Next Article in Journal
Factors Affecting the Color Change of Monolithic Zirconia Ceramics: A Narrative Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Hydroxyapatite Dental Inserts for Tooth Restoration: Stress and Displacement Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Enhancing Bone Repair: Impact of Raloxifene-Functionalized Cerabone® on Rat Calvarial Defects
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Mechanical Surface Treatment on Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets to 3D Printed and Milled CAD/CAM Provisional Materials: An In Vitro Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Dental Implant Survival Rates: Comprehensive Insights from a Large-Scale Electronic Dental Registry

1
Department of Community Dentistry, Hebrew University-Hadassah School of Dental Medicine, Jerusalem 76841, Israel
2
Department of Periodontology, Hebrew University-Hadassah School of Dental Medicine, Jerusalem 91120, Israel
3
Research Unit Maccabi-Dent, Tel Aviv 6801298, Israel
4
Oral Medicine Unit, Sheba Medical Centre, Tel-Hashomer 5262000, Israel
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Funct. Biomater. 2025, 16(2), 60; https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb16020060
Submission received: 12 January 2025 / Revised: 3 February 2025 / Accepted: 6 February 2025 / Published: 11 February 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomechanical Studies and Biomaterials in Dentistry)

Abstract

Background: This descriptive study aimed to assess the survival rates and outcomes of dental implants in one of the four national HMOs in Israel. Data are provided for the period from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2022. Materials and Methods: This retrospective analysis utilized electronic medical records of patients who underwent dental implant placement during the specified period. Statistical analyses included chi-squared tests, Student’s t-tests, and generalized estimating equation (GEE) analyses to identify potential risk factors associated with early and late implant failures. Results: A total of 158,824 dental implants were placed in 53,874 patients. The overall implant failure rate was 2.21%, while the early failure rate during the osseointegration phase—before prosthetic reconstruction—was 1.56%. Significant associations with implant failure were observed for male patients (2.53% failure rate), implants in the maxillary molar region (3%), and the central incisor region (3.37%), approximately double the failure rates seen in other implant sites (p < 0.001). Conclusions: This extensive data analysis demonstrates a low overall failure rate for dental implants. The highest failure incidence occurred within the first year post-implantation, declining in subsequent years irrespective of rehabilitation status. Early failure risk factors differ based on various factors and should be carefully integrated into presurgical planning.
Keywords: dental implant; early failure; osseointegration; risk factors dental implant; early failure; osseointegration; risk factors

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tobias, G.; Chackartchi, T.; Haim, D.; Mann, J.; Findler, M. Dental Implant Survival Rates: Comprehensive Insights from a Large-Scale Electronic Dental Registry. J. Funct. Biomater. 2025, 16, 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb16020060

AMA Style

Tobias G, Chackartchi T, Haim D, Mann J, Findler M. Dental Implant Survival Rates: Comprehensive Insights from a Large-Scale Electronic Dental Registry. Journal of Functional Biomaterials. 2025; 16(2):60. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb16020060

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tobias, Guy, Tali Chackartchi, Doron Haim, Jonathan Mann, and Mordechai Findler. 2025. "Dental Implant Survival Rates: Comprehensive Insights from a Large-Scale Electronic Dental Registry" Journal of Functional Biomaterials 16, no. 2: 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb16020060

APA Style

Tobias, G., Chackartchi, T., Haim, D., Mann, J., & Findler, M. (2025). Dental Implant Survival Rates: Comprehensive Insights from a Large-Scale Electronic Dental Registry. Journal of Functional Biomaterials, 16(2), 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb16020060

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop