Skip to Content
DiagnosticsDiagnostics
  • Interesting Images
  • Open Access

27 February 2026

A Rare Variation of Coeliac Trunk Hexafurcation

,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
2
Research Unit of Radiology and Medical Imaging, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
3
Second Department of Radiology, General University Hospital “Attikon”, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece
4
Fourth Department of Surgery, General University Hospital “Attikon”, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece

Abstract

We report an incidental finding of a coeliac trunk (CeT) hexafurcation in a 62-year-old female during computed tomography angiography, where the trunk sequentially branches off the left and right inferior phrenic arteries (IPAs) and the left gastric artery (LGA) as collateral branches, before a terminal trifurcation into the common hepatic (CHA), splenic (SA), and dorsal pancreatic (DPA) arteries. While the CeT typically trifurcates, hexafurcation is exceedingly rare. This variation likely stems from the failure of standard regression of primitive splanchnic arteries. The aberrant branches (IPA and DPA) are involved in numerous surgical and interventional procedures. Therefore, this image emphasizes the necessity of high-resolution preoperative imaging and three-dimensional reconstruction to identify complex vascular morphologies
Figure 1. Three-dimensional (A) and multiplanar (BE) reconstructions of the arterial anatomy of the patient. A hexafurcated coeliac trunk (CeT) can be observed in the three-dimensional volume reconstruction. The right and left inferior phrenic arteries (RIPA and LIPA) are identified in coronal reconstructions (B), as well as the left gastric artery (C). Lastly, the dorsal pancreatic artery (DPA) origin and course posteriorly to the pancreas can be observed in sagittal reconstructions (D,E). The image was identified during an abdominal computed tomography angiography assessment of a 62-year-old female patient. The examination was performed using a multidetector CT scanner (Canon Medical Systems, Tochigi, Japan). Imaging was acquired using a contrast-enhanced biphasic abdominal CT protocol. Intravenous iodinated contrast medium (370 mg iodine/mL) was administered via a power injector at a rate of approximately 4 mL/s, followed by a saline flush. Arterial phase acquisition was acquired using bolus tracking, with the region of interest placed in the abdominal aorta (AA). The scan was evaluated using Horos software version 3.3.6 (Horos Project, New York, NY, USA). Multiplanar reconstructions (axial, coronal, and sagittal) and three-dimensional volume-rendered images were used to assess the vascular anatomy. Typically, the CeT branches off the left gastric (LGA), the common hepatic (CHA) and the splenic (SA) arteries [1]. Numerous variations on this branching pattern have been described. Bergman’s Comprehensive Encyclopedia of Human Anatomic Variations states that the CeT can range from absence (all the arteries arising from the aorta) to six branches (three typical and three additional) [2]. The most common variation is considered to be the tetrafurcation of the CeT, with the additional branch corresponding to either one of the inferior phrenic arteries (IPA), the dorsal pancreatic artery (DPA) or the gastroduodenal artery [2]. During the recent meta-analysis of CeT anatomy, the variations were classified from type 0 (absence of the trunk) to type 4 (three typical and one additional branch). The typical configuration (type 3) had a pooled prevalence of 83.15% [3]. The presence of accessory branches arising from the CeT (type 4) was considered infrequent, with a pooled prevalence of 1.80% [3]—excluding the IPA and DPA, which very commonly arise from the CeT [4,5]. However, during the systematic review, sporadic cases reported the pentafurcation or hexafurcation of the CeT [3]. The current case corresponds to a hexafurcated variant of the CeT with the three typical (LGA, CHA and SA) and three additional branches (LIPA, RIPA and DPA). Manta et al. [6] reported two cases of CeT hexafurcation and reviewed similar reports. They were able to identify eight cases in the current literature. However, only one of them presented photographic evidence of the variation [7]. Therefore, according to Manta et al. [6] and our observations, only four evidence-based cases reporting CeT hexafurcation were previously reported. Nevertheless, a single case of CeT heptafurcation was also recorded recently [8]. The embryological mechanism for this rare hexafurcation is best explained by the longitudinal ventral anastomosis theory. During the embryonic stage, the 10th through 13th metameric ventral splanchnic arteries arise from the aorta to form the LGA, SA, CHA, and superior mesenteric arteries, respectively [3]. These primitive vessels are interconnected by a longitudinal ventral anastomosis located in front of the aorta (the so-called arc of Bühler). In the reported case, the hexafurcation likely resulted from a failure of standard regression, where branches that normally migrate to secondary origins (DPA and IPA) maintained their primary connections directly to the coeliac axis [4,5]. The clinical and surgical significance of identifying a hexafurcated CeT variant is substantial, as precise knowledge of these arterial patterns is critical for preoperative planning and preventing intraoperative complications. The presence of the DPA as a direct terminal branch of the CeT is particularly vital in pancreatic surgery. During a pancreaticoduodenectomy, the DPA must be identified early to facilitate ligation, which reduces blood loss and ensures complete arterial exclusion of the pancreatic head [9,10]. In laparoscopic procedures, a CeT-derived DPA can be easily overlooked, leading to inadvertent and potentially uncontrollable bleeding [9,10]. Furthermore, the simultaneous origin of both IPAs from the CeT also complicates procedures such as liver transplantation and oncological resections [4]. For interventional radiologists, this morphology allows for multi-vessel access but increases the risk of non-target embolization during transarterial chemoembolization [4].
Figure 1. Three-dimensional (A) and multiplanar (BE) reconstructions of the arterial anatomy of the patient. A hexafurcated coeliac trunk (CeT) can be observed in the three-dimensional volume reconstruction. The right and left inferior phrenic arteries (RIPA and LIPA) are identified in coronal reconstructions (B), as well as the left gastric artery (C). Lastly, the dorsal pancreatic artery (DPA) origin and course posteriorly to the pancreas can be observed in sagittal reconstructions (D,E). The image was identified during an abdominal computed tomography angiography assessment of a 62-year-old female patient. The examination was performed using a multidetector CT scanner (Canon Medical Systems, Tochigi, Japan). Imaging was acquired using a contrast-enhanced biphasic abdominal CT protocol. Intravenous iodinated contrast medium (370 mg iodine/mL) was administered via a power injector at a rate of approximately 4 mL/s, followed by a saline flush. Arterial phase acquisition was acquired using bolus tracking, with the region of interest placed in the abdominal aorta (AA). The scan was evaluated using Horos software version 3.3.6 (Horos Project, New York, NY, USA). Multiplanar reconstructions (axial, coronal, and sagittal) and three-dimensional volume-rendered images were used to assess the vascular anatomy. Typically, the CeT branches off the left gastric (LGA), the common hepatic (CHA) and the splenic (SA) arteries [1]. Numerous variations on this branching pattern have been described. Bergman’s Comprehensive Encyclopedia of Human Anatomic Variations states that the CeT can range from absence (all the arteries arising from the aorta) to six branches (three typical and three additional) [2]. The most common variation is considered to be the tetrafurcation of the CeT, with the additional branch corresponding to either one of the inferior phrenic arteries (IPA), the dorsal pancreatic artery (DPA) or the gastroduodenal artery [2]. During the recent meta-analysis of CeT anatomy, the variations were classified from type 0 (absence of the trunk) to type 4 (three typical and one additional branch). The typical configuration (type 3) had a pooled prevalence of 83.15% [3]. The presence of accessory branches arising from the CeT (type 4) was considered infrequent, with a pooled prevalence of 1.80% [3]—excluding the IPA and DPA, which very commonly arise from the CeT [4,5]. However, during the systematic review, sporadic cases reported the pentafurcation or hexafurcation of the CeT [3]. The current case corresponds to a hexafurcated variant of the CeT with the three typical (LGA, CHA and SA) and three additional branches (LIPA, RIPA and DPA). Manta et al. [6] reported two cases of CeT hexafurcation and reviewed similar reports. They were able to identify eight cases in the current literature. However, only one of them presented photographic evidence of the variation [7]. Therefore, according to Manta et al. [6] and our observations, only four evidence-based cases reporting CeT hexafurcation were previously reported. Nevertheless, a single case of CeT heptafurcation was also recorded recently [8]. The embryological mechanism for this rare hexafurcation is best explained by the longitudinal ventral anastomosis theory. During the embryonic stage, the 10th through 13th metameric ventral splanchnic arteries arise from the aorta to form the LGA, SA, CHA, and superior mesenteric arteries, respectively [3]. These primitive vessels are interconnected by a longitudinal ventral anastomosis located in front of the aorta (the so-called arc of Bühler). In the reported case, the hexafurcation likely resulted from a failure of standard regression, where branches that normally migrate to secondary origins (DPA and IPA) maintained their primary connections directly to the coeliac axis [4,5]. The clinical and surgical significance of identifying a hexafurcated CeT variant is substantial, as precise knowledge of these arterial patterns is critical for preoperative planning and preventing intraoperative complications. The presence of the DPA as a direct terminal branch of the CeT is particularly vital in pancreatic surgery. During a pancreaticoduodenectomy, the DPA must be identified early to facilitate ligation, which reduces blood loss and ensures complete arterial exclusion of the pancreatic head [9,10]. In laparoscopic procedures, a CeT-derived DPA can be easily overlooked, leading to inadvertent and potentially uncontrollable bleeding [9,10]. Furthermore, the simultaneous origin of both IPAs from the CeT also complicates procedures such as liver transplantation and oncological resections [4]. For interventional radiologists, this morphology allows for multi-vessel access but increases the risk of non-target embolization during transarterial chemoembolization [4].
Diagnostics 16 00701 g001

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.T., N.-A.A. and M.P.; methodology, N.-A.A., G.V.; validation, G.T., A.S., O.L. and P.K.; investigation, G.T., N.-A.A. and M.P.; data curation, A.S., O.L. and P.K.; writing—original draft preparation, G.T. and N.-A.A.; writing—review and editing, G.V., A.S., O.L., P.K. and M.P.; supervision, M.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (protocol code 1037, 28 April 2025).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Standring, S.; Tubbs, R.S. Gray’s Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice, 43rd ed.; Elsevier: London, UK, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  2. Sahni, D.; Aggarwal, A.; Gupta, T.; Kaur, H.; Gupta, R.; Chawla, K.; Saini, N.; Garg, S.; Singla, A.; Deep, A.; et al. Abdominal Aorta. In Bergman’s Comprehensive Encyclopedia of Human Anatomic Variation; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2016; pp. 619–681. [Google Scholar]
  3. Triantafyllou, G.; Belimezakis, N.; Lyros, O.; Węgiel, A.; Arkadopoulos, N.; Olewnik, Ł.; Tsakotos, G.; Zielinska, N.; Piagkou, M. Prevalence of Coeliac Trunk Variants: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Ann. Anat.—Anat. Anz. 2025, 259, 152385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Whitley, A.; Křeček, J.; Kachlík, D. The Inferior Phrenic Arteries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann. Anat.—Anat. Anz. 2021, 235, 151679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Rousek, M.; Whitley, A.; Kachlík, D.; Balko, J.; Záruba, P.; Belbl, M.; Nikov, A.; Ryska, M.; Gürlich, R.; Pohnán, R. The Dorsal Pancreatic Artery: A Meta-Analysis with Clinical Correlations. Pancreatology 2022, 22, 325–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Manta, B.A.; Rusu, M.C.; Jianu, A.M.; Ilie, A.C. Hexafurcated Coeliac Trunks, Trifurcated Common Hepatic Artery, and a New Variant of the Arc of Bühler. Folia Morphol. 2022, 81, 365–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Agarwal, S. Unusual Variation in the Branching Pattern of the Celiac Trunk and Its Embryological and Clinical Perspective. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2016, 10, AD05–AD07. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rusu, M.C.; Manta, B.A. Novel Anatomic Variation: Heptafurcation of the Celiac Trunk. Surg. Radiol. Anat. 2018, 40, 457–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Triantafyllou, G.; Lyros, O.; Arkadopoulos, N.; Kokoropoulos, P.; Demetriou, F.; Samolis, A.; Olewnik, Ł.; Landfald, I.C.; Piagkou, M. The Blood Supply of the Human Pancreas: Anatomical and Surgical Considerations. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 5625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Yamane, M.; Ishikawa, Y.; Asano, D.; Watanabe, S.; Ueda, H.; Akahoshi, K.; Ono, H.; Kudo, A.; Tanaka, S.; Sugiyama, Y.; et al. Surgical Anatomy of the Dorsal Pancreatic Artery: Considering Embryonic Development. Pancreatology 2023, 23, 697–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.