Next Article in Journal
A Dual-Source RF Transmitter System Makes Broadband Matching of a Highly Reactive Antenna Feasible Without Non-Foster Elements
Next Article in Special Issue
Noise-Resilient Masked Face Detection Using Quantized DnCNN and YOLO
Previous Article in Journal
An Approach Based on Granular Computing and 2-Tuple Linguistic Model to Personalize Linguistic Information in Group Decision-Making
Previous Article in Special Issue
End-to-End Camera Pose Estimation with Camera Ray Token
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Hybrid Rule-Based Classification and Defect Detection System Using Insert Steel Multi-3D Matching

1
OceanlightAI. Co., Ltd., Daegu 41260, Republic of Korea
2
School of Electronics Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Electronics 2025, 14(23), 4701; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14234701
Submission received: 4 November 2025 / Revised: 21 November 2025 / Accepted: 24 November 2025 / Published: 28 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and 3D Display)

Abstract

This paper presents an integrated three-dimensional (3D) quality inspection system for mold manufacturing that addresses critical industrial constraints, including zero-shot generalization without retraining, complete decision traceability for regulatory compliance, and robustness under severe data shortages (<2% defect rate). Dual optical sensors (Photoneo MotionCam 3D and SICK Ruler) are integrated via affine transformation-based registration, followed by computer-aided design (CAD)-based classification using geometric feature matching to CAD specifications. Unsupervised defect detection combines density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN) clustering, curvature analysis, and alpha shape boundary estimation to identify surface anomalies without labeled training data. Industrial validation on 38 product classes (3000 samples) yielded 99.00% classification accuracy and 99.12% macroscopic precision, outperforming Point-MAE (93.24%) trained under the same limited-data conditions. The CAD-based architecture enables immediate deployment via CAD reference registration, eliminating the five-day retraining cycle required for deep learning, essential for agile manufacturing. Processing time stability (0.47 s compared to 43.68 s for Point-MAE) ensures predictable production throughput. Defect detection achieved 98.00% accuracy on a synthetic validation dataset (scratches: 97.25% F1; dents: 98.15% F1).
Keywords: industrial quality inspection; dual-sensor 3D scanning; CAD-based classification; zero-shot generalization; manufacturing deployment; mold-insert inspection; unsupervised defect detection; smart manufacturing systems industrial quality inspection; dual-sensor 3D scanning; CAD-based classification; zero-shot generalization; manufacturing deployment; mold-insert inspection; unsupervised defect detection; smart manufacturing systems

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kwon, S.W.; Park, H.G.; Baek, S.K.; Kim, M.Y. Hybrid Rule-Based Classification and Defect Detection System Using Insert Steel Multi-3D Matching. Electronics 2025, 14, 4701. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14234701

AMA Style

Kwon SW, Park HG, Baek SK, Kim MY. Hybrid Rule-Based Classification and Defect Detection System Using Insert Steel Multi-3D Matching. Electronics. 2025; 14(23):4701. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14234701

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kwon, Soon Woo, Hae Gwang Park, Seung Ki Baek, and Min Young Kim. 2025. "Hybrid Rule-Based Classification and Defect Detection System Using Insert Steel Multi-3D Matching" Electronics 14, no. 23: 4701. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14234701

APA Style

Kwon, S. W., Park, H. G., Baek, S. K., & Kim, M. Y. (2025). Hybrid Rule-Based Classification and Defect Detection System Using Insert Steel Multi-3D Matching. Electronics, 14(23), 4701. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14234701

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop