Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Dissonance? A Valuation Perspective on Rural Social Innovation Processes
Previous Article in Journal
Adaptation of the Work-Related Quality of Life-2 Scale (WRQoL-2) among Portuguese Workers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Instruments to Assess People’s Attitude and Behaviours towards Tolerance: A Systematic Review of Literature

by
Hiroko Costantini
1,2,3,*,
Muhammad Abdul Aziz Al Mujahid
4,
Kengo Hosaka
5,
Takazumi Ono
6 and
Misato Nihei
2,6
1
Institute for Future Initiatives, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
2
Institute of Gerontology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan
3
Oxford Institute of Population Ageing, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 4BH, UK
4
Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan
5
Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa City 277-8561, Chiba, Japan
6
Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Societies 2024, 14(7), 121; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14070121
Submission received: 3 May 2024 / Revised: 4 July 2024 / Accepted: 11 July 2024 / Published: 16 July 2024

Abstract

While tolerance is recognised as important, especially to diverse societies, understanding tolerance poses complexities, both theoretically and in practical application. Tolerance is relevant in different social contexts, yet these pose distinct challenges to measurement. Thus, understanding the measurement of tolerance is important. This study provides a systematic review of tolerance scales, with the procedure based on the PRISMA statement. The initial collection of over 1600 papers through the systematic review process yielded a set of 11 papers. These papers trace the development of tolerance scales to encompass distinct social contexts over time, including political, cultural, ethnic and racial, racial and religious, gender and sexual, and social. Correspondingly, the approaches reflect particular challenges relevant to these domains for understanding and measuring tolerance. In contrast, some recent contributions aim to develop broader, less context-specific means to assess tolerance. Notwithstanding the breadth of articles included, this systematic review yielded articles that covered only selected Western-centric geographies: this indicates the opportunity for further research to access and integrate non-English-language articles to broaden the geographical and cultural perspectives on tolerance.
Keywords: tolerance; tolerance scales; systematic review; societal tolerance; tolerance scales; systematic review; societal

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Costantini, H.; Al Mujahid, M.A.A.; Hosaka, K.; Ono, T.; Nihei, M. Instruments to Assess People’s Attitude and Behaviours towards Tolerance: A Systematic Review of Literature. Societies 2024, 14, 121. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14070121

AMA Style

Costantini H, Al Mujahid MAA, Hosaka K, Ono T, Nihei M. Instruments to Assess People’s Attitude and Behaviours towards Tolerance: A Systematic Review of Literature. Societies. 2024; 14(7):121. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14070121

Chicago/Turabian Style

Costantini, Hiroko, Muhammad Abdul Aziz Al Mujahid, Kengo Hosaka, Takazumi Ono, and Misato Nihei. 2024. "Instruments to Assess People’s Attitude and Behaviours towards Tolerance: A Systematic Review of Literature" Societies 14, no. 7: 121. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14070121

APA Style

Costantini, H., Al Mujahid, M. A. A., Hosaka, K., Ono, T., & Nihei, M. (2024). Instruments to Assess People’s Attitude and Behaviours towards Tolerance: A Systematic Review of Literature. Societies, 14(7), 121. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14070121

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop