Multi-State Photoluminescence of Donor–π–Acceptor Tetrafluorinated Tolane Mesogenic Dimers in Solution, Crystal, and Liquid-Crystalline Phases

Abstract

Photoluminescent liquid crystals with photoluminescence (PL) and liquid-crystalline (LC) properties have attracted attention as PL-switching materials owing to their thermally induced phase transitions, such as crystal → smectic A/nematic → isotropic phase transitions. Our group previously developed tetrafluorinated tolane mesogenic dimers linked by flexible alkylene-1,n-dioxy spacers, demonstrating that the position of the tetrafluorinated aromatic ring critically influences the LC behavior. However, these compounds exhibited very weak fluorescence owing to an insufficient D–π–A character of the π-conjugated mesogens, which facilitated internal conversion from emissive ππ* to non-emissive πσ* states. We designed and synthesized derivatives in which the mesogen–spacer linkage was modified from ether to ester, thereby enhancing the D–π–A character. Thermal and structural analyses revealed spacer-length parity effects: even-numbered spacers induced nematic phases, whereas odd-numbered spacers stabilized smectic A phases. Photophysical studies revealed multi-state PL across solution, crystal, and LC phases. Strong blue PL (Φ_PL = 0.39–0.48) was observed in solution, while crystals exhibited aggregation-induced emission enhancement (Φ_PL = 0.48–0.77) with spectral diversity. In LC states, Φ_PL values up to 0.36 were maintained, showing reversible intensity and spectral shifts with phase transitions. These findings establish design principles that correlate spacer parity, phase behavior, and PL properties, enabling potential applications in PL thermosensors and responsive optoelectronic devices.

1. Introduction

Organic solid-state luminescent materials are indispensable functional components in modern optoelectronic devices, particularly organic light-emitting diodes and organic electroluminescent displays [1,2,3]. In general, luminescent molecules with extended π-conjugated systems exhibit strong emission in dilute solutions; however, their luminescence in the solid state is often quenched owing to aggregation-caused quenching (ACQ) [4,5,6] originating from π-π stacking and subsequent energy transfer. In contrast, the phenomenon of aggregation-induced emission (AIE) [7,8,9,10], first reported by Tang et al. in 2001 [11], provides a molecular design strategy to circumvent ACQ. This discovery has since then led to significant progress in solid-state luminescent materials. Moreover, compounds presenting aggregation-induced emission enhancement (AIEE), which fluoresce in solution state but exhibit much stronger luminescence in the solid state, have been identified [12,13], broadening the scope of dual-state emissive materials capable of functioning in both solution and solid states.

Our research group has explored photoluminescent liquid crystals by employing tolane, a compact linear π-conjugated unit, as a luminescent mesogen and introducing flexible chains to confer both emissive and liquid-crystalline (LC) properties. Although tolane has long been used as a mesogenic unit in LC compounds [14,15,16], it was traditionally considered a poor luminophore because of the rapid internal conversion of its photoexcited ππ* state to a non-emissive πσ* state [17,18,19]. However, in the context of tolane-based dimers, restricted intramolecular rotation can effectively suppress this non-radiative pathway, thereby leading to AIEE. Recent studies have demonstrated that tolane scaffolds can become highly emissive when molecular motions are constrained, as exemplified by AIE-active tolane systems [20] and crystallization-induced emission enhancement active derivatives [21]. In addition, it has been reported that enforcing a twisted conformation between the two aromatic rings of tolane produces phosphorescence at low temperatures, highlighting an unusual emissive behavior [22,23].

Previously, we reported photoluminescent tetrafluorinated tolane derivatives with four fluorine atoms positioned along the short molecular axis of the aromatic ring. These compounds displayed strong solid-state photoluminescence (PL) and enhanced crystalline stability via intermolecular C–H···F interactions (Figure 1a) [24,25,26].

However, the strong aggregation induced by these interactions suppressed LC phase formation, even when the flexible chains were elongated [26], hindering the simultaneous realization of PL and LC behaviors. To address this, we designed mesogenic dimers, in which two tetrafluorinated tolane units were linked by an alkylene-1,n-dioxy spacer [27,28]. This approach reduced the crystallinity of the material and enabled the coexistence of PL and LC properties (Figure 1b,c). Nonetheless, the electron density distribution within the π-conjugated framework remained insufficient, resulting in weak PL in both solution and solid states.

In this study, we sought to enhance the PL performance of tolane-based mesogens by replacing the electron-donating ether linkage with an electron-withdrawing ester linkage, thereby increasing the dipole moment of the donor–π–acceptor (D–π–A) mesogenic unit [29]. This molecular design was expected to improve the PL efficiency of the mesogen in solution, solid, and LC states. Specifically, we designed novel D–π–A tetrafluorinated tolane-based mesogenic dimers incorporating decyloxy substituents as electron-donating groups (EDGs) and ester linkages as electron-withdrawing groups (EWGs), connected by flexible alkylene spacers (Figure 1d). Here, we present a systematic evaluation of the LC and PL properties of these mesogenic dimer compounds and discuss how their molecular structures influence these characteristics. In addition, we report PL measurements conducted in the LC state, thereby demonstrating that these compounds serve as effective multi-state fluorescent materials, with distinct emission characteristics observed in solution, crystalline, and LC phases.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. General

Melting temperatures (T_m) were measured through polarizing optical microscopy (POM; BX-53, Olympas, Tokyo, Japan) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC; DSC-60 Plus, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). ¹H, ¹³C, and ¹⁹F NMR spectra were recorded on an AVANCE III 400 NMR spectrometer (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) in CDCl₃ (¹H: 400 MHz; ¹³C: 100 MHz; and ¹⁹F: 376 MHz). Chemical shifts are reported in parts per million (ppm) relative to residual solvent peaks for ¹H and ¹³C or relative to C₆F₆ (δ_F = −163 ppm) for ¹⁹F. Infrared (IR) spectra were obtained with an FT/IR-4100 type A spectrometer (JASCO, Tokyo, Japan) using the KBr method. High-resolution mass spectroscopy (HRMS) was conducted using a JMS-700MS spectrometer (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) using the fast-atom bombardment method.

All reactions were performed under an argon atmosphere in dried glassware with magnetic stir bars. Column chromatography was conducted using silica gel (Wakogel^® 60N, 38–100 μm), and thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was performed on silica gel TLC plates (60F₂₅₄, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany).

The target compounds 1_n (n = 4–8) were synthesized from commercially available ethyl 2,3,5,6-tetrafluoro-4-iodobenzoate via a Sonogashira cross-coupling reaction, hydrolysis under basic conditions, and esterification with alkane-1,n-diol (Scheme 1). The ¹H, ¹³C, and ¹⁹F NMR spectra of compounds 1_n are provided in the Supplementary Material (Figures S3–S18).

2.2. Synthesis of 2,3,5,6-Tetrafluoro-4-[2-(4-decyloxyphenyl)ethyn-1-yl]benzoic Acid (3)

A two-necked round-bottomed flask equipped with a Teflon^®-coated magnetic stirring bar was charged with 4-(decyloxyphenyl)acetylene (7.75 g, 30 mmol), Cl₂Pd(PPh3)2 (0.71 g, 1.0 mmol), ethyl 2,3,5,6-tetrafluoro-4-iodobenzoate (6.96 g, 20 mmol), and triphenylphosphine (0.55 g, 2.0 mmol) in triethylamine (100 mL). Copper(I) iodide (0.39 g, 2.0 mmol) was then added to the suspension. The reaction mixture was heated at 80 °C under stirring for 19 h. After being cooled to room temperature, the resulting precipitate was removed by atmospheric filtration under air, and the filtrate was poured into an aqueous NH₄Cl solution (100 mL). The mixture was extracted with EtOAc (75 mL, three times), and the combined organic layer was washed once with brine, dried over anhydrous Na₂SO₄, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude residue was purified by silica-gel column chromatography (hexane/CH₂Cl₂ = 10:1) to obtain compound 2 (14.5 mmol, 73% yield, determined by ¹⁹F NMR) along with an inseparable byproduct. The obtained compound 2, as a mixture with the inseparable byproduct, was directly subjected to the subsequent hydrolysis without further purification.

A two-necked round-bottomed flask equipped with a Teflon^®-coated magnetic stirring bar was charged with compound 2 (14.5 mmol) and LiOH·H₂O (1.52 g, 36.2 mmol) in tetrahydrofuran (THF; 72 mL) and H₂O (30 mL). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 4 h and then acidified with 10% aqueous HCl until the pH was below 1. The crude product was extracted with Et₂O (50 mL, three times) and the combined organic layer was washed once with brine. The organic layer was subsequently dried over anhydrous Na₂SO₄, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was recrystallized from CH₂Cl₂ to afford compound 3 (4.74 g, 10.5 mmol) in 53% overall yield (two steps).

2,3,5,6-Tetrafluoro-4-[2-(4-decyloxyphenyl)ethyn-1-yl]benzoic Acid (3)

Yield: 53% in two steps (pale yellow solid); M.P.: 138 °C determined by POM; ¹H NMR (Acetone-d₆): δ 0.87 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H), 1.25–1.41 (m, 12H), 1.48 (quin, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 1.79 (quin, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 4.07 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 7.03 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.58 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H); ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃): δ 14.1, 23.1, 26.4, 29.8 (for two carbons), 30.0, 30.1, 32.4, 68.7, 73.1 (t, J = 4.4 Hz), 104.8 (t, J = 2.9 Hz), 107.9 (t, J = 2.2 Hz), 113.2, 113.4, 113.6, 115.7, 134.3, 143.7–146.7 (dm, J = 253.7 Hz), 145.7–148.6 (dm, J = 250.8 Hz), 160.0 (t, J = 3.0 Hz), 161.6; ¹⁹F NMR (Acetone-d₆, C₆F₆): δ −136.90 to −137.05 (m, 2F), −140.21 to −140.37 (m, 2F); IR (KBr): ν 3744, 2953, 2926, 2852, 2213, 1684, 1476, 1419, 1254, 1169, 994, 838 cm⁻¹; HRMS: (FAB+) m/z [M]⁺ Calcd. for C₂₅H₂₆F₄O₃: 450.1818; Found: 450.1815.

2.3. Typical Synthetic Procedure for Target Compounds 1₄

Compound 3 (0.45 g, 1.0 mmol) and butane-1,4-diol (0.045 g, 0.5 mmol) were dissolved in CH₂Cl₂ (2.0 mL) in a two-necked round-bottomed flask equipped with a Teflon^®-coated magnetic stirring bar. To this solution, 4-(dimethylamino)pyridinium p-toluenesulfonate (DPTS; 0.31 g, 1.05 mmol) and N,N′-diisopropylcarbodiimide (DIC; 0.13 g, 1.0 mmol) were added at 0 °C. The resulting mixture was warmed to room temperature and stirred for 20 h. It was then poured into saturated aqueous NaHCO₃ solution (30 mL). The crude product was extracted with CHCl₃ (15 mL, three times), and the combined organic layer was washed once with brine. The organic layer was subsequently dried over anhydrous Na₂SO₄, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (hexane/CH₂Cl₂ = 3:1), followed by recrystallization from hexane to recover the target compound 1₄ in 70% isolated yield (0.33 g, 0.35 mmol) as a white solid.

2.3.1. 1,4-Bis[2,3,5,6-tetrafluoro-4-{2-(4-decyloxyphenyl)ethyn-1-yl}benzoyloxy]butane 1₄

Yield: 70% (White solid); M.P.: 111 °C (determined by DSC); ¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 0.88 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 6H), 1.21–1.54 (m, 28H), 1.79 (quin, J = 6.8 Hz, 8H), 3.98 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 4H), 4.40 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 4H), 6.89 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 4H), 7.52 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 4H); ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃): δ 14.1, 22.7, 25.4, 26.0, 28.3, 29.1, 29.3, 29.4, 29.6, 31.9, 66.5, 68.2, 73.0 (t, J = 3.7 Hz), 104.7 (t, J = 2.9 Hz), 108.1 (tt, J = 2.9 Hz), 111.9 (t, J = 16.2 Hz), 113.0, 114.8, 133.8, 143.1–146.1 (dm, J = 256.8 Hz), 145.1–148.0 (dm, J = 253.0 Hz), 159.6, 160.6; ¹⁹F NMR (CDCl₃): δ −137.32 to −137.48 (m, 4F), −141.22 to −141.39 (m, 4F); IR (KBr): ν 2953, 2921, 2850, 2213, 1730, 1602, 1515, 1474, 1329, 1295, 1167, 994 cm⁻¹; HRMS: (FAB+) m/z [M]⁺ Calcd. for C₅₄H₅₈F₈O₆: 954.4106; Found: 954.4109.

2.3.2. 1,5-Bis[2,3,5,6-tetrafluoro-4-{2-(4-decyloxyphenyl)ethyn-1-yl}benzoyloxy]pentane 1₅

Yield: 80% (White solid); M.P.: 77 °C (determined by DSC); ¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 0.88 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 6H), 1.21–1.40 (m, 24H), 1.45 (quin, J = 7.6 Hz, 4H), 1.58–1.66 (m, 2H), 1.74–1.88 (m, 8H), 3.97 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 4H), 4.42 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 4H), 6.87 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 4H), 7.51 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 4H); ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃): δ 14.1, 22.3, 22.7, 26.0, 28.0, 29.1, 29.3, 29.4, 29.6 (for two carbons), 31.9, 66.3, 68.2, 73.0 (t, J = 4.4 Hz), 104.7 (t, J = 3.6 Hz), 108.2 (tt, J = 17.6, 2.9 Hz), 111.7 (t, J = 16.1 Hz), 113.0, 114.7, 133.7, 143.1–146.2 (dm, J = 255.2 Hz), 145.0–148.0 (dm, J = 253.0 Hz), 159.6, 160.6; ¹⁹F NMR (CDCl₃): δ −137.43 to −137.60 (m, 4F), −141.36 to −141.52 (m, 4F); IR (KBr): ν 2921, 2851, 2218, 1728, 1605, 1475, 1331, 1261, 1172, 990, 830 cm⁻¹; HRMS: (FAB+) m/z [M]⁺ Calcd. for C₅₅H₆₀F₈O₆: 968.4262; Found: 968.4267.

2.3.3. 1,6-Bis[2,3,5,6-tetrafluoro-4-{2-(4-decyloxyphenyl)ethyn-1-yl}benzoyloxy]hexane 1₆

Yield: 70% (White solid); M.P.: 98 °C (determined by DSC); ¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 0.88 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 6H), 1.21–1.40 (m, 26H), 1.4–1.55 (m, 6H), 1.79 (quin, J = 6.8 Hz, 8H), 3.98 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 4H), 4.40 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 4H), 6.89 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 4H), 7.52 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 4H); ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃): δ 14.1, 22.7, 25.4, 26.0, 28.3, 29.1, 29.3, 29.4, 29.5 (for two carbons), 31.9, 66.5, 68.2, 73.0 (t, J = 3.7 Hz), 104.6 (t, J = 2.9 Hz), 108.1 (tt, J = 18.3, 2.9 Hz), 111.9 (t, J = 16.2 Hz), 113.0, 114.7, 133.7, 143.1–146.0 (dm, J = 255.2 Hz), 145.1–148.0 (dm, J = 251.6 Hz), 159.6, 160.6; ¹⁹F NMR (CDCl₃): δ −137.43 to −137.57 (m, 4F), −141.38 to −141.52 (m, 4F); IR (KBr): ν 2952, 2925, 2853, 2212, 1733, 1603, 1478, 1337, 1254, 1171, 991, 838 cm⁻¹; HRMS: (FAB+) m/z [M]⁺ Calcd. for C₅₆H₆₂F₈O₆: 982.4419; Found: 982.4416.

2.3.4. 1,7-Bis[2,3,5,6-tetrafluoro-4-{2-(4-decyloxyphenyl)ethyn-1-yl}benzoyloxy]heptane 1₇

Yield: 19% (White solid); M.P.: 82 °C (determined by DSC); ¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 0.88 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 6H), 1.22–1.40 (m, 26H), 1.40–1.52 (m, 8H), 1.72–1.84 (m, 8H), 3.98 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 4H), 4.40 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 4H), 6.89 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 4H), 7.52 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 4H); ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃); δ 14.1, 22.7, 25.6, 26.0, 28.3, 28.6, 29.1, 29.3, 29.4, 29.5 (for two carbons), 31.9, 66.7, 68.2, 73.0 (t, J = 3.6 Hz), 104.6 (t, J = 2.9 Hz), 108.1 (tt, J = 16.2, 3.7 Hz), 111.9 (t, J = 16.1 Hz), 113.0, 114.4, 133.8, 143.0–146.5 (m), 145.0–148.0 (m), 159.6, 160.6; ¹⁹F NMR (CDCl₃): δ −137.45 to −137.60 (m, 4F), −141.38 to −141.53 (m, 4F); IR (KBr): ν 2922, 2853, 2215, 1721, 1604, 1479, 1332, 1269, 1173, 995, 832 cm⁻¹; HRMS: (FAB+) m/z [M]⁺ Calcd. for C₅₇H₆₄F₈O₆: 996.4575; Found: 996.4570.

2.3.5. 1,8-Bis[2,3,5,6-tetrafluoro-4-{2-(4-decyloxyphenyl)ethyn-1-yl}benzoyloxy]octane 1₈

Yield: 78% (White solid); M.P.: 98 °C (determined by DSC); ¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 0.88 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 6H), 1.22–1.50 (m, 36H), 1.72–1.85 (m, 8H), 3.98 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 4H), 4.39 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 4H), 6.89 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 4H), 7.52 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 4H); ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃): δ 14.1, 22.7, 25.7, 26.0, 28.4, 29.0, 29.1, 29.3, 29.4, 29.5 (for two carbons), 31.9, 66.8, 68.2, 73.0 (t, J = 4.4 Hz), 104.6 (t, J = 3.6 Hz), 108.1 (tt, J = 16.8, 3.0 Hz), 111.9 (t, J = 16.1 Hz), 113.0, 114.7, 133.7, 143.1–146.0 (dm, J = 256.0 Hz), 145.1–147.9 (dm, J = 253.0 Hz), 159.6, 160.6; ¹⁹F NMR (CDCl₃): δ −137.46 to −137.62 (m, 4F), −141.41 to −141.56 (m, 4F); IR (KBr): ν 2932, 2853, 2223, 1734, 1606, 1476, 1469, 1250, 1172, 990, 843 cm⁻¹; HRMS: (FAB+) m/z [M]+ Calcd. for C₅₈H₆₆F₈O₆: 1010.4732; Found: 1010.4725.

2.4. Density Functional Theory Calculation

Density functional theory (DFT) calculations were carried out using the Gaussian 16 software (Rev. B.01; Gaussian, Wallingford, CT, USA) [30]. Geometrical optimizations were performed at the M06-2X/6-31G(d) level of theory [31] using the conductor-like polarizable continuum model (CPCM) implicit solvation model [32] to simulate CH₂Cl₂. Vertical electronic transitions were evaluated through time-dependent DFT (TD-DFT) at the same level of theory [33].

2.5. Phase-Transition Behavior

The phase-transition behaviors of the specimens were examined by POM using a BX-53 microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a heating–cooling stage (10.002 L, Linkam Scientific Instruments, Redhill, UK). The phase sequences and transition enthalpies were determined by DSC (Shimadzu DSC-60 Plus) under a N₂ atmosphere at heating and cooling rates were 5.0 °C min⁻¹. Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns were acquired using an X-ray diffractometer (Rigaku MiniFlex600, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with an X-ray tube (Cu Kα, λ = 1.54 Å) and semiconductor detector (D/teX Ultra2). The sample powder was mounted on a silicon non-reflecting plate set on a benchtop heating stage (Anton Paar, BTS-500, Graz, Austria). The temperature, heating/cooling rate, and time of X-ray exposure were precisely controlled.

2.6. Photophysical Behavior

UV–visible absorption spectra were recorded using a V-750 absorption spectrometer (JASCO, Tokyo, Japan). PL spectra in the solution and crystalline (Cr) states were acquired using an RF-6000 spectrofluorophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The absolute quantum yields of the materials in solution and Cr phases were measured using a Quantaurus-QY C11347-01 absolute PL quantum yield spectrometer (Hamamatsu Photonics, Hamamatsu, Japan). The PL lifetime (τ_PL) was measured using a Quantaurus-Tau C11367-34 fluorescence lifetime spectrometer (Hamamatsu Photonics, Hamamatsu, Japan).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Thermophysical Properties

The target compounds were synthesized according to Scheme 1 and purified by silica gel column chromatography followed by recrystallization. A decyloxy group and an ester moiety were introduced as the EDG and EWG, respectively, into D–π–A fluorinated tolanes. The resulting compounds constitute a homologous series of mesogenic dimers, ranging from dimer 1₄ with a butylene spacer to dimer 1₈ with an octylene spacer. The phase-transition behaviors of these compounds were first investigated using DSC. Each compound was subjected to three consecutive heating–cooling cycles to evaluate its thermal behavior. Furthermore, the mesophases formed upon phase transitions were identified by POM and PXRD. Figure 2 presents the phase-transition sequences observed during the second heating–cooling cycle and the POM texture images; the detailed thermograms are presented in Figures S19–S23 in the Electronic Supplementary Material.

DSC and POM observations revealed that compounds 1₄–1₇ form mesophases upon both heating and cooling. By contrast, in compound 1₈, which contains an octylene spacer, only a crystal–isotropic (Cr–Iso) transition was observed under the present conditions as the sample could not be sufficiently supercooled to detect any potential monotropic mesophase (Figures S19–S23). POM observations of the mesophases revealed that compounds with even-numbered spacers (1₄ and 1₆) exhibit Schlieren textures, whereas those with odd-numbered spacers (1₅ and 1₇) display fan-shaped textures consisting of small domains (Figure 2b). PXRD and small-angle X-ray scattering measurements were performed on the mesophases obtained upon cooling. For even-spacer compounds 1₄ and 1₆, only a diffuse halo peak was observed at 2θ ≈ 20°, with no sharp diffractions detected across the entire region (Figure S24b,e). In contrast, odd-spacer compounds 1₅ and 1₇ exhibited distinct diffraction peaks in the low-angle region, indicating the presence of layered order along the molecular long axis (Figure 3).

Based on the POM and PXRD results, the mesophases formed by even-spacer compounds 1₄ and 1₆ were assigned to nematic (N) phases, which possess orientational order only. Conversely, the mesophases formed by odd-spacer compounds 1₅ and 1₇ were identified as smectic (Sm) phases characterized by both orientational and positional order. Furthermore, the PXRD patterns of compounds 1₅ and 1₇ displayed sharp (001) reflections at 2θ = 3.45° and 3.35°, respectively. Using Bragg’s equation, the corresponding layer spacings (d-spacing) of compounds 1₅ and 1₇ were calculated to be 2.56 and 2.64 nm, respectively.

Further, structural optimizations were performed on compounds 1₅ and 1₇, which formed Sm phases with layered aggregated structures, and the resulting optimized geometries are shown in Figure 4a.

The optimized geometries exhibited a bent conformation, in which the π-conjugated mesogens were deflected in the same direction as the linking spacer. The molecular lengths of each structural unit were approximately 1.48 nm for the D–π–A fluorinated tolane unit, 1.01 nm for the terminal decyloxy chain, and 0.97 and 1.22 nm for the linking spacers in compounds 1₅ and 1₇, respectively. In the SmA phase, intermolecular interactions between the D–π–A-type π-conjugated mesogens, which possess large dipole moments, are predominant (Figure 4b). Under these conditions, the sum of the molecular lengths of the π-conjugated mesogen and the linking spacer corresponds to the layer spacing of the Sm structure, which in turn coincides with the d-spacing associated with the (001) reflection observed in the PXRD pattern. Collectively, these results demonstrate that the mesophases formed by compounds 1₅ and 1₇ can be assigned to the SmA phase because the observed layer spacing corresponds to the molecular length along the layer normal.

Furthermore, Figure 2c shows the relationship between the number of carbon atoms in the linking spacer chain and the phase-transition temperature during the cooling process for the 1_n mesogens. Here, the Iso-to-LC transition temperature is defined as T_LC–Iso and the LC-to-Cr phase-transition temperature is defined as T_Cr–LC. Remarkably, a distinct odd-even effect was observed, with both transition temperatures being higher for mesogens with even-numbered spacers than for the mesogens with odd-numbered spacers. The mesophases formed by the molecules with odd-numbered spacers were identified as SmA phases, which have a higher degree of order than the N phases formed by the molecules with even-numbered spacers. Consequently, the direct formation of the ordered SmA phase from the Iso phase upon cooling was hindered, leading to a decrease in the T_LC–Iso value. In addition, the optimized geometries of the mesogens with odd-numbered spacers exhibited bent conformations. Assuming that this bent structure reflects the molecular arrangement in the Cr phase, the transition from the SmA phase to a bent molecular conformation is also unfavorable, resulting in the phase transition occurring at lower temperatures.

These phase-transition behaviors indicate that the D–π–A tetrafluorinated tolane mesogenic dimers designed and synthesized in this study, with spacers ranging from butylene to heptylene, form LC phases. Notably, the results clearly reveal that the type of mesophase, that is, N or SmA, can be controlled by the parity of the spacer length. An examination of the relationship between the molecular lengths calculated by DFT and the exhibited mesophases revealed that the molecular lengths of the compounds with even-numbered spacers showing the N phase were 56.61 Å for 1₄, 57.69 Å for 1₆, and 59.16 Å for 1₈. By contrast, the molecular lengths of the derivatives with odd-numbered spacers exhibiting the SmA phase were 25.49 Å for both 1₅ and 1₇ (Figure S32). These results suggest that molecules with more linear structures tend to form the N phase, whereas those with bent structures are inclined to form the SmA phase.

3.2. Photophysical Properties

3.2.1. UV-Visible (UV-Vis) and PL Behavior in CH₂Cl₂ Solutions

Having examined the phase-transition behavior, the photophysical properties of D–π–A tetrafluorinated tolane mesogenic dimers with linking spacers of varying chain lengths, viz., 1₄–1₈, were investigated. To gain fundamental insight into their electronic characteristics, the UV–vis absorption and PL properties were examined in a CH₂Cl₂ solution. The UV–vis. and PL spectra of compounds 1₄–1₈ are shown in Figure 5 and Figure S25, and the detailed photophysical data are provided in

Table 1. Photophysical data of compounds 1₄–1₈ in CH₂Cl₂ solutions.

Compound	λabs [nm] a (ε [103, L mol−1 cm−1])	λPL [nm] b (ΦPL) c	τPL [ns] d	τ1 [ns] d	τ2 [ns] d	kr (×108) [s−1] e	knr (×108) [s−1] f	knr/kr
14	327 (35.2)	437 (0.41)	3.67	1.88	25.90	1.12	1.61	1.44
15	326 (66.9)	441 (0.48)	5.26	1.68	14.00	0.91	0.99	1.08
16	326 (44.5)	435 (0.40)	2.67	1.79	9.68	1.50	2.25	1.50
17	326 (56.9)	435 (0.41)	2.86	1.82	11.39	1.43	2.06	1.44
18	326 (49.3)	430 (0.39)	1.97	1.97	–	1.98	3.10	1.56

^a Observed at a concentration of 1.0 × 10⁻⁵ mol L⁻¹. ^b Observed at a concentration of 1.0 × 10⁻⁶ mol L⁻¹. ^c Determined using an absolute quantum yield measurement system equipped with an integrating sphere. ^d τ_PL refers to the PL lifetime. For samples exhibiting biexponential decay behavior, τ_PL is calculated as the amplitude-weighted mean of τ₁ and τ₂. For single-exponential decay, τ₂ is not used in the fitting and is therefore indicated as “–”. ^e Radiative deactivation rate constant k_r = Φ_PL/τ_PL. ^f Nonradiative deactivation rate constant k_nr = (1 − Φ_PL)/τ_PL.

.

The CH₂Cl₂ solutions of compounds 1₄–1₈ were transparent in the 400–800 nm region. Below 400 nm, they exhibited absorption maxima (λ_abs) at 326–327 nm, as shown in Figure 6a. To elucidate the nature of these absorptions, time-dependent DFT (TD-DFT) calculations were performed using the optimized geometries obtained from DFT and including the CPCM solvation model for CH₂Cl₂ (Figure 6,

Table 2. Theoretical data for vertical electronic transitions of compounds 1₄–1₈ ¹.

Compound	HOMO–1/ HOMO [eV]	LUMO/ LUMO+1 [eV]	ΔEH-L [eV]	Theoretical Electronic Transition (Population)	λcalcd [nm]	Oscillator Strength (f)
14	−7.423/−7.422	−1.672/−1.667	5.75	HOMO–1 → LUMO (41.3%) HOMO–1 → LUMO+1 (9.3%) HOMO → LUMO (8.7%) HOMO → LUMO+1 (32.9%)	318	3.1272
15	−7.423/−7.422	−1.667/−1.665	5.76	HOMO–1 → LUMO+1 (46.0%) HOMO → LUMO (46.1%)	317	1.7796
				HOMO–1 → LUMO (46.2%) HOMO → LUMO+1 (46.1%)	316	1.3306
16	−7.420/−7.419	−1.663/−1.658	5.76	HOMO–1 → LUMO+1 (34.9%) HOMO → LUMO (54.8%)	317	3.0916
17	−7.421/−7.4209	−1.659/−1.658	5.76	HOMO–1 → LUMO+1 (44.5%) HOMO → LUMO (44.5%)	317	1.7845
				HOMO–1 → LUMO (45.7%) HOMO → LUMO+1 (45.7%)	316	1.3297
18	−7.420/−7.419	−1.659/−1.650	5.76	HOMO–1 → LUMO (66.9%) HOMO → LUMO+1 (25.3%)	316	2.9565

¹ Computed at the M06-2X/6-31+G(d,p)//M06-2X/6-31G(d) level.

).

The results revealed that the number of electronically allowed excited states depends on the parity of the spacer length. For compounds with even-numbered spacers, whose optimized structures adopt an N-type geometry, a single excited state transition dominated. In contrast, compounds with odd-numbered spacers, which adopt bent geometries, allowed transitions to two excited states. All these excited states correspond to transitions from the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) or HOMO–1 to the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) or LUMO+1. The analysis of molecular orbital distributions revealed that for compounds with odd-numbered spacers, the bent geometry endowed higher symmetry, resulting in orbital delocalization from HOMO–1 to LUMO+1 over both groups of π-conjugated mesogens. In contrast, in compounds with even-numbered spacers that adopt N-type geometries, the same set of orbitals was localized on one of the two π-conjugated mesogens. This difference in orbital delocalization accounts for the disparity in the number of accessible excited states.

Furthermore, molecular orbital diagrams of HOMO/HOMO–1 and LUMO/LUMO+1 revealed substantial electron density on the electron-rich alkoxy-substituted aromatic rings, whereas the electron-deficient ester-substituted aromatic rings exhibited smaller electron distributions. These results confirm the presence of a typical D–π–A electronic structure. Indeed, our previous studies demonstrated π-π* transitions originating from intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) states in fluorinated tolanes bearing ester functionality as electron-withdrawing substituents [24,26], and a similar ICT-based π-π* transition is inferred here for the present mesogenic dimer systems.

The theoretically calculated absorption maxima (λ_calcd) of the allowed transitions with high oscillator strengths (f) were 316–318 nm, slightly blue-shifted relative to the experimental λ_abs values of 326–327 nm. This small discrepancy can be attributed to environmental effects. Therefore, the absorption processes of tetrafluorinated tolane mesogenic dimers 1₄–1₈ can be assigned to ICT-based π-π* transitions involving HOMO/HOMO–1 → LUMO/LUMO+1, as supported by theoretical calculations.

Using the observed λ_abs values as excitation wavelengths, the PL properties of compounds 1₄–1₈ in CH₂Cl₂ solutions were further investigated (Figure 5b and Figure S25). Independent of the spacer length, all compounds exhibited a single blue PL band with emission maxima (λ_PL) at 430–441 nm. The PL quantum yields (Φ_PL = emitted photons/absorbed photons) were moderate, ranging from 0.39 to 0.48. In contrast, previously reported ether-linked analogs emitted at ~360 nm with Φ_PL ≈ 0.035, exhibiting only very weak near-UV PL [27,28]. Thus, the substitution of the ether linkage with an ester linkage enhances the D–π–A character, leading to comparatively stronger PL in the visible region. Fluorescence decay measurements revealed average lifetimes (τ_PL) of 1.97–5.26 ns for mesogenic dimers 1₄–1₈ (Table 2, Figure S26). The nano-second lifetimes indicate that the radiative decay arises from fluorescence. In most cases, the decay profiles could be fitted well with biexponential functions, suggesting the involvement of at least two emissive excited states. Although the detailed excited-state structures remain to be determined, the introduction of the EDG and EWG into the π-conjugated core induces a strong D–π–A character, implying that in addition to monomeric CT-state emission, partial aggregation-derived emission (either intramolecular or intermolecular) may also contribute to PL. From Φ_PL and τ_ave, the radiative (k_r) and non-radiative (k_nr) decay rate constants were calculated to be 0.91–1.98 × 10⁸ and 0.99–3.10 × 10⁸ s⁻¹, respectively. The k_nr/k_r ratios ranged from 1.08 to 1.56, indicating that non-radiative decay can be up to 1.56 times faster than radiative decay. In general, diphenylacetylenes are known to undergo ultrafast internal conversion from a linear fluorescent ππ* excited state to a non-fluorescent trans-bent πσ* excited state [17,18,19]. Although the incorporation of the EDG and EWG at the longitudinal molecular termini to form a D–π–A structure has been reported to suppress this internal conversion [29], in the present D–π–A tetrafluorinated tolane mesogenic dimeric systems, rapid internal conversion remains predominant, resulting in a greater k_nr than the k_r.

3.2.2. PL Behavior of the Mesogenic Dimers in the Cr Phase

Next, the PL behaviors of the D–π–A tetrafluorinated tolane mesogenic dimers, which exhibited relatively strong blue fluorescence in CH₂Cl₂ solutions, were investigated in the Cr state. For PL measurements, the Cr samples obtained by recrystallization after silica gel column chromatography were used. Figure 7 and Figure S27 present the PL spectra of the Cr samples, along with the photographs of their emission under UV irradiation. The corresponding photophysical data are summarized in

Table 3. Photophysical data of compounds 1₄–1₈ in the crystalline state.

Compd.	λPL [nm] a	ΦPL b	τPL [ns] c	τ1 [ns] c	τ2 [ns] c	kr (×108) [s−1] d	knr (×108) [s−1] e	knr/kr
14	399, 421, 449	0.64	1.42	1.42	–	4.51	2.53	0.56
15	449	0.68	10.73	10.73	–	0.63	0.30	0.47
16	400, 420sh, 449sh	0.68	1.61	1.31	8.30	4.22	1.98	0.47
17	431	0.48	4.17	4.17	–	1.15	1.25	1.08
18	423	0.77	7.52	2.18	9.62	1.02	3.06	0.30

^a Excitation wavelength: 370 nm for 1₄, 349 nm for 1₅, 364 nm for 1₆, 370 nm for 1₇, and 347 nm for 1₈. ^b Determined using an absolute quantum yield measurement system equipped with an integrating sphere. ^c τ_PL refers to the PL lifetime. For samples exhibiting biexponential decay behavior, τ_PL is calculated as the amplitude-weighted mean of τ₁ and τ₂. For single-exponential decay, τ₂ is not used in the fitting and is therefore indicated as “–”. ^d Radiative deactivation rate constant k_r = Φ_PL/τ_PL. ^e Non-radiative deactivation rate constant k_nr = (1 − Φ_PL)/τ_PL. sh: shoulder peak.

.

In contrast to the PL behaviors observed in CH₂Cl₂ solutions, the spectral profiles and λ_PL values of the Cr state varied significantly depending on the spacer length, although no clear correlation between the spacer length and PL behavior could be established. Specifically, compound 1₄, with the shortest spacer, exhibited a PL spectrum with maxima at 399, 421, and 449 nm. Compound 1₆, which also has an even-numbered spacer, showed a main λ_PL at ~400 nm, accompanied by shoulder peaks at ~420 and 449 nm. Compound 1₈ displayed a broad single PL band centered at 423 nm. In contrast, compound 1₅ with an odd-numbered spacer exhibited a single PL band at λ_PL = 449 nm, while compound 1₇ showed a blue-shift of the λ_PL by approximately 18 nm relative to that of compound 1₅. These variations are likely attributable to the differences in the molecular packing of the different mesogenic dimers in the Cr state; however, the crystal structures of these compounds remain undetermined. A notable feature of the Cr-state PL behavior is that all compounds exhibited enhanced Φ_PL values relative to those measured in CH₂Cl₂ solutions, resulting in a strong blue emission. In general, compounds with extended π-conjugation tend to undergo π-π stacking in the Cr state, which facilitates non-radiative deactivation, leading to fluorescence quenching, in a phenomenon known as ACQ. In contrast, compounds 1₄–1₈ did not exhibit ACQ; rather, they showed AIEE.

Fluorescence decay measurements revealed τ_PL values of 1.42–10.73 ns, confirming that the radiative decay processes in the Cr state originate from fluorescence (Figure S28). From the Φ_PL and τ_PL values, the k_r and k_nr were calculated to be 0.63–4.51 × 10⁸ and 0.30–3.06 × 10⁸ s⁻¹, respectively. Notably, the k_nr/k_r ratios ranged from 0.30 to 1.08, indicating that all compounds, except compound 1₇ with a relatively low Φ_PL, show significantly accelerated k_r values. Although the crystal structures remain unresolved, it is reasonable to conclude that stronger intermolecular interactions and restricted molecular motions in the Cr state suppress non-radiative deactivation pathways, thereby enhancing the PL efficiency.

3.2.3. PL Behavior in the Mesophase

Finally, the PL behaviors of compounds 1₄–1₇, which exhibited an LC phase upon cooling, were investigated in the mesophase during the cooling process; the samples were first heated to the Iso phase and subsequently cooled gradually, during which the PL spectra were recorded at each temperature, at 2 °C intervals near the phase transition and at 5 °C intervals otherwise (Figure 8 and Figure S29).

For compound 1₄, a single PL band was observed at λ_PL ≈ 430 nm (Φ_PL = 0.288) upon transition to the Iso phase. During cooling, the Φ_PL gradually increased while the λ_PL underwent a slight redshift. In the N phase, the λ_PL further shifted to 450 nm, and the Φ_PL reached 0.35. Upon transition from the N to Cr phase, the λ_PL returned to ~430 nm, and the Φ_PL decreased to 0.281. Thereafter, the Φ_PL recovered, whereas the λ_PL remained nearly constant, resulting in λ_PL = 433 nm and Φ_PL = 0.310 at 30 °C. Compound 1₆, which also forms an N phase, displayed a somewhat different behavior. In the Iso phase, λ_PL was ~445 nm with Φ_PL = 0.33. Upon transition to the N phase, the λ_PL blue-shifted to ~406 nm, and the Φ_PL slightly decreased to 0.31. Further cooling induced a gradual blue shift of the λ_PL to ~400 nm, while the Φ_PL increased. At 30 °C, the λ_PL reached 395 nm, and the Φ_PL was 0.38. In contrast, 1₅ and 1₇, which form SmA phases, exhibited different trends. For compound 1₅, a red-shift from λ_PL = 449 nm (Cr phase) to λ_PL = 457 nm (Iso phase) was observed, accompanied by a decrease in the Φ_PL to 0.34. In the SmA phase, the λ_PL further red-shifted to 466 nm, but the Φ_PL remained nearly constant (0.32). Upon transitioning back to the Cr phase, the λ_PL blue-shifted markedly to 426 nm, whereas the Φ_PL remained at 0.34. Similarly, compound 1₇ exhibited a red-shift of the λ_PL and a decrease in the Φ_PL upon transitioning from the Cr phase (λ_PL = 431 nm) to the Iso one (λ_PL = 453 nm, Φ_PL = 0.24). In the SmA phase, the λ_PL further red-shifted to 456 nm, whereas the Φ_PL remained constant at 0.28. Ultimately, the λ_PL blue-shifted again in the Cr phase, yielding λ_PL = 435 nm and Φ_PL = 0.233 at 30 °C.

Overall, for all compounds, the λ_PL values in the cooled Cr phases were blue-shifted relative to those before heating. This behavior is attributed to differences in the crystallization processes, which may lead to distinct crystal polymorphs. Moreover, the red-shifts observed in the SmA phases were also evident in the absorption spectra (Figure S31), suggesting the formation of J-aggregate-like assemblies of the π-conjugated moieties.

4. Conclusions

In this study, we developed multi-state PL materials operating in dilute solution, solid, and LC states. Specifically, we produced novel mesogenic dimers by linking D–π–A tetrafluorinated tolane units, which consisted of a decyloxy group as an electron donor and an ester functionality as an electron acceptor, with flexible alkylene spacers. Analyses of their phase-transition behavior revealed a strong dependence on spacer parity: even-numbered spacers produced N phases, while odd-numbered spacers yielded layered SmA phases. Photophysical studies revealed that all compounds exhibited blue PL in the solution state while showing enhanced PL in the crystalline state owing to AIEE. In the LC phases, phase transitions were accompanied by shifts in the PL wavelength and efficiency, and the PL quantum yields (Φ_PL) reached 0.36. These results establish that D–π–A tetrafluorinated tolane mesogenic dimers represent an effective design strategy for multi-state PL materials, providing PL across solution, solid, and LC states. This approach offers important guidelines for developing next-generation photoluminescent LC materials through controlled molecular assembly, resulting in potential applications in optoelectronic devices, such as light-emitting displays, luminescent sensors, optical switches, and stimuli-responsive functional materials.