Next Article in Journal
Ovarian Reserve after Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Update on Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Matrix Metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3) Polymorphisms Are Associated with Prolonged ECG-Derived QTc Interval: A Cross-Sectional Study of the Australian Rural Population
Previous Article in Special Issue
Robotic Esophagectomy. A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Update on Robotic Rectal Prolapse Treatment

by
Giampaolo Formisano
1,
Luca Ferraro
1,*,
Adelona Salaj
1,
Simona Giuratrabocchetta
1,
Andrea Pisani Ceretti
2,
Enrico Opocher
2 and
Paolo Pietro Bianchi
1
1
Division of General and Robotic Surgery, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università di Milano, 20142 Milano, Italy
2
Division of General and HPB Surgery, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università di Milano, 20142 Milano, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Pers. Med. 2021, 11(8), 706; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11080706
Submission received: 13 June 2021 / Revised: 19 July 2021 / Accepted: 20 July 2021 / Published: 23 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Update on Robotic Gastrointestinal Surgery)

Abstract

Rectal prolapse is a condition that can cause significant social impairment and negatively affects quality of life. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment, with the aim of restoring the anatomy and correcting the associated functional disorders. During recent decades, laparoscopic abdominal procedures have emerged as effective tools for the treatment of rectal prolapse, with the advantages of faster recovery, lower morbidity, and shorter length of stay. Robotic surgery represents the latest evolution in the field of minimally invasive surgery, with the benefits of enhanced dexterity in deep narrow fields such as the pelvis, and may potentially overcome the technical limitations of conventional laparoscopy. Robotic surgery for the treatment of rectal prolapse is feasible and safe. It could reduce complication rates and length of hospital stay, as well as shorten the learning curve, when compared to conventional laparoscopy. Further prospectively maintained or randomized data are still required on long-term functional outcomes and recurrence rates.
Keywords: robotic surgery; robotic ventral rectopexy; rectal prolapse; pelvic organ prolapse treatment robotic surgery; robotic ventral rectopexy; rectal prolapse; pelvic organ prolapse treatment

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Formisano, G.; Ferraro, L.; Salaj, A.; Giuratrabocchetta, S.; Pisani Ceretti, A.; Opocher, E.; Bianchi, P.P. Update on Robotic Rectal Prolapse Treatment. J. Pers. Med. 2021, 11, 706. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11080706

AMA Style

Formisano G, Ferraro L, Salaj A, Giuratrabocchetta S, Pisani Ceretti A, Opocher E, Bianchi PP. Update on Robotic Rectal Prolapse Treatment. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2021; 11(8):706. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11080706

Chicago/Turabian Style

Formisano, Giampaolo, Luca Ferraro, Adelona Salaj, Simona Giuratrabocchetta, Andrea Pisani Ceretti, Enrico Opocher, and Paolo Pietro Bianchi. 2021. "Update on Robotic Rectal Prolapse Treatment" Journal of Personalized Medicine 11, no. 8: 706. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11080706

APA Style

Formisano, G., Ferraro, L., Salaj, A., Giuratrabocchetta, S., Pisani Ceretti, A., Opocher, E., & Bianchi, P. P. (2021). Update on Robotic Rectal Prolapse Treatment. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 11(8), 706. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11080706

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop