Next Article in Journal
Serum Albumin Concentrations in Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Intercostal Catheters for Postoperative Pain Management in VATS Reduce Opioid Consumption
Previous Article in Journal
Head-to-Head Comparison of Rapid and Automated Antigen Detection Tests for the Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Infection
Previous Article in Special Issue
Implementation of Robotic Assistance in Pancreatic Surgery: Experiences from the First 101 Consecutive Cases
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Genital Prolapse Surgery: What Options Do We Have in the Age of Mesh Issues?

J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(2), 267; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020267
by Guenter K. Noé 1,2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(2), 267; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020267
Submission received: 23 December 2020 / Revised: 8 January 2021 / Accepted: 11 January 2021 / Published: 13 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Minimally Invasive Surgery)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The author performed a review of the literature and  summarised different surgical routes for  prolapse repair - especially taking into account the use of mesh . 

The topic is interesting and also important , but I have some comments 

  • Introduction : is adequate from the length but should be more structured and focus should be on different surgical routes with mesh or native tissue repair (mein advantages/disadvantages...) The reader should understand the importance and also difficulties of this topic.
  • Furthermore . I would suggest to mention indication for one or another surgical route (SKP, Lateral suspension, vag SSH...)- best way to correct posterior compartment , apex ...?
  • It is well known that pelvic floor surgery varies and no one fits all operations exist - the author should discuss or even mention that age, BMI, general health status, sexual activity, and so on also play a major role before surgeons decide which kind of pelvic floor surgery will be selected 
  • lack of evidence and heterogeneity should be discussed in more detail 
  • it should clearly be stated that this is a review of the literature - no own results or data are presented at the recent version
  • After revision and in case of acceptance this paper is suitable for the special issue " Clinical researches in urogynecology" as a review (of the literature= 

Author Response

Attached the answers to the reviewers

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

according to our knowledge some references as  surgical management of recurrences of multicompartements pelvic organe prolapse after failure of pops :initial report of the first six cases and outcomes at 2 years follow up and robotic sacrocolpopexy by damiani et all must be cited

however llops is not well described as all the procedures and tecniques as anly short described 

another point to analize are the failure and the recurrences and how to manage it

Author Response

attached the answers to the reviewers

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop