEP, leathery exocarp. n.a., not active Data are expressed as the mean of three replicates ± SD.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Elshafie, H.S.; Caputo, L.; De Martino, L.; Sakr, S.H.; De Feo, V.; Camele, I. Study of Bio-Pharmaceutical and Antimicrobial Properties of Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Leathery Exocarp Extract. Plants 2021, 10, 153. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10010153

AMA Style

Elshafie HS, Caputo L, De Martino L, Sakr SH, De Feo V, Camele I. Study of Bio-Pharmaceutical and Antimicrobial Properties of Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Leathery Exocarp Extract. Plants. 2021; 10(1):153. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10010153

Chicago/Turabian Style

Elshafie, Hazem S., Lucia Caputo, Laura De Martino, Shimaa H. Sakr, Vincenzo De Feo, and Ippolito Camele. 2021. "Study of Bio-Pharmaceutical and Antimicrobial Properties of Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Leathery Exocarp Extract" Plants 10, no. 1: 153. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10010153

APA Style

Elshafie, H. S., Caputo, L., De Martino, L., Sakr, S. H., De Feo, V., & Camele, I. (2021). Study of Bio-Pharmaceutical and Antimicrobial Properties of Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Leathery Exocarp Extract. Plants, 10(1), 153. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10010153

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop