This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
The Conclusive and Continuous Tool to Assess Severity and Improvement of Eating Disorders (CONTASI-ED): Development and Psychometric Properties
by
Moria Golan
Moria Golan 1,2,*
,
Roni Sides
Roni Sides 2,
Keren Baum
Keren Baum 2,
Rachel Arbib
Rachel Arbib 2 and
Wiessam Abu Ahmad
Wiessam Abu Ahmad 3
1
Department of Nutritional Sciences, Tel Hai College, North Galilee, Qiryat Shemona 1220800, Israel
2
SHAHAF—A Community-Based Facility for Treatment of Eating Disorders, Ganey Hadar 7683000, Israel
3
3 Braun School of Public Health, Hebrew University-Hadassah, Jerusalem 91120, Israel
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2025, 17(11), 1790; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17111790 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 22 April 2025
/
Revised: 20 May 2025
/
Accepted: 23 May 2025
/
Published: 24 May 2025
Abstract
Abstract: Background: Accurately assessing eating disorder (ED) severity and treatment progress is essential for effective intervention. The Comprehensive and Continuous Tool to Assess Severity and Improvement of Eating Disorders (CONTASI-ED) was developed to address limitations in existing assessments by incorporating behavioral, cognitive, and physiological markers. Objectives: This study aimed to examine the psychometric properties and sensitivity to symptom changes of the CONTASI-ED in a community-based clinical sample of women with ED. Methods: Participants were 58 females diagnosed with EDs and 10 healthy controls. The CONTASI-ED assessments were conducted over multiple time points in outpatient and intensive treatment settings. We examined reliability, validity, and sensitivity to treatment-related change. The CONTASI-ED scores were compared with EAT-26, and multivariable analyses explored the effects of body mass index (BMI), age, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) on symptom trajectories. Results: The CONTASI-ED demonstrated strong reliability, with test–retest correlations between 0.72 and 0.90 and inter-rater reliability of 0.68–0.95. The tool effectively distinguished ED patients from healthy controls (p < 0.001) and correlated strongly with EAT-26. Significant reductions in the CONTASI-ED scores over time (p < 0.001) reflected treatment-related improvements—although temporary score increases highlighted greater self-awareness and symptom disclosure. BMI, age, and PTSD significantly influenced symptom severity and treatment response. Conclusions: The CONTASI-ED demonstrated strong reliability and validity in distinguishing clinical and non-clinical cases and in tracking treatment-related changes. However, the findings are based on a relatively small, all-female sample, underscoring the need for further validation in more diverse populations.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Golan, M.; Sides, R.; Baum, K.; Arbib, R.; Abu Ahmad, W.
The Conclusive and Continuous Tool to Assess Severity and Improvement of Eating Disorders (CONTASI-ED): Development and Psychometric Properties. Nutrients 2025, 17, 1790.
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17111790
AMA Style
Golan M, Sides R, Baum K, Arbib R, Abu Ahmad W.
The Conclusive and Continuous Tool to Assess Severity and Improvement of Eating Disorders (CONTASI-ED): Development and Psychometric Properties. Nutrients. 2025; 17(11):1790.
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17111790
Chicago/Turabian Style
Golan, Moria, Roni Sides, Keren Baum, Rachel Arbib, and Wiessam Abu Ahmad.
2025. "The Conclusive and Continuous Tool to Assess Severity and Improvement of Eating Disorders (CONTASI-ED): Development and Psychometric Properties" Nutrients 17, no. 11: 1790.
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17111790
APA Style
Golan, M., Sides, R., Baum, K., Arbib, R., & Abu Ahmad, W.
(2025). The Conclusive and Continuous Tool to Assess Severity and Improvement of Eating Disorders (CONTASI-ED): Development and Psychometric Properties. Nutrients, 17(11), 1790.
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17111790
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.