Next Article in Journal
Comprehensive Study of Some Cyanobacteria in Moscow Waterbodies (Russia), Including Characteristics of the Toxigenic Microcystis aeruginosa Strains
Previous Article in Journal
Profiling the Paralytic Effects and Lethality of Cone Snail Venom Toxins Using Nanofractionation Analytics with In Vivo Zebrafish Larvae Assays
Previous Article in Special Issue
Co-Occurrence of Major Mycotoxins and Emerging Alternaria Toxins in Couscous Marketed in Algeria
 
 
Correction to Toxins 2025, 17(7), 348.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Thenuwara et al. Recent Advancements in Lateral Flow Assays for Food Mycotoxin Detection: A Review of Nanoparticle-Based Methods and Innovations. Toxins 2025, 17, 348

1
School of Food Science and Environmental Health, Technological University Dublin, Grangegorman, D07 ADY7 Dublin, Ireland
2
Nanolab Research Centre, Physical to Life Sciences Research Hub, Technological University Dublin, Camden Row, D08 CKP1 Dublin, Ireland
3
MiCRA Biodiagnostics Technology Gateway and Health, Engineering & Materials Science (HEMS) Research Hub, Technological University Dublin, D24 FKT9 Dublin, Ireland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2025, 17(10), 505; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins17100505 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 29 September 2025 / Accepted: 30 September 2025 / Published: 14 October 2025
Figure/Legend
In the original publication [1], there was a mistake in the figure and legend of “Figure 1. Schematic of a competitive lateral flow assay (LFA) for mycotoxin detection”. “A sandwich immunoassay design was included for the schematic of a LFA”. The correct figure and legend appear below. The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.
Figure 1. Schematic of a competitive lateral flow assay (LFA) for mycotoxin detection. The assay consists of a sample pad, conjugate pad, nitrocellulose membrane with test (T) and control lines (C), absorbent pad, and backing card. AuNP-labeled anti-mycotoxin antibodies migrate with the sample by capillary flow and interact either with free mycotoxin analytes (hapten) in a solution or with the immobilized mycotoxin–protein conjugate (e.g., ZEN–BSA) at the test line. In the presence of mycotoxin, free analytes compete for antibody binding, resulting in a reduced or absent signal at the test line, while the control line remains visible, confirming assay validity and a positive result. The signal intensity at the test line is inversely proportional to the mycotoxin concentration in the sample (bottom left). In contrast, when the mycotoxin is absent, antibody–nanoparticle conjugates bind to the immobilized conjugate, generating a visible signal at the test line alongside the control line, indicating a negative result (bottom right). Red arrows indicate that signal intensity at the test line decreases as mycotoxin concentration increases (created with Biorender).
Figure 1. Schematic of a competitive lateral flow assay (LFA) for mycotoxin detection. The assay consists of a sample pad, conjugate pad, nitrocellulose membrane with test (T) and control lines (C), absorbent pad, and backing card. AuNP-labeled anti-mycotoxin antibodies migrate with the sample by capillary flow and interact either with free mycotoxin analytes (hapten) in a solution or with the immobilized mycotoxin–protein conjugate (e.g., ZEN–BSA) at the test line. In the presence of mycotoxin, free analytes compete for antibody binding, resulting in a reduced or absent signal at the test line, while the control line remains visible, confirming assay validity and a positive result. The signal intensity at the test line is inversely proportional to the mycotoxin concentration in the sample (bottom left). In contrast, when the mycotoxin is absent, antibody–nanoparticle conjugates bind to the immobilized conjugate, generating a visible signal at the test line alongside the control line, indicating a negative result (bottom right). Red arrows indicate that signal intensity at the test line decreases as mycotoxin concentration increases (created with Biorender).
Toxins 17 00505 g001
In the original publication, there was a mistake in the figure and legend of “Figure 2: Schematic representation of label designs”. “A sandwich format was included for the signal amplification of LFA”. The correct figure and legend appear below.
Figure 2. Schematic representation of label designs (A) and detection readers (B) used for signal amplification in lateral flow assays for mycotoxin detection. Labeling strategies include nanoparticles, enzymes, surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS), and fluorescent labels. Reader technologies range from visual inspection to portable optical, and Raman devices, with smartphone-based digital readers offering field-deployable quantification (created with Biorender).
Figure 2. Schematic representation of label designs (A) and detection readers (B) used for signal amplification in lateral flow assays for mycotoxin detection. Labeling strategies include nanoparticles, enzymes, surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS), and fluorescent labels. Reader technologies range from visual inspection to portable optical, and Raman devices, with smartphone-based digital readers offering field-deployable quantification (created with Biorender).
Toxins 17 00505 g002

Reference

  1. Thenuwara, G.; Akhtar, P.; Javed, B.; Singh, B.; Byrne, H.J.; Tian, F. Recent Advancements in Lateral Flow Assays for Food Mycotoxin Detection: A Review of Nanoparticle-Based Methods and Innovations. Toxins 2025, 17, 348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Thenuwara, G.; Akhtar, P.; Javed, B.; Singh, B.; Byrne, H.J.; Tian, F. Correction: Thenuwara et al. Recent Advancements in Lateral Flow Assays for Food Mycotoxin Detection: A Review of Nanoparticle-Based Methods and Innovations. Toxins 2025, 17, 348. Toxins 2025, 17, 505. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins17100505

AMA Style

Thenuwara G, Akhtar P, Javed B, Singh B, Byrne HJ, Tian F. Correction: Thenuwara et al. Recent Advancements in Lateral Flow Assays for Food Mycotoxin Detection: A Review of Nanoparticle-Based Methods and Innovations. Toxins 2025, 17, 348. Toxins. 2025; 17(10):505. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins17100505

Chicago/Turabian Style

Thenuwara, Gayathree, Perveen Akhtar, Bilal Javed, Baljit Singh, Hugh J. Byrne, and Furong Tian. 2025. "Correction: Thenuwara et al. Recent Advancements in Lateral Flow Assays for Food Mycotoxin Detection: A Review of Nanoparticle-Based Methods and Innovations. Toxins 2025, 17, 348" Toxins 17, no. 10: 505. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins17100505

APA Style

Thenuwara, G., Akhtar, P., Javed, B., Singh, B., Byrne, H. J., & Tian, F. (2025). Correction: Thenuwara et al. Recent Advancements in Lateral Flow Assays for Food Mycotoxin Detection: A Review of Nanoparticle-Based Methods and Innovations. Toxins 2025, 17, 348. Toxins, 17(10), 505. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins17100505

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop