Next Issue
Volume 14, October
Previous Issue
Volume 14, June
 
 

Laws, Volume 14, Issue 4 (August 2025) – 18 articles

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Section
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
17 pages, 243 KiB  
Article
Apologies in Mitigation of Damages for Negligence: Incentive or Weapon?
by Jessica Kerr and Robyn Carroll
Laws 2025, 14(4), 59; https://doi.org/10.3390/laws14040059 - 13 Aug 2025
Viewed by 270
Abstract
Apologies can offer solace and compensate for intangible and emotional harm in social and legal contexts. In some areas of law, an apology offered by a defendant will be factored into the assessment of damages awarded to vindicate the plaintiff’s rights and compensate [...] Read more.
Apologies can offer solace and compensate for intangible and emotional harm in social and legal contexts. In some areas of law, an apology offered by a defendant will be factored into the assessment of damages awarded to vindicate the plaintiff’s rights and compensate for loss. This is the case in Australia, the jurisdiction primarily considered in this article, and in many other jurisdictions. There is a danger, however, of assuming that because apologies are compensatory in some sense, they can be used as a basis to reduce damages in tort law more generally. Even though general damages for non-pecuniary loss in fault-based torts are incommensurate to a monetary amount, they are still intended to compensate for actual loss. Empowering defendants to reduce their damages exposure by apologizing might incentivize meaningful apologies which are valued by plaintiffs. It might also create perverse incentives for plaintiffs and defendants alike, further unbalancing a system in which plaintiffs are already at risk of under-compensation. And it raises uncomfortable questions of evidence, reciprocity, agency and expertise which are yet to be fully explored. We argue for these reasons that it is not currently defensible to reduce an award of general damages for negligence, especially for personal injuries, on the basis of an apology by the defendant. Full article
21 pages, 271 KiB  
Article
Moral Injury: An Emerging Aspect of the Employer’s Duty of Care to Employees?
by Wendy Elizabeth Bonython
Laws 2025, 14(4), 58; https://doi.org/10.3390/laws14040058 - 12 Aug 2025
Viewed by 382
Abstract
Moral injury is a discrete form of harm affecting individuals as a potentially avoidable consequence of exposure to a morally injurious event. That injury (independent of psychological injury or illness) has been identified as a cause of physical symptoms, suicide and suicidality. Originally [...] Read more.
Moral injury is a discrete form of harm affecting individuals as a potentially avoidable consequence of exposure to a morally injurious event. That injury (independent of psychological injury or illness) has been identified as a cause of physical symptoms, suicide and suicidality. Originally identified within military and veteran cohorts, it is observable in emergency responders, healthcare providers, human rights advocates and others. Its aetiology suggests that other groups where the potential for tensions between personal morals, professional ethics and occupational activities arises (such as whistleblowers, law enforcement personnel and lawyers) may be at risk. Despite increasingly diverse evidence identifying moral injury as a substantive harm with significant consequences, the legal options for redress are unclear. This article explores whether requirements for establishing a duty of care as a precursor to a negligence claim are likely to pose an insurmountable obstacle for plaintiffs, including in the context of employer–employee duty relationships. It concludes that despite popular perceptions that negligence law is unlikely to be able to accommodate moral injury claims, a closer reading of key judgments indicates that there are opportunities for it to potentially be recognised as a harm on a principled basis—consistent with existing jurisprudence and legislation—for the purposes of establishing a duty of care. In the event that normative claims for its recognition are resisted, the justification for that resistance must be found outside historical development of legal principles from case law. Full article
18 pages, 309 KiB  
Review
Authorship and Ownership Issues Raised by AI-Generated Works: A Comparative Analysis
by Anthi Gaidartzi and Irini Stamatoudi
Laws 2025, 14(4), 57; https://doi.org/10.3390/laws14040057 - 11 Aug 2025
Viewed by 830
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming the creative landscape and challenging traditional copyright frameworks historically focused on human authorship. As AI-generated works become increasingly common, legal systems worldwide are confronted with urgent questions about originality, ownership, and liability. While most jurisdictions adhere to the [...] Read more.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming the creative landscape and challenging traditional copyright frameworks historically focused on human authorship. As AI-generated works become increasingly common, legal systems worldwide are confronted with urgent questions about originality, ownership, and liability. While most jurisdictions adhere to the principle of strict human authorship, a growing trend toward more flexible policies recognizes the transformative potential of these technologies in the creative sectors. This paper examines the complexities and ambiguities of the current copyright systems regarding art created by AI, highlighting the varied international legal approaches and the philosophical discussions surrounding authorship and creativity. Full article
19 pages, 253 KiB  
Article
Hybrid Working Policies, Reasonable Accommodation, and Staff with Disabilities: A Case Study of European Universities
by Lisa Waddington
Laws 2025, 14(4), 56; https://doi.org/10.3390/laws14040056 - 8 Aug 2025
Viewed by 366
Abstract
The post-pandemic world has seen a large shift to hybrid working, including for staff at European universities. Under the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, European Union law, and the related non-discrimination law of the EU Member States, employers are [...] Read more.
The post-pandemic world has seen a large shift to hybrid working, including for staff at European universities. Under the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, European Union law, and the related non-discrimination law of the EU Member States, employers are obliged to provide reasonable accommodations to staff members with a disability, including allowing them to work on a hybrid basis and providing additional support to facilitate this where this is needed for a disability-related reason. Hybrid working potentially offers a number of advantages for persons with disabilities, including increased flexibility and autonomy, reduced need for commuting, and generally allowing staff to arrange their work around health-related limitations. Universities now usually have policies on hybrid working. This article considers whether and how hybrid working policies at seven European universities address the specific situation of persons with disabilities. It reveals a diversity of approaches, including policies in which staff with disabilities are ‘invisible’ and policies that pay significant attention to ensuring that staff with disabilities are able to benefit from hybrid working and are provided with suitable accommodations. It argues that university hybrid working policies should address the situation of staff with disabilities and make explicit links with the duty to provide reasonable accommodation. Full article
14 pages, 220 KiB  
Article
Resolution After Medical Injuries: Case Studies of Communication-and-Resolution-Programs Demonstrate Their Promise as an Alternative to Clinical Negligence
by Jennifer Sarah Schulz
Laws 2025, 14(4), 55; https://doi.org/10.3390/laws14040055 - 6 Aug 2025
Viewed by 324
Abstract
The agony of medical negligence for all involved is well documented. Health practitioners involved in harm events are described in the literature as “second victims”. Injured patients report that clinical negligence litigation is traumatic, slow, expensive, and does not meet their needs. Clinical [...] Read more.
The agony of medical negligence for all involved is well documented. Health practitioners involved in harm events are described in the literature as “second victims”. Injured patients report that clinical negligence litigation is traumatic, slow, expensive, and does not meet their needs. Clinical negligence lawyers have complained that healthcare injury cases are so complex and expensive that many firms do not accept these cases. This article uses a qualitative case study research design to analyse two cases from the United States of America (US) to explore the promise of an alternative resolution process: the communication-and-resolution program (CRP). CRPs involve the hospital disclosing the healthcare injury, investigating and explaining what happened, apologising and, sometimes, offering compensation to injured patients and families. In the US, CRPs have not replaced tort law. The two case studies analysed in this article offer a rare insight into the accounts of those who have experienced clinical negligence and an alternative non-litigation approach. The case study approach delves into the detail, providing an in-depth glimpse into the complexity of healthcare injuries in their real-life context. The case studies provide valuable lessons for reshaping resolution processes to better meet injured patients’ needs. Full article
28 pages, 352 KiB  
Article
Algorithm Power and Legal Boundaries: Rights Conflicts and Governance Responses in the Era of Artificial Intelligence
by Jinghui He and Zhenyang Zhang
Laws 2025, 14(4), 54; https://doi.org/10.3390/laws14040054 - 31 Jul 2025
Viewed by 1373
Abstract
This study explores the challenges and theoretical transformations that the widespread application of AI technology in social governance brings to the protection of citizens’ fundamental rights. By examining typical cases in judicial assistance, technology-enabled law enforcement, and welfare supervision, it explains how AI [...] Read more.
This study explores the challenges and theoretical transformations that the widespread application of AI technology in social governance brings to the protection of citizens’ fundamental rights. By examining typical cases in judicial assistance, technology-enabled law enforcement, and welfare supervision, it explains how AI characteristics such as algorithmic opacity, data bias, and automated decision-making affect fundamental rights including due process, equal protection, and privacy. The article traces the historical evolution of privacy theory from physical space protection to informational self-determination and further to modern data rights, pointing out the inadequacy of traditional rights-protection paradigms in addressing the characteristics of AI technology. Through analyzing AI-governance models in the European Union, the United States, Northeast Asia, and international organizations, it demonstrates diverse governance approaches ranging from systematic risk regulation to decentralized industry regulation. With a special focus on China, the article analyzes the special challenges faced in AI governance and proposes specific recommendations for improving AI-governance paths. The article argues that only within the track of the rule of law, through continuous theoretical innovation, institutional construction, and international cooperation, can AI technology development be ensured to serve human dignity, freedom, and fair justice. Full article
15 pages, 226 KiB  
Article
From Legal Commentaries to Common Instruction: Joseph Story’s Abridgments to His Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States
by Brigid Flaherty Staab
Laws 2025, 14(4), 53; https://doi.org/10.3390/laws14040053 - 31 Jul 2025
Viewed by 250
Abstract
Justice Joseph Story’s Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States (1833) have long been regarded as the scholarly source for a nationalist account of the U.S. Constitution in Antebellum America. Yet recent scholarship has questioned whether the Commentaries should be viewed exclusively [...] Read more.
Justice Joseph Story’s Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States (1833) have long been regarded as the scholarly source for a nationalist account of the U.S. Constitution in Antebellum America. Yet recent scholarship has questioned whether the Commentaries should be viewed exclusively as a work of legal scholarship. This article reinterprets Justice Story’s three-volume work as a project of civic education during a period of political and constitutional uncertainty. Written during the Nullification Crisis and in the wake of codification efforts, Justice Story presents his Commentaries for the use of the American public, providing them, and not exclusively lawyers and judges, with a source to support a popular conception of American constitutionalism. Story’s project of civic education is clearly shown by his personal efforts to abridge his Commentaries on three separate occasions to ensure the wide distribution of the work to Americans of different ages, groups, localities, and levels of education. As such, this article offers Justice Story as a guide to contemporary judges who seek to engage in civic education projects. Full article
33 pages, 1129 KiB  
Article
Toward a ‘Green Intelligence’? The Intelligence Practices of Non-Governmental Organisations Which Combat Environmental Crime
by Charlotte M. Davies
Laws 2025, 14(4), 52; https://doi.org/10.3390/laws14040052 - 28 Jul 2025
Viewed by 711
Abstract
Environmental crime has been increasingly recognised as transnational organised crime, but efforts to build a coherent and effective international response are still in development and under threat from shifts in the funding landscape. This mixed methods study addresses the role of one significant [...] Read more.
Environmental crime has been increasingly recognised as transnational organised crime, but efforts to build a coherent and effective international response are still in development and under threat from shifts in the funding landscape. This mixed methods study addresses the role of one significant group of actors in environmental crime enforcement, which are non-governmental organisations (NGOs) who gather intelligence that can be shared with law enforcement and regulatory agencies. The study compares their intelligence practices to findings from traditional intelligence sectors, with a focus upon criminal justice and policing. The research generated quantitative and qualitative data from NGO practitioners, which is integrated to discern three overarching themes inherent in these NGOs’ intelligence practices: the implementation of formal intelligence practices is still underway in the sector; there remains a need to improve cooperation to break down silos between agencies and NGOs, which requires an improvement in trust between these entities; the operating environment provides both opportunities and challenges to the abilities of the NGOs to deliver impact. The study concludes by positing that the characteristics of NGOs mean that this situation constitutes ‘green intelligence’, contextualising intelligence theory and highlighting areas in which agencies can further combat environmental crime. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Global Threats in the Illegal Wildlife Trade and Advances in Response)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 203 KiB  
Article
Accessibility of Dutch Public Space: Regulations and Local Actions by Pedestrians with Disabilities
by Dick Houtzager and Edwin Luitzen De Vos
Laws 2025, 14(4), 51; https://doi.org/10.3390/laws14040051 - 24 Jul 2025
Viewed by 521
Abstract
This article examines the accessibility of public space for individuals with disabilities in the Netherlands, as well as the relevant legal frameworks intended to promote accessibility. It discusses the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UN CRPD) and efforts to implement [...] Read more.
This article examines the accessibility of public space for individuals with disabilities in the Netherlands, as well as the relevant legal frameworks intended to promote accessibility. It discusses the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UN CRPD) and efforts to implement its provisions at the local level. The article first provides an overview of Dutch legislation and regulations concerning accessibility in public spaces. It then presents an analysis of the experiences of individuals with disabilities in navigating streets and pavements in two Dutch cities, Utrecht and Almere. The central question is to what extent equal participation in public space has been realised. The findings indicate that national legislation remains inadequate in addressing the accessibility of streets and pavements. Despite the constitutional amendment in January 2023, which prohibits discrimination on the grounds of disability, substantive equality is largely dependent on the individual policies and bylaws of the 342 municipalities. The involvement of individuals with disabilities in shaping the inclusive use of public space is therefore crucial at the local level. This article highlights local initiatives that have successfully drawn the attention of municipal policymakers and civil servants to the importance of accessible streets. Full article
16 pages, 1244 KiB  
Article
A Study on the Underperformance of Civil Law in the University Rankings and Research Databases
by Zlatan Meskic
Laws 2025, 14(4), 50; https://doi.org/10.3390/laws14040050 - 18 Jul 2025
Viewed by 604
Abstract
This study focuses on the position of civil law research in the Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus scientific databases. Two of the most reputable university rankings, the Shanghai Ranking of World Universities (Shanghai University Rankings) and the Times Higher Education rankings, evaluate [...] Read more.
This study focuses on the position of civil law research in the Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus scientific databases. Two of the most reputable university rankings, the Shanghai Ranking of World Universities (Shanghai University Rankings) and the Times Higher Education rankings, evaluate the quality of research on the law subject matter directly based on its position in the WoS and Scopus, respectively. This study shows that there are only 13 civil law journals in WoS, while the situation is only slightly better in Scopus. That is why the civil law colleges are ranked much lower in the Shanghai rankings and still very low in the Times Higher Education rankings. This study, in particular, indicates that there are a low number of civil law journals published in languages other than English. Thereby, the most important civil law journals are excluded from the evaluation, and the rankings of civil law colleges are not accurate. The study further focuses on the number of journals included in the WoS and Scopus in a specific area of civil and commercial law. It shows that several core legal areas of civil and commercial law either are not covered at all in WoS and Scopus or are available in very few journals that publish legal research only in the English language. It further reveals that very few languages other than English are represented in WoS and Scopus in the civil law area, and some important civil law nations are not represented by a single law journal publishing in their official languages. This research aims to provide suggestions for university rankings and academic databases on how to evaluate civil law research more appropriately. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

30 pages, 368 KiB  
Article
Mining Work Health, Safety Laws and Serious Industrial Crimes in Australia: Down the Shaft of Jurisdictional Inconsistency
by Trajce Cvetkovski and Neville Weston
Laws 2025, 14(4), 49; https://doi.org/10.3390/laws14040049 - 16 Jul 2025
Viewed by 840
Abstract
This article examines the level of inconsistency in work, health and safety (WHS) laws across Australia’s mining sector. Despite general efforts towards national harmonisation through model WHS legislation, significant inconsistencies persist because individual states and territories retain primary regulatory control. A critical analysis [...] Read more.
This article examines the level of inconsistency in work, health and safety (WHS) laws across Australia’s mining sector. Despite general efforts towards national harmonisation through model WHS legislation, significant inconsistencies persist because individual states and territories retain primary regulatory control. A critical analysis of each jurisdiction’s legislative framework reveals a fragmented legal landscape. Queensland, especially, exhibits notable divergence. Key findings highlight a considerable variation in legislative approaches to risk management principles and specific obligations. In particular, a disjointed and incremental approach to serious offences such as industrial manslaughter and provisions concerning imputed conduct are evident. These inconsistencies suggest that corporations operating in multiple Australian mining regions must develop a nuanced understanding of the varying WHS requirements in each jurisdiction. This study underscores the need for caution when assessing risk management strategies aimed at preventing serious incidents because the presumption of a harmonised system can be misleading, especially concerning mining-specific legislation. Full article
18 pages, 706 KiB  
Article
Community Cornerstones: An Analysis of HBCU Law School Clinical Programs’ Impact on Surrounding Communities
by Adeshola Akintobi, Sabine O’Hara, Elgloria Harrison and John Brittain
Laws 2025, 14(4), 48; https://doi.org/10.3390/laws14040048 - 15 Jul 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 812
Abstract
Fifty million Americans, nearly 15% of the population, live below the federal poverty level, often facing civil legal issues without representation. Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) have long served as economic engines and vital resources for their communities. HBCU law schools uphold [...] Read more.
Fifty million Americans, nearly 15% of the population, live below the federal poverty level, often facing civil legal issues without representation. Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) have long served as economic engines and vital resources for their communities. HBCU law schools uphold this legacy by preparing students for legal careers while instilling a commitment to service, particularly for underserved citizens who lack access to quality legal representation. This research examines the dual mission of HBCU law schools—educating students and serving local communities—through a systematic document analysis of publicly available materials and literature on law school clinical programs. The findings identify four key community performance indicators that define the community impact of HBCU law schools: advocacy, engagement, client outcomes, and representation. These indicators reflect a shared commitment across all institutions to addressing systemic inequities through clinical legal education, reinforcing the role of HBCU law schools as both training grounds for future attorneys and essential pillars of justice in their communities. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 223 KiB  
Article
Balancing Privacy and Risk: A Critical Analysis of Personal Data Use as Governed by Saudi Insurance Law
by Mutaz Abdulaziz Alkhedhairy
Laws 2025, 14(4), 47; https://doi.org/10.3390/laws14040047 - 6 Jul 2025
Viewed by 1073
Abstract
The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) Personal Data Protection Law (PDPL) was enacted in 2021. In its brief three-year existence, the PDPL has attracted significant academic and legal practitioner attention. This critical analysis focuses on three key questions: (1) What are the key [...] Read more.
The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) Personal Data Protection Law (PDPL) was enacted in 2021. In its brief three-year existence, the PDPL has attracted significant academic and legal practitioner attention. This critical analysis focuses on three key questions: (1) What are the key PDPL objectives? (2) How does this legislation compare with privacy–data protection approaches adopted in other jurisdictions (notably the European Union General Data Protection Regulation 2016 (GDPR))? and (3) Does the PDPL achieve a reasonable, workable balance between personal data protection (‘data subjects’ interests) and risks associated with personal data being shared with KSA insurers? The analysis confirms that these PDPL measures appear sound, but a definitive assessment of the ‘balance’ objectives highlighted here requires ongoing attention—three years of PDPL use is an insufficient basis to reach final conclusions regarding PDPL fitness for purpose. However, a tentative ‘soundness’ conclusion has reasonable support when the relevant authorities are collectively assessed, particularly regarding the treatment of personal data by KSA insurers in the context of personal insurance policies. Full article
18 pages, 280 KiB  
Article
Organisational Challenges in US Law Enforcement’s Response to AI-Driven Cybercrime and Deepfake Fraud
by Leo S. F. Lin
Laws 2025, 14(4), 46; https://doi.org/10.3390/laws14040046 - 4 Jul 2025
Viewed by 1787
Abstract
The rapid rise of AI-driven cybercrime and deepfake fraud poses complex organisational challenges for US law enforcement, particularly the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Applying Maguire’s (2003) police organisation theory, this qualitative single-case study analyses the FBI’s structure, culture, technological integration, and inter-agency [...] Read more.
The rapid rise of AI-driven cybercrime and deepfake fraud poses complex organisational challenges for US law enforcement, particularly the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Applying Maguire’s (2003) police organisation theory, this qualitative single-case study analyses the FBI’s structure, culture, technological integration, and inter-agency collaboration. Findings underscore the organisational strengths of the FBI, including a specialised Cyber Division, advanced detection tools, and partnerships with agencies such as the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA). However, constraints, such as resource limitations, detection inaccuracies, inter-agency rivalries, and ethical concerns, including privacy risks associated with AI surveillance, hinder operational effectiveness. Fragmented global legal frameworks, diverse national capacities, and inconsistent detection of advanced deepfakes further complicate responses to this issue. This study proposes the establishment of agile task forces, public–private partnerships, international cooperation protocols, and ethical AI frameworks to counter evolving threats, offering scalable policy and technological solutions for global law enforcement. Full article
16 pages, 241 KiB  
Article
Justice Delayed in the COVID-19 Era: Injunctions, Mootness, and Religious Freedom in the United States Legal System
by Karen McGuffee, Tammy Garland and Sherah L. Basham
Laws 2025, 14(4), 45; https://doi.org/10.3390/laws14040045 - 29 Jun 2025
Viewed by 683
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic exposed critical deficiencies in the United States’ legal system’s handling of emergency injunctions, particularly concerning religious freedom. This article examines the challenges courts faced in balancing public health measures with constitutional rights, focusing on the use of shadow dockets and [...] Read more.
The COVID-19 pandemic exposed critical deficiencies in the United States’ legal system’s handling of emergency injunctions, particularly concerning religious freedom. This article examines the challenges courts faced in balancing public health measures with constitutional rights, focusing on the use of shadow dockets and the frequent dismissal of cases due to mootness. Analyzing key Supreme Court decisions and lower court rulings, we highlight the inconsistencies and delays that arose when addressing First Amendment challenges to pandemic-related restrictions. Arguments for procedural reforms, including expedited hearings and avoiding mootness dismissals in cases of national importance, are provided to protect fundamental rights during future public health crises. Full article
20 pages, 2275 KiB  
Article
How Can Legal Measures Protect Chinese Doctors from Patient Violence?
by Weimin Shi, Ruiyu Geng and Hanbin Wang
Laws 2025, 14(4), 44; https://doi.org/10.3390/laws14040044 - 27 Jun 2025
Viewed by 812
Abstract
This article explores the persistent issue of assaults on medical staff in China that are unrelated to malpractice, which exacerbate tensions in doctor–patient relationships. These conflicts are primarily fueled by factors such as the disparity between doctors and patients, unequal distribution of medical [...] Read more.
This article explores the persistent issue of assaults on medical staff in China that are unrelated to malpractice, which exacerbate tensions in doctor–patient relationships. These conflicts are primarily fueled by factors such as the disparity between doctors and patients, unequal distribution of medical resources, and inadequacies in the legal protection system. Drawing on Foucault’s micro-power theory, this research proposes a tripartite governance model that includes reconfiguring medical resources through public–private partnerships, implementing proactive legal mechanisms such as hospital-embedded policing systems, and establishing mandatory protocols for treatment explanations to reduce information asymmetry. The article also highlights the importance of medical conflict mediation systems to effectively resolve disputes and ensure satisfaction for all parties involved. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 486 KiB  
Article
Copyright Implications and Legal Responses to AI Training: A Chinese Perspective
by Li You and Han Luo
Laws 2025, 14(4), 43; https://doi.org/10.3390/laws14040043 - 23 Jun 2025
Viewed by 2371
Abstract
The emergence of generative AI presents complex challenges to existing copyright regimes, particularly concerning the large-scale use of copyrighted materials in model training. Legal disputes across jurisdictions highlight the urgent need for a balanced, principle-based framework that protects the rights of creators while [...] Read more.
The emergence of generative AI presents complex challenges to existing copyright regimes, particularly concerning the large-scale use of copyrighted materials in model training. Legal disputes across jurisdictions highlight the urgent need for a balanced, principle-based framework that protects the rights of creators while fostering innovation. In China, a regulatory approach of “moderate leniency” has emerged—emphasizing control over downstream AI-generated content (AIGC) while adopting a more permissive stance toward upstream training. This model upholds the idea–expression dichotomy, rejecting theories such as “retained expression” or “retained style”, which improperly equate ideas with expressions. A critical legal distinction lies between real-time training, which is ephemeral and economically insignificant, and non-real-time training, which involves data retention and should be assessed under fair use test. A fair use exception specific to AI training is both timely and justified, provided it ensures equitable sharing of technological benefits and addresses AIGC’s potential substitutive impact on original works. Furthermore, technical processes like format conversion and machine translation do not infringe derivative rights, as they lack human creativity and expressive content. Even when training involves broader use, legitimacy may be established through the principle of technical necessity within the reproduction right framework. Full article
17 pages, 248 KiB  
Article
Incremental Progress in Combating IUU Fishing: A Review of China’s 2020 Administrative Regulations for Distant-Water Fisheries
by Qing Zhao, Xuexin Yi and Ming Jing
Laws 2025, 14(4), 42; https://doi.org/10.3390/laws14040042 - 23 Jun 2025
Viewed by 631
Abstract
Addressing the illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing in the water beyond its jurisdiction poses a significant challenge for China as it aims to establish itself as a responsible participant in global fishing governance. Inadequate regulation and enforcement largely contribute to the increase [...] Read more.
Addressing the illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing in the water beyond its jurisdiction poses a significant challenge for China as it aims to establish itself as a responsible participant in global fishing governance. Inadequate regulation and enforcement largely contribute to the increase in the suspected illegal fishing by Chinese vessels, fishing enterprises, and crew members. In 2020, China revised the RDWF (2020) to address the growing issues of IUU fishing. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the RDWF (2020) in addressing China’s IUU fishing in distant water. This paper concludes that RDWF (2020) represents an incremental advancement in China’s initiatives to eliminate IUU fishing. RDWF (2020) emphasizes the government’s responsibilities in regulating vessel quantities and ensuring accurate reporting. Furthermore, RDWF (2020) adopts measures to fulfill China’s responsibilities under RFMOs. Additionally, RDWF (2020) expands the roster of operators liable for penalties and delineates IUU fishing activities that necessitate sanctions. Ultimately, RDWF (2020) develops an evaluation system to monitor compliance with anti-IUU fishing obligations as stipulated by international treaties and Chinese laws and regulations. However, RDWF (2020) encounters limitations that may impede its effectiveness in addressing IUU fishing, such as the lack of responsibilities assigned to administrative bodies, insufficient penalties for serious IUU fishing activities, and inadequate compliance with international standards for sustainable fishing. This paper provides policymakers specific recommendations for improving the identified areas of RDWF (2020) and offers insights for distant-water fishing nations that are grappling with significant IUU fishing issues to make gradual improvements in combating IUU fishing. Full article
Previous Issue
Next Issue
Back to TopTop