You are currently on the new version of our website. Access the old version .
NutrientsNutrients
  • This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
  • Article
  • Open Access

21 January 2026

Prediction Equations to Estimate Resting Metabolic Rate in Healthy, Community-Dwelling Chinese Older Adults

,
,
,
,
,
and
1
School of Exercise and Health, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai 200438, China
2
College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ 85003, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Nutritional Status in Community-Dwelling Older Adults

Abstract

Background: China’s rapidly aging population demonstrates the importance of conducting an accurate resting metabolic rate (RMR, kcal/day) assessment to mitigate geriatric nutritional imbalances—amid concurrent undernutrition (e.g., ~1/3 with protein insufficiency) and overnutrition (e.g., high obesity and type 2 diabetes rates). While RMR prediction equations exist for other populations, none are specific to Chinese older adults. This study aimed to develop and validate population-specific RMR prediction equations for community-dwelling Chinese older adults. Methods: A total of 189 healthy participants (Aged 69.5 ± 6.3, range: 60–94 years; BMI: 24.0 ± 3.1 kg/m2) were recruited from the Shanghai, China, community. RMR was measured via indirect calorimetry, and body composition via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Results: Two novel prediction equations were derived: Cai1 (fat-free mass [FFM] + age): RMR = 1393.019 − (11.112 × age) + (11.963 × FFM); R2 = 0.572, and Cai2 (sex + age + weight [WT]): RMR = 1537.513 + (91.038 × sex) − (11.515 × age) + (5.436 × WT); R2 = 0.528. Both novel prediction equations achieved 82.5% adequacy (predicted RMR within 90–110% of measured values), minimal systematic bias (%) (−0.72% and −1.08%) and strong positive correlations with measured RMR (r = 0.792 and 0.773, both p < 0.001). Bland–Altman analysis confirmed no systematic bias. In contrast, 11 widely used published prediction equations (e.g., Harris–Benedict, Mifflin–St. Jeor) exhibited significant overestimation (systematic bias +8.39% to +38.03%). Conclusion: The novel population-specific RMR equations outperform published ones, providing a clinically reliable tool for individualized energy prescription in nutritional interventions to support healthy aging in Chinese older adults.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.