The Impact of Clonal Micropropagation and Acclimatization Methods on the Productivity and Essential Oil Quality of Three Mentha Cultivars
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Plant Material
2.2. In Vitro Cultivation
2.3. Acclimatization Stage to In Vivo Conditions
2.4. In Vivo Cultivation
2.5. Determination of Essential Oil in Mint Plants
2.6. Determining the Productivity of Genotypes to Calculate Product Yield
2.7. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Lawrence, B.M. Mint. The Genus Mentha; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2006; pp. 1–56. [Google Scholar]
- Silva, H.A. Descriptive overview of the medical uses given to Mentha aromatic herbs throughout history. Biology 2020, 9, 484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tafrihi, M.; Imran, M.; Tufail, T.; Gondal, T.A.; Caruso, G.; Sharma, S.; Atanassova, M.; Atanassov, L.; Fokou, P.V.T.; Pezzani, R. The wonderful activities of the genus Mentha: Not only antioxidant properties. Molecules 2021, 26, 1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Salehi, B.; Stojanovic-Radic, Z.; Matejic, J.; Sharopov, F.; Antolak, H.; Kregiel, D.; Sen, S.; Sharifi-Rad, M.; Acharya, K.; Sharifi-Rad, R.; et al. Plants of genus Mentha: From farm to food factory. Plants 2018, 7, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kazemi, A.; Iraji, A.; Esmaealzadeh, N.; Salehi, M.; Hashempur, M.H. Peppermint and menthol: A review on their biochemistry, pharmacological activities, clinical applications, and safety considerations. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2025, 65, 1553–1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yesil, M. The effect of different planting times on yield and quality features in some mint species (Mentha longifolia, Mentha × piperita, Mentha spicata). Emir. J. Food Agric. 2021, 33, 671–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lothe, N.B.; Mazeed, A.; Pandey, J.; Patairiya, V.; Verma, K.; Semwal, M.; Verma, R.S.; Verma, R.K. Maximizing yields and economics by supplementing additional nutrients for commercially grown menthol mint (Mentha arvensis L.) cultivars. Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 160, 113110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brar, A.S.; Buttar, G.S.; Singh, M.; Singh, S.; Vashist, K.K. Improving bio-physical and economic water productivity of menthol mint (Mentha arvensis L.) through drip fertigation. Irrig. Sci. 2021, 39, 505–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khaliq, F.A.; Mushtaq, A. The five most traded compounds worldwide: Importance, opportunities, and risks. Int. J. Chem. Biochem. Sci. 2023, 23, 185–194. [Google Scholar]
- Lu, L.; Cao, H.; Li, H.; Zhang, H.; Li, S.; Wang, J. Diversity and profiles of volatile compounds in twenty-five peppermint genotypes grown in China. Int. J. Food Prop. 2022, 25, 1472–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kippes, N.; Tsai, H.; Lieberman, M.; Culp, D.; McCormack, B.; Wilson, R.G.; Dowd, E.; Comai, L.; Henry, I.M. Diploid mint (M. longifolia) can produce spearmint type oil with a high yield potential. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 23521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prasad, P.; Gupta, A.; Singh, V.; Kumar, B. Impact of induced mutation-derived genetic variability, genotype and varieties for quantitative and qualitative traits in Mentha species. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 2024, 100, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yaghini, H.; Sabzalian, M.R.; Rahimmalek, M.; Garavand, T.; Maleki, A.; Mirlohi, A. Seed set in inter specific crosses of male sterile Mentha spicata with M. longifolia. Euphytica 2020, 55, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vining, K.J.; Hummer, K.E.; Bassil, N.V.; Lange, B.M.; Khoury, C.K.; Carver, D. Crop wild relatives as germplasm resource for cultivar improvement in mint (Mentha L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vining, K.J.; Pandelova, I.; Hummer, K.E.; Bassil, N.V.; Contreras, R.; Neill, K.; Chen, H.; Parrish, A.N.; Lange, B.M. Genetic diversity survey of Mentha aquatica L. and Mentha suaveolens Ehrh., mint crop ancestors. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2019, 66, 825–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, D.; Kumar, R.; Singh, A.K.; Verma, K.; Singh, K.P.; Nilofer; Kumar, A.; Parminder, K.; Singh, A.; Pandey, J.; et al. Influence of planting methods on production of suckers (rhizome or propagative material), essential oil yield, and quality of menthol mint (Mentha arvensis L.). Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2020, 9, 3675–3689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Triharyanto, E.; Pujiasmanto, B.; Pardono, P.; Fa’izah, A.T. Response of growth and yield of mint (Mentha spicata) cuttings to auxin and composition of planting media. Agrotechnol. Res. J. 2023, 7, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kreckel, H.D.; Samuels, F.M.; Bonnart, R.; Volk, G.M.; Stich, D.G.; Levinger, N.E. Tracking permeation of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) in Mentha × piperita shoot tips using coherent Raman microscopy. Plants 2023, 12, 2247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hutsol, T.; Priss, O.; Kiurcheva, L.; Serdiuk, M.; Panasiewicz, K.; Jakubus, M.; Barabasz, W.; Furyk-Grabowska, K.; Kukharets, M. Mint plants (Mentha) as a promising source of biologically active substances to combat hidden hunger. Sustainability 2023, 15, 11648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalra, A.; Singh, H.; Pandey, R.; Samad, A.; Patra, N.; Kumar, S. Diseases in mint: Causal organisms, distribution, and control measures. J. Herbs Spices Med. Plants 2005, 11, 71–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martin, C.; Senula, A.; Gonzalez, I.; Acosta, A.; Keller, E.R.J.; Gonzalez-Benito, M.E. Genetic identity of three mint accessions stored by different conservation procedures: Field collection, in vitro and cryopreservation. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2013, 60, 243–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martin, C.; Cremer, C.; Gonzalez, I.; Gonzalez-Benito, M.E. Influence of the cryopreservation technique, recovery medium and genotype on genetic stability of mint cryopreserved shoot tips. Plant Cell Tissue Org. Cult. 2015, 122, 185–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gomes, H.; Bartos, P.; Martins, A.; Oliveira, S.; Schewinski-Pereira, J. Assessment of mint (Mentha spp.) species for large-scale production of plantlets by micropropagation. Acta Sci. Biol. Sci. 2015, 37, 405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Łyczko, J.; Piotrowski, K.; Kolasa, K.; Galek, R.; Szumny, A. Mentha piperita L. micropropagation and the potential influence of plant growth regulators on volatile organic compound composition. Molecules 2020, 25, 2652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Soltanbeigi, A.; Özgüven, M. Influence of planting date on growth, yield, and volatile oil of menthol mint (Mentha arvensis) under marginal land conditions. J. Essent. Oil-Bear. Plants 2021, 24, 360–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- State Commission of the Russian Federation for Testing and Protection of Selection Achievements (FSBI “Gossortkomissiya”). Available online: https://gossortrf.ru/registry/ (accessed on 7 November 2025).
- Shelepova, O.V.; Konovalova, L.N.; Baranova, E.N.; Dilovarova, T.A. Comparison of the chemical composition of essential oils of two species of Mentha L., propagated in vitro and in vivo. Biotechnology 2023, 39, 65–74. [Google Scholar]
- Shelepova, O.V.; Dilovarova, T.A.; Gulevich, A.A.; Olekhnovich, L.S.; Shirokova, A.V.; Ushakova, I.T.; Zhuravleva, E.V.; Konovalova, L.N.; Baranova, E.N. Chemical components and biological activities of essential oils of Mentha × piperita L. from field-grown and field-acclimated after in vitro propagation plants. Agronomy 2021, 11, 2314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hammer, Ø.; Harper, D.A.T.; Ryan, P.D. PAST: Paleontological Statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol. Electron. 2001, 4, 9. [Google Scholar]
- GOST ISO 31791-2017; Essential Oils and Floral-Herbaceous Essential Oil Raw Materials. Technical Conditions. Standartinform: Moscow, Russia, 2017; pp. 1–28.
- GOST ISO 9776-2017; Essential Oil of Cornmint (Mentha arvensis), Partially Dementholized (Mentha arvensis L. var. piperascens Malinv. and var. glabrata Holmes). Standartinform: Moscow, Russia, 2017; pp. 1–16.
- Khan, S.; Shende, S.M.; Bonde, D.R. In vitro micropropagation of mint (Mentha). World J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2021, 10, 1688–1692. [Google Scholar]
- Shelepova, O.V.; Olekhnovich, L.S.; Konovalova, L.N.; Khusnetdinova, T.I.; Gulevich, A.A.; Baranova, E.N. Assessment of essential oil yield in three mint species in the climatic conditions of Central Russia. Agron. Res. 2021, 19, 1551–1562. [Google Scholar]
- Vaidya, B.N.; Asanakunov, B.; Shahin, L.; Jernigan, H.L.; Joshee, N.; Dhekney, S.A. Improving micro-propagation of Mentha × piperita L. using a liquid culture system. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2019, 55, 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zagorskaya, M.S.; Abdurashytov, S.F. Genetic identity of mint cultivars after in vitro conservation, assessed by ISSR primers. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 937, 042014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radomir, A.M.; Stan, R.; Pandelea, M.L.; Vizitiu, D.E. In vitro multiplication of Mentha piperita L. and comparative evaluation of some biochemical compounds in plants regenerated by micropropagation and conventional method. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus 2022, 21, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zagorskaya, M.S.; Yegorova, N.A. Optimization of the nutrient medium composition for the clonal micropropagation in vitro mint cultivars Azhurnaya and Bergamotnaya. Sci. Notes V.I. Vernadsky CFU Biol. Chem. 2018, 70, 73–84. [Google Scholar]
- Paric, A.; Karalija, E.; Jasmina, C. Growth, secondary metabolites production, antioxidative and antimicrobial activity of mint under the influence of plant growth regulators. Acta Biol. Szeged. 2017, 61, 189–195. [Google Scholar]
- Agudelo-Morales, C.E.; Lerma, T.A.; Martinez, J.M.; Palencia, M.; Combatt, E.M. Phytohormones and plant growth regulators—A review. J. Sci. Technol. Appl. 2021, 10, 27–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khaldari, I.; Afshoon, E.; Nik, S.H. Phytohormonal elicitation triggers oxidative stress and enhances menthol biosynthesis through modulation of key pathway genes in Mentha piperita L. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 30495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khanam, D.; Mohammad, F. Effect of structurally different plant growth regulators (PGRs) on the concentration, yield, and constituents of peppermint essential oil. J. Herbs Spices Med. Plants 2018, 23, 26–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shao, Z.; Chen, C.Y.; Qiao, H. How chromatin senses plant hormones. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2024, 81, 102592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.; Ke, M.; Sun, Y.; Niu, S.; Zhang, W.; Li, Y. Epigenetic regulation and epigenetic memory resetting during plant rejuvenation. J. Exp. Bot. 2024, 75, 733–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaski, C.; Giannoulis, K.D.; Alexopoulos, A.A.; Petropoulos, S.A. Biostimulant application alleviates the negative effects of deficit irrigation and improves growth performance, essential oil yield and water-use efficiency of mint crop. Agronomy 2023, 13, 2182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Li, M.; Zhang, H.; Pang, X. Comparative investigation on aroma profiles of five different mint (Mentha) species using a combined sensory, spectroscopic and chemometric study. Food Chem. 2022, 371, 131104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alami, M.M.; Guo, S.; Mei, Z.; Yang, G.; Wang, X. Environmental factors on secondary metabolism in medicinal plants: Exploring accelerating factors. Med. Plant Biol. 2024, 3, e016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Voigt, V.; Franke, H.; Lachenmeier, D.W. Risk assessment of pulegone in foods based on benchmark dose–response modeling. Foods 2024, 13, 2906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khan, M.S.; Singh, S.; Pandey, P.; Semwal, M.; Kalra, A. Menthol mint (Mentha arvensis L.) crop acreage estimation using multi-temporal satellite imagery. J. Indian Sci. Remote Sens. 2021, 49, 987–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jedrzejczyk, I.; Rewers, M. Genome size and ISSR markers for Mentha L. (Lamiaceae) genetic diversity assessment and species identification. Ind. Crops Prod. 2018, 120, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaput, M.-H.; San, H.; De Hys, L.; Grenier, E.; David, H.; David, A. How plant regeneration from Mentha × piperita L. and Mentha × citrata Ehrh. leaf protoplasts affects their monoterpene composition in field conditions. J. Plant Physiol. 1996, 149, 481–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fejér, J.; Gruľová, D.; De Feos, V.; Ürgeová, E.; Obert, B.; Preťová, A. Mentha × piperita L. nodal segments cultures and their essential oil production. Ind. Crops Prod. 2018, 112, 550–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bertoli, A.; Leosnardi, M.; Krzyzanowska, J.; Oleszek, W.; Pistelli, L. In vitro production of Mentha × piperita not containing pulegone and menthofuran. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2012, 59, 417–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, S.; Kumar, A.; Gupta, A.K.; Jnanesha, A.C.; Talha, M.; Srivastava, A.; Lal, R.K. Industrial mint crop revolution, new opportunities, and novel cultivation ambitions: A review. Ecol. Genet. Genom. 2023, 27, 100174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akram, M.; Akhtar, M.T.; Akram, F.; Gohar, U.F. Mentha. In Essentials of Medicinal and Aromatic Crops; Zia-Ul-Haq, M., Al-Huqail, A.A., Riaz, M., Gohar, U.F., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 33–52. [Google Scholar]



| Compared Cultivars | cv ‘Pamyati Kirichenko’ | cv ‘Serebryanoye Chudo’ | cv ‘Botanicheskaya’ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nutrient medium variants | MS | MS with regulators | MS | MS with regulators | MS | MS with regulators |
| Shoot length, cm | 18.7 ± 1.2 | 17.2 ± 1.9 | 14.8 ± 0.9 | 9.2 ± 1.1 | 17.9 ± 1.2 | 16.0 ± 1.5 |
| Number of internodes | 8 ± 0.4 | 7.9 ± 0.3 | 7.7 ± 1.0 | 5.8 ± 0.8 | 8.1 ± 0.8 | 6.9 ± 0.5 |
| Length of roots, cm | 10.5 ± 0.7 | 12.7 ± 1.1 | 6.7 ± 0.5 | 3.4 ± 0.7 | 12.2 ± 0.8 | 12.8 ± 1.0 |
| Number of stolons | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 0.1 | 0 | 1 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.1 |
| Length of stolons, cm | 2.9 ± 0.7 | 2.0 ± 0.5 | 1 ± 0.2 | 0 | 3.0 ± 0.8 | 2.6 ± 1.1 |
| Number of lateral shoots | 1.5 ± 0.4 | 1 ± 0.2 | 1.6 ± 0.3 | 0.7 ± 0.3 | 1 ± 0.2 | 1.1 ± 0.4 |
| Length of lateral shoots, cm | 4.8 ± 0.7 | 3.4 ± 0.5 | 4.2 ± 0.3 | 2.1 ± 0.8 | 3.5 ± 0.5 | 5.9 ± 0.2 |
| Mass of ten plants, g | 5.03 ± 0.7 | 5.91 ± 0.2 | 5.52 ± 0.8 | 3.68 ± 1.1 | 6.05 ± 0.5 | 6.39 ± 0.6 |
| Reproduction coefficient | 11.7 ± 0.2 | 12.4 ± 0.1 | 6.5 ± 0.3 | 4.8 ± 0.4 | 10.8 ± 0.2 | 12.4 ± 0.2 |
| Welch’s ANOVA | F(22.39) = 0.0433, p = 0.99 | F(18.10) = 3.98, p = 0.04 | F(15.95) = 0.0045, p = 0.95 | |||
| Tukey’s HSD test | 0.999 | 0.0442 | 0.947 | |||
| Cultivars | cv ‘Pamyati Kirichenko’ | cv ‘Botanicheskaya’ | cv ‘Serebryanoye Chudo’ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Directly planted in field | Greenhouse pre-acclimatized | Directly planted in field | Greenhouse pre-acclimatized | Directly planted in field | Greenhouse pre-acclimatized | |
| Fresh raw materials | 410.5 | 501.0 | 398.0 | 481.5 | 310.5 | 399.5 |
| Air-dried raw materials | 90.0 | 109.5 | 88.1 | 107.5 | 80.9 | 97.4 |
| Essential oil content,% (v/w) | 3.8 | 3.9 | 4.1 | 4.9 | 2.0 | 2.7 |
| Essential oil production, g/m2 | 3.42 | 4.27 | 3.61 | 5.27 | 1.62 | 2.63 |
| Welch’s ANOVA | F(5.78) = 0.033, p = 0.862 | F(5.80) = 0.032, p = 0.864 | F(15.78) = 3.31, p = 0.048 | |||
| Tukey’s HSD test | 0.8663 | 0.8644 | 0.0483 | |||
| Welch’s ANOVA | F(6.64) = 0.019, p = 0.996 | F(6.59) = 0.044, p = 0.987 | F(6.57) = 0.050, p = 0.984 | |||
| Tukey’s HSD test | 0.9963 | 0.9872 | 0.9844 | |||
| Compound | cv ‘Pamyati Kirichenko’ | cv ‘Serebryanoye Chudo’ | cv ‘Botanicheskaya’ | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mother Plants * | Without Acclimatization | Greenhouse Acclimatization | Mother Plants * | Without Acclimatization | Greenhouse Acclimatization | Mother Plants * | Without Acclimatization | Greenhouse Acclimatization | |
| Sabinene | 0.16–0.21 | 0.75 | 0.55 | 0.70–1.11 | 4.46 | 3.18 | 0.18–0.59 | 0.65 | 0.70 |
| Limonene | 1.53–1.83 | 3.50 | 2.98 | 1.4–2.11 | 3.83 | 4.15 | 1.79–2.17 | 2.41 | 1.93 |
| 1,8-cineole | 0.38–0.20 | t | 0.15 | 1.61–3.60 | 10.82 | 8.60 | 0.24–6.61 | t | 0.28 |
| Hexyl isovalerate | t | t | 1.10–6.59 | 3.26 | 2.01 | t | t | ||
| Menthone | 7.80–11.30 | 18.57 | 15.35 | 2.34–6.53 | 5.34 | 3.48 | 10.21–20.78 | 15.58 | 12.15 |
| Isomenthone | 18.92–19.40 | 4.26 | 2.63 | t | t | 3.33–19.17- | 3.94 | 15.04 | |
| Linalool | 0.78–0.92 | 0.44 | 0.88 | 67.21–80.94 | 48.97 | 59.50 | 0.22–0.29 | 0.35 | 0.25 |
| Neomenthol | 0.24–0.46 | 0.68 | 1.01 | t | t | 0.38–0.64 | 2.57 | 0.88 | |
| Menthol | 40.32–62.82 | 40.76 | 52.60 | t | t | 36.43–48.37 | 30.67 | 33.05 | |
| Isomenthol | 0.93–1.1 | 0.30 | 0.45 | t | t | 1.17–2.87 | 0.27 | 0.25 | |
| Isoneomenthol | 0.87–1.50 | 0.78 | 0.50 | t | t | 0.15–1.17 | 1.94 | 0.90 | |
| Pulegone | 0.11–0.42 | 0.58 | 1.01 | t | t | 0.14–2.43 | 0.11 | 0.85 | |
| Piperitone | 0.84–1.11 | 2.31 | 2.50 | t | t | 0.52–0.67 | 1.09 | 0.55 | |
| Menthyl acetate | 8.11–25.19 | 19.28 | 15.34 | t | t | 1.42–8.27 | 30.09 | 28.65 | |
| α-terpineol | 0.13–0.17 | 0.10 | 0.15 | 0.44–1.15 | 3.83 | 3.40 | 0.19–0.26 | 0.10 | 0.15 |
| Germacrene D | 0.02–0.81 | 1.59 | 1.65 | 2.01–3.59 | 6.57 | 5.90 | 1.43–1.64 | 0.89 | 1.05 |
| γ-elemene | t | t | 1.01–2.33 | 1.34 | 1.30 | t | t | ||
| Caryophyllene oxide | t | t | 1.71–2.59 | 2.57 | 1.48 | t | t | ||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Shelepova, O.V.; Yuorieva, N.O.; Olecknovich, L.S.; Konovalova, L.N.; Gulevich, A.A.; Baranova, E.N. The Impact of Clonal Micropropagation and Acclimatization Methods on the Productivity and Essential Oil Quality of Three Mentha Cultivars. Agronomy 2025, 15, 2870. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15122870
Shelepova OV, Yuorieva NO, Olecknovich LS, Konovalova LN, Gulevich AA, Baranova EN. The Impact of Clonal Micropropagation and Acclimatization Methods on the Productivity and Essential Oil Quality of Three Mentha Cultivars. Agronomy. 2025; 15(12):2870. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15122870
Chicago/Turabian StyleShelepova, Olga V., Natalia O. Yuorieva, Ludmila S. Olecknovich, Ludmila N. Konovalova, Alexander A. Gulevich, and Ekaterina N. Baranova. 2025. "The Impact of Clonal Micropropagation and Acclimatization Methods on the Productivity and Essential Oil Quality of Three Mentha Cultivars" Agronomy 15, no. 12: 2870. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15122870
APA StyleShelepova, O. V., Yuorieva, N. O., Olecknovich, L. S., Konovalova, L. N., Gulevich, A. A., & Baranova, E. N. (2025). The Impact of Clonal Micropropagation and Acclimatization Methods on the Productivity and Essential Oil Quality of Three Mentha Cultivars. Agronomy, 15(12), 2870. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15122870

