Optimizing the Seahorse XF Mito Stress Test Workflow and Troubleshooting Notes: A Stepwise Protocol for HUVECs
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Experimental Design
2.1. Materials
2.2. Equipment
3. Procedure
3.1. Cell Seeding: Two Experimental Strategies
3.1.1. Strategy A: Treatment Followed by Seeding
3.1.2. Strategy B: Seeding Followed by Treatment
3.2. Preparation of Cells and Cartridge Before the Formal Experiment (One Day Before Assay)
3.2.1. Instrument Open and Startup
3.2.2. Hydrate Cartridge and Pre-Warm XF Calibrant Solution
3.2.3. Cells Preparation and Seeding
3.3. Preparation of Media and Cartridge Before the Formal Experiment (On the Day of Assay)
3.3.1. Assay Medium Preparation
3.3.2. Sensor Cartridge Hydration
3.3.3. Preparation of Compound Stocks and Working Solutions
3.3.4. Preparation for the Cell Culture Miniplate
3.3.5. Cartridge Loading
3.3.6. Instrument Setup and Assay Execution
3.4. Post-Assay Protein Quantification for Data Normalization
3.4.1. Preparation of Lysis Reagent
3.4.2. Cell Lysis
3.4.3. Protein Quantification via BCA Assay
3.4.4. Data Analysis and Normalization
3.5. Seahorse Data Extraction and Normalization
3.5.1. Data Processing with Wave Software
3.5.2. Normalization Procedure
4. Results
4.1. OCR, ECAR, and Energy Map
4.2. Plate Map, Group List, and Data View
5. Notes for Easily Missed Details and Troubleshooting
- Do not overlook the step of instrument opening and startup, as insufficient warming up may lead to errors in test results. Additionally, forgetting this step could cause other subsequent processing steps to be completed while the instrument remains inadequately warmed up, resulting in prolonged waiting time for cells and potentially compromising their condition, thereby affecting the results.
- It is important to use proper and gentle techniques whenever handling the probe plate to prevent probe damage.
- For initial experiments, it is still recommended to use the orthogonal matrix design to determine an optimal concentration in the Seahorse cell culture plate to define a suitable cell density and FCCP concentration.
- The seeding area per well of the XFe96 cell culture plate is 0.106 cm2, which is 40% of the seeding area per well of a standard 96-well cell culture plate (this can be appropriately adjusted and optimized based on your previous experience with seeding in 96-well plates). Before seeding cells, the optimal seeding density should be determined as it varies for different cell types; it is typically optimized within the range of 5 × 103~4 × 104 cells/well. If this is not suitable, please adjust the cell density range. According to previous articles, aging HUVEC cell densities could be taken as examples for a related range (Table 1) using other types of Seahorse Analyzer.
| No. | Seahorse Model | Cell Number/Well | Culture Duration | Study Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | XF24 | 1 × 104 | 48 h Starvation 24 h Prevention 24 h | Atovastatin on mitochondrial energy metabolism [13] |
| 2 | XF24 | 2 × 104 | 28 h Adherence 4 h Drug coincubation 24 h | Advanced glycation end products on mitochondrial energy [21] |
| 3 | XF24 | 3 × 104 | 30–32 h Adherence 6–8 h Starvation 24 h | ALDH2 on mitochondrial oxygen reserve capacity in ECs [22] |
| 4 | XF24 | 6.25 × 104 | 48 h (Details not mentioned) | VEGF on endothelial metabolism [23] |
- It is important to note that if the seeding volume is calculated as 80 µL/well, the cell suspension density should be calculated as 1 × 104 cells (as an example)/80 µL/well = 1.25 × 105 cells/mL. This is an easily forgotten step.
- L-Glutamine solution must be frozen at −20 °C. As all assay reagents should be prepared freshly before use, it is recommended to aliquot the reagent into EP tubes immediately upon receipt, freezing 1 mL per tube. When needed, thaw an aliquot and ensure it is thoroughly mixed before use.
- The Seahorse DMEM (corresponding to the catalog number mentioned in the Materials Section 2.1.) has been pre-adjusted for pH. After the XF supplement is added, no further pH adjustment is required. If other products are used, an additional step to adjust the pH is necessary.
- When preparing drug solutions, it is recommended to use extended-length pipette tips for mixing. Otherwise, due to the narrow tube diameter, thorough mixing may not be achieved, or spillage may easily occur during the mixing process.
- One foil pouch includes enough compounds for just one test instance. Leftover compounds after the test cannot be frozen and are not suitable for the next test instance.
- When handling cells, place the tip at a 45° angle against the well wall at mid-height before dispensing, and keep it slightly submerged in the suspension afterward. This combined approach effectively minimizes bubble formation to prevent interference with downstream detection (Figure 6a).

- Before cells are loaded onto the instrument for detection, the degassing and equilibration time should preferably not exceed 60 min, as longer durations may affect the detection results.
- When washing the cells, pay attention to the handling of the four blank (background) wells. Pipette tips should be changed after adding compounds to each column to prevent cross contamination.
- Notes on Drug Addition Technique: The accompanying drug-loading auxiliary plate can be used according to personal preference (different orientations allow for dosing into different well positions). Since improper use of the auxiliary plate may result in incomplete delivery of the drug solution, an alternative method is to insert a multichannel pipette vertically into the drug ports and inject the solution slowly in one continuous motion without pausing, minimizing bubble formation. When observing the delivery of the solution (Figure 6b), avoid lifting the plate arbitrarily to prevent spillage; instead, view it at eye level to check the wells. Whenever possible, use a multichannel pipette with accurate volume calibration to reduce dispensing errors.
- During the cell washing process, you may use a calibrated well to perform a sampling test to detect and roughly estimate the remaining liquid volume in the wells. It is not strictly necessary to achieve exactly 180 µL but try to keep it as close as possible.
- You may first complete drug treatment, then digest and centrifuge the cells before seeding them onto the Seahorse cell culture plate. Alternatively, you can seed the cells directly into the Seahorse cell culture plate before performing the treatment until the assay begins. However, since the two approaches result in different total culture durations on the Seahorse plate, the cell seeding density should be adjusted accordingly.
- Based on our experimental study, using Ang II as an in vitro cell aging inducer for 60 h and using Notoginsenoside R1, Ginsenoside Rg1, and Resveratrol as prevention treatments for 48 h, the final cell density adopted was 1 × 104 cells per well, with an FCCP concentration of 0.25 μM. However, specific parameters such as the cell density and concentration of FCCP or other compounds should still be adjusted according to actual experimental conditions or further optimized based on the relevant literature within the overall framework provided.
- To prevent common errors and ensure a smooth, reliable workflow, a comprehensive, phase-specific checklist is provided in Appendix A, Checklist of the Workflow. This checklist serves as a core tool for systematic quality control and workflow organization. We strongly recommend printing it out and using it to perform a step-by-step verification at each key stage of the protocol. Actively consulting and completing this checklist is crucial for preventing oversight and ensuring strict procedural adherence. Furthermore, researchers are encouraged to adapt and expand this template based on their specific experimental conditions, thereby enhancing its utility as a personalized instrument to safeguard consistency and reproducibility.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| CVDs | Cardiovascular diseases |
| VA | Vascular aging |
| EC | Endothelial cell |
| HUVECs | Human Umbilical Vascular Endothelial Cells |
| OCR | Oxygen consumption rate |
| ECAR | Extracellular acidification rate |
| FCCP | Carbonyl Cyanide-4-(Trifluoromethoxy) Phenylhydrazone |
| BCA | Bicinchoninic acid |
| PBS | Phosphate-buffered saline |
| BSA | Bovine serum albumin |
Appendix A
Checklist of the Workflow
| Checklist for Seahorse Mito Cell Test Assay Workflow | |||||
| Date: | Operator: | Instrument Status: | |||
| Memo: | |||||
| Process Stage | Specific Steps | Key Points for Details | Check Board | ||
| Part I The day before the assay | 1. Instrument Open and Startup | Make sure the analyzer connects, initializes, and warms up overnight (37 °C). | |||
| 2. Hydrate Cartridge | Add 200 μL sterile water per well, incubate at 37 °C in a non-CO2 incubator overnight, and handle with care to avoid probe damage. | ||||
| 3. Pre-warm XF Calibrant Solution | Transfer 20 mL to a 50 mL centrifuge tube and incubate overnight at 37 °C in a non-CO2 incubator. (PS: Step 3 and step 4 can be completed simultaneously.) | ||||
| 4. Cell Preparation and Seeding | Prepare blank controls with medium in designated wells; harvest, count, and dilute cells to recommended density (e.g., 5 × 103–4 × 104/well); seed 80 µL suspension into experimental wells; let settle at room temperature for 1 h, then microscopically inspect before transferring to a 37 °C, 5% CO2 incubator for overnight culture (~16 h), keeping moats hydrated if extended. | ||||
| Part II On the Day of Assay | 1. Assay Medium Preparation | Supplement XF DMEM base medium (97 mL) with glucose (1 mL), sodium pyruvate (1 mL), and L-glutamine (1 mL) to final concentrations of 10 mM, 1 mM, and 2 mM, respectively, in a biosafety cabinet; pre-warm at 37 °C in a non-CO2 incubator for 15~30 min before use. | |||
| 2. Sensor Cartridge Hydration | Aspirate hydration water and replace with 200 µL pre-warmed XF Calibrant per well; incubate in non-CO2 incubator at 37 °C for ~60 min before assay. | ||||
| 3. Preparation of Compound Stocks and Working Solutions | Using a single-use Mito Stress Test Kit, reconstitute the three compounds (oligomycin, FCCP, rotenone/antimycin A) with pre-warmed assay medium. Prepare working solutions targeting final in-well concentrations (e.g., 1.50 µM, 0.25 µM *, 0.50 µM after 1:10 injection), noting that the optimal FCCP concentration requires prior titration. | ||||
| 4. Preparation of the Cell Culture Miniplate | Confirm cell confluence and health via microscope, gently wash cells twice with pre-warmed assay medium, then add 160 µL medium per well (final 180 µL) and equilibrate in a 37 °C non-CO2 incubator for 45~60 min. | ||||
| 5. Cartridge Loading (Select One Way) | Standard assay: Oligomycin (Port A 20 µL), FCCP (Port B 22 µL), and rotenone/antimycin A (Port C 25 µL). | ||||
| Modified assay: Other test compound (Port A 20 µL), oligomycin (Port B 22 µL), FCCP (Port C 25 µL), and rotenone/antimycin A (Port D 27 µL). | |||||
| 6. Instrument Setup and Assay Execution | Initialize the “Mito Stress Test” protocol in the software, calibrate the loaded sensor cartridge (around 20 min), then replace with the cell plate to start real-time measurements and compound injections. PS: Note the loading direction. | ||||
- * This table streamlines and summarizes the key optimized steps, with critical procedures highlighted in red to facilitate user verification during procedure execution. Users may also consult the official instrument-specific protocols based on their laboratory’s Seahorse model at https://www.agilent.com.cn/zh-cn/product/cell-analysis/how-to-run-an-assay, accessed on 20 January 2026.
- Recommendation: We sincerely recommend that the process start at around 4 P.M. the day before the assay to allow for enough preparation and a well-organized time schedule. According to our time record, Part I takes about 1~1.5 h, and Part II takes around 3.5~4.5 h till measurement starts for all the samples. The whole measurement process takes about 1.5 h. Based on the actual workflow, the procedure has been optimized by grouping identical steps together to minimize operational errors and by reorganizing the sequence according to execution speed. This adjustment aims to prevent prolonged cell incubation in the non-CO2 incubator prior to the assay, thereby reducing the risk of result inaccuracies.
References
- Crimmins, E.M. Social hallmarks of aging: Suggestions for geroscience research. Ageing Res. Rev. 2020, 63, 101136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heidenreich, P.A.; Trogdon, J.G.; Khavjou, O.A.; Butler, J.; Dracup, K.; Ezekowitz, M.D.; Finkelstein, E.A.; Hong, Y.; Johnston, S.C.; Khera, A.; et al. Forecasting the future of cardiovascular disease in the United States: A policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2011, 123, 933–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Donato, A.J.; Machin, D.R.; Lesniewski, L.A. Mechanisms of Dysfunction in the Aging Vasculature and Role in Age-Related Disease. Circ. Res. 2018, 123, 825–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ungvari, Z.; Tarantini, S.; Sorond, F.; Merkely, B.; Csiszar, A. Mechanisms of Vascular Aging, A Geroscience Perspective: JACC Focus Seminar. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2020, 75, 931–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chirinos, J.A. The Run Against Arterial Aging. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2020, 75, 72–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kucharska-Newton, A.M.; Stoner, L.; Meyer, M.L. Determinants of Vascular Age: An Epidemiological Perspective. Clin. Chem. 2019, 65, 108–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Muhetarijiang, M.; Chen, R.J.; Hu, X.; Han, J.; Zheng, L.; Chen, T. Mitochondrial Dysfunction: A Roadmap for Understanding and Tackling Cardiovascular Aging. Aging Dis. 2024, 16, 2575–2614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ungvari, Z.; Tarantini, S.; Donato, A.J.; Galvan, V.; Csiszar, A. Mechanisms of Vascular Aging. Circ. Res. 2018, 123, 849–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaffe, E.A.; Nachman, R.L.; Becker, C.G.; Minick, C.R. Culture of human endothelial cells derived from umbilical veins. Identification by morphologic and immunologic criteria. J. Clin. Investig. 1973, 52, 2745–2756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pfleger, J. Measurements of Mitochondrial Respiration in Intact Cells, Permeabilized Cells, and Isolated Tissue Mitochondria Using the Seahorse XF Analyzer. Methods Mol. Biol. 2022, 2497, 185–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brand, M.D.; Nicholls, D.G. Assessing mitochondrial dysfunction in cells. Biochem. J. 2011, 435, 297–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Divakaruni, A.S.; Paradyse, A.; Ferrick, D.A.; Murphy, A.N.; Jastroch, M. Analysis and interpretation of microplate-based oxygen consumption and pH data. Methods Enzymol. 2014, 547, 309–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chang, Y.; Li, Y.; Ye, N.; Guo, X.; Li, Z.; Sun, G.; Sun, Y. Atorvastatin protects the proliferative ability of human umbilical vein endothelial cells inhibited by angiotensin II by changing mitochondrial energy metabolism. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2018, 41, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shchepina, L.A.; Pletjushkina, O.Y.; Avetisyan, A.V.; Bakeeva, L.E.; Fetisova, E.K.; Izyumov, D.S.; Saprunova, V.B.; Vyssokikh, M.Y.; Chernyak, B.V.; Skulachev, V.P. Oligomycin, inhibitor of the F0 part of H+-ATP-synthase, suppresses the TNF-induced apoptosis. Oncogene 2002, 21, 8149–8157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dranka, B.P.; Benavides, G.A.; Diers, A.R.; Giordano, S.; Zelickson, B.R.; Reily, C.; Zou, L.; Chatham, J.C.; Hill, B.G.; Zhang, J.; et al. Assessing bioenergetic function in response to oxidative stress by metabolic profiling. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2011, 51, 1621–1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heinz, S.; Freyberger, A.; Lawrenz, B.; Schladt, L.; Schmuck, G.; Ellinger-Ziegelbauer, H. Mechanistic Investigations of the Mitochondrial Complex I Inhibitor Rotenone in the Context of Pharmacological and Safety Evaluation. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 45465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hytti, M.; Korhonen, E.; Hyttinen, J.M.T.; Roehrich, H.; Kaarniranta, K.; Ferrington, D.A.; Kauppinen, A. Antimycin A-Induced Mitochondrial Damage Causes Human RPE Cell Death despite Activation of Autophagy. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, 2019, 1583656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agilent Technologies, Inc. Agilent Seahorse XF Cell Mito Stress Test Kit (Product No. 103015-100) [Product Brochure]. Agilent Technologies. Available online: https://www.agilent.com.cn/zh-cn/product/cell-analysis/real-time-cell-metabolic-analysis/xf-assay-kits-reagents-cell-assay-media/seahorse-xf-cell-mito-stress-test-kit-740885 (accessed on 20 January 2026).
- Subasinghe, K.; Berry, R.; Rowe, M., III; Winters, A.; Yang, S.; Phillips, N. Mito Stress Assay of PBMCs With Seahorse XFe96 Flux Analyzer and Comparison of Poly-D-Lysine and Poly-L-Lysine for Cell Affinity. Bio-Protocol 2025, 15, e5327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, X.; Ma, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wan, Q. Measurement of mitochondrial respiration in adherent cells by Seahorse XF96 Cell Mito Stress Test. STAR Protoc. 2021, 2, 100245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Chang, Y.; Ye, N.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, N.; Sun, Y. Advanced glycation end products-induced mitochondrial energy metabolism dysfunction alters proliferation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Mol. Med. Rep. 2017, 15, 2673–2680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nannelli, G.; Terzuoli, E.; Giorgio, V.; Donnini, S.; Lupetti, P.; Giachetti, A.; Bernardi, P.; Ziche, M. ALDH2 Activity Reduces Mitochondrial Oxygen Reserve Capacity in Endothelial Cells and Induces Senescence Properties. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2018, 2018, 9765027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Domigan, C.K.; Warren, C.M.; Antanesian, V.; Happel, K.; Ziyad, S.; Lee, S.; Krall, A.; Duan, L.; Torres-Collado, A.X.; Castellani, L.W.; et al. Autocrine VEGF maintains endothelial survival through regulation of metabolism and autophagy. J. Cell Sci. 2015, 128, 2236–2248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]





Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Wang, J.; Jiao, Y.; Li, J.; Ma, Y.; Liu, C.; Yang, J. Optimizing the Seahorse XF Mito Stress Test Workflow and Troubleshooting Notes: A Stepwise Protocol for HUVECs. Metabolites 2026, 16, 99. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo16020099
Wang J, Jiao Y, Li J, Ma Y, Liu C, Yang J. Optimizing the Seahorse XF Mito Stress Test Workflow and Troubleshooting Notes: A Stepwise Protocol for HUVECs. Metabolites. 2026; 16(2):99. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo16020099
Chicago/Turabian StyleWang, Jingyi, Yue Jiao, Jingzhe Li, Yanyan Ma, Changzhen Liu, and Jing Yang. 2026. "Optimizing the Seahorse XF Mito Stress Test Workflow and Troubleshooting Notes: A Stepwise Protocol for HUVECs" Metabolites 16, no. 2: 99. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo16020099
APA StyleWang, J., Jiao, Y., Li, J., Ma, Y., Liu, C., & Yang, J. (2026). Optimizing the Seahorse XF Mito Stress Test Workflow and Troubleshooting Notes: A Stepwise Protocol for HUVECs. Metabolites, 16(2), 99. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo16020099

