Skip to Content
You are currently on the new version of our website. Access the old version .
EnvironmentsEnvironments
  • Correction
  • Open Access

5 February 2026

Correction: Ittipong et al. Soil Moisture and Growth Rates During Peak Yield Accumulation of Cassava Genotypes for Drought and Full Irrigation Conditions. Environments 2025, 12, 420

,
,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
2
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
3
Plant Breeding Research Center for Sustainable Agriculture, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
4
Faculty of Science and Health Technology, Kalasin University, Kalasin 46000, Thailand

1. Error in Table

In the original publication [1], an error occurred in Table 5. The corrected version of Table 5 is provided below.
Table 5. Total dry weight, storage root dry weight, starch yield, and harvest index at 360 days after planting (DAP) of six cassava genotypes under two water regimes in the 2022/2023 and 2023/2024 growing seasons.

2. Error in Figure

In the original publication, an error occurred in Figures 4 and 5. The corrected versions of Figure 4 and Figure 5 are provided below.
Figure 4. A correlation matrix of growth rates (RGR = relative growth rate, LGR = leaf growth rate, SRGR = storage root growth rate, CGR = crop growth rate, and SGR = stem growth rate) and final yield (total dry weight, storage root dry weight, starch yield, and harvest index) at 360 days after planting (DAP) of six cassava genotypes grown under irrigation treatment across the 2022/2023 and 2023/2024 growing seasons (n = 48).
Figure 5. A correlation matrix of growth rates (SRGR = storage root growth rate, LGR = leaf growth rate, SGR = stem growth rate, CGR = crop growth rate, and RGR = relative growth rate) and final yield (total dry weight, storage root dry weight, starch yield, and harvest index) at 360 days after planting (DAP) of six cassava genotypes grown under drought treatment across the 2022/2023 and 2023/2024 growing seasons (n = 48).

3. Text Correction

There were some errors in the original publication.
  • In the Abstract, the phrase “and starch yield” should be deleted and please replace the phrase “with SRGR and starch yield reduced by 26.4% and 9.5%, respectively” with “with SRGR and starch yield reduced by 16.9% and 7.4%.”
  • In the Materials and Methods (Section 2.2., Equation (6)), please replace the word “storage root dry weight” with “storage root fresh weight”.
  • In the Results (Section 3.4., paragraph 1), please replace the word “four metrics” with “three metrics”, replace the phrase “four crop characteristics” with “three crop characteristics”. The phrase “, and starch yield (5.28 t ha–1; p ≤ 0.01)”, “, and starch yield (6.00 t ha–1; p ≤ 0.01)”, “, and starch yield (p ≤ 0.05)”, “, and starch yield (3.87 t ha–1)” should be deleted.
  • In the Results (Section 3.4., paragraph 2) and Conclusions, please replace the value “6.66 t ha–1” with “13.13 t ha–1”.
  • In the Results (Section 3.5., paragraph 1), please replace the phrase “a negative correlation was observed between starch yield and LGR during 270–360 DAP (r = −0.50, p ≤ 0.01).” with “a negative correlation was observed between starch yield and LGR during 270–360 DAP (r = −0.66, p ≤ 0.01)”.
  • In the Discussion (paragraph 1), the phrase “, and starch yield” should be deleted.
  • In the Discussion (paragraph 3), the phrase “and starch yield” should be deleted.
  • In the Discussion (paragraph 4), please replace the phrase “Despite yield reductions of –47.2% (storage root dry weight) and –25.9% (starch yield) in 2022/2023, and –73.6% for both traits in 2023/2024” with “Despite yield reductions of –46.1% (storage root dry weight) and –2.3% (starch yield) in 2022/2023, and reductions of –95.9% and –91.4% for storage root dry weight and starch yield, respectively, in 2023/2024”. The phrase “or starch yield,” should be deleted.
  • In the Conclusions, the phrase “, and 6.00 t ha–1 for starch yield”, “and starch yield” should be deleted and please replace the phrase “starch yield (6.85 and 5.95 t ha−1, respectively)” with “starch yield (15.10 and 13.97 t ha−1, respectively)”.

Reference

  1. Ittipong, P.; Santanoo, S.; Vorasoot, N.; Jogloy, S.; Vongcharoen, K.; Theerakulpisut, P.; Lawson, T.; Banterng, P. Soil Moisture and Growth Rates During Peak Yield Accumulation of Cassava Genotypes for Drought and Full Irrigation Conditions. Environments 2025, 12, 420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.