The authors wish to make the following corrections to this paper [1]:
The body weight given as the weight of the 35th week of age is in fact the weight of the 49th week of age. However, the data presented are correct and the changes do not alter their interpretation.
Main Body Paragraphs Correction
There was an error in the original article. On page 4, Section 2.3. Experimental Procedure, 1st paragraph, the sentence:
“Body weight (g) was measured at hatch and during the experimental period (at week 21, 25, 35 and 69) using a digital table scale (CPA 16001S, Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany) with a weighing accuracy of 0.1 g.”
should be
“Body weight (g) was measured at hatch and during the experimental period (at week 21, 25, 49 and 69) using a digital table scale (CPA 16001S, Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany) with a weighing accuracy of 0.1 g.”
Figures/Tables Correction
Due to the mistake mentioned above, we need to make the following changes to figures and tables:
Replace Figure 1:
Figure 1.
Schematic illustration of the experimental setup (A) and related data collection (B). In two consecutive generations, four chicken layer lines were allocated to a diet containing either 300 or 3000 IU of vitamin D3. During the experimental period, data on egg number, egg quality, feed consumption, and body weight were collected as indicated. Post mortem, bone morphometry, bone mineral density, and bone breaking strength were assessed.
With new Figure 1 below:
Figure 1.
Schematic illustration of the experimental setup (A) and related data collection (B). In two consecutive generations, four chicken layer lines were allocated to a diet containing either 300 or 3000 IU of vitamin D3. During the experimental period, data on egg number, egg quality, feed consumption, and body weight were collected as indicated. Post mortem, bone morphometry, bone mineral density, and bone breaking strength were assessed.
Change in Supplementary File
Replace Table S5:
Table S5.
Sample sizes for the analysis.
Table S5.
Sample sizes for the analysis.
| Variable | Total | Layer Line | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WLA | R11 | BLA | L68 | ||
| Laying maturity | 524 | 129 | 134 | 133 | 128 |
| Total number of eggs | 524 | 129 | 134 | 133 | 128 |
| Egg weight | 524 | 129 | 134 | 133 | 128 |
| Eggshell weight | 524 | 129 | 134 | 133 | 128 |
| Eggshell proportion | 524 | 129 | 134 | 133 | 128 |
| Total eggshell production | 524 | 129 | 134 | 133 | 128 |
| Daily feed consumption | 513 | 128 | 131 | 129 | 125 |
| Feed-to-egg-conversion rate | 513 | 128 | 131 | 129 | 125 |
| Feed-to-eggshell conversion rate | 513 | 128 | 131 | 129 | 125 |
| Bone breaking strength Tibiotarsus | 518 | 126 | 134 | 131 | 127 |
| Bone mineral density Tibiotarsus | 524 | 129 | 134 | 133 | 128 |
| Weight Tibiotarsus | 524 | 129 | 134 | 133 | 128 |
| Length Tibiotarsus | 524 | 129 | 134 | 133 | 128 |
| Thickness Tibiotarsus | 524 | 129 | 134 | 133 | 128 |
| Bone breaking strength Humerus | 516 | 128 | 131 | 132 | 125 |
| Bone mineral density Humerus | 519 | 129 | 134 | 128 | 128 |
| Weight Humerus | 521 | 127 | 134 | 132 | 128 |
| Length Humerus | 523 | 129 | 134 | 132 | 128 |
| Thickness Humerus | 523 | 129 | 134 | 132 | 128 |
| Body weight at hatch | 523 | 129 | 133 | 133 | 128 |
| Body weight at week 21 | 524 | 129 | 134 | 133 | 128 |
| Body weight at week 25 | 524 | 129 | 134 | 133 | 128 |
| Body weight at week 35 | 524 | 129 | 134 | 133 | 128 |
| Body weight at week 69 | 524 | 129 | 134 | 133 | 128 |
With new Table S5:
Table S5.
Sample sizes for the analysis.
Table S5.
Sample sizes for the analysis.
| Variable | Total | Layer Line | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WLA | R11 | BLA | L68 | ||
| Laying maturity | 524 | 129 | 134 | 133 | 128 |
| Total number of eggs | 524 | 129 | 134 | 133 | 128 |
| Egg weight | 524 | 129 | 134 | 133 | 128 |
| Eggshell weight | 524 | 129 | 134 | 133 | 128 |
| Eggshell proportion | 524 | 129 | 134 | 133 | 128 |
| Total eggshell production | 524 | 129 | 134 | 133 | 128 |
| Daily feed consumption | 513 | 128 | 131 | 129 | 125 |
| Feed-to-egg-conversion rate | 513 | 128 | 131 | 129 | 125 |
| Feed-to-eggshell conversion rate | 513 | 128 | 131 | 129 | 125 |
| Bone breaking strength Tibiotarsus | 518 | 126 | 134 | 131 | 127 |
| Bone mineral density Tibiotarsus | 524 | 129 | 134 | 133 | 128 |
| Weight Tibiotarsus | 524 | 129 | 134 | 133 | 128 |
| Length Tibiotarsus | 524 | 129 | 134 | 133 | 128 |
| Thickness Tibiotarsus | 524 | 129 | 134 | 133 | 128 |
| Bone breaking strength Humerus | 516 | 128 | 131 | 132 | 125 |
| Bone mineral density Humerus | 519 | 129 | 134 | 128 | 128 |
| Weight Humerus | 521 | 127 | 134 | 132 | 128 |
| Length Humerus | 523 | 129 | 134 | 132 | 128 |
| Thickness Humerus | 523 | 129 | 134 | 132 | 128 |
| Body weight at hatch | 523 | 129 | 133 | 133 | 128 |
| Body weight at week 21 | 524 | 129 | 134 | 133 | 128 |
| Body weight at week 25 | 524 | 129 | 134 | 133 | 128 |
| Body weight at week 49 | 524 | 129 | 134 | 133 | 128 |
| Body weight at week 69 | 524 | 129 | 134 | 133 | 128 |
And replace Table S6:
Table S6.
Least squares means ± standard errors and level of significance for body weight measured at hatching, and different weeks of age under the effect of layer line (LL), generation (Gen), and their interaction.
Table S6.
Least squares means ± standard errors and level of significance for body weight measured at hatching, and different weeks of age under the effect of layer line (LL), generation (Gen), and their interaction.
| Effect | Body Weight (g) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hatch | Week 21 | Week 25 | Week 35 | Week 69 | |||
| Layer line (LL) | |||||||
| WLA | 38.35 ± 0.37 a | 1420.02 ± 15.79 b | 1468.38 ± 16.19 b | 1497.54 ± 20.46 b | 1504.23 ± 22.26 c | ||
| R11 | 33.17 ± 0.36 c | 1040.84 ± 15.60 c | 1236.40 ± 15.99 c | 1309.28 ± 20.21 c | 1362.79 ± 21.99 d | ||
| BLA | 39.35 ± 0.37 a | 1584.15 ± 15.71 a | 1663.55 ± 16.11 a | 1821.81 ± 20.34 a | 1838.10 ± 22.13 b | ||
| L68 | 34.84 ± 0.37 b | 1568.91 ± 15.81 a | 1714.92 ± 16.21 a | 1837.91 ± 20.48 a | 1923.44 ± 22.29 a | ||
| Generation (Gen) | |||||||
| Gen 1 | 35.86 ± 0.26 | 1379.01 ± 11.17 | 1485.67 ± 11.45 | 1567.49 ± 14.47 | 1616.21 ± 15.76 | ||
| Gen 2 | 37.00 ± 0.26 | 1427.95 ± 11.07 | 1555.96 ± 11.36 | 1665.79 ± 14.34 | 1698.07 ± 15.59 | ||
| LL × Gen | |||||||
| WLA × Gen1 | 37.77 ± 0.52 | 1376.72 ± 22.36 | 1415.84 ± 22.91 | 1460.33 ± 28.96 | 1443.48 ± 31.51 | ||
| WLA × Gen2 | 38.93 ± 0.52 | 1463.31 ± 22.32 | 1520.93 ± 22.88 | 1534.75 ± 28.91 | 1564.98 ± 31.45 | ||
| R11 × Gen1 | 32.64 ± 0.51 | 1027.33 ± 21.99 | 1222.77 ± 22.53 | 1284.20 ± 28.49 | 1338.12 ± 31.02 | ||
| R11 × Gen2 | 33.69 ± 0.52 | 1054.36 ± 22.14 | 1250.04 ± 22.71 | 1334.37 ± 28.66 | 1387.45 ± 31.17 | ||
| BLA × Gen1 | 38.84 ± 0.52 | 1549.66 ± 22.41 | 1627.91 ± 22.97 | 1767.90 ± 29.03 | 1804.33 ± 31.60 | ||
| BLA × Gen2 | 39.87 ± 0.51 | 1618.63 ± 22.02 | 1699.19 ± 22.59 | 1875.73 ± 28.50 | 1871.86 ± 30.98 | ||
| L68 × Gen1 | 34.18 ± 0.52 | 1562.32 ± 22.61 | 1676.16 ± 23.16 | 1757.53 ± 29.31 | 1878.89 ± 31.92 | ||
| L68 × Gen2 | 35.51 ± 0.51 | 1575.50 ± 22.11 | 1753.67 ± 22.68 | 1918.30 ± 28.62 | 1968.00 ± 31.12 | ||
| ANOVA significance level (p value) | |||||||
| Layer line | Generation | LL × Gen | |||||
| Hatch | <0.0001 | 0.0019 | 0.9908 | ||||
| Week 21 | <0.0001 | 0.0020 | 0.3097 | ||||
| Week 25 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.3907 | ||||
| Week 35 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.2486 | ||||
| Week 69 | 0.0003 | <0.0001 | 0.6892 | ||||
Means within a column with different letters differ significantly (Tukey’s HSD-Test, p < 0.05).
With new Table S6:
Table S6.
Least squares means ± standard errors and level of significance for body weight measured at hatching, and different weeks of age under the effect of layer line (LL), generation (Gen), and their interaction.
Table S6.
Least squares means ± standard errors and level of significance for body weight measured at hatching, and different weeks of age under the effect of layer line (LL), generation (Gen), and their interaction.
| Effect | Body Weight (g) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hatch | Week 21 | Week 25 | Week 49 | Week 69 | |||
| Layer line (LL) | |||||||
| WLA | 38.35 ± 0.37 a | 1420.02 ± 15.79 b | 1468.38 ± 16.19 b | 1497.54 ± 20.46 b | 1504.23 ± 22.26 c | ||
| R11 | 33.17 ± 0.36 c | 1040.84 ± 15.60 c | 1236.40 ± 15.99 c | 1309.28 ± 20.21 c | 1362.79 ± 21.99 d | ||
| BLA | 39.35 ± 0.37 a | 1584.15 ± 15.71 a | 1663.55 ± 16.11 a | 1821.81 ± 20.34 a | 1838.10 ± 22.13 b | ||
| L68 | 34.84 ± 0.37 b | 1568.91 ± 15.81 a | 1714.92 ± 16.21 a | 1837.91 ± 20.48 a | 1923.44 ± 22.29 a | ||
| Generation (Gen) | |||||||
| Gen 1 | 35.86 ± 0.26 | 1379.01 ± 11.17 | 1485.67 ± 11.45 | 1567.49 ± 14.47 | 1616.21 ± 15.76 | ||
| Gen 2 | 37.00 ± 0.26 | 1427.95 ± 11.07 | 1555.96 ± 11.36 | 1665.79 ± 14.34 | 1698.07 ± 15.59 | ||
| LL × Gen | |||||||
| WLA × Gen1 | 37.77 ± 0.52 | 1376.72 ± 22.36 | 1415.84 ± 22.91 | 1460.33 ± 28.96 | 1443.48 ± 31.51 | ||
| WLA × Gen2 | 38.93 ± 0.52 | 1463.31 ± 22.32 | 1520.93 ± 22.88 | 1534.75 ± 28.91 | 1564.98 ± 31.45 | ||
| R11 × Gen1 | 32.64 ± 0.51 | 1027.33 ± 21.99 | 1222.77 ± 22.53 | 1284.20 ± 28.49 | 1338.12 ± 31.02 | ||
| R11 × Gen2 | 33.69 ± 0.52 | 1054.36 ± 22.14 | 1250.04 ± 22.71 | 1334.37 ± 28.66 | 1387.45 ± 31.17 | ||
| BLA × Gen1 | 38.84 ± 0.52 | 1549.66 ± 22.41 | 1627.91 ± 22.97 | 1767.90 ± 29.03 | 1804.33 ± 31.60 | ||
| BLA × Gen2 | 39.87 ± 0.51 | 1618.63 ± 22.02 | 1699.19 ± 22.59 | 1875.73 ± 28.50 | 1871.86 ± 30.98 | ||
| L68 × Gen1 | 34.18 ± 0.52 | 1562.32 ± 22.61 | 1676.16 ± 23.16 | 1757.53 ± 29.31 | 1878.89 ± 31.92 | ||
| L68 × Gen2 | 35.51 ± 0.51 | 1575.50 ± 22.11 | 1753.67 ± 22.68 | 1918.30 ± 28.62 | 1968.00 ± 31.12 | ||
| ANOVA significance level (p value) | |||||||
| Layer line | Generation | LL × Gen | |||||
| Hatch | <0.0001 | 0.0019 | 0.9908 | ||||
| Week 21 | <0.0001 | 0.0020 | 0.3097 | ||||
| Week 25 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.3907 | ||||
| Week 49 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.2486 | ||||
| Week 69 | 0.0003 | <0.0001 | 0.6892 | ||||
Means within a column with different letters differ significantly (Tukey’s HSD-Test, p < 0.05).
The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused to the readers by these changes.
Reference
- Jansen, S.; Baulain, U.; Habig, C.; Weigend, A.; Halle, I.; Scholz, A.M.; Simianer, H.; Sharifi, A.R.; Weigend, S. Relationship between Bone Stability and Egg Production in Genetically Divergent Chicken Layer Lines. Animals 2020, 10, 850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).