Next Article in Journal
The Intake of Phosphorus and Nitrites through Meat Products: A Health Risk Assessment of Children Aged 1 to 9 Years Old in Serbia
Previous Article in Journal
Do Overweight People Have Worse Cognitive Flexibility? Cues-Triggered Food Craving May Have a Greater Impact
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 14
Issue 2
10.3390/nu14020241
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Culturing and Molecular Approaches for Identifying Microbiota Taxa Impacting Children’s Obesogenic Phenotypes Related to Xenobiotic Dietary Exposure

by
Ana López-Moreno
1,2,3,*,†,
Ángel Ruiz-Moreno
1,2,†,
Jesús Pardo-Cacho
1,
Klara Cerk
1,2,
Alfonso Torres-Sánchez
1,2,
Pilar Ortiz
1,2,
Marina Úbeda
1 and
Margarita Aguilera
1,2,3,*
1
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
2
Center of Biomedical Research, Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology “José Mataix”, University of Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain
3
Microbiota Laboratory, IBS: Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs, 18012 Granada, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Nutrients 2022, 14(2), 241; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14020241
Submission received: 26 November 2021 / Revised: 31 December 2021 / Accepted: 3 January 2022 / Published: 6 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Nutrition and Public Health)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Integrated data from molecular and improved culturomics studies might offer holistic insights on gut microbiome dysbiosis triggered by xenobiotics, such as obesity and metabolic disorders. Bisphenol A (BPA), a dietary xenobiotic obesogen, was chosen for a directed culturing approach using microbiota specimens from 46 children with obesity and normal-weight profiles. In parallel, a complementary molecular analysis was carried out to estimate the BPA metabolising capacities. Firstly, catalogues of 237 BPA directed-cultured microorganisms were isolated using five selected media and several BPA treatments and conditions. Taxa from Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria were the most abundant in normal-weight and overweight/obese children, with species belonging to the genera Enterococcus, Escherichia, Staphylococcus, Bacillus, and Clostridium. Secondly, the representative isolated taxa from normal-weight vs. overweight/obese were grouped as BPA biodegrader, tolerant, or resistant bacteria, according to the presence of genes encoding BPA enzymes in their whole genome sequences. Remarkably, the presence of sporobiota and concretely Bacillus spp. showed the higher BPA biodegradation potential in overweight/obese group compared to normal-weight, which could drive a relevant role in obesity and metabolic dysbiosis triggered by these xenobiotics.

1. Introduction

Exposure to obesogens and endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) can lead to microbial and molecular dysbiosis [1,2], which is based on misbalanced taxa compositions and associated with several metabolic diseases, such as type 2 diabetes, obesity, and other endocrine disorders [3,4,5]. EDCs are also considered microbiota disrupting chemicals (MDCs) [6]. Concretely, Bisphenol A (BPA), as one of the more representative, studied, and controversial EDCs, is widely used in polycarbonate and epoxy resins and packages [7]. The contaminant is widely present in the environment, including soils, sediments, aquatic environments; and water, air, and dust particles [8]. Several routes of human exposure to BPA have been described, including the digestive system (ingestion) through exposure to food packaging, drinking containers, and dental monomers [9,10]; the vertical transmission (maternofetal) [11]; the respiratory system (inhalation) [12]; and the integumentary system (skin and eye contact) through exposure to the thermal paper of receipts, contact lenses, and feminine hygiene products [13,14]. The presence of these obesogens and MDCs in humans has been also confirmed in serum, urine, saliva, hair, tissue, and blood [15,16]. Thus, BPA removal from the natural environment is of increasing interest worldwide. Several studies have identified biological effective ways to remove it through organisms, such as bacteria, fungi, algae, and plants [17,18]. The evidence of the impact of dietary exposure to BPA has led the industry to use analogous compounds, such as bisphenol S (BPS), bisphenol F (BPF), etc. However, recent studies showed that some of these analogues may be even more harmful than BPA [19]. In the case of BPS, evidence suggests that it acts as an MDC, but research in this field has remained limited [20].
Metabolism and metabolites upon ingestion of BPA undergo rapid first-pass metabolism to BPA-glucuronide, which is biologically inert and rapidly cleared in the urine [21]. Glucuronidation is the main detoxication pathway for BPA in humans and other species, understanding the differential impact and potential health risks from early-life exposure to BPA, especially in the neo-natal period and infancy [22]. BPA glucuronide is driven by uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) in the liver and gut. However, BPA microbial metabolisation starts to be understood under the relevance of toxicomicrobiomics recent studies [23]. In this sense, the isolation, culture, and analysis of the microbial taxa components associated with adverse functional effects, would allow a better understanding of the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and control via administration of beneficial microbes, helping to regulate the physiological hormonal axis [24]. The application of culturomics for the human microbiome description is advancing towards more effective isolations via sophisticated culture methods of the human microbiome [25]. These methods rely on culturing of human samples with different growth media under varying conditions, along with identification of isolated bacterial colonies with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and 16S rRNA gene sequencing [25,26]. Culturomics has been successful in the isolation, description, and characterisation of new bacterial species from the human microbiota [25,27,28]. This enabled the expansion of the current human microbial database via the isolation of a significant number of novel bacterial species and allowed the identification of previously considered “uncultured organisms”, with potential for further use in clinical settings [28]. Moreover, culturomics remains as a main strategy for the isolation of new gut microorganisms with metabolising capacities. Moreover, the searching of next generation probiotics (NGP) increases due to the advancing knowledge of the human intestinal microbiota and the potential of intervening and modulating the specific dysbiosis and certain metabolic diseases [29,30].
Thus, a new area of research is worth exploring where potential NGPs with the ability to modulate the gut microbiota could be used, counteracting the impact of xenobiotics ingested through the diet. BPA measurement in foods usually consumed by children showed summatory exposure levels over 400 ng g−1 [10]. Moreover, animal studies detected BPA levels in faeces over 50–70 ng g−1 [31]. Directed culturing of microorganisms from the gut microbiota of obese and non-obese individuals exposed to EDC may lead to the identification of strains with xenobiotics detoxifying potential, which could be assessed for being used as NGP [29,32].
The aim of this work was to advance knowledge regarding culturomics data and directed culturing techniques for searching key microbiota isolates from children with obesity vs normal-weight with differential metabolic capacities. Comparative gene catalogues of the identified BPA tolerant or biodegrader taxa will be further well-defined through molecular and enzymatic pathways analyses.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Microbiota Culturing Approaches, Media, and Conditions for Isolation of Gut Microbial Taxa Components

Theoretical searching of culturomics data, which were thoroughly analysed, allowed us to retrieve and compile main culturing media and conditions for isolation of relevant gut microbiota taxa components (Table 1). Data analysis and extraction revealed a battery of media for successful isolation of anaerobic and aerobic species and taxa belonging to phyla Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, and alpha-Proteobacteria. Similarly, useful information on favoured cultured isolates from gut microbiota acting as beneficial microorganisms or potential NGP was previously retrieved. Main media and pertinent modifications for isolating potential obesity and anti-obesity probiotics were: BHI, GAM, gut microbiota medium (GMM), Lactobacillus selection (LB), MRS, YCFA, and BPA-added media [29]. Therefore, culturomic efforts contributed to enlarge the repertoire of isolated bacterial species from humans by 28% and provided biological material to the scientific community that can be further studied for its role and interaction with other bacterial species and host [33]. Conversely, metagenomics aims to describe the human microbiota taxa without culturing efforts, given their limitations [34,35], including incomplete genomic databases [28,33,36] and the inability to distinguish between live and dead bacterial specimens in the studied samples [36]. In a previous study that examined the gut microbiota composition of eight healthy individuals, it was shown that culturomics enabled 20% higher bacterial richness in comparison to metagenomics [37]. Interestingly, the isolated species’ genome sequences were increased by 22% compared to the data obtained by metagenomic analyses alone, suggesting that the number of species recovered by culturing was higher than the number of species detected by metagenomics [37]. It is also important for culturomics approaches to highlight how faecal specimens collection, transport, and storage systems were designed and validated to optimise the viability of all groups of bacteria under several situations. After analysing the present results, the anaerobic kit used for collection and the immediate storage at −80 °C until the culturing assays, resulted in being effective in maintaining anaerobic and aerobic bacteria viability and relative abundances in all specimens analysed. Altogether, it highlights the importance of better exploring the culturing approaches to obtain microbial resources and understand the gut microbiome’s specific functional roles. In this sense, BPA-degradation capabilities of certain microorganisms were previously studied as a source for environmental bioremediation [38,39]. Furthermore, species from Bacillus genus isolated from infant faecal samples were shown to harbour the four complete molecular pathways for BPA biodegradation [40]. This could underline the relevance of the sporobiota (all spore-forming bacteria from microbial communities [41,42]) in the tolerance or biodegradation of xenobiotics compounds such as BPA. However, while the use of BPA-degrading microorganisms is widely extended to bioremediation, based on a previous review [30], clinical studies and trials involving beneficial microorganisms, metabolic diseases, and xenobiotic obesogens are lacking.

2.2. BPA Directed Culturomics Taxa Catalogue from Microbiota of Normal-Weight, Overweight, and Obese Children

A total of 192 bacterial isolates were identified from the 46 microbiota specimens in several media treated with different concentrations of BPA. Participants were categorised in children with overweight, obesity, or normal-weight according to the description made by the World Health Organisation (WHO) (Table 2).
The media BHI, MRS, RCM, GAMa, and GAMg were selected for further testing adding BPA concentrations based on higher count results after preliminary global tests with the media described in Table 1. Strains were isolated from five media supplemented with BPA: BHI (80 isolates), MRS (49 isolates), RCM (30 isolates), GAMa (18 isolates), and GAMg (15 isolates). The overall mean values estimated for colony counts were: 7 × 107 CFU/g in BHI + BPA 20 ppm; 2 × 108 CFU/g in BHI + BPA 50 ppm; 8 × 107 CFU/g in MRS + BPA 20 ppm, and 4 × 107 CFU/g in MRS + BPA 50 ppm; 5 × 107 CFU/g in RCM + BPA 20 ppm, 1 × 107 CFU/g RCM + BPA 50 ppm; 1 × 106 CFU/g in GAMa + BPA 20 ppm, and 5 × 105 CFU/g GAMa + BPA 50 ppm; 5 × 106 CFU/g in GAMg + BPA 20 ppm, and 2 × 106 CFU/g GAMg + BPA 50 ppm. We isolated taxa from microbiota in 25 different culture conditions (BPA directed culturing with five media and five BPA concentrations).
Similarly, current culturomics studies suggested that through using 16 culture conditions, around 98% of the known cultivated taxa of the human gut microbiota could be isolated [46]. It is interesting to highlight that Actinobacteria taxa with high BPA tolerance were isolated only from BHI medium.
The relative abundance of the isolates, together with the taxonomically closest species, the maximum BPA concentration tolerated and the specific media used for obese and normal-weight children specimens are detailed in Table 3. A phylum data analysis showed differences in relative abundance of cultured Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria between both populations. Firmicutes were the most abundant phylum with BPA tolerance found, representing 72% in normal-weight children and 73% in children with obesity. Proteobacteria was differentially represented in both groups by 17% and 20%, respectively. However, the dataset showed differences in Actinobacteria and uncultured bacterial groups. The Actinobacteria group represented 6% of the bacteria isolated from the gut microbiota of normal-weight children and 5% in the case of children with obesity. Uncultured bacteria represented 5% of the total bacteria isolated from the microbiota of normal-weight group, and 3% in population with obesity.
Similarly, xenobiotic-tolerant and specifically BPA-tolerant gut microorganisms were previously described for the traditional probiotics Bifidobacterium breve strain Yakult (BbY) and Lactobacillus casei strain Shirota (LcS), that showed protective effects against BPA dietary exposure in rats by reducing the intestinal absorption of BPA and facilitating its excretion [59]. Likewise, Lactococcus lactis strains adsorbed BPA but it was not able to degrade it [60]. Bioaccessibility of BPA decreased after digestion and this exposure changed the microbial community by up-regulating the abundance of BPA-degrading bacteria, such as Microbacterium and Alcaligenes [61].
The most dominant BPA-tolerant taxa found in this study were Enterococcus spp., Bacillus spp., Escherichia spp., Staphylococcus spp., and Clostridium spp. In both populations (Table 3), representing about 80% of the cultured microorganisms found. However, differences between the groups were observed in the minority BPA-tolerant genera cultured. Some of these genera were found exclusively to each population, demonstrating dissimilarities in gut microbiota compositions between obesity and normal-weight children. The less abundant BPA-tolerant genera found only in normal-weight children were Rothia, Paraclostridium, and Bifidobacterium. However, taxa belonging to Kocuria, Micrococcus, Burholderia, Raoultella, Shigella, and Latilactobacillus were found exclusively in overweight and obese children.

2.3. BPA Directed Culturomics and Spore-Forming Microbiota Taxa: Clostridium and Bacillus spp.

A total of 45 spore-forming bacterial isolates (sporobiota) from the human gut microbiota with high BPA tolerance (>20 ppm) were identified. They were isolated from five different media supplemented with different concentrations of BPA: GAMg (16 isolates), GAMa (17 isolates), and RCM (12 isolates) without any specific media for associated taxa. The overall mean values for colony counts were: 9 × 104 CFU/g in GAMa + BPA 20 ppm; 4 × 104 CFU/g in GAMa + BPA 50 ppm; 1 × 105 CFU/g GAMg + BPA 20 ppm; 6 × 104 CFU/g GAMg + BPA 50 ppm; 9 × 104 CFU/g RCM + BPA 20 ppm; and 5 × 104 CFU/g RCM + BPA 50 ppm. The relative abundance of these spore-forming bacterial isolates, together with taxonomically closest species, maximum BPA concentration tolerated and specific media used are detailed in Table 4. Sporobiota isolates from normal-weight children were distributed within Clostridium spp. Represented by 24% and Bacillus spp. By 27.4%. In contrast, in obese children, higher percentages were found for Clostridium spp. that constituted 43.9%, being similar for Bacillus spp. as 25.1%. It is interesting to highlight that Paeniclostridium sordellii showing high BPA tolerance was isolated only from normal-weight children, where it was the most representative species isolated (34.5%). Focusing on biodiversity at the species level, a total of 11 different species and 1 uncultured isolate belonged to normal-weight children. In overweight or children with obesity, a total of seven different species and three previously uncultured bacteria were successfully cultured. It is well known that traditional methods for determining the diversity of spore-forming bacteria are very important but still challenging [41]. It needs a combined approached based on culture, molecular, and omics methodologies [62,63,64].
Moreover, microbial communities identified through BPA culturomics-based approach revealed that the overweight/obese group had more diversity, richness, and evenness than the normal-weight group. It was also observed that there were more differential species in obese than in normal-weight, considering global taxa analysis (Figure 1a). Conversely, sporobiota taxa analysis (Table 4) showed more variety of species in normal-weight (Figure 1b). As for other culturomic studies, these results lead to complement the molecular approaches by highlighting the role of bacteria that were considered “un-cultivable” as they might be impacting health balance and/or disease development [36]. Culturomics for isolation of new bacterial species able to metabolize toxicants was previously done by other authors, and it was framed as toxicogenomics studies [24]. New isolated bacterial species should be subjected to a series of phenotypic, biochemical, and genomic characterisation (habitat, sporulation, shape, antibiotics profile, metabolism, fatty acids contents, genome sequencing/ assembly, and annotation).

2.4. BPA Biodegradation Metabolic Maps through WGST Data Mining

The bioinformatics and molecular analysis carried out on the WGS of type strains from the taxonomic closest species to the isolates from the gut microbiota identified as cultivable species showed a differential potential of BPA biodegradation corresponding to its specific enzyme arsenal (Figure 2). Genome mining allowed the identification of specific clusters prone to degrade bisphenols described according to the main four BPA biodegradation pathways. Bioinformatics tools and Pascal programming allowed the analysis of the retrieved sequences of the relevant type strains from a public database (GenBank—Supplementary Table S1). According to the theoretical predictive results, the overall BPA directed-cultured microbiota naturally possessed an intermediate degree of BPA biodegradation potential depending on the different enzymatic arsenal estimated (BPA (I) 47%, BPA (II) 34%, BPA (III) 48%, and BPA (IV) 50%). Specific taxa belonging to Burkholderia, Bacillus, Raoultella, Acinetobacter, Micrococcus, Pseudomonas, and Microbacterium could be clustered as biodegrader because they harboured the more complete BPA biodegradation genetic clusters (>50%). Conversely, Clostridium species could be considered as BPA resistant bacteria. Similarly, Shigella, Bifidobacterium, Enterococcus, Lactobacillus, and Turicibacter were considered tolerant or resistant as the predictive analysis showed lower representative percentages of the gene loci for encoding BPA biodegradation enzymes. After crossing data from the relative abundance data from cultured of isolated taxa with their specific BPA biodegradation predictive values, a lower score was found in normal-weight compared to overweight or obese populations (Figure 3a). The same trend was also observed when analysing the sporobiota alone and its BPA genes potential (Figure 3b). Remarkably, the analyses results showed that the composition of independent sporobiota taxa (mainly Bacillus spp.) might contribute to a significant role in the gut dysbiosis/eubiosis on the studied children population. It seems very important to elucidate the differential impact of specific metabolites from the BPA pathways that can specifically contribute to trigger obesogenic effects, such as Acetyl CoA, which is a convergent end metabolite in several BPA pathways, and is demonstrated to have obesogenic effects [65,66].
Genome mining of WGST for BPA biodegradation genes was performed through available databases. Advances in Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) and in silico tools allowed us to perform an appropriate screening for genes of concern in the gut microbiota. BPA biodegradation capacity or toxicomicrobiomics more generally can potentially be exploited through bioinformatics, metagenomics, or in silico analysis of cultivable isolates via WGS [67,68]. Moreover, a better understanding of the microbiota ecology driven by metabolites and bioactive compounds, which are released by specific gut microbial components, may drive towards better and personalised clinical interventions [69]. Genome mining conducted in the present study allowed BLAST driven searching for predicted BPA pathways. Pascal programming was a useful prediction tool for toxicomicrobiomics analysis. Similarly, another useful prediction tool could be used as well as for BPA biodegradation pathways [70].
Interestingly, certain species found exclusively in the microbiota of normal-weight children microbiota (Paraclostridium spp. and Bifidobacterium spp.) had a low BPA biodegradation potential, being clustered as BPA tolerant or resistant. However, certain species isolated exclusively from the microbiota of overweight and/or obese children (Kouria spp., Micrococcus spp., Burkholderia spp., Raoultella spp., and Shigella spp.) showed the higher BPA degradation potential, being grouped as BPA biodegrader. Thus, a first trend of this analysis revealed that microorganisms from the gut microbiota of children with obesity may have more BPA biodegradation potential than those of normal-weight children.
Based on comparative data from metagenomics regarding the variability of taxa composition in individuals with obesity and normal-weight, the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes (F/B) ratio constitutes a recognised biomarker for comparisons, as well as the relative abundances of Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria. In the present study, four major bacterial phyla (Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria) dominated the gut microbiota and a predisposition of higher relative abundance of Firmicutes and Actinobacteria in the individuals with obesity was observed. The landscape, richness, and diversity of the observed study group showed no statistical significance in the variability of taxa composition between individuals with obesity and normal-weight. For the statistical analysis of comparative metagenomics of the cohort, the microbiome data were uploaded to the MicrobiomeAnalyst server [71]. Since microbiome studies usually generate datasets that are both large in size and complex in structure, and could carry a great ‘big data’ challenge in downstream data analysis, the platforms such as the MicrobiomeAnalyst server are powerful tools, which offer comprehensive support with a wide array of methods for taxonomic diversity analysis, functional profiling, visualisation, and significance testing. The F/B ratio was higher in obese than normal-weight individuals, and Actinobacteria were usually more abundant in an obese population. Conversely, Bacteroides and Proteobacteria were slightly higher in normal-weight populations [72]. In this sense, our BPA directed culturomics approach highlighted Firmicutes as one of the most predominant populated taxa able to grow with high BPA concentrations and relatively high BPA biodegradation potential (Bacillus, Staphylococcus, Micrococcus). However, it was not possible to explore Bacteroidetes in a similar way, as no cultivable components of this taxon were obtained through this approach. On the other hand, cultivable Proteobacteria taxa (Table 2) isolated from obese specimens were different compared to those obtained from normal-weight children. Moreover, they harboured the highest BPA enzymatic capacities according to the gene loci presence (Burkholderia contaminans, Raoultella ornithinolytica, Acinetobacter radioresistens Escherichia spp., and Shigella flexneri).
Moreover, it is important to consider the ecological role of these enzymes and their impact on the composition of the gut microbiota, which may have a large influence on metabolising and neutralising BPA via releasing metabolites that contribute to the modification of individual microbial taxa components on a long-term basis [73]. Interestingly, specific transitory taxa of the gut microbiota with a high potential of BPA biodegradation could also be used for environmental bioremediation purposes or as animal or plant probiotics. Similarly, several authors investigated the BPA removal capacity of bacterial strains isolated in dessert soil, including Pseudomonas putida, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter cloacae, Klebsiella sp., and Pantoea sp. [8,74]. Likewise, a consortium of microorganisms isolated from river sediment (Terrimonas pekingensis and Pseudomonas sp.) was demonstrated to use BPS as the sole carbon source and was highly efficient in degrading 99% of the BPS with an initial concentration of 50 mg/L in 10 days [75]. Moreover, gut bacteria harbouring laccases could be used for detoxification of several hazardous dietary contaminants and emerging EDC in a bioreactor with a novel biocatalytic system based on active membranes and immobilised laccase technology [76]. The directed culturing approach could be also applied to study and predict the microorganisms able to biodegrade other obesogens and MDCs, such as parabens, phthalates, and benzophenones [77,78,79].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Culturomics Review Data for Increasing the Microbiota Taxa Isolates

A literature search and review of studies was conducted in collaboration with Granada library support, using medical subject headings (MeSH) and key words (see below) under a stepwise procedure search adapted to each database’s tutorials. The search was limited for culturomics literature published until July 2021, and conducted on the following electronic databases: PubMed, Web of Science (Thomson Reuters Scientific), and Scopus (Elsevier). Titles and abstracts were reviewed, then full-text publications with reference to the inclusion criteria, which were all the studies about culturomics or culturing from human gut microbiota. The key words were culturomics* AND microbiota, culturing* AND microbiota AND obesity AND “endocrine disrupt*”; culturomics* and microbiota and obesity and xenobiotic*; culturing * and microbiota and obesity and hormon*; culturing* and microbiota and obesity and “drug metabol*”; culturing* and microbiota and “metabolic syndrome” “endocrine disrupt*”; culturomics* and microbiota and “metabolic syndrome” and xenobiotic*; culturomics* and microbiota and “metabolic syndrome” and hormon*; culturomics * and microbiota and “metabolic syndrome” and “drug metabol*”; culturomics * and microbiota and diabetes and “endocrine disrupt*”; culturomics * and microbiota and diabetes and xenobiotic*; culturomics* and microbiota and diabetes and hormon*; culturomics* and microbiota and diabetes and “drug metabol*”; culturomics* and microbiota and fertility.

3.2. Experimental Culturomics Approach to Isolate Gut Microbes Metabolising Obesogenic EDCs

BPA Directed Culturing Approach for the Isolation of Microbiota Strain Catalogue

A previous common approach to isolate microbial strains from microbiota after BPA treatment has been followed [40]. For this study, human faecal samples were collected with anaerobic kits from obese, overweight, and normal-weight children aged between four and twelve years old, anthropometry data are detailed in Table 2. The anthropometry classification was made according to data collected by WHO 2007 (Table S2, https://www.who.int/toolkits/growth-reference-data-for-5to19-years/indicators/bmi-for-age 22 October 2021). The faecal samples were collected in anaerobic conditions and maintained appropriately frozen at −80 °C until experimental assays were performed for avoiding significant loss of isolated taxa as previously was described in several studies [80,81].
Faecal samples (0.5 g) underwent a directed culturing approach adding BPA to search tolerant and potentially BPA biodegrading microorganisms. The experiment was carried out by serial dilution method of the samples and their exposition to different BPA concentrations (0.5, 10, 20, and 50 ppm) during 72 h at 37 °C, accordingly to previous primary searching and screening studies to obtain microbial biodegrader strains [40]. Further spreading in different media was performed and later incubated under aerobic and anaerobic conditions with anaerobic jars through Anaerocult® A system (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) at 72 h and 37 °C. The different culture media used for optimising the uncultured bacterial growth were brain heart infusion (BHI), Man, Rogosa and Sharpe (MRS), reinforced clostridial medium (RCM), Gifu anaerobic modified medium (GAMm) agar/gellan [82]. The isolation of BPA-tolerant bacteria was carried out under the experienced picking method [43], according to different morphology of the colonies, these were isolated as pure culture for subsequent morphological, phenotypic, and genotypic identifications.

3.3. Genomic DNA Extraction and Partial and Complete 16S rRNA Analysis

Microbial genomic DNA was extracted using DNeasy columns following the manufacturing instructions, and DNA extraction from stools was performed using the PowerSoil DNA Isolation Kit (Qiagen®, Hilden, Germany). The isolated DNA was quantified using Nanodrop (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and biophotometer (Eppendorf® D30). The quality of DNA was analysed spectrophotometrically, by gel electrophoresis. Partial and complete 16S rRNA genes from gDNA from all isolated colonies were amplified by PCR and subsequently sequenced by Sanger method and analysed to identify each taxon (primer amplification: 16F27-5′-AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTC-3′ and 1525R-5′-AAGGAGGTGATCCAGCC-3′; primers sequencing: F357-5′-CTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCA-3, R519-5′-GWATTACCGCGGCKGCTG-3, and F915-5′-GGGCCCGCACAAGCGGTGG-3) (Institute of Parasitology and Biomedicine “López-Neyra” (IPBLN) Service). Sequence analysis was done using Chromas Pro 2.0 (Technelysium Pty Ltd., Tewantin, Australia). Sequences were examined for maximum homology against GenBank using the National Centre of Biotechnology Information’s (NCBI) BLASTn program. The collection and phylogenetic comparison of 16S rRNA partial gene sequences was done using the Ezbiocloud platform [83].

3.4. BPA Directed Culturing and Searching for Spore-Forming Taxa Components: Clostridium spp. and Bacillus spp.

In parallel, a specific treatment was carried out to favour the isolation of spore-forming bacteria. For this, after the exposure to BPA and before the spread on the media, the microbiota samples were exposed to 70% ethanol for 4 h and treated with a bile acids solution (0.1 mg/mL of bile bovine in PBS) for the metabolic activation of the spores. Then, the samples were processed and analysed as described above.

3.5. Genome Data Mining Tools for Prediction of BPA Metabolic Maps and Enzymatic Pathways in Whole Genome Sequence of Type Strains (WGST) from the Closest Species to Isolates from Gut Microbiota

In order to assess the presence of BPA biodegradation gene potential of the cultured microbiota, several bioinformatics tools were used to perform the genome mining.
The identification of potential BPA genes encoding enzymes involved in the four biodegradation pathways was carried out by the analysis of genomes of type strains WGST closest to the representative isolates identified. A data retrieving program was specifically computed using Pascal programming language, to obtain the identifier ID of the specific enzymes participating in the BPA pathways and the corresponding loci from the microbial genomes (Figure 2).
The type strains whole genome sequences (WGST) were retrieved from NCBI Genome Data Bank as GenBank file format to list the genes that could potentially encode the enzymes of interest. A more detailed prediction of the BPA gene clusters from the four main pathways was performed by checking the downstream and upstream genes of those involved in BPA biodegradation, using NCBI genome map viewer.
Pascal programming language registers the entire GenBank file of the type species and checks whether a certain keyword for the enzyme was found in the field corresponding to the name of the protein. The program returns in a notepad file a list of the possible relevant candidate enzyme names and identifier ID, loci, and annotations features. Afterwards, the output file notes are reviewed, validated, and organized through checking the presence or absence of the relevant enzymes, either of any of the degradation routes of BPA whose presence was searched. An Excel spreadsheet shows a positive (+) if the microorganism is theoretically capable of producing that enzyme, or a negative (−) if was not able to produce it (Supplementary Table S1). Verification of certain enzyme names according to their function and substrate was also done using different nomenclatures supported by the Kyoto Encyclopaedia of Genes and Genomes database (KEGG Enzyme, https://www.genome.jp/kegg/annotation/enzyme.html 24 June 2021).

4. Conclusions

The pathophysiological impact and severity of obesogens, such as BPA, appears to depend on inter-individual and diverse gut microbial components that trigger microbiota dysbiosis with clinical symptoms of obesity and metabolic disorders. Therefore, to contribute to the understanding of how these specific microbial consortia interact with the host and how their enzymatic arsenal could shape those communities and functional human microbiome become a relevant health challenge. Innovatively, BPA directed culturing and molecular approaches indicated that specific gut microbiota found in normal-weight vs obese individuals were differentially enriched in potential biodegrader, resistant, and tolerant microorganisms. The present study also highlights the potential biodegradation of the sporobiota, focused mainly on Bacillus genus as relevant for impacting on the obesogenic phenotypes. Moreover, directed-cultured microbial communities from children with obesity showed a slight higher potential capacity of BPA genes encoding enzymes compared to the normal-weight population. It should be further investigated how the differential microbiota components release variable BPA metabolites or intermediates that might play determinant roles on obesity. In addition, cumulative environmental exposure to these obesogens might also drive microbiota ecological modifications that trigger dysbiosis and differential expression of specific gene pathways, impacting on the long-term individual health and disease status.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nu14020241/s1, Supplementary Table S1: Bioinformatics for BPA enzyme ID and Loci Prediction. Supplementary Table S2: Categorisation of data for overweight, obesity, or normal-weight in children according to the description by the World Health Organisation (WHO).

Author Contributions

M.A. conceptualised the rationale of the manuscript; A.L.-M. and Á.R.-M. performed the experimental directed culturing for the bacteria catalogue. P.O. and M.Ú. performed the core work of the culturomics literature review. A.L.-M. drafted and prepared the initial manuscript. J.P.-C., K.C. and A.T.-S. performed the BPA bioinformatics and WGS data mining. All authors assessed the content of the manuscript and discussion and performed a critical comparison of full data. M.A. revised, validated, and amended the final draft of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

A.L.-M. has a Ph.D. contract through the EFSA grant and the programme “Intensificación de la Investigación” University of Granada (2019–2022). PO is under the contract “Garantía Juvenil” –FEDER-Junta de Andalucía. K. Cerk is under the EU-FORA Fellowship Programme. A.L-M., A.R-M., P.O., A.T.-S. and M.A. are part of the BIO-190 Research Group. They are also part of “UGR Plan Propio de Investigación 2019–2022. This work was carried out within the frame of FEDER-Infrastructure: IE19_198 UGR and OBEMIRISK EFSA-Partnering Grant Project GP/EFSA/ENCO/2018/03-GA04.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee from the University of Granada (CEIC 20 December 2019.).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Egusquiza, R.J.; Blumberg, B. Environmental Obesogens and Their Impact on Susceptibility to Obesity: New Mechanisms and Chemicals. Endocrinology 2020, 161, bqaa024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Aguilera, M.; Lamas, B.; Van Pamel, E.; Bhide, M.; Houdeau, E.; Rivas, A. Editorial: Risk of Dietary Hazardous Substances and Impact on Human Microbiota: Possible Role in Several Dysbiosis Phenotypes. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 669480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cohen, I.C.; Cohenour, E.R.; Harnett, K.G.; Schuh, S.M. BPA, BPAF and TMBPF Alter Adipogenesis and Fat Accumulation in Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells, with Implications for Obesity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, T.; Li, M.; Chen, B.; Xu, M.; Xu, Y.; Huang, Y.; Lu, J.; Chen, Y.; Wang, W.; Li, X.; et al. Urinary Bisphenol A (BPA) Concentration Associates with Obesity and Insulin Resistance. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 97, E223–E227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Lai, K.P.; Ng, A.H.-M.; Wan, H.T.; Wong, A.Y.-M.; Leung, C.C.-T.; Li, R.; Wong, C.K.-C. Dietary Exposure to the Environmental Chemical, PFOS on the Diversity of Gut Microbiota, Associated with the Development of Metabolic Syndrome. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Aguilera, M.; Gálvez-Ontiveros, Y.; Rivas, A. Endobolome, a New Concept for Determining the Influence of Microbiota Disrupting Chemicals (MDC) in Relation to Specific Endocrine Pathogenesis. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 578007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jalal, N.; Surendranath, A.R.; Pathak, J.L.; Yu, S.; Chung, C.Y. Bisphenol A (BPA) the Mighty and the Mutagenic. Toxicol. Rep. 2018, 5, 76–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Louati, I.; Dammak, M.; Nasri, R.; Belbahri, L.; Nasri, M.; Abdelkafi, S.; Mechichi, T. Biodegradation and Detoxification of Bisphenol A by Bacteria Isolated from Desert Soils. 3 Biotech 2019, 9, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Joskow, R.; Barr, D.B.; Barr, J.R.; Calafat, A.M.; Needham, L.L.; Rubin, C. Exposure to Bisphenol A from Bis-Glycidyl Dimethacrylate-Based Dental Sealants. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2006, 137, 353–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Gálvez-Ontiveros, Y.; Moscoso-Ruiz, I.; Rodrigo, L.; Aguilera, M.; Rivas, A.; Zafra-Gómez, A. Presence of Parabens and Bisphenols in Food Commonly Consumed in Spain. Foods 2021, 10, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Stoker, C.; Andreoli, M.F.; Kass, L.; Bosquiazzo, V.L.; Rossetti, M.F.; Canesini, G.; Luque, E.H.; Ramos, J.G. Perinatal Exposure to Bisphenol A (BPA) Impairs Neuroendocrine Mechanisms Regulating Food Intake and Kisspetin System in Adult Male Rats. Evidences of Metabolic Disruptor Hypothesis. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2020, 499, 110614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Chung, Y.H.; Han, J.H.; Lee, S.-B.; Lee, Y.-H. Inhalation Toxicity of Bisphenol A and Its Effect on Estrous Cycle, Spatial Learning, and Memory in Rats upon Whole-Body Exposure. Toxicol. Res. 2017, 33, 165–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Hormann, A.M.; Vom Saal, F.S.; Nagel, S.C.; Stahlhut, R.W.; Moyer, C.L.; Ellersieck, M.R.; Welshons, W.V.; Toutain, P.-L.; Taylor, J.A. Holding Thermal Receipt Paper and Eating Food after Using Hand Sanitizer Results in High Serum Bioactive and Urine Total Levels of Bisphenol A (BPA). PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e110509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Gao, C.-J.; Kannan, K. Phthalates, Bisphenols, Parabens, and Triclocarban in Feminine Hygiene Products from the United States and Their Implications for Human Exposure. Environ. Int. 2020, 136, 105465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Vandenberg, L.N.; Chahoud, I.; Heindel, J.J.; Padmanabhan, V.; Paumgartten, F.J.R.; Schoenfelder, G. Urinary, Circulating, and Tissue Biomonitoring Studies Indicate Widespread Exposure to Bisphenol A. Cienc. Saude Colet. 2012, 17, 407–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Vandenberg, L.N.; Hauser, R.; Marcus, M.; Olea, N.; Welshons, W.V. Human Exposure to Bisphenol A (BPA). Reprod. Toxicol. 2007, 24, 139–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Suyamud, B.; Thiravetyan, P.; Gadd, G.M.; Panyapinyopol, B.; Inthorn, D. Bisphenol A Removal from a Plastic Industry Wastewater by Dracaena Sanderiana Endophytic Bacteria and Bacillus Cereus NI. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2020, 22, 167–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Vijayalakshmi, V.; Senthilkumar, P.; Mophin-Kani, K.; Sivamani, S.; Sivarajasekar, N.; Vasantharaj, S. Bio-Degradation of Bisphenol A by Pseudomonas Aeruginosa PAb1 Isolated from Effluent of Thermal Paper Industry: Kinetic Modeling and Process Optimization. J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci. 2018, 11, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Thoene, M.; Dzika, E.; Gonkowski, S.; Wojtkiewicz, J. Bisphenol S in Food Causes Hormonal and Obesogenic Effects Comparable to or Worse than Bisphenol A: A Literature Review. Nutrients 2020, 12, 532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Wu, L.-H.; Zhang, X.-M.; Wang, F.; Gao, C.-J.; Chen, D.; Palumbo, J.R.; Guo, Y.; Zeng, E.Y. Occurrence of Bisphenol S in the Environment and Implications for Human Exposure: A Short Review. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 615, 87–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Völkel, W.; Colnot, T.; Csanády, G.A.; Filser, J.G.; Dekant, W. Metabolism and Kinetics of Bisphenol a in Humans at Low Doses Following Oral Administration. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2002, 15, 1281–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. McCarver, D.G.; Hines, R.N. The Ontogeny of Human Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes: Phase II Conjugation Enzymes and Regulatory Mechanisms. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2002, 300, 361–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Kim, H.M.; Kang, J.S. Metabolomic Studies for the Evaluation of Toxicity Induced by Environmental Toxicants on Model Organisms. Metabolites 2021, 11, 485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rajkumar, H.; Mahmood, N.; Kumar, M.; Varikuti, S.R.; Challa, H.R.; Myakala, S.P. Effect of Probiotic (VSL#3) and Omega-3 on Lipid Profile, Insulin Sensitivity, Inflammatory Markers, and Gut Colonization in Overweight Adults: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. Mediat. Inflamm. 2014, 2014, 348959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Lagier, J.-C.; Armougom, F.; Million, M.; Hugon, P.; Pagnier, I.; Robert, C.; Bittar, F.; Fournous, G.; Gimenez, G.; Maraninchi, M.; et al. Microbial Culturomics: Paradigm Shift in the Human Gut Microbiome Study. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2012, 18, 1185–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Váradi, L.; Luo, J.L.; Hibbs, D.E.; Perry, J.D.; Anderson, R.J.; Orenga, S.; Groundwater, P.W. Methods for the Detection and Identification of Pathogenic Bacteria: Past, Present, and Future. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 4818–4832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Lagier, J.-C.; Hugon, P.; Khelaifia, S.; Fournier, P.-E.; La Scola, B.; Raoult, D. The Rebirth of Culture in Microbiology through the Example of Culturomics To Study Human Gut Microbiota. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2015, 28, 237–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Lagier, J.-C.; Khelaifia, S.; Alou, M.T.; Ndongo, S.; Dione, N.; Hugon, P.; Caputo, A.; Cadoret, F.; Traore, S.I.; Seck, E.H.; et al. Culture of Previously Uncultured Members of the Human Gut Microbiota by Culturomics. Nat. Microbiol. 2016, 1, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. López-Moreno, A.; Acuña, I.; Torres-Sánchez, A.; Ruiz-Moreno, Á.; Cerk, K.; Rivas, A.; Suárez, A.; Monteoliva-Sánchez, M.; Aguilera, M. Next Generation Probiotics for Neutralizing Obesogenic Effects: Taxa Culturing Searching Strategies. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. López-Moreno, A.; Suárez, A.; Avanzi, C.; Monteoliva-Sánchez, M.; Aguilera, M. Probiotic Strains and Intervention Total Doses for Modulating Obesity-Related Microbiota Dysbiosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Javurek, A.B.; Spollen, W.G.; Johnson, S.A.; Bivens, N.J.; Bromert, K.H.; Givan, S.A.; Rosenfeld, C.S. Effects of Exposure to Bisphenol A and Ethinyl Estradiol on the Gut Microbiota of Parents and Their Offspring in a Rodent Model. Gut Microbes 2016, 7, 471–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. O’Toole, P.W.; Marchesi, J.R.; Hill, C. Next-Generation Probiotics: The Spectrum from Probiotics to Live Biotherapeutics. Nat. Microbiol. 2017, 2, 17057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Bilen, M.; Dufour, J.-C.; Lagier, J.-C.; Cadoret, F.; Daoud, Z.; Dubourg, G.; Raoult, D. The Contribution of Culturomics to the Repertoire of Isolated Human Bacterial and Archaeal Species. Microbiome 2018, 6, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Greub, G. Culturomics: A New Approach to Study the Human Microbiome. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2012, 18, 1157–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Locey, K.J.; Lennon, J.T. Scaling Laws Predict Global Microbial Diversity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 5970–5975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Bilen, M. Strategies and Advancements in Human Microbiome Description and the Importance of Culturomics. Microb. Pathog. 2020, 149, 104460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Diakite, A.; Dubourg, G.; Dione, N.; Afouda, P.; Bellali, S.; Ngom, I.I.; Valles, C.; Million, M.; Levasseur, A.; Cadoret, F.; et al. Extensive Culturomics of 8 Healthy Samples Enhances Metagenomics Efficiency. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0223543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Li, G.; Zu, L.; Wong, P.-K.; Hui, X.; Lu, Y.; Xiong, J.; An, T. Biodegradation and Detoxification of Bisphenol A with One Newly-Isolated Strain Bacillus sp. GZB: Kinetics, Mechanism and Estrogenic Transition. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 114, 224–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Das, R.; Liang, Z.; Li, G.; Mai, B.; An, T. Genome Sequence of a Spore-Laccase Forming, BPA-Degrading Bacillus sp. GZB Isolated from an Electronic-Waste Recycling Site Reveals Insights into BPA Degradation Pathways. Arch. Microbiol. 2019, 201, 623–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. López-Moreno, A.; Torres-Sánchez, A.; Acuña, I.; Suárez, A.; Aguilera, M. Representative Bacillus sp. AM1 from Gut Microbiota Harbor Versatile Molecular Pathways for Bisphenol A Biodegradation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tetz, G.; Tetz, V. Introducing the Sporobiota and Sporobiome. Gut Pathog. 2017, 9, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Egan, M.; Dempsey, E.; Ryan, C.A.; Ross, R.P.; Stanton, C. The Sporobiota of the Human Gut. Gut Microbes 2021, 13, 1863134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chang, Y.; Hou, F.; Pan, Z.; Huang, Z.; Han, N.; Bin, L.; Deng, H.; Li, Z.; Ding, L.; Gao, H.; et al. Optimization of Culturomics Strategy in Human Fecal Samples. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Park, S.-K.; Kim, M.-S.; Roh, S.W.; Bae, J.-W. Blautia stercoris sp. Nov., Isolated from Human Faeces. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2012, 62, 776–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Pham, T.-P.-T.; Cadoret, F.; Alou, M.T.; Brah, S.; Diallo, B.A.; Diallo, A.; Sokhna, C.; Delerce, J.; Fournier, P.-E.; Million, M.; et al. ‘Urmitella timonensis’ Gen. Nov., sp. Nov., ‘Blautia marasmi’ sp. Nov., ‘Lachnoclostridium pacaense’ sp. Nov., ‘Bacillus marasmi’ sp. Nov. and ‘Anaerotruncus Rubiinfantis’ sp. Nov., Isolated from Stool Samples of Undernourished African Children. New Microbes New Infect. 2017, 17, 84–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Diakite, A.; Dubourg, G.; Dione, N.; Afouda, P.; Bellali, S.; Ngom, I.I.; Valles, C.; lamine Tall, M.; Lagier, J.-C.; Raoult, D. Optimization and Standardization of the Culturomics Technique for Human Microbiome Exploration. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 9674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Browne, H.P.; Forster, S.C.; Anonye, B.O.; Kumar, N.; Neville, B.A.; Stares, M.D.; Goulding, D.; Lawley, T.D. Culturing of ‘Unculturable’ Human Microbiota Reveals Novel Taxa and Extensive Sporulation. Nature 2016, 533, 543–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Durand, G.A.; Pham, T.; Ndongo, S.; Traore, S.I.; Dubourg, G.; Lagier, J.-C.; Michelle, C.; Armstrong, N.; Fournier, P.-E.; Raoult, D.; et al. Blautia massiliensis sp. Nov., Isolated from a Fresh Human Fecal Sample and Emended Description of the Genus Blautia. Anaerobe 2017, 43, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Traore, S.I.; Azhar, E.I.; Yasir, M.; Bibi, F.; Fournier, P.-E.; Jiman-Fatani, A.A.; Delerce, J.; Cadoret, F.; Lagier, J.-C.; Raoult, D. Description of ‘Blautia phocaeensis’ sp. Nov. and ‘Lachnoclostridium edouardi’ sp. Nov., Isolated from Healthy Fresh Stools of Saudi Arabia Bedouins by Culturomics. New Microbes New Infect. 2017, 19, 129–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ghimire, S.; Wongkuna, S.; Kumar, R.; Nelson, E.; Christopher-Hennings, J.; Scaria, J. Genome Sequence and Description of Blautia brookingsii SG772 sp. Nov., a Novel Bacterial Species Isolated from Human Faeces. New Microbes New Infect. 2020, 34, 100648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Alou, M.T.; Ndongo, S.; Frégère, L.; Labas, N.; Andrieu, C.; Richez, M.; Couderc, C.; Baudoin, J.-P.; Abrahão, J.; Brah, S.; et al. Taxonogenomic Description of Four New Clostridium Species Isolated from Human Gut: ‘Clostridium amazonitimonense’, ‘Clostridium merdae’, ‘Clostridium massilidielmoense’ and ‘Clostridium nigeriense’. New Microbes New Infect. 2018, 21, 128–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Yimagou, E.K.; Tall, M.L.; Baudoin, J.P.; Raoult, D.; Bou Khalil, J.Y. Clostridium transplantifaecale sp. Nov., a New Bacterium Isolated from Patient with Recurrent Clostridium Difficile Infection. New Microbes New Infect. 2019, 32, 100598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Tall, M.L.; Lo, C.I.; Yimagou, E.K.; Ndongo, S.; Pham, T.P.T.; Raoult, D.; Fournier, P.-E.; Fenollar, F.; Levasseur, A. Description of Clostridium cagae sp. Nov., Clostridium rectalis sp. Nov. and Hathewaya massiliensis sp. Nov., New Anaerobic Bacteria Isolated from Human Stool Samples. New Microbes New Infect. 2020, 37, 100719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Gouba, N.; Yimagou, E.K.; Hassani, Y.; Drancourt, M.; Fellag, M.; Mbogning Fonkou, M.D. Enterococcus Burkinafasonensis sp. Nov. Isolated from Human Gut Microbiota. New Microbes New Infect. 2020, 36, 100702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Anani, H.; Guilhot, E.; Andrieu, C.; Fontanini, A.; Raoult, D.; Fournier, P.E. Prevotella ihumii sp. Nov., a New Bacterium Isolated from a Stool Specimen of a Healthy Woman. New Microbes New Infect. 2019, 32, 100607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Hedberg, M.E.; Israelsson, A.; Moore, E.R.B.; Svensson-Stadler, L.; Wai, S.N.; Pietz, G.; Sandström, O.; Hernell, O.; Hammarström, M.-L.; Hammarström, S. Prevotella jejuni sp. Nov., Isolated from the Small Intestine of a Child with Coeliac Disease. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2013, 63, 4218–4223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bellali, S.; Naud, S.; Ndongo, S.; Lo, C.I.; Anani, H.; Raoult, D.; Lagier, J.-C. Corynebacterium pacaense sp. Nov., Alistipes megaguti sp. Nov., Alistipes provencensis sp. Nov., 3 New Bacteria Isolated from Fresh Human Stool Specimens. New Microbes New Infect. 2019, 32, 100593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Lagier, J.-C.; Karkouri, K.E.; Mishra, A.K.; Robert, C.; Raoult, D.; Fournier, P.-E. Non Contiguous-Finished Genome Sequence and Description of Enterobacter massiliensis sp. Nov. Stand. Genom. Sci. 2013, 7, 399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Oishi, K.; Sato, T.; Yokoi, W.; Yoshida, Y.; Ito, M.; Sawada, H. Effect of Probiotics, Bifidobacterium Breve and Lactobacillus Casei, on Bisphenol A Exposure in Rats. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2008, 72, 1409–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Endo, Y.; Kimura, N.; Ikeda, I.; Fujimoto, K.; Kimoto, H. Adsorption of Bisphenol A by Lactic Acid Bacteria, Lactococcus, Strains. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 74, 202–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wang, Y.; Rui, M.; Nie, Y.; Lu, G. Influence of Gastrointestinal Tract on Metabolism of Bisphenol A as Determined by in Vitro Simulated System. J. Hazard Mater. 2018, 355, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Filippidou, S.; Junier, T.; Wunderlin, T.; Lo, C.-C.; Li, P.-E.; Chain, P.S.; Junier, P. Under-Detection of Endospore-Forming Firmicutes in Metagenomic Data. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2015, 13, 299–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Tetz, V.; Tetz, G. Draft Genome Sequence of Bacillus Obstructivus VT-16-70 Isolated from the Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid of a Patient with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Genome Announc. 2017, 5, e01754-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Vartoukian, S.R. Cultivation Strategies for Growth of Uncultivated Bacteria. J. Oral Biosci. 2016, 58, 143–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Lee, J.V.; Shah, S.A.; Wellen, K.E. Obesity, Cancer and Acetyl-CoA Metabolism. Drug Discov. Today Dis. Mech. 2013, 10, e55–e61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Trent, C.M.; Blaser, M.J. Microbially Produced Acetate: A “Missing Link” in Understanding Obesity? Cell Metab. 2016, 24, 9–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Calatayud Arroyo, M.; García Barrera, T.; Callejón Leblic, B.; Arias Borrego, A.; Collado, M.C. A Review of the Impact of Xenobiotics from Dietary Sources on Infant Health: Early Life Exposures and the Role of the Microbiota. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 269, 115994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Abdelsalam, N.A.; Ramadan, A.T.; ElRakaiby, M.T.; Aziz, R.K. Toxicomicrobiomics: The Human Microbiome vs. Pharmaceutical, Dietary, and Environmental Xenobiotics. Front. Pharmacol 2020, 11, 390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Marchesi, J.R.; Adams, D.H.; Fava, F.; Hermes, G.D.A.; Hirschfield, G.M.; Hold, G.; Quraishi, M.N.; Kinross, J.; Smidt, H.; Tuohy, K.M.; et al. The Gut Microbiota and Host Health: A New Clinical Frontier. Gut 2016, 65, 330–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Rangwala, S.H.; Kuznetsov, A.; Ananiev, V.; Asztalos, A.; Borodin, E.; Evgeniev, V.; Joukov, V.; Lotov, V.; Pannu, R.; Rudnev, D.; et al. Accessing NCBI Data Using the NCBI Sequence Viewer and Genome Data Viewer (GDV). Genome Res. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Dhariwal, A.; Chong, J.; Habib, S.; King, I.L.; Agellon, L.B.; Xia, J. MicrobiomeAnalyst: A Web-Based Tool for Comprehensive Statistical, Visual and Meta-Analysis of Microbiome Data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, W180–W188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Riva, A.; Borgo, F.; Lassandro, C.; Verduci, E.; Morace, G.; Borghi, E.; Berry, D. Pediatric Obesity Is Associated with an Altered Gut Microbiota and Discordant Shifts in Firmicutes Populations. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 19, 95–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Ly, L.K.; Doden, H.L.; Ridlon, J.M. Gut Feelings about Bacterial Steroid-17,20-Desmolase. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2021, 525, 111174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Eltoukhy, A.; Jia, Y.; Nahurira, R.; Abo-Kadoum, M.A.; Khokhar, I.; Wang, J.; Yan, Y. Biodegradation of Endocrine Disruptor Bisphenol A by Pseudomonas Putida Strain YC-AE1 Isolated from Polluted Soil, Guangdong, China. BMC Microbiol. 2020, 20, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Wang, X.; Chen, J.; Ji, R.; Liu, Y.; Su, Y.; Guo, R. Degradation of Bisphenol S by a Bacterial Consortium Enriched from River Sediments. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2019, 103, 630–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Barrios-Estrada, C.; de Jesús Rostro-Alanis, M.; Parra, A.L.; Belleville, M.-P.; Sanchez-Marcano, J.; Iqbal, H.M.N.; Parra-Saldívar, R. Potentialities of Active Membranes with Immobilized Laccase for Bisphenol A Degradation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 108, 837–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Gkrillas, A.; Dirven, H.; Papadopoulou, E.; Andreassen, M.; Hjertholm, H.; Husøy, T. Exposure Estimates of Phthalates and DINCH from Foods and Personal Care Products in Comparison with Biomonitoring Data in 24-Hour Urine from the Norwegian EuroMix Biomonitoring Study. Environ. Int. 2021, 155, 106598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Monteagudo, C.; Robles-Aguilera, V.; Salcedo-Bellido, I.; Gálvez-Ontiveros, Y.; Samaniego-Sánchez, C.; Aguilera, M.; Zafra-Gómez, A.; Burgos, M.A.M.; Rivas, A. Dietary Exposure to Parabens and Body Mass Index in an Adolescent Spanish Population. Environ. Res. 2021, 201, 111548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Vindenes, H.K.; Svanes, C.; Lygre, S.H.L.; Real, F.G.; Ringel-Kulka, T.; Bertelsen, R.J. Exposure to Environmental Phenols and Parabens, and Relation to Body Mass Index, Eczema and Respiratory Outcomes in the Norwegian RHINESSA Study. Environ. Health 2021, 20, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Musser, J.M.B.; Gonzalez, R. Efficacy of an Anaerobic Swab Transport System to Maintain Aerobic and Anaerobic Microorganism Viability after Storage at −80 °C. J. VET Diagn. Investig. 2011, 23, 95–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Gorzelak, M.A.; Gill, S.K.; Tasnim, N.; Ahmadi-Vand, Z.; Jay, M.; Gibson, D.L. Methods for Improving Human Gut Microbiome Data by Reducing Variability through Sample Processing and Storage of Stool. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0134802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Tamaki, H.; Sekiguchi, Y.; Hanada, S.; Nakamura, K.; Nomura, N.; Matsumura, M.; Kamagata, Y. Comparative Analysis of Bacterial Diversity in Freshwater Sediment of a Shallow Eutrophic Lake by Molecular and Improved Cultivation-Based Techniques. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 2162–2169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Yoon, S.-H.; Ha, S.-M.; Kwon, S.; Lim, J.; Kim, Y.; Seo, H.; Chun, J. Introducing EzBioCloud: A Taxonomically United Database of 16S RRNA Gene Sequences and Whole-Genome Assemblies. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 1613–1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nutrients 14 00241 g001 550
Figure 1. Venn diagram analyses of species isolated in normal-weight and overweight/obese children after in (a) BPA directed culturomics and (b) BPA directed culturomics spore-forming bacteria (sporobiota).
Figure 1. Venn diagram analyses of species isolated in normal-weight and overweight/obese children after in (a) BPA directed culturomics and (b) BPA directed culturomics spore-forming bacteria (sporobiota).
Nutrients 14 00241 g001
Nutrients 14 00241 g002a 550Nutrients 14 00241 g002b 550
Figure 2. Bioinformatics and molecular predictive analysis; (a) percentages of BPA genes of the four different pathways present on WGST from the major isolated representative microbiota taxa, (b) biodegradation pathways of BPA.
Figure 2. Bioinformatics and molecular predictive analysis; (a) percentages of BPA genes of the four different pathways present on WGST from the major isolated representative microbiota taxa, (b) biodegradation pathways of BPA.
Nutrients 14 00241 g002aNutrients 14 00241 g002b
Nutrients 14 00241 g003 550
Figure 3. Percentages of microbial taxa abundance distribution of isolated genera after BPA treatments in Normal-weight (A); Overweight/Obese samples (B) and its Potential BPA Biodegradation capability (C) (proportion of BPA degradation genes) according to (C1) Total BPA directed culturomics (C2) Sporobiota BPA-culturomics approach. Normal-weight (NW); Overweight/Obese (O).
Figure 3. Percentages of microbial taxa abundance distribution of isolated genera after BPA treatments in Normal-weight (A); Overweight/Obese samples (B) and its Potential BPA Biodegradation capability (C) (proportion of BPA degradation genes) according to (C1) Total BPA directed culturomics (C2) Sporobiota BPA-culturomics approach. Normal-weight (NW); Overweight/Obese (O).
Nutrients 14 00241 g003
Table
Table 1. Culturing media and conditions for isolation of microbiota taxa components (Aer: aerobic; AAn: aerotolerant anaerobe; SAn: strictly anaerobic; FAn: facultative anaerobe).
Table 1. Culturing media and conditions for isolation of microbiota taxa components (Aer: aerobic; AAn: aerotolerant anaerobe; SAn: strictly anaerobic; FAn: facultative anaerobe).
Species/Oxygen ToleranceCulturing Media and Conditions *
FirmicutesBacillus spp./Aer/AAn /Fan [25,43,44,45,46]BCB38; BCB02; BCB03; BCB04; BCB05; BCB06; BCB08; BCB09; BCB10; COS01; COS03; MB01; MB02; TSB01; BHI01; BCB19; YCFA06; BCB23; COS09; TSB04; BCB07; YCFA02; MB03; TSB03; BCB18; BCB01; COS02; COS04; BHI02; CBA01; MRS02; BCB37; BCB33; BHI07; BCB36; BCB46; BCB14; BCB15; BCB12; BBCB22; BHI04; BCB13; YCFA01; MB04; BCB55
Blautia spp./SAn [44,45,46,47,48,49,50]BHI05; BCB13; BCB15; BCB01; BCB03; BCB05; BCB07; BCB09; BCB10; COS02; MB02; TSB04; YCFA05; CBA01; BCB52; RM01; BCB11; CNA01; YCFA01; BCB28; BCB19; COS09; YCFA03; WC02; CBA02; GAM02; RCA02
Clostridium spp./San [27,43,46,47,51,52,53]BCB01; BCB03; BCB05; BCB07; BCB09; BCB10; COS04; MB02; BCB15; COS02; RM01; RCA01; BCB34; BCB39; CHRIS01; CBA01; BCB19; COS09; YCFA05; BCB13; TSB04; CBA02; YCFA01; SCM04; YCFA04; MB04; RM02; BCB49; BCB28; BCB25; CNA01; BCB17; BCB21; BCB50; BCB32; BCB02; BCB04; BCB11; WC01; BHI02; YCFA03; RCA02; WC02; BHI03; BCB33; BCB30; TSB02; BCB31; YCFA02; MRS02; RM03; COS03; TSB01; BCB22; COS08; MB03; TSB03; BCB06; MRS01; BHI01; BCB23; BCB12; BCB14; BCB16; BCB20
Dialister spp./SAn [46]BCB07; CHRIS01; SCM04; RM01; RM02; BCB11; BCB19; COS02; BCB01; BCB03; BCB05; BCB09; BCB10; COS04; MB02; YCFA01; MRS01
Enterococcus spp./FAn [43,46,54]CBA03; YCFA04; YCFA06; BCB04; BCB07; BCB06; BCB08; COS01; COS03; COS04; MB01; MB02; TSB01; YCFA01; CHRIS01; MRS01; SCM04; RM01; BCB23; BCB11; BCB17; BCB22; BCB19; BCB20; COS09; MB03; TSB03; TSB04; BCB10; RM02; BCB01; BCB03; COS02; BCB05; BCB09; BHI01; BCB02; CNA01; RM03; SCM01; YCFA02; RCA01; BCB15; BCB21; TSB02; WC01; BHI02; CBA01; MRS02; BCB13; BCB14; COS08; MB04; BCB12; BCB16; YCFA03; RCA02; WC02; BHI03; MRS03
Eubacterium spp./SAn [43,46]BCB07; SCM04; BCB15; MB02; BCB19; BCB01; BCB05; BCB09; COS02; COS04; RM01; RCA01; YCFA04; BCB03; BCB11; WC01; CBA01; COS09; BCB13; MB04
Lactobacillus spp./AAn [46]BCB07; COS04; SCM04; CNA01; BCB10; COS02; YCFA01; MRS01; RM01; BCB11; YCFA02; CHRIS01; BCB15; BCB19; COS09; BHI03; BCB02; BCB03; BCB04; BCB06; COS01; COS03; MB01; MB02; TSB01; BHI01; BCB13; RCA01; RM02; BCB23; RM03; SCM01; CBA01; MRS02; BCB01; BCB09; BCB05; WC01; BHI02
Megasphaera spp./SAn [46,55]COS02; COS04; RM01; BCB07; YCFA01; BCB09; BCB10; SCM04; BCB31
Peptoniphilus spp./San [25,27,46]CHRIS01; BCB01; BCB05; BCB07; MB02; BCB10; COS02; COS04; RM02; BCB35; YCFA01; MRS01; RM01; BCB53; BCB15; BCB03; BCB09; SCM04; BCB11; BCB38; BCB40; YCFA03
Ruminococcus spp./SAn [25,27,46,47]YCFA05; BCB11; RM03; SCM01/04; YCFA02; CBA01; BCB05/11/13/15/40/41; BCB19; BCB03; BCB07; BCB09; COS02; RCA02; BHI03; RM01; RM02; TSB04; YCFA01; CHRIS01; CNA01
Staphylococcus spp./FAn [43,46]YCFA06; BCB01; BCB02; BCB03; BCB07; BCB06, BCB10; COS01; COS04; MB01; MB02; YCFA01; RM01; RM02; BCB11; BCB15; BCB19; COS09; MB04; BCB05; BCB14; BCB17; BCB20; COS08; MB03; TSB03; BCB08; BCB09; CHRIS01; BCB04; COS02; COS03; BHI01; CBA01
Streptococcus spp./FAn [43,46]BCB07; YCFA04; BCB04; BCB05; BCB10; MB02; RM01; CBA01; BCB06; COS02; BHI01: YCFA01; BCB02; BCB09; COS01; COS03; BCB03; COS04; BCB23; CNA01; BCB01; CHRIS01; SCM04; BHI02; BCB08; TSB01; MRS01; RCA01; WC01; YCFA06; BCB11
BacteroidetesAlistipes spp./SAn [25,27,43,46,47]YCFA05; BCB01; BCB03; BCB05; BCB07; BCB09; BCB10; COS02; COS04; RM02; BCB11; CNA01; YCFA02; WC01; CBA01; BCB19; YCFA01; CHRIS01; SCM04; BCB48; MB02; BHI02; CPVX01; BCB13; BCB24; MRS01; TSB04; YCFA04; RCA01; BRU02; SCM01; BCB15; COS09; MB04; SCM02; RM03; BCB27
Bacteroides spp./SAn [27,43,46]BCB01; BCB03; BCB05; BCB07; BCB09; BCB10; COS02; COS04; MB02; BCB11; SCM01; YCFA02; RCA01; WC01; BHI02; CBA01; MRS02; BCB19; RM03; BCB13; CBA02; SCM04; YCFA04; CNA01; RM01; TSB04; BCB15; RM02; YCFA01; CHRIS01; MB04; TSB03; WC02; COS09; YCFA03; TSB02
Butyricimonas spp./SAn [27,43,46]BCB41; BCB01; BCB03; BCB05; BCB07; BCB09; BCB10; COS02; MB02; CBA01; YCFA04; CHRIS01; SCM04; RM02; BCB11; SCM01; COS09; YCFA02; CNA01; BCB19
Parabacteroides spp. /SAn/[43,46]BCB05; BCB07; COS02; COS04; SCM04; RM02; CBA01; BCB19; YCFA04; CHRIS01; RM01; BCB11; CNA01; SCM01; BCB15; TSB04; BCB01; BCB03; BCB09; BCB10; BHI01; WC01; BHI02; YCFA01; MB02; YCFA02; RCA01
Prevotella spp./SAn [43,46,47,56]BCB10; COS02; RM01; BCB05; BCB01; BCB07; BCB09; YCFA01; CHRIS01; WC01; BCB11; CNA01; CBA01; YCFA05; SCM01; SCM04; CBA04; BRU03; BCB19; BCB03
ActinobacteriaActinomyces spp. AAn [25,27,47]BCB03; BCB09; YCFA02; CBA01; COS09; BCB19; BCB07; MB02; BCB48; BCB11; BCB42
Bifidobacterium spp. /An/SAn [43,46]BCB07; BCB10; YCFA01; MRS01; SCM04; RM01; RM02; BCB11; CNA01; RM03; SCM01; CBA01; BCB15; BCB19; COS09; BCB01; BCB03; BCB05; YCFA02; RCA01; WC01; BHI02; COS02; MB02; CHRIS01; MRS02; BCB13; BCB17; YCFA03; WC02; BHI03; CBA02; MRS03; RCA02; BCB09; COS04; YCFA04; BCB23
Collinsella spp./SAn [27,43,46]YCFA04; BCB05; BCB07; COS02; YCFA01; CHRIS01; RM01; BCB11; CNA01; RM03; SCM01; CBA01; BCB13; BCB15; BCB19; SCM04; RM02; BCB01; CBA02; MRS02; BCB41; MB07; BCB10; YCFA02; BCB23; COS09
Corynebacterium spp./AAn [27,46,57]SCM04; RM02; BCB11; BCB23; CPVX02; COS02; BCB44; BHI01; BCB07; COS04; BCB10; MRS01; CBA03
Propionibacterium spp. /AAn [46]BCB07; YCFA01; RM02; BCB11; BCB19; MB04; TSB04; YCFA03; CHRIS01; MRS01; SCM04; RM01; BCB09; MRS02; BCB02; BCB06; BCB10; MB01; MB02
α-PEnterobacter spp./AAn [43,46,58]BHI08; COS04; MB02; RM01; RM02; YCFA04; MRS01; BCB23; YCFA06; BCB11; BCB02; BCB03; BCB04; BCB07; BCB09; COS01; COS02; MB01; BHI01
* BCB: blood culture bottle; BHI: brain heart infusion; BRU: Brucella medium; CBA: Columbia blood agar; CHRIS: Christensenella medium; COS: Columbia agar liquid medium + 5% sheep blood; CPVX: chocolate agar + PolyViteX; GAM: Gifu anaerobic media; GAMa: Gifu anaerobic media agar; GAMg: Gifu anaerobic media gellan; MB: marine broth; MRS: Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe; RM: R-medium; RCA: reinforced clostridial agar; RCM: reinforced clostridial media; SCM: Schaedler medium; TSB: trypticase soy broth; YCFA: yeast extract-casein hydrolysate-fatty acids; WC: Wilkins Chalgren.
Table
Table 2. Anthropometry global data from children with obesity and normal-weight individuals categorised by WHO.
Table 2. Anthropometry global data from children with obesity and normal-weight individuals categorised by WHO.
Normal-Weight Children *Overweight/Obese Children *
FemaleMaleFemaleMale
IDBMIAgeIDBMIAgeIDBMIAgeIDBMIAge
117.171313.862319.673522.39
218.4121413.252420.7103622.18
315.661515.952521.283725.410
415.661615.372623.983817.46
513.981715.672718.283920.66
613.861814.152822.6124023.611
717.161914.742918.4114124.96
814.142014.573025.3104223.911
915.462118.093126.8104321.45
1014.4102216.5103229.974427.18
1113.46 3326.9114525.69
1216.36 3421.494623.59
Means ± SD 15.4 ± 1.66.9 ± 2.2 15.2 ± 1.46.5 ± 1.9 22.9 ± 3.79.3 ± 1.7 23.1 ± 2.68.2 ± 2.0
* According to WHO 2007 (data available as Table S2). ID sample, BMI (kg/m2), age (years), mean ± SD.
Table
Table 3. BPA-tolerant cultured bacteria taxa from the gut microbiota of normal-weight and overweight/obese.
Table 3. BPA-tolerant cultured bacteria taxa from the gut microbiota of normal-weight and overweight/obese.
Closest TaxaMicrobiota Isolates from
Normal-Weight		Microbiota Isolates from
Overweight/Obese
Phylum/SpeciesBPA
[ppm]		Media%BPA
[ppm]		Media%
Firmicutes
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens100BHI1.120RCM1.0
Bacillus velezensis50BHI/MRS11.550BHI/MRS12.4
Bacillus subtilis50BHI/MRS3.450GAMg1.9
Bacillus nealsonii50GAMg1.1---
Bacillus altitudinis50BHI2.320GAMg1.0
Bacillus pacificus---50GAMa1.0
Bacillus cereus---20MRS1.0
Bacillus paramycoides---20RCM1.0
Bacillus circulans---50MRS1.0
Bacillus safensis---20BHI1.9
Bacillus licheniformis---20MRS1.0
Lacticaseibacillus paracasei10RCM1.1---
Lacticaseibacillus casei---20MRS1.9
Latilactobacillus sakei---10MRS3.8
Lysinibacillus fusiformis50MRS2.3 (1)50BHI1.0
Bifidobacterium animalis20MRS1.1 (19)---
Enterococcus faecium50BHI/MRS/GAMg/RCM14.920/50BHI/MRS/GAMa18.1
Enterococcus faecalis20BHI5.720BHI/RCM2.9
Enterococcus durans50GAMg1.1---
Enterococcus mundtii20GAMg1.1---
Enterococcus lactis20RCM1.150BHI3.8
Enterococcus hirae50RCM3.420BHI2.9
Enterococcus galinarum---50BHI1.0
Staphylococcus capitis20BHI1.110MRS1.0
Staphylococcus caprae50MRS2.350BHI1.0
Staphylococcus cohnii50BHI/GAMa2.3---
Staphylococcus epidermidis50RCM3.420/50BHI/RCM/GAMa4.8
Staphylococcus saprophyticus50BHI1.120BHI1.0
Turicibacter sanguinis50BHI1.150BHI1.0
Clostridium tertium20BHI1.150BHI1.0
Clostridium symbiosis20BHI1.1---
Clostridium paraputrificum50BHI/GAMa5.750GAMg4.8
Clostridium disporicum---20GAMg1.0
Paraclostridium bifermentans50RCM1.1---
Proteobacteria
Escherichia coli20/50BHI/MRS/GAMa11.520/50BHI/MRS13.3
Escherichia fergusonii20BHI1.110BHI1.0
Shigella flexneri---50RCM1.0
Pseudomonas synxantha20GAMg1.1---
Pseudomonas parafulva50GAMa1.150MRS1.0
Enterobacter hormaechei50RCM1.1---
Enterobacter cancerogenus---20RCM1.0
Acinetobacter radioresistens20RCM1.110BHI1.9
Raoultella ornithinolytica---50BHI1.0
Burkholderia contaminans---20MRS1.0
Actinobacteria
Rothia dentocariosa100BHI1.1---
Microbacterium paraoxydans20/50BHI4.6---
Microbacterium oxydans---50BHI1.0
Micrococcus luteus---20BHI1.0
Kocuria rhizophila---20BHI1.0
Uncultured bacteria20/100RCM/BHI4.620/50BHI2.9
Table
Table 4. BPA tolerant spore-forming bacteria taxa cultured from normal-weight and overweight/obese microbiota.
Table 4. BPA tolerant spore-forming bacteria taxa cultured from normal-weight and overweight/obese microbiota.
Closest TaxaMicrobiota Isolates from
Normal-Weight		Microbiota Isolates from
Overweight/Obese
Sporobiota SpeciesBPA
[ppm]		Media%BPA
[ppm]		Media%
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens20/50GAMa/GAMg10.350RCM/GAMa12.5
Bacillus vallismortis---50RCM6.3
Bacillus velezensis20/50GAMa6.9---
Bacillus pumilus50GAMa3.4---
Bacillus subtilis50GAMa3.4---
Bacillus licheniformis20RCM3.4---
Bacillus paralicheniformis---50GAMg6.3
Clostridium disporicum50GAMg3.4---
Clostridium paraputrificum20/50RCM/GAMa/GAMg13.820/50GAMa/GAMg31.3
Clostridium perfringens50GAMa3.420GAMg6.3
Clostridium symbiosum20RCM3.4---
Clostridium tepidum---20GAMa6.3
Paraclostridium benzoelyticum50GAMa/GAMg10.320/50GAMg12.5
Paeniclostridium sordellii20/50RCM/GAMa/GAMg34.5---
Uncultured bacteria20GAMa3.450GAMa/GAMg/RCM18.9
Pre-treatment ethanol and bile acids. All sequences were submitted to GenBank under accession numbers: MZ612806-MZ612850.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

López-Moreno, A.; Ruiz-Moreno, Á.; Pardo-Cacho, J.; Cerk, K.; Torres-Sánchez, A.; Ortiz, P.; Úbeda, M.; Aguilera, M. Culturing and Molecular Approaches for Identifying Microbiota Taxa Impacting Children’s Obesogenic Phenotypes Related to Xenobiotic Dietary Exposure. Nutrients 2022, 14, 241. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14020241

AMA Style

López-Moreno A, Ruiz-Moreno Á, Pardo-Cacho J, Cerk K, Torres-Sánchez A, Ortiz P, Úbeda M, Aguilera M. Culturing and Molecular Approaches for Identifying Microbiota Taxa Impacting Children’s Obesogenic Phenotypes Related to Xenobiotic Dietary Exposure. Nutrients. 2022; 14(2):241. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14020241

Chicago/Turabian Style

López-Moreno, Ana, Ángel Ruiz-Moreno, Jesús Pardo-Cacho, Klara Cerk, Alfonso Torres-Sánchez, Pilar Ortiz, Marina Úbeda, and Margarita Aguilera. 2022. "Culturing and Molecular Approaches for Identifying Microbiota Taxa Impacting Children’s Obesogenic Phenotypes Related to Xenobiotic Dietary Exposure" Nutrients 14, no. 2: 241. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14020241

APA Style

López-Moreno, A., Ruiz-Moreno, Á., Pardo-Cacho, J., Cerk, K., Torres-Sánchez, A., Ortiz, P., Úbeda, M., & Aguilera, M. (2022). Culturing and Molecular Approaches for Identifying Microbiota Taxa Impacting Children’s Obesogenic Phenotypes Related to Xenobiotic Dietary Exposure. Nutrients, 14(2), 241. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14020241

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop