You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Animals
  • Correction
  • Open Access

9 December 2020

Correction: Jansen, S., et al. Relationship between Bone Stability and Egg Production in Genetically Divergent Chicken Layer Lines. Animals 2020, 10, 850

,
,
,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Institute of Farm Animal Genetics, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, 31535 Neustadt, Germany
2
Institute of Animal Nutrition, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany
3
Livestock Center of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 85764 Oberschleissheim, Germany
4
Animal Breeding and Genetics Group, Department of Animal Sciences, University of Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
This article belongs to the Section Poultry
The authors wish to make the following corrections to this paper [1]:
The body weight given as the weight of the 35th week of age is in fact the weight of the 49th week of age. However, the data presented are correct and the changes do not alter their interpretation.

Main Body Paragraphs Correction

There was an error in the original article. On page 4, Section 2.3. Experimental Procedure, 1st paragraph, the sentence:
“Body weight (g) was measured at hatch and during the experimental period (at week 21, 25, 35 and 69) using a digital table scale (CPA 16001S, Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany) with a weighing accuracy of 0.1 g.”
should be
“Body weight (g) was measured at hatch and during the experimental period (at week 21, 25, 49 and 69) using a digital table scale (CPA 16001S, Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany) with a weighing accuracy of 0.1 g.”

Figures/Tables Correction

Due to the mistake mentioned above, we need to make the following changes to figures and tables:
Replace Figure 1:
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the experimental setup (A) and related data collection (B). In two consecutive generations, four chicken layer lines were allocated to a diet containing either 300 or 3000 IU of vitamin D3. During the experimental period, data on egg number, egg quality, feed consumption, and body weight were collected as indicated. Post mortem, bone morphometry, bone mineral density, and bone breaking strength were assessed.
With new Figure 1 below:
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the experimental setup (A) and related data collection (B). In two consecutive generations, four chicken layer lines were allocated to a diet containing either 300 or 3000 IU of vitamin D3. During the experimental period, data on egg number, egg quality, feed consumption, and body weight were collected as indicated. Post mortem, bone morphometry, bone mineral density, and bone breaking strength were assessed.

Change in Supplementary File

Replace Table S5:
Table S5. Sample sizes for the analysis.
Table S5. Sample sizes for the analysis.
VariableTotalLayer Line
WLAR11BLAL68
Laying maturity524129134133128
Total number of eggs524129134133128
Egg weight524129134133128
Eggshell weight524129134133128
Eggshell proportion524129134133128
Total eggshell production524129134133128
Daily feed consumption513128131129125
Feed-to-egg-conversion rate513128131129125
Feed-to-eggshell conversion rate513128131129125
Bone breaking strength Tibiotarsus518126134131127
Bone mineral density Tibiotarsus524129134133128
Weight Tibiotarsus524129134133128
Length Tibiotarsus524129134133128
Thickness Tibiotarsus524129134133128
Bone breaking strength Humerus516128131132125
Bone mineral density Humerus519129134128128
Weight Humerus521127134132128
Length Humerus523129134132128
Thickness Humerus523129134132128
Body weight at hatch523129133133128
Body weight at week 21524129134133128
Body weight at week 25524129134133128
Body weight at week 35524129134133128
Body weight at week 69524129134133128
With new Table S5:
Table S5. Sample sizes for the analysis.
Table S5. Sample sizes for the analysis.
VariableTotalLayer Line
WLAR11BLAL68
Laying maturity524129134133128
Total number of eggs524129134133128
Egg weight524129134133128
Eggshell weight524129134133128
Eggshell proportion524129134133128
Total eggshell production524129134133128
Daily feed consumption513128131129125
Feed-to-egg-conversion rate513128131129125
Feed-to-eggshell conversion rate513128131129125
Bone breaking strength Tibiotarsus518126134131127
Bone mineral density Tibiotarsus524129134133128
Weight Tibiotarsus524129134133128
Length Tibiotarsus524129134133128
Thickness Tibiotarsus524129134133128
Bone breaking strength Humerus516128131132125
Bone mineral density Humerus519129134128128
Weight Humerus521127134132128
Length Humerus523129134132128
Thickness Humerus523129134132128
Body weight at hatch523129133133128
Body weight at week 21524129134133128
Body weight at week 25524129134133128
Body weight at week 49524129134133128
Body weight at week 69524129134133128
And replace Table S6:
Table S6. Least squares means ± standard errors and level of significance for body weight measured at hatching, and different weeks of age under the effect of layer line (LL), generation (Gen), and their interaction.
Table S6. Least squares means ± standard errors and level of significance for body weight measured at hatching, and different weeks of age under the effect of layer line (LL), generation (Gen), and their interaction.
EffectBody Weight (g)
HatchWeek 21Week 25Week 35Week 69
Layer line (LL)
WLA38.35 ± 0.37 a1420.02 ± 15.79 b1468.38 ± 16.19 b1497.54 ± 20.46 b1504.23 ± 22.26 c
R1133.17 ± 0.36 c1040.84 ± 15.60 c1236.40 ± 15.99 c1309.28 ± 20.21 c1362.79 ± 21.99 d
BLA39.35 ± 0.37 a1584.15 ± 15.71 a1663.55 ± 16.11 a1821.81 ± 20.34 a1838.10 ± 22.13 b
L6834.84 ± 0.37 b1568.91 ± 15.81 a1714.92 ± 16.21 a1837.91 ± 20.48 a1923.44 ± 22.29 a
Generation (Gen)
Gen 135.86 ± 0.261379.01 ± 11.171485.67 ± 11.451567.49 ± 14.471616.21 ± 15.76
Gen 237.00 ± 0.261427.95 ± 11.071555.96 ± 11.361665.79 ± 14.341698.07 ± 15.59
LL × Gen
WLA × Gen137.77 ± 0.521376.72 ± 22.361415.84 ± 22.911460.33 ± 28.961443.48 ± 31.51
WLA × Gen238.93 ± 0.521463.31 ± 22.321520.93 ± 22.881534.75 ± 28.911564.98 ± 31.45
R11 × Gen132.64 ± 0.511027.33 ± 21.991222.77 ± 22.531284.20 ± 28.491338.12 ± 31.02
R11 × Gen233.69 ± 0.521054.36 ± 22.141250.04 ± 22.711334.37 ± 28.661387.45 ± 31.17
BLA × Gen138.84 ± 0.521549.66 ± 22.411627.91 ± 22.971767.90 ± 29.031804.33 ± 31.60
BLA × Gen239.87 ± 0.511618.63 ± 22.021699.19 ± 22.591875.73 ± 28.501871.86 ± 30.98
L68 × Gen134.18 ± 0.521562.32 ± 22.611676.16 ± 23.161757.53 ± 29.311878.89 ± 31.92
L68 × Gen235.51 ± 0.511575.50 ± 22.111753.67 ± 22.681918.30 ± 28.621968.00 ± 31.12
ANOVA significance level (p value)
Layer lineGenerationLL × Gen
Hatch<0.00010.00190.9908
Week 21<0.00010.00200.3097
Week 25<0.0001<0.00010.3907
Week 35<0.0001<0.00010.2486
Week 690.0003<0.00010.6892
Means within a column with different letters differ significantly (Tukey’s HSD-Test, p < 0.05).
With new Table S6:
Table S6. Least squares means ± standard errors and level of significance for body weight measured at hatching, and different weeks of age under the effect of layer line (LL), generation (Gen), and their interaction.
Table S6. Least squares means ± standard errors and level of significance for body weight measured at hatching, and different weeks of age under the effect of layer line (LL), generation (Gen), and their interaction.
EffectBody Weight (g)
HatchWeek 21Week 25Week 49Week 69
Layer line (LL)
WLA38.35 ± 0.37 a1420.02 ± 15.79 b1468.38 ± 16.19 b1497.54 ± 20.46 b1504.23 ± 22.26 c
R1133.17 ± 0.36 c1040.84 ± 15.60 c1236.40 ± 15.99 c1309.28 ± 20.21 c1362.79 ± 21.99 d
BLA39.35 ± 0.37 a1584.15 ± 15.71 a1663.55 ± 16.11 a1821.81 ± 20.34 a1838.10 ± 22.13 b
L6834.84 ± 0.37 b1568.91 ± 15.81 a1714.92 ± 16.21 a1837.91 ± 20.48 a1923.44 ± 22.29 a
Generation (Gen)
Gen 135.86 ± 0.261379.01 ± 11.171485.67 ± 11.451567.49 ± 14.471616.21 ± 15.76
Gen 237.00 ± 0.261427.95 ± 11.071555.96 ± 11.361665.79 ± 14.341698.07 ± 15.59
LL × Gen
WLA × Gen137.77 ± 0.521376.72 ± 22.361415.84 ± 22.911460.33 ± 28.961443.48 ± 31.51
WLA × Gen238.93 ± 0.521463.31 ± 22.321520.93 ± 22.881534.75 ± 28.911564.98 ± 31.45
R11 × Gen132.64 ± 0.511027.33 ± 21.991222.77 ± 22.531284.20 ± 28.491338.12 ± 31.02
R11 × Gen233.69 ± 0.521054.36 ± 22.141250.04 ± 22.711334.37 ± 28.661387.45 ± 31.17
BLA × Gen138.84 ± 0.521549.66 ± 22.411627.91 ± 22.971767.90 ± 29.031804.33 ± 31.60
BLA × Gen239.87 ± 0.511618.63 ± 22.021699.19 ± 22.591875.73 ± 28.501871.86 ± 30.98
L68 × Gen134.18 ± 0.521562.32 ± 22.611676.16 ± 23.161757.53 ± 29.311878.89 ± 31.92
L68 × Gen235.51 ± 0.511575.50 ± 22.111753.67 ± 22.681918.30 ± 28.621968.00 ± 31.12
ANOVA significance level (p value)
Layer lineGenerationLL × Gen
Hatch<0.00010.00190.9908
Week 21<0.00010.00200.3097
Week 25<0.0001<0.00010.3907
Week 49<0.0001<0.00010.2486
Week 690.0003<0.00010.6892
Means within a column with different letters differ significantly (Tukey’s HSD-Test, p < 0.05).
The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused to the readers by these changes.

Reference

  1. Jansen, S.; Baulain, U.; Habig, C.; Weigend, A.; Halle, I.; Scholz, A.M.; Simianer, H.; Sharifi, A.R.; Weigend, S. Relationship between Bone Stability and Egg Production in Genetically Divergent Chicken Layer Lines. Animals 2020, 10, 850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.