Abstract
Hyperspectral (HSI) remote sensing has emerged as a transformative technology for Earth Observation, enabling detailed assessments across different domains. The current PRISMA-aligned systematic review aims to compare classical physics-based algorithms with emerging machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL) and hybrid approaches across two relevant application domains (vegetation and raw materials), analyzing over 350 peer-reviewed studies (194 after the screening) sourced from Scopus and Web of Science and accessed in July 2025. Specific domain-related studies have been considered, excluding duplicates and studies not strictly related to HSI. Risk of bias was assessed qualitatively based on different criteria. The efficiency of the techniques was analyzed by comparing the accuracy metrics reported in the studies. The heterogeneity of the evaluation metrics used across the different categories of the studies and the underrepresentation of some application domains is the final baseline of the work. The results were synthesized, grouping by application domains and algorithm category: ML and DL models dominate vegetation applications, and physics-based methods remain prevalent in raw materials. Hybrid models achieve the highest performances across all domains. This review highlights the importance of the hyperspectral operational requirements identified for upcoming missions (CHIME, SBG and IRIDE) and points out the opportunity for algorithm development.