Next Article in Journal
Why and How Women in Business Can Make Innovations in Light of the Sustainable Development Goals
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Universities in Sustainability-Oriented Competencies Development: Insights from an Empirical Study on Polish Universities
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluation of Consumers’ WTP for Service Recovery in Restaurants: Waiting Time Perspective

1
Department of Tourism, Food and Beverage Management, Chang Jung Christian University, Tainan City 71101, Taiwan
2
Business School, Yulin Normal University, Yulin 537000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Adm. Sci. 2019, 9(3), 63; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci9030063
Submission received: 15 June 2019 / Revised: 25 July 2019 / Accepted: 21 August 2019 / Published: 23 August 2019

Abstract

Restaurant service quality assessment has generally focused on the dining service. However, restaurant service begins with waiting for the meal. When service failure occurs due to a long waiting time, restaurant managers should adopt appropriate service recovery measures to retain consumers and reduce loss. This approach would allow them to mitigate customer dissatisfaction and negative impressions. In this study, we explore the importance of pre-processing service in the context of possible restaurant service crises and construct a restaurant service recovery model for willingness to pay (WTP) through the contingent valuation method (CVM) to measure the effects before and after implementing service recovery. Overall, several psychological and tangible service recovery measures are provided to enhance people’s willingness to extend their waiting time. Within our study group, relatively young participants showed a high willingness to extend their waiting time. Furthermore, the opportunity cost of high-income people in the waiting process was relatively high. Compared with psychological service recovery programs, our results show that tangible service recovery programs prompt respondents to wait for an additional ~10 min. This paper offers support for restaurant managers to manage consumer relationships.
Keywords: waiting time; service recovery; contingent valuation method (CVM) waiting time; service recovery; contingent valuation method (CVM)

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ting, C.-T.; Huang, Y.-S.; Lin, C.-T.; Pan, S.-C. Evaluation of Consumers’ WTP for Service Recovery in Restaurants: Waiting Time Perspective. Adm. Sci. 2019, 9, 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci9030063

AMA Style

Ting C-T, Huang Y-S, Lin C-T, Pan S-C. Evaluation of Consumers’ WTP for Service Recovery in Restaurants: Waiting Time Perspective. Administrative Sciences. 2019; 9(3):63. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci9030063

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ting, Chung-Te, Yu-Sheng Huang, Cheng-Te Lin, and Szu-Chin Pan. 2019. "Evaluation of Consumers’ WTP for Service Recovery in Restaurants: Waiting Time Perspective" Administrative Sciences 9, no. 3: 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci9030063

APA Style

Ting, C.-T., Huang, Y.-S., Lin, C.-T., & Pan, S.-C. (2019). Evaluation of Consumers’ WTP for Service Recovery in Restaurants: Waiting Time Perspective. Administrative Sciences, 9(3), 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci9030063

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop