Genital Prolapse Surgery: What Options Do We Have in the Age of Mesh Issues?
1
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Witten-Herdecke, 41540 Dormagen, Germany
2
Rheinlandclinics Dormagen, 41540 Dormagen, Germany
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(2), 267; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020267
Received: 23 December 2020 / Revised: 8 January 2021 / Accepted: 11 January 2021 / Published: 13 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Minimally Invasive Surgery)
Here, we describe the current laparoscopic procedures for prolapse surgery and report data based on the application of these procedures. We also evaluate current approaches in vaginal prolapse surgery. Debates concerning the use of meshes have seriously affected vaginal surgery and threaten to influence reconstructive laparoscopic surgery as well. We describe the option of using autologous tissue in combination with the laparoscopic approach. Study data and problematic issues concerning the existing techniques are highlighted, and future options addressed.
View Full-Text
▼
Show Figures
Figure 1
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
MDPI and ACS Style
Noé, G.K. Genital Prolapse Surgery: What Options Do We Have in the Age of Mesh Issues? J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 267. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020267
AMA Style
Noé GK. Genital Prolapse Surgery: What Options Do We Have in the Age of Mesh Issues? Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021; 10(2):267. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020267
Chicago/Turabian StyleNoé, Guenter K. 2021. "Genital Prolapse Surgery: What Options Do We Have in the Age of Mesh Issues?" J. Clin. Med. 10, no. 2: 267. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020267
Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
Search more from Scilit
