Review Reports

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The problem is timely and interesting. I recommend the publication of the manuscript after the following revisions are properly made:

 

Comment No. 1: Initially, I encourage the authors to review the abstract in order to make it more creative, thereby piquing the interest of future readers. Additionally, it would be beneficial to provide a preview of the main results achieved in the paper.

 

Comment No. 2: English of the paper should be polished carefully.

 

Comment No. 3: What is author own contribution what is focus of the study and motivation.

 

Comment No. 4: Authors are encouraged to discuss the possibility to use functionally graded materials by discussing the following works: [(a) - Tounsi et al. (2023), “Free vibration investigation of functionally graded plates with temperature-dependent properties resting on a viscoelastic foundation”, Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 86(1), 1-16.; (b) - Tounsi et al. (2023), “An integral quasi-3D computational model for the hygro-thermal wave propagation of imperfect FGM sandwich plates”, Computers and Concrete, 32(1), 61-74.].

Comment No. 5: Figs.7 and 8 should be more discussed.

Comment No. 6: I would encourage the authors to review the conclusion by introducing the main quantitative results presented in the paper. 

The Quality of English is good.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper presents an analysis of measurement uncertainty using the linear-scanning sewing method for the measurable dimension of small cylinders.

In order to verify the credibility, the authors proposed methods of linear seam scanning for measuring the roundness of small cylindrical objects and carried out uncertainty measurements for objects of various dimensions.

The success of the authors is the use of the linear scanning method for measuring small cylindrical holes and examining the measurement uncertainty.

the workpiece is divided

To sum up, it should be said that this is not a typical scientific article, but rather a case study that has its own significant scientific value solving a specific problem.

The paper presents an analysis of the scientific literature, which should be extended.

The value of this analysis will increase after supplementing the review with literature showing technical challenges showing research and practical applications of measurement techniques:

https://doi.org/10.24425/118164

https://doi.org/10.1515/msr-2016-0031

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-017-0058-8

https://doi.org/10.3390/s22082977 

https://doi.org/10.3390/s20123478

1The conclusions of the research are correct, but the conclusions should refer to the authors' achievements in the field of research considered, but the lack of their specific demonstration. The first part of the conclusions from line 349 to 363 is more suitable for the description of the research carried out than for conclusions. There is no indication of directions for further, in-depth research for the future and no limitations of the conducted research and the method used.

The work needs improvement as it cannot be accepted in its current form.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

I thank the authors for taking into account my corrections and suggestions. The quality of work has been improved.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx