3.2. Computational Study of Antioxidant Activity
Initially, all secondary metabolite structures of the lichen
Pseudocyphellaria compar were optimized in the gas phase without imaginary frequencies, following the guidelines proposed by Kabanda et al. [
31]. Given that antioxidant activity assays are based on different mechanisms—Hydrogen Atom Transfer (HAT, ABTS
•+ and DPPH
• assays) and Single Electron Transfer (SET, FRAP assay) [
32], the behavior of the compounds was analyzed independently for each mechanism. The first step between the phenol moiety of the antioxidant and the oxidizing agent (ABTS
•+ and DPPH
• radicals) leads to the formation of a radical species capable of delocalizing the unpaired electron through resonance, which contributes to the stabilization of the generated radical [
33]. In this context, the relative energies of the different radicals that can be formed during this process were evaluated by considering compounds
VI–XI (
Tables S1–S5). The results showed that for all the compounds evaluated, the removal of the hydrogen atom from the aromatic –OH group that did not participate in an intramolecular hydrogen bridge was thermodynamically more favorable than the removal from an –OH group involved in such an interaction, in agreement with previous reports [
46], and is shown in
Figure 3 for the most active compounds
IX and
XI (for the other compounds, see
Figure S1). Likewise, it was observed that the overall process of transferring the hydrogen atom from the antioxidant to the oxidizing agent to form a stable intermediate is not very favorable, given the increase in the relative energy of all the structures evaluated, including that of the chromophores used in the antioxidant activity tests (
Figure S1) [
33].
Therefore, the electronic properties of the compounds were analyzed using a structure-property relationship model, following an approach similar to that reported previously [
32]. First, the electronic descriptors obtained from the calculations in the ground state were used as variables to evaluate the intrinsic reactivity of each free radical analyzed (ABTS
•+ and DPPH
•). The analysis revealed that the antioxidant activity exhibited by the metabolites in the ABTS
•+ assay showed a strong negative correlation with the overall electrophilicity index (ω, r = −0.983,
Figure 4), a parameter that describes the stabilization energy associated with the acceptance of a fraction of the electronic charge by a chemical species [
47]. This result suggests that in the reaction mechanism involved in the ABTS
•+ assay, the antioxidant efficiency is mainly determined by the compound’s ability to stabilize the radical formed in the first step of the process [
48].
Although both the ABTS
•+ and DPPH
• assays are based on a predominant HAT mechanism, the values obtained using both methods were not correlated (r = 0.244). This difference can be attributed to the energy disparity between the two radicals: the neutralization of ABTS
•+ requires approximately 2.6 times less energy than that required for DPPH
•, suggesting different sensitivities to the electronic characteristics of the antioxidant (
Figure S1). Considering these results, we evaluated whether the electronic descriptors calculated in the ground state were related to the activity measured using the DPPH
• assay. However, no significant correlation was observed (r
2 < 0.49), indicating that the reactivity in this assay is not governed by the electronic properties of the antioxidant in its neutral state.
Consequently, the relationship between the electronic descriptors of the possible radical species generated after hydrogen atom donation (
Figure S1) and the experimental activity was evaluated. This analysis revealed that the DPPH
• radical inhibition was inversely correlated with Pearson’s smoothness (r = −0.744, excluding compound
IX;
Figure 3).
This descriptor is associated with the ease of electronic reorganization during the charge transfer process during covalent bonding [
49]; that is, those with a lower electronic density distribution or reorganization capacity have higher activity. This suggests that the radicals derived from these compounds tend to retain a higher local electron density, favoring their reactivity with the DPPH
• radical.
In the FRAP assay, based on the SET mechanism, the linear relationship between different electronic descriptors and antioxidant activity, expressed in µmol of Trolox equivalents, was evaluated. Considering all the compounds analyzed, no significant correlation was observed between the variables (r
2 < 0.5). However, when the most active compound (
XI, FRAP = 116.07 µmol Trolox equivalents) was excluded from the analysis, a strong negative correlation emerged between the energy of the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and FRAP activity (r = –0.889) (
Figure 4).
This correlation indicates that for most of the metabolites analyzed, the antioxidant efficiency observed in the FRAP assay is associated with the ability of the molecule to donate electrons to the Fe(III)–TPTZ complex. From a molecular orbital perspective, efficient electron transfer requires adequate energy compatibility between the donor (HOMO) and acceptor (LUMO) molecular orbitals of the antioxidant and the complex (LUMO).
To visualize this process, the HOMO and LUMO orbitals of the most active (
IX) and least active (
X) compounds are represented, together with the orbitals involved in the reduction in the Fe(III)–TPTZ complex (
Figure S2). As an example of this mechanism, we analyzed the behavior of compound
XI, one of the most active compounds evaluated, as shown in
Figure 5. This figure shows that the LUMO of the Fe(III)–TPTZ complex becomes the HOMO of the reduced Fe (II)–TPTZ complex upon accepting an electron from the antioxidant, with an energy difference in |ΔE| = 0.2849 eV. When these values were compared with the energies of the orbitals of the metabolites evaluated, it was found that the most active compound (
IX) had a minimal energy difference between its ground-state HOMO and the HOMO of the radical formed (|ΔE| = 0.0022 eV), whereas in the least active compound (
X), this difference was significantly greater (|ΔE| = 0.2672 eV) (
Figure S2). This energy change does not affect the electronic distribution between the ground-state molecular orbitals and the formed radicals. Additionally, this disparity suggests that the efficiency of the SET process in the FRAP assay is strongly conditioned by the energy proximity between the donor orbitals of the metabolites and the acceptor orbitals of the ferric complex, which would explain the low activity observed for compound
X.
3.3. Antibacterial Properties
In this study, the antibacterial activity of six compounds was evaluated against four representative human pathogens: two Gram-positive bacteria (
Staphylococcus aureus and
Streptococcus pyogenes) and two Gram-negative bacteria (
Escherichia coli and
Salmonella typhi).
Table 2 presents the mean diameters of the growth inhibition zones (in mm) for each strain. These values reflect the efficacy of each compound in inhibiting bacterial growth, with larger inhibition zones indicating stronger antibacterial activity.
As shown in
Table 2, compounds
VII,
VIII,
IX, and
XI were selected based on the diameters of the growth inhibition zones in the agar disk diffusion test, and the MIC was determined using a standard microdilution technique. The three lichen metabolites elicited antibacterial properties, and the non-lichen monomer,
XI.
As shown by the MIC values in
Table 3, the results obtained for
S. pyogenes are particularly noteworthy. This bacterium is a common human pathogen implicated in a spectrum of diseases ranging from mild infections, such as pharyngitis and impetigo, to life-threatening conditions, including necrotizing fasciitis, sepsis, and toxic shock syndrome [
50]. The increasing resistance of
S. pyogenes to multiple antibiotic classes, particularly macrolides and lincosamides, underscores the need to identify alternative therapeutic agents. Resistance to erythromycin, clindamycin, and tetracycline have been reported in several strains, raising clinical concerns. Although penicillin remains the first-line treatment, the emergence of resistance to other antibiotics highlights the need for continued surveillance and novel antimicrobial strategies targeting this pathogen [
51].
3.6. Calculated Physicochemical and ADME Properties
Drug-like properties, such as pharmacokinetic (ADME) and pharmacodynamic (e.g., toxicological) profiles, are important during drug discovery and development. These properties demonstrate the optimization of a leading compound as a successful candidate in the preclinical stages [
58]. ADMET properties are important for determining chemical descriptors, such as the polar surface area (PSA) and molecular weight (MW) of molecules, which are useful for determining the oral absorption of drugs. Small hydrophilic molecules undergo rapid renal clearance, whereas large hydrophobic compounds undergo extensive hepatic metabolism and poor absorption [
59]. Therefore, finding a suitable hydrophilic-hydrophobic drug balance is a significant challenge for medicinal chemists. Thus, to evaluate these properties and predict good oral bioavailability, two sets of rules, Lipinski and Veber, should be followed for a good prediction [
60]. Lipinski’s rule of five states that an orally bioavailable molecule should not violate the following criteria: ≤5 hydrogen bond donors (HBD), ≤10 hydrogen bond acceptors (HBA), MW < 500, and log
p-value < 5. In contrast, Veber et al. described the role of PSA and the number of rotatable bonds as criteria for estimating oral bioavailability. Veber’s rule states that a compound that is orally bioavailable should have either a PSA ≤ 140 Å and ≤10 rotatable bonds (NRB) or ≤12 HBD and HBA in total and ≤10 rotatable bonds. As shown in
Table 7, physciosporin
IX achieved the drug-likeness criteria described by Lipinski and Veber; therefore, they are expected to have good oral bioavailability. In addition, from SwissADME (
http://www.swissadme.ch/index.php, accessed on 17 May 2025), the bioavailability radar chart showed that
IX is in the desired range (pink region) of five parameters from the six parameters used for oral absorption prediction: FLEX (flexibility), LIPO (lipophilicity), INSOLU (solubility), SIZE, and POLAR (polarity), while they are in the undesirable area of INSATU (saturation) (
Figure 10), confirming their good oral bioavailability.