Next Article in Journal
Parameterization for EROSION-3D Model under Simulated Rainfall Conditions in Lower Shivaliks of India
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular Effects of Inorganic and Methyl Mercury in Aquatic Primary Producers: Comparing Impact to A Macrophyte and A Green Microalga in Controlled Conditions
Open AccessTechnical Note

Characterization of Vegetation Physiognomic Types Using Bidirectional Reflectance Data

Department of Informatics, Tokyo University of Information Sciences, 4-1 Onaridai, Wakaba-ku, Chiba 265-8501, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Geosciences 2018, 8(11), 394; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8110394
Received: 6 September 2018 / Revised: 18 October 2018 / Accepted: 26 October 2018 / Published: 29 October 2018
This paper presents an assessment of the bidirectional reflectance features for the classification and characterization of vegetation physiognomic types at a national scale. The bidirectional reflectance data at multiple illumination and viewing geometries were generated by simulating the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Bidirectional Reflectance Distribution Function (BRDF) model parameters with Ross-Thick Li-Sparse-Reciprocal (RT-LSR) kernel weights. This research dealt with the classification and characterization of six vegetation physiognomic types—evergreen coniferous forest, evergreen broadleaf forest, deciduous coniferous forest, deciduous broadleaf forest, shrubs, and herbaceous—which are distributed all over the country. The supervised classification approach was used by employing four machine learning classifiers—k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Random Forests (RF), Support Vector Machines (SVM), and Multilayer Perceptron Neural Networks (NN)—with the support of ground truth data. The confusion matrix, overall accuracy, and kappa coefficient were calculated through a 10-fold cross-validation approach, and were also used as the metrics for quantitative evaluation. Among the classifiers tested, the accuracy metrics did not vary much with the classifiers; however, the Random Forests (RF; Overall accuracy = 0.76, Kappa coefficient = 0.72) and Support Vector Machines (SVM; Overall accuracy = 0.76, Kappa coefficient = 0.71) classifiers performed slightly better than other classifiers. The bidirectional reflectance spectra did not only vary with the vegetation physiognomic types, it also showed a pronounced difference between the backward and forward scattering directions. Thus, the bidirectional reflectance data provides additional features for improving the classification and characterization of vegetation physiognomic types at the broad scale. View Full-Text
Keywords: vegetation; physiognomy; machine learning; cross-validation; bidirectional reflectance vegetation; physiognomy; machine learning; cross-validation; bidirectional reflectance
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Sharma, R.C.; Hara, K. Characterization of Vegetation Physiognomic Types Using Bidirectional Reflectance Data. Geosciences 2018, 8, 394.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop