Next Article in Journal
Optimization Model of Maintenance Scheduling Problem for Heritage Buildings with Constraint Programming
Next Article in Special Issue
The Green Dimension of a Compact City: Temperature Changes in the Urban Area of Banja Luka
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring the Effect of Varying Fiber Dosages as Stirrup Substitutes in Torsion-Loaded Concrete Beams
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Validated Framework for Characterising Informal Settlements: Two Cases from Greater Cairo, Egypt
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Can Technology Reinforce Cogency of the Architectural Argument: Trial and Error Approach

1
Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
2
Department of Computing and Control Engineering, Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
3
AN Group Balkan doo, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2023, 13(7), 1866; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071866
Submission received: 15 June 2023 / Revised: 20 July 2023 / Accepted: 20 July 2023 / Published: 23 July 2023

Abstract

The main question proposed in this research is whether different types of organizational approaches could help in shortening the response time needed to analyze advanced design solutions in accordance with the changed circumstances. Approaches that we are considering have been adapted from rapidly changing disciplines—such as the IT industry, and software engineering. This paradigm allows for architectural programming to obtain different positions in the timeline of project planning and realization. We proposed a novel methodology of architectural design and project management as an instrument inspired by the Agile Manifesto and some of its instantiations, most notably by the Scrum framework. This research shows that application of the proposed framework significantly shortens the design process and facilitates the involvement of a larger number of authors within the same project team. This study focused on the specific case of architectural competitions. However, the results showed that the same framework could be applied in a broader design context, details of which have been left for future considerations.
Keywords: transdisciplinary urban planning; design process methodology; design strategy vs. design tactics; agile development; Scrum framework; project management efficiency transdisciplinary urban planning; design process methodology; design strategy vs. design tactics; agile development; Scrum framework; project management efficiency

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Atanacković Jeličić, J.; Rapaić, M.R.; Maraš, I.; Tot, E.; Ecet, D. Can Technology Reinforce Cogency of the Architectural Argument: Trial and Error Approach. Buildings 2023, 13, 1866. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071866

AMA Style

Atanacković Jeličić J, Rapaić MR, Maraš I, Tot E, Ecet D. Can Technology Reinforce Cogency of the Architectural Argument: Trial and Error Approach. Buildings. 2023; 13(7):1866. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071866

Chicago/Turabian Style

Atanacković Jeličić, Jelena, Milan R. Rapaić, Igor Maraš, Erne Tot, and Dejan Ecet. 2023. "Can Technology Reinforce Cogency of the Architectural Argument: Trial and Error Approach" Buildings 13, no. 7: 1866. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071866

APA Style

Atanacković Jeličić, J., Rapaić, M. R., Maraš, I., Tot, E., & Ecet, D. (2023). Can Technology Reinforce Cogency of the Architectural Argument: Trial and Error Approach. Buildings, 13(7), 1866. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071866

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop