Next Article in Journal
Plant-Based Diets and Metabolic Syndrome Components: The Questions That Still Need to Be Answered—A Narrative Review
Previous Article in Journal
The Effects of a High-Carbohydrate versus a High-Fat Shake on Biomarkers of Metabolism and Glycemic Control When Used to Interrupt a 38-h Fast: A Randomized Crossover Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Peer Teasing and Restrained Eating among Chinese College Students: The Chain Mediating Role of Negative Coping Styles and Negative Physical Self

1
Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
2
Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality (SWU), Ministry of Education, Chongqing 400715, China
3
China Research Center of Psychology and Social Development, Chongqing 400715, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2024, 16(1), 163; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16010163
Submission received: 30 November 2023 / Revised: 25 December 2023 / Accepted: 28 December 2023 / Published: 4 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Nutrition and Public Health)

Abstract

:
This study aimed to determine whether negative coping styles and negative physical self sequentially mediate the relationship between peer teasing and restrained eating among Chinese university students. In total, 1127 participants (66.9% women, average age = 18.43 years; age range, 14–26 years) completed the Perception of Teasing Scale, Coping Style Questionnaire, Negative Physical Self Scale, and the Chinese version of the Restraint Scale. The mediational analysis showed that, after controlling for age, sex, and body mass index (BMI), peer teasing was related to restrained eating behaviors through (a) the mediating effect of negative coping styles, (b) the mediating effect of negative physical self, and (c) the chain-mediating effect of negative coping styles and negative physical self. This study showed for the first time that negative coping styles and negative physical self may chain mediate the association between peer teasing and restrained eating. It also provides suggestions for clinical practices as to strategies for controlling restrained eating.

1. Introduction

The term restrained eating (i.e., controlling food intake to alter external appearance) refers to eating behaviors that have negative effects on an individual’s physical and mental well-being. These behaviors have become hot topics in health psychology [1]. A study conducted on >80,000 adolescents found that 28% and 56% of boys and girls, respectively, reported engaging in one or more negative eating behaviors [2]. On 10 May 2023, the China University of Social Sciences and Social Science Literature Publishing House jointly released a research report titled “Study on Health Behaviors of Chinese Adolescents—Analysis of Survey Data from 13 Provinces”. The study indicates that most adolescents are not very satisfied with their body weight, and 9.2% of adolescents choose to engage in restrained eating for weight loss. Since restrained eating behaviors can have serious and negative consequences on physical (e.g., nutrient imbalance, insufficient energy intake, and anemia) and mental health (e.g., decreased self-esteem and depression) [3,4], it is critical to be aware of the factors contributing to restrained eating.
Previous studies on diet have found that negative peer relationships, such as social pressure regarding appearance and verbal bullying from peers, can lead to adolescents engaging in restrained eating as a coping mechanism with these negative influences [5,6]. Research has internationally shown that bullying (including ridicule) by peers is a common phenomenon for individuals learning in a school setting [7], and it occurs chronically and repeatedly [8]. Peer teasing is a major form of bullying [9], and is the negative evaluation of verbal abuse and taunting by peers related to physical appearance and behavioral ability [10]. Among adolescents, peer relationships become increasingly important, and recent research has found that peer teasing can lead to unhealthy eating behaviors [11]. Furthermore, teasing peers is a direct factor contributing to eating disorders [12]. Regarding the potential benefits of peer interactions for eating behavior, a past meta-analysis showed that positive peer influence was associated with less unhealthy eating behavior [13], and a study depicted that peer relationships in the campus system are important in daily life and serve as a significant source for the development of various social skills and behavioral choices [14]. These findings on the benefits of positive peer influence and the potentially detrimental effects of negative peer relationships collectively imply that peer ridicule about one’s body can further lead individuals to internalize this kind of body discrimination [15]. Furthermore, peer teasing about the body can lead individuals to change their eating behaviors to achieve a “standard” body to avoid ridicule [16]. Regarding the relevance of sex for related discussions, while peer evaluations may have had a greater impact on girls’ dieting behavior (vs. boys) in the past—leading them to adopt negative eating practices to achieve a “slim figure” [17]—boys, too, nowadays may often be impacted by peer evaluations and try to modify their physique by reducing their carbohydrate intake [18].
Although the impact of peer teasing on the development of restrained eating has been confirmed [19], the exploration of its internal mechanisms remains quite limited. One variable that may be related to this impact is the negative physical self. As an important research topic in the field of body image, a negative physical self refers to individuals’ negative perception, negative emotional experiences, and corresponding behavioral regulation regarding their own physical appearance, including aspects such as weight, height, and facial features [20]. Research shows that individuals start incorporating peer evaluations into their self-system ever since childhood, and that peer teasing during childhood influences the relationship between weight status and self-concept [21]. Then, as individuals progress into college, peer evaluations become increasingly important and a significant component of self-concept [22]. The increased significance given to peer evaluations may lead individuals to experience dissatisfaction with their bodies after receiving negative evaluations from their peers [23]. Chen and Jackson conducted a longitudinal study and found that peer teasing played a significant role in the formation of negative self-body image [24]. Furthermore, there is accumulating evidence suggesting that the negative physical self is a proximal factor implicated in various disordered eating behaviors among college students [25,26,27]. The impact of negative physical self on eating disorders tends to intensify over time [28] and can predict eating disorder severity [27]. Therefore, we may infer that the negative physical self can mediate the effect of peer teasing on restrained eating.
There is also some evidence pointing to the possibility of coping style serving as a mediator in the relation of peer ridicule and restrictive eating. Coping style is the primary way through which college students deal with stressful events, referring to a strategy that determines cognitive and behavioral outcomes when facing stressors [29]. Coping styles typically include two types: active coping (e.g., seeking problem solving and help) and passive coping (e.g., self-blame, fantasy, forgiveness, avoidance, and rationalization) [30]. The choice of coping style depends on the nature of specific events, often leaning towards passive coping after experiencing negative life events such as lack of peer support and negative parenting [31,32]. According to Selman’s perspective on the development stages of social perspective taking, normal peer interactions provide an important background for individuals to learn social behaviors, such as seeking help and respect, and adaptive abilities. Therefore, research suggests that peer ridicule, as a negative event in peer interactions, can lead individuals to adopt passive coping styles to distract attention or provide a potential avoidance strategy, which may further exacerbate psychological and behavioral problems [33,34]. Meanwhile, other studies indicate that the adoption of passive coping strategies such as giving up, denial, and self-blame when dealing with peer-induced stressors may, to some extent, serve as a short-term and effective self-protective strategy [35,36]. Additionally, existing research found that the adoption of passive avoidance coping styles may lead to more severe restrictive eating behaviors, which may be influenced more by negative stimuli than cognitive control. According to the attentional failure theory, the use of avoidance coping may weaken the cognitive processing of negative events and further intensify restrictive eating behaviors [37,38]. The predominance of passive coping strategies characterized by avoidance may lead individuals to continuously internalize stressful events, and peer ridicule related to abilities and appearance may lead individuals to engage in restrictive eating as a means of changing peer evaluation and seeking peer approval [39,40]. Therefore, it is reasonable to hypothesize that negative coping styles may mediate the effect of peer ridicule on restrictive eating behaviors.
Passive coping styles are positively correlated with negative body image [41]. According to the theory of early maladaptive schemas, the belief in self-defeat regarding oneself, others, and the world, formed by the accumulation of negative experiences from negative life events, leads to more negative self-cognition [42]. Longitudinal evidence suggests that positive coping styles can alleviate postoperative negative body image in breast cancer patients, whereas avoidance, fear, and other negative coping styles may exacerbate patients’ negative body self-assessment [43]. This evidence supports this study’s viewpoint that the connection between negative coping styles and negative body image may be associated with the adoption of restrictive eating behaviors.
In summary, this study proposes the following hypotheses: (1) there is a significant correlation between peer teasing and restrained eating; (2) negative coping styles mediate the relation between peer teasing and restrained eating; (3) negative physical self mediates the relation between peer teasing and restrained eating; and (4) negative coping styles and negative physical self play a chain-mediating role in the relation between peer teasing and restrained eating. To this end, this study attempted to develop a chain-mediation model to explore these variable relations. The evidence of this research is expected to provide knowledge on potential associations that can be targeted by interventions for reducing peer teasing and overcoming restrained eating, which may then support the promotion of college students’ physical and mental development.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants

The data were collected from our ongoing project named the Behavioral Brain Research Project of Chinese Personality (BBP). It employs convenience sampling to recruit college students from various departments of a university in Chongqing, China, and then uses a random assignment method for participant allocation post sampling. Before participants undergo data collection procedures (i.e., behavioral variable measurements), they are screened for self-reported medical illness, neurological illness, and psychiatric disorders (i.e., through binary self-reported variables indicating the presence or absence of particular diseases, disorders, and use of psychoactive medications). The participants are then requested to respond to each question as honestly as possible to minimize the influence of social desirability bias.
All participants of this study signed an informed consent form before participation in the study and received an honorarium of CNY 5 (approximately USD 0.77) upon completion of their participation. Ethical approval for this study was granted by the Ethics Committee Board of the university to which this study is related. Prior to screening, the study sample comprised 1816 participants (Figure 1).
A final sample of 1127 participants (754 females) ranging from 15–26 years (M = 18.43, SD = 1.04) was included in the analysis. Their mean age was 19.8 (SD = 1.75), with an age range of 15–26. Their mean body mass index (BMI) was 21.39 (SD = 3.07), with a BMI range of 10.24–35.54, and sample characteristics are shown in Table 1.

2.2. Measures

2.2.1. Perception of Teasing Scale

The Perception of Teasing Scale (POTS), developed by Thompson et al. [44], was used to describe the frequency of peer teasing and the degree of being affected by peer teasing. The POTS consists of 11 items in total, and the content of ridicule includes both physical and ability ridicule; the entire questionnaire is divided into two subscales of ridicule content and impact. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale, with the frequency of peer ridicule ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (very frequent) and the degree of being affected by peer ridicule ranging from 1 (never frustrated) to 5 (very frustrated). Higher scores indicate higher levels of peer ridicule and influence on individuals. In this study, the Cronbach coefficient of this scale was 0.94.

2.2.2. Coping Style

The simple coping style questionnaire developed by Jie [45] was used to describe individuals’ attitudes toward and ways of coping with life events. The scale consists of 20 questions and includes two dimensions: positive and negative coping styles. The present study adopted the subscale of negative coping style. Items are rated on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 (not taken) to 3 (often taken). The higher the subscale score, the more pronounced the adoption of a negative coping style. In this study, the Cronbach coefficient of this scale was 0.70.

2.2.3. Negative Physical Self

Chen developed the Negative Physical Self Scale (NPSS) [46] to describe negative perceptions, negative affective experiences, and corresponding behavioral modifications regarding one’s body. The scale comprises 48 items and includes 5 dimensions: overall, fat, thin, short, and appearance. The items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (always). Higher scores indicate that respondents are more dissatisfied with their own bodies. In this study, the Cronbach coefficient of this scale was 0.89.

2.2.4. Restrained Eating

The Chinese version of the Restraint Scale (RS) revised by Kong et al. [47] was used. The scale contains 10 items measuring both dietary concerns and weight change, with questions 5–8 scored on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 (never) to 3 (always), and questions 1–4 and 9–10 on a 5-point scale, with higher scores indicating higher levels of restrictive eating. In this study, the Cronbach coefficient of this scale was 0.75.

2.2.5. Control Variables

Considering that age, sex, and BMI are all important factors associated with restrained eating, these variables were treated as covariates. Age, sex, weight, and height were self-reported. The BMI was calculated using the standard formula of weight (kilograms) divided by height (meters) squared (BMI = kg/m2).

2.3. Data Analysis

The data were organized and analyzed using SPSS 26.0. IBM SPSS Statistics is a software product of IBM Corporation, headquartered in Armonk, New York, United States. It was first used to count variable distribution and calculate variable correlation. Bootstrap analysis [48] with 5000 iterations was conducted using PROCESS Macro to assess the effects of peer teasing on restrained eating through the mediation of negative coping styles and negative physical self.

3. Results

3.1. Common Method Biases Test

In view of the possible common method bias from the use of self-reporting data collection methods, the necessary procedural controls, such as protecting respondents’ anonymity, explaining to participants that the use of the data obtained would be restrained to scientific research, and using reverse presentation for some items, were conducted during the administration process. To further improve study rigor, Harman’s one-way test (i.e., unrotated factor analysis for all variable items) was used as a statistical control before formal data analysis. The results showed that the variance explained by the first factor was 16.77%, which is less than the threshold of 40%. Therefore, no significant common method bias was observed in the data used in this study.

3.2. Preliminary Analyses

The descriptive statistics and correlation matrix for the study variables are presented in Table 2.

3.3. The Chain-Mediation Analyses

Table 3 shows the mediation results. The path coefficient of the total effect of peer teasing on restrained eating was significant (p < 0.001). Next, the mediating variables, negative coping style, and negative physical self, were added to the model to obtain the path model shown in Figure 1. The results showed that all paths reached a statistically significant level (p < 0.001). The model not only showed the direct effect of peer teasing on restrained eating but also that negative coping style and negative physical self played a mediating role in the relationship between peer teasing and restrained eating. There were three pathways, as follows: at first, we observed a separate mediating role of negative coping style and a separate mediating role of negative physical self; bootstrap results showed that negative coping style, negative physical self, and negative coping style–negative physical self had mediating effects. Figure 2 illustrates the serial mediation model.
The direct effect of peer teasing on restrained eating was 0.1764, with a confidence interval of [0.0973, 0.2554]. Furthermore, X had a significant indirect influence on Y, with an effect size of 0.7735 and a confidence interval of [0.6808, 0.8620]. Among the mediating variables, the effect size obtained when using M1 as the mediator was 0.5298, with a confidence interval of [0.4468, 0.6100]. The effect size obtained when using M2 as the mediator was 0.1240, with a confidence interval of [0.0790, 0.1725]. The effect size obtained when both M1 and M2 were used as serial mediators was 0.1197, with a confidence interval of [0.0753, 0.1685]. The effect sizes of the three mediation paths accounted for 55.774%, 13.430%, and 12.601%, respectively. All the effect sizes of the models fell within their respective confidence intervals, which did not include zero.

4. Discussion

This study examines the association between peer teasing and restrained eating among Chinese college students. The mediating effects of negative coping style and negative physical self on this association were also investigated. Our data demonstrates that peer teasing is associated positively with restrained eating. Consistent with previous studies [5,28], our results confirmed this association to be mediated by negative physical self. Additionally, we showed for the first time that peer teasing could be associated with restrained eating through (a) the mediating effect of negative coping style and (b) the chain mediating effect of negative coping style and negative physical self.
As predicted, the negative physical self mediated the association between peer teasing and restrained eating among Chinese college students. For example, Rodgers et al. [49] found that peer teasing in early adolescence positively correlated with unhealthy weight control behaviors about restrained eating, and this effect was directly mediated by a negative body image. Similarly, Duarte et al. [28] found that a negative physical self was a significant mediator in the relationship between peer teasing and restrained eating. According to the tripartite influence model proposed by Thompson et al. [50], when influenced by external pressures (e.g., peer pressure), college students may experience pressure to conform to specific appearance standards. When unable to meet these standards, they may develop a negative body image. The notion of a negative physical self refers to a form of “perceiving a flaw in oneself” that can lead individuals to engage in certain behaviors in an attempt to compensate for this “flaw”, which directly predicts restrictive eating behavior [24]. Therefore, the focus of prevention and treatment efforts for restrictive eating could be placed on fostering critical thinking skills or positive self-awareness [27,33].
This study also examined the mediating role of negative coping styles in the relationship between peer teasing and restrained eating. Because of the psychological reasons underlying coping strategy choice, the consequences of their use, and the importance of coping strategies in college students’ management of stress and handling of life events, coping styles have attracted extensive attention from researchers. Previous studies have found associations between negative coping styles and negative interpersonal events [31,36,51], negative body image [41,42,43], and disordered eating behavior [37,38,39]. College students use coping strategies as the main approach for dealing with stress, interpersonal adaptation, and conflict regulation [31]. Negative coping styles are typically triggered by negative life events [31,32,36] and subsequently lead to various negative cognitions [43,44] and behaviors [41,42]. Previous studies showcase that coping strategy choice is directly related to perceived environmental support, and the nature of stressful events and can lead to different behavioral outcomes [51]. According to social–cultural theory, peer relationships and social interactions play a central role in campus interpersonal relationships, help college students perceive social support, and contribute to self-awareness development. However, recent research has found that peer ridicule is a negative event within peer relationships that can undermine perceived social support among individuals [13,16]; in such situations, college students become more likely to respond with passive avoidance and negative coping strategies [52], which can help, to some extent, individuals temporarily escape the pressure brought by peer events. It can be perceived as a temporary self-protective measure. However, negative evaluations from others, when accompanied by the absence of timely reassessment and self-affirmation of own worth [19], can have negative impacts that lead to severe psychological problems and further behavioral issues [12,23]. Consequently, in the long term, there may be an increased risk of engaging in other harmful behaviors, such as restrictive dieting.
These discussions show that coping styles may come into play between peer teasing and restrained dieting owing to their roles as primary adaptive strategies among college students. In today’s campus life, the interpersonal adaptation skills and stress event management abilities of college students permeate all aspects of their campus lives, directly influencing their interpersonal experiences and overall life satisfaction. Issues related to diet may require stronger personal control compared to other behavioral problems [53]. Therefore, proactive coping strategies may have a positive relationship with the avoidance of eating disorders, whereas negative coping strategies (e.g., avoidance) may intensify the perception of distress and a sense of loss of control, making it easier for individuals to choose extreme problem-solving methods [31,53]. For example, adopting self-blame or self-criticism as coping strategies when faced with peer ridicule can encourage individuals to resort to extreme dieting behaviors to address the non-acceptance of their appearance. This, in turn, leads to various maladaptive adaptations and psychological issues. To support these assumptions, a systematic review has demonstrated that coping strategies directly influence various future risk behaviors, including eating disorders [54]. Therefore, supporting the adoption of more positive coping strategies, such as humor and positive interpretations of others’ evaluations, can be associated with the prevention of various psychological and behavioral issues [55]. It may also be related to more positive dietary behaviors and the promotion of self-health development.
Our data further indicated that a negative coping style could indirectly influence restrained eating through negative physical self; that is, a negative coping style may be associated with the strengthening of the internalization of peer teasing content. The theory of negative self-schema further emphasizes this relationship, as excessive negative responses to others’ evaluations can exacerbate dissatisfaction with their own body, leading to a stereotyped and emotional reaction to body-related information (e.g., self-weight and body shape) and an excessive emphasis on outward self-representation [56]. Studies have depicted that the external environment in which one grows up influences individual attitudes toward things and has a certain impact on development [57]. Therefore, peer teasing may be related to an intensification of negative social adaptation and the deepening of individual negative self-evaluation; meanwhile, a negative body self-perception may be associated with the mismanagement of negative response styles to peer ridicule. In summary, college students may choose to adopt restrained eating behaviors in relation to attempts to cope with the negative perception of their bodies.
To summarize, our study has extended the scope of previous research by revealing the novel mediating role of negative coping styles and the chain-mediating role of negative coping styles and negative physical self in the relationship between peer teasing and restrained eating among Chinese college students. These findings have important clinical implications for the prevention and treatment of restrained eating and insights for intervention research on college students’ restrictive eating behaviors. For example, college students may come to focus on their psychological and physical health in campus life. When facing peer teasing, the findings of this study suggest that there may be a correlation between students being able to deal better with the situation and them engaging in the following behaviors: being firm in self-awareness; accepting reasonable suggestions from others; taking the initiative to maintain self-independence and uniqueness; addressing negative comments or stressful events from others through proactive and positive behaviors; resolving difficulties after a rational analysis of the events without compromising their physical and mental well-being. Therefore, it may be important for stakeholders to endeavor to prevent peer ridicule behaviors that occur in school or daily life, actively devise strategies to promote self-confidence, -esteem, and -love, and develop a healthy understanding of the importance of positive eating behaviors.
Although this study expanded existing research on the effects of restrained eating to some extent, there are some limitations that need to be addressed in future studies. First, despite this study and its examinations being based on past research and theories, its cross-sectional design hinders our ability to provide causality inferences. Future experimental and longitudinal research could explore in-depth the influence mechanisms between the variables we explored. Second, the effect sizes we observed were small to moderate, and thus generalizations should be made with caution; still, the study sample was relatively large, allowing for significant results to be obtained even with small effect sizes. Finally, this study used mostly self-reports from college student groups who may be more concerned and confronted with peer influences in their lives, including language and behavior, and therefore have more influence on restrained eating. Future research should explore the influence of peer teasing on the restrained eating of other groups.

5. Conclusions

This study depicts that for Chinese college students, peer teasing is significantly and positively associated with restrained eating. Moreover, negative coping styles and negative physical self mediated the relationship between peer teasing and restrained eating through three pathways: the mediation of negative coping styles, the mediation of negative physical self, and the chain mediation of negative coping styles–negative physical self. Future research should explore the influence of peer teasing on restrained eating in other groups.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, formal analysis, writing—original draft and writing—review and editing, Y.W.; writing—review and editing and supervision, Y.L.; methodology, J.Z. and Y.C.; writing—review and editing and funding acquisition, H.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Social Science Foundation of China (No. 22&ZD184).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study complied with the standards for the ethical treatment of human participants and was approved by the Ethical Committee for Scientific Research at Southwest University. The approval date of the ethical statement is 7 September 2019 (project identification code: SWUPSY19090201).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

To promote data transparency, anonymized data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The data are not publicly available due to these data are derived from the Behavioral Brain Research Project of Chinese Personality (BBP).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Anglé, S.; Engblom, J.; Eriksson, T.; Kautiainen, S.; Saha, M.-T.; Lindfors, P.; Lehtinen, M.; Rimpelä, A. Three Factor Eating Questionnaire-R18 as a Measure of Cognitive Restraint, Uncontrolled Eating and Emotional Eating in a Sample of Young Finnish Females. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2009, 6, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Croll, J.K.; Neumark-Sztainer, D.; Story, M.; Ireland, M. Prevalence and risk and protective factors related to disordered eating behaviors among adolescents: Relationship to gender and ethnicity. J. Adolesc. Health 2002, 31, 166–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. He, J.; Zickgraf, H.F.; Essayli, J.H.; Fan, X. Classifying and characterizing Chinese young adults reporting picky eating: A latent profile analysis. Int. J. Eat. Disord. 2020, 53, 883–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Paans, N.P.G.; Gibson-Smith, D.; Bot, M.; van Strien, T.; Brouwer, I.A.; Visser, M.; Penninx, B.W.J.H. Depression and eating styles are independently associated with dietary intake. Appetite 2019, 134, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chng, S.C.W.; Fassnacht, D.B. Parental Comments: Relationship with Gender, Body Dissatisfaction, and Disordered Eating in Asian Young Adults. Body Image 2016, 16, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Duarte, C.; Pinto-Gouveia, J.; Stubbs, R.J. The prospective associations between bullying experiences, body image shame and disordered eating in a sample of adolescent girls. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2017, 116, 319–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Olweus, D. Bully/victim problems among schoolchildren: Basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program. In The Development and Treatment of Childhood Aggression; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.: Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1991; pp. 411–448, Chapter xvii; ISBN 978-0-8058-0370-9. [Google Scholar]
  8. Olweus, D. Bullying at School: What We Know and What We Can Do; Blackwell Publishing: Malden, MA, USA, 1993; Chapter xii; ISBN 978-0-631-19241-1. [Google Scholar]
  9. Roth, D.A.; Coles, M.E.; Heimberg, R.G. The relationship between memories for childhood teasing and anxiety and depression in adulthood. J. Anxiety Disord. 2002, 16, 149–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhou, T.D.; Chen, H. A correlation study of middle school students’ negative physical self and peer tease in Sichuan province. Chin. J. Sch. Health 2009, 30, 339–341. [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen, D.-R.; Lin, L.-Y.; Hsiao, S.-C. Role of Peer Support on the Cycle of Weight Teasing, Psychological Distress and Disordered Eating in Taiwanese Adolescents: A Moderated Mediation Analysis. Eat. Behav. 2023, 51, 101815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Menzel, J.E.; Schaefer, L.M.; Burke, N.L.; Mayhew, L.L.; Brannick, M.T.; Thompson, J.K. Appearance-Related Teasing, Body Dissatisfaction, and Disordered Eating: A Meta-Analysis. Body Image 2010, 7, 261–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Faber, A.; Dubé, L.; Knäuper, B. Attachment and Eating: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Relevance of Attachment for Unhealthy and Healthy Eating Behaviors in the General Population. Appetite 2018, 123, 410–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Connolly, J.; Furman, W.; Konarski, R. The Role of Peers in the Emergence of Heterosexual Romantic Relationships in Adolescence. Child Dev. 2000, 71, 1395–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ostaszewski, K.; Zimmerman, M.A. The Effects of Cumulative Risks and Promotive Factors on Urban Adolescent Alcohol and Other Drug Use: A Longitudinal Study of Resiliency. Am. J. Community Psychol. 2006, 38, 237–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Pace, U.; D’Urso, G.; Zappulla, C. Negative Eating Attitudes and Behaviors among Adolescents: The Role of Parental Control and Perceived Peer Support. Appetite 2018, 121, 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Hilbert, A.; Zenger, M.; Eichler, J.; Brähler, E. Psychometric evaluation of the Eating Disorders in Youth-Questionnaire when used in adults: Prevalence estimates for symptoms of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder and population norms. Int. J. Eat. Disord. 2021, 54, 399–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Murray, S.B.; Griffiths, S.; Nagata, J.M. Community-Based Eating Disorder Research in Males: A Call to Action. J. Adolesc. Health 2018, 62, 649–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Fields, L.C.; Brown, C.; Skelton, J.A.; Cain, K.S.; Cohen, G.M. Internalized Weight Bias, Teasing, and Self-Esteem in Children with Overweight or Obesity. Child. Obes. 2021, 17, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, H. A Theoretic and Practical Study on Adolescents Physical Self. Ph.D. Thesis, Southwest Normal University, Chongqing, China, 2003; pp. 31–92. [Google Scholar]
  21. Davison, K.K.; Birch, L.L. Processes Linking Weight Status and Self-Concept among Girls from Ages 5 to 7 Years. Dev. Psychol. 2002, 38, 735–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Copeland, W.E.; Wolke, D.; Angold, A.; Costello, E.J. Adult psychiatric outcomes of bullying and being bullied by peers in childhood and adolescence. JAMA Psychiatry 2013, 70, 419–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Phares, V.; Steinberg, A.R.; Thompson, J.K. Gender Differences in Peer and Parental Influences: Body Image Disturbance, Self-Worth, and Psychological Functioning in Preadolescent Children. J. Youth Adolesc. 2004, 33, 421–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chen, H.; Jackson, T. Predictors of Changes in Weight Esteem among Mainland Chinese Adolescents: A Longitudinal Analysis. Dev. Psychol. 2009, 45, 1618–1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ghaderi, A.; Scott, B. Pure and Guided Self-Help for Full and Sub-Threshold Bulimia Nervosa and Binge Eating Disorder. Br. J. Clin. Psychol. 2003, 42, 257–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ghaderi, A.; Scott, B. Prevalence, Incidence and Prospective Risk Factors for Eating Disorders. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 2001, 104, 122–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Williams, B.M.; Levinson, C.A. Negative Beliefs about the Self Prospectively Predict Eating Disorder Severity among Undergraduate Women. Eat. Behav. 2020, 37, 101384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Schaumberg, K.; Anderson, D. Dietary Restraint and Weight Loss as Risk Factors for Eating Pathology. Eat. Behav. 2016, 23, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Huang, X.T.; Yu, H.; Zheng, Y.; Yang, J.Z.; Wang, W.H. A preliminary research on the coping style of middle school. J. Psychol. Sci. 2000, 23, 1–5+124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xiao, J.; Xu, X. Reliability and validity of coping style questionnaire. Chin. Ment. Health 1996, 10, 164–168. [Google Scholar]
  31. Ebata, A.T.; Moos, R.H. Coping and Adjustment in Distressed and Healthy Adolescents. J. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 1991, 12, 33–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Alhurani, A.S.; Dekker, R.; Ahmad, M.; Miller, J.; Yousef, K.M.; Abdulqader, B.; Salami, I.; Lennie, T.A.; Randall, D.C.; Moser, D.K. Stress, Cognitive Appraisal, Coping, and Event Free Survival in Patients with Heart Failure. Heart Lung 2018, 47, 205–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ouellet-Morin, I.; Danese, A.; Williams, B.; Arseneault, L. Validation of a high-sensitivity assay for C-reactive protein in human saliva. Brain Behav. Immun. 2011, 25, 640–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sun, X.; Niu, G.; You, Z.; Zhou, Z.; Tang, Y. Gender, Negative Life Events and Coping on Different Stages of Depression Severity: A Cross-Sectional Study among Chinese University Students. J. Affect. Disord. 2017, 209, 177–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Braun-Lewensohn, O.; Sagy, S.; Roth, G. Coping Strategies among Adolescents: Israeli Jews and Arabs Facing Missile Attacks. Anxiety Stress Coping 2010, 23, 35–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Nuttman-Shwartz, O.; Dekel, R. Ways of Coping and Sense of Belonging in the Face of a Continuous Threat. J. Trauma. Stress 2009, 22, 667–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Lee, J.M.; Greening, L.; Stoppelbein, L. The Moderating Effect of Avoidant Coping on Restrained Eaters’ Risk for Disinhibited Eating: Implications for Dietary Relapse Prevention. Behav. Res. Ther. 2007, 45, 2334–2348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Fairburn, C.G.; Cooper, Z.; Shafran, R. Cognitive behaviour therapy for eating disorders: A “transdiagnostic” theory and treatment. Behav. Res. Ther. 2003, 41, 509–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Gomez, F.; Perez, M. Motivation for Dietary Restraint, and Disordered Eating among Adults Experiencing Food Insecurity in the United States. Int. J. Eat. Disord. 2022, 55, 838–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. London-Johnson, A.M.; Allen, J.W.; Pocchio, K.E.; Grzywacz, J.G. Associations between parent restrained eating, conflict, and adolescent eating (in latinx sample). J. Child Fam. Stud. 2021, 30, 98–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Koff, E.; Sangani, P. Effects of Coping Style and Negative Body Image on Eating Disturbance. Int. J. Eat. Disord. 1997, 22, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Villa, V.; Manzoni, G.M.; Pagnini, F.; Castelnuovo, G.; Cesa, G.L.; Molinari, E. Do Coping Strategies Discriminate Eating Disordered Individuals Better Than Eating Disorder Features? An Explorative Study on Female Inpatients with Anorexia and Bulimia Nervosa. J. Clin. Psychol. Med. Settings 2009, 16, 297–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. den Heijer, M.; Seynaeve, C.; Timman, R.; Duivenvoorden, H.J.; Vanheusden, K.; Tilanus-Linthorst, M.; Menke-Pluijmers, M.B.E.; Tibben, A. Body Image and Psychological Distress after Prophylactic Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction in Genetically Predisposed Women: A Prospective Long-Term Follow-Up Study. Eur. J. Cancer 2012, 48, 1263–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Thompson, J.; Cattarin, J.; Fowler, B.; Fisher, E. The Perception of Teasing Scale (Pots)—A Revision and Extension of the Physical Appearance Related Teasing Scale (Parts). J. Personal. Assess. 1995, 65, 146–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jie, Y.L. A preliminary study on the reliability and validity of simple coping style scale. Chin. J. Clin. Psychol. 1998, 6, 114–115. [Google Scholar]
  46. Chen, H.; Jackson, T.; Huang, X. The Negative Physical Self Scale: Initial Development and Validation in Samples of Chinese Adolescents and Young Adults. Body Image 2006, 3, 401–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kong, F.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, H. The Construct Validity of the Restraint Scale among Mainland Chinese Women. Eat. Behav. 2013, 14, 356–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Preacher, K.J.; Hayes, A.F. Asymptotic and Resampling Strategies for Assessing and Comparing Indirect Effects in Multiple Mediator Models. Behav. Res. Methods 2008, 40, 879–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rodgers, R.F.; Simone, M.; Franko, D.L.; Eisenberg, M.E.; Loth, K.; Neumark-Sztainer, D. The Longitudinal Relationship between Family and Peer Teasing in Young Adulthood and Later Unhealthy Weight Control Behaviors: The Mediating Role of Body Image. Int. J. Eat. Disord. 2021, 54, 831–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Thompson, J.K.; Heinberg, L.J.; Altabe, M.; Tantleff-Dunn, S. Exacting Beauty: Theory, Assessment, and Treatment of Body Image Disturbance; American Psychological Association: Washington, DC, USA, 1999; Chapter xii; 396p. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Huang, Y.J.; Li, X.X.; Zhang, S.J.; Liu, H.Y. The Relationship between Early Maladaptive Schemas and Negative Emotional Responses: The Mediating and Moderating Role of Coping Styles. J. Hangzhou Norm. Univ. Nat. Sci. Ed. 2022, 21, 462–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chen, J.; Li, J.; Cao, B.; Wang, F.; Luo, L.; Xu, J. Mediating Effects of Self-Efficacy, Coping, Burnout, and Social Support between Job Stress and Mental Health among Young Chinese Nurses. J. Adv. Nurs. 2020, 76, 163–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Pinkasavage, E.; Arigo, D.; Schumacher, L.M. Social Comparison, Negative Body Image, and Disordered Eating Behavior: The Moderating Role of Coping Style. Eat. Behav. 2015, 16, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Phelan, S.M.; Burgess, D.J.; Yeazel, M.W.; Hellerstedt, W.L.; Griffin, J.M.; Van Ryn, M. Impact of Weight Bias and Stigma on Quality of Care and Outcomes for Patients with Obesity. Obes. Rev. 2015, 16, 319–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Mazurkiewicz, N.; Lipowski, M.; Krefta, J.; Lipowska, M. “Better If They Laugh with Me than at Me”: The Role of Humor in Coping with Obesity-Related Stigma in Women. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 7974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Markus, H. Self-Schemata and Processing Information about the Self. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1977, 35, 63–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Romero-Pérez, E.M.; Núñez Enríquez, O.; Gastélum-Cuadras, G.; Horta-Gim, M.A.; González-Bernal, J.J.; de Paz, J.A. Assessment of Attitudes Toward Physical Education by the Implementation of an Extracurricular Program for Obese Children. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 5300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Flow chart of the screening process for the selection of eligible participants.
Figure 1. Flow chart of the screening process for the selection of eligible participants.
Nutrients 16 00163 g001
Figure 2. Serial mediation model testing negative physical self and restrained eating as mediators between peer teasing and negative coping style. Standardized coefficients, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 2. Serial mediation model testing negative physical self and restrained eating as mediators between peer teasing and negative coping style. Standardized coefficients, *** p < 0.001.
Nutrients 16 00163 g002
Table 1. Sample characteristics.
Table 1. Sample characteristics.
CharacteristicsOptionsFrequencyPercentage (%)
1. SexMale37333.2
Female75166.8
2. Age14–17544.8
17–20100188.8
20–23696.1
23–2630.3
<17.49 kg/m2726.4
3. BMI17.5–23.99 kg/m285375.7
24–27.99 kg/m216714.8
≥30 kg/m2353.1
Table 2. Correlations, means, and standard deviations of study variables.
Table 2. Correlations, means, and standard deviations of study variables.
VariablesM (SD)Correlations
1. Age2. BMI3. PT4. NCS5. NPS6. RE
1. Age18.43 (1.05)
2. BMI21.39 (3.07)−0.10 **
3. PT38.72 (17.58)−0.10 ***0.16 ***
4. NCS10.46 (4.05)0.040.08 **0.24 ***
5. NPS114.21 (22.50)0.07 *0.22 ***0.42 ***0.28 ***
6. RE12.25 (5.85)0.000.41 ***0.32 ***0.20 ***0.37 ***
Note: BMI = body mass index; M = mean; NCS = negative coping styles; NPS = negative physical self; PT = peer teasing; RE = restrained eating; SD = standard deviation. *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05.
Table 3. Mediating effect analysis of the chain-mediating model path.
Table 3. Mediating effect analysis of the chain-mediating model path.
PathMediating Effect ValueStandard ErrorLower Limit of 95% CIUpper Limit of 95% CIp
Total effect0.2300.0250.1820.278<0.001
Direct effects0.1300.0260.0780.180<0.001
Total mediation effect0.1010.0140.0750.129<0.001
Peer teasing → Negative coping style → Restrained eating0.0220.0010.0100.035<0.001
Peer teasing → Negative physical self → Restrained eating0.0710.0120.0480.096<0.001
Peer teasing → Negative coping style → Negative physical self → Restrained eating0.0090.0020.0050.014<0.001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.; Luo, Y.; Zhao, J.; Cui, Y.; Chen, H. Peer Teasing and Restrained Eating among Chinese College Students: The Chain Mediating Role of Negative Coping Styles and Negative Physical Self. Nutrients 2024, 16, 163. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16010163

AMA Style

Wang Y, Luo Y, Zhao J, Cui Y, Chen H. Peer Teasing and Restrained Eating among Chinese College Students: The Chain Mediating Role of Negative Coping Styles and Negative Physical Self. Nutrients. 2024; 16(1):163. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16010163

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Yuwansu, Yijun Luo, Jie Zhao, Yicen Cui, and Hong Chen. 2024. "Peer Teasing and Restrained Eating among Chinese College Students: The Chain Mediating Role of Negative Coping Styles and Negative Physical Self" Nutrients 16, no. 1: 163. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16010163

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop