Next Article in Journal
Sustainability-Oriented Assessment of the Governance Capacity of China’s Intangible Cultural Heritage Policies: A Hybrid BERTopic-PMC Systematic Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of the CSRD on Managerial Strategies and Sustainable Competitive Advantages in the Tourism Industry
Previous Article in Special Issue
A New Approach to Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Reinforced Concrete Buildings Using Laminated Timber
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Timber Construction as a Systemic Pathway Towards Sustainable Built Environments

1
Department of Construction Engineering and Project Management, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
2
Department of Construction Engineering and Management, School of Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 7820436, Chile
3
Centro Nacional de Excelencia para la Industria de la Madera (CENAMAD), Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 7820436, Chile
Sustainability 2026, 18(5), 2176; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18052176
Submission received: 11 February 2026 / Revised: 19 February 2026 / Accepted: 19 February 2026 / Published: 24 February 2026
The construction sector is at a critical crossroads [1]. Achieving sustainable built environments now requires systemic solutions that integrate materials, processes, and territorial conditions, rather than isolated technological improvements [2,3]. Material choice has therefore become a strategic decision rather than a purely technical one [4,5].
Within this context, timber has re-emerged as a key material for sustainable construction. Its renewability, capacity for biogenic carbon storage, and compatibility with industrialised and prefabricated processes position it as a central component of low-carbon construction strategies [6,7]. However, the sustainability of timber construction cannot be assessed at the level of individual products or buildings alone; it must be examined across the full value chain, from territorial and forest-related conditions to material processing, structural performance, and urban-scale impacts [8,9].
This Special Issue, “Timber Construction as a Systemic Pathway Towards Sustainable Built Environments”, was conceived to address timber construction as a continuous and interconnected system. The eleven contributions approach this system from complementary perspectives, covering upstream environmental baselines, material and process innovation, construction-scale performance, and city-level implications.
At the upstream end of the value chain, two contributions focus on the environmental conditions that underpin any credible timber-based construction strategy. One study, on Pinus radiata plantations, analyses the relationship between carbon stock and cumulative production at harvesting age, demonstrating how soil conditions influence both productivity and carbon storage potential (1). In parallel, the assessment of agricultural land expansion and groundwater sustainability in north-central Chile highlights how land-use change and water scarcity can constrain long-term territorial sustainability (2). Together, these works emphasise that the environmental performance of timber construction is inseparable from resilient land, forest, and water management.
Material innovation and value recovery are subsequently explored through bio-based and circular approaches. The applicability of pulp and paper industry waste in manufacturing mycelium-based thermoacoustic insulation materials illustrates how industrial by-products can be transformed into functional construction solutions (3). Complementarily, the development of cement pastes incorporating wheat straw ash and silica fume contributes to a reduction in embodied carbon through agricultural residue valorisation and hybrid material systems (4). Although not timber-based, this contribution reinforces the transversal nature of sustainable construction and the importance of low-impact material portfolios.
At the product and process scale, engineered wood performance and manufacturing quality are addressed. An investigation into green-glued finger joints examines the influence of wood ring orientation on adhesion performance, providing practical knowledge to improve reliability, material efficiency, and the use of underutilised timber resources (5). Such process-level insights are essential, as connection behaviour often governs the structural performance and robustness of modern timber systems.
Several contributions adopt a broader perspective, analysing how timber construction knowledge evolves and is translated into practice. A bibliometric review of prefabricated and modular timber construction maps research development from 1990 to 2023, identifying dominant themes, emerging trends, and persistent challenges related to industrialisation and circular economy principles (6). A science mapping study focused on mid-rise and tall timber buildings highlights the growing relevance of timber in urban construction while underlining the need to align environmental ambition with structural feasibility and regulatory acceptance (7). In addition, a bibliometric analysis centred on urban coastal development situates timber housing within climate-resilient planning strategies, reinforcing the link between timber construction and adaptation-orientated urban policies (8).
Downstream, whole-building and urban-scale performance are examined. A life cycle assessment and cost analysis comparing mid-rise mass timber and concrete buildings in Australia demonstrate that timber solutions can provide both environmental and economic advantages when assessed across the building life cycle (9). At the city scale, the concept of urban timber buildings as a “second forest” reframes timber structures as long-term biogenic carbon stocks, positioning cities as active components in carbon management strategies (10).
Finally, this Special Issue addresses the transformation of the existing building stock. The proposed use of laminated timber elements to enhance the seismic performance of reinforced concrete buildings illustrates how timber can contribute to retrofit and strengthening strategies, extending its role beyond new construction while supporting sustainability objectives (11).
Together, the contributions to this Special Issue demonstrate that timber construction represents a systemic pathway towards sustainable built environments rather than a singular material substitution. Progress depends on linking robust territorial and environmental baselines, innovative and efficient material processing, reliable engineered products, and credible performance at the building and urban scales. By addressing timber construction as an integrated system, this Special Issue contributes to a deeper understanding of how timber can support climate-resilient, resource-efficient, and scalable construction strategies in the decades ahead.

Funding

This work was funded by the projects ANID BASAL FB210015 CENAMAD and BG23/00134.

Acknowledgments

The Editor would like to thank all the authors who contributed to this Special Issue for their commitment and the high quality of their research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

List of Contributions

  • Asmussen, M.V.; Rubilar, R.; Bozo, D.; Alzamora, R.M.; Elissetche, J.P.; Pincheira, M.; Jara, O. Relationship Between Carbon Stock and Stand Cumulative Production at Harvesting Age of Pinus radiata Plantations: A Comparison Between Granitic and Metamorphic Soils. Sustainability 2025, 17, 3614.
  • Pizarro, R.; Borcoski, F.; Ingram, B.; Bustamante-Ortega, R.; Sangüesa, C.; Ibáñez, A.; Toledo, C.; Vidal, C.; Garcia-Chevesich, P.A. Increases in the Amounts of Agricultural Surfaces and Their Impact on the Sustainability of Groundwater Resources in North-Central Chile. Sustainability 2024, 16, 7570.
  • Muñoz, H.; Molina, P.; Urzúa-Parra, I.A.; Vasco, D.A.; Walczak, M.; Rodríguez-Grau, G.; Chateau, F.; Sancy, M. Applicability of Paper and Pulp Industry Waste for Manufacturing Mycelium-Based Materials for Thermoacoustic Insulation. Sustainability 2024, 16, 8034.
  • Bastías, B.; González, M.; Rey-Rey, J.; Valerio, G.; Guindos, P. Sustainable Cement Paste Development Using Wheat Straw Ash and Silica Fume Replacement Model. Sustainability 2024, 16, 11226.
  • Rodríguez-Grau, G.; Cordonnier, P.-L.; Navarrete, B.; Montero, C.; Alvarado, C.; Pommier, R.; Rosales, V.; Galarce, C. The Adhesion Performance in Green-Glued Finger Joints Using Different Wood Ring Orientations. Sustainability 2024, 16, 7158.
  • Gutiérrez, N.; Negrão, J.; Dias, A.; Guindos, P. Bibliometric Review of Prefabricated and Modular Timber Construction from 1990 to 2023: Evolution, Trends, and Current Challenges. Sustainability 2024, 16, 2134.
  • Wenzel, A.; Guindos, P.; Carpio, M. Using Timber in Mid-Rise and Tall Buildings to Construct Our Cities: A Science Mapping Study. Sustainability 2025, 17, 1928.
  • García-Ruiz, A.; Díez-Minguito, M.; Verichev, K.; Carpio, M.; Bibliometric Analysis of Urban Coastal Development: Strategies for Climate-Resilient Timber Housing. Sustainability 2024, 16, 1431.
  • Jolly, R.; Fairweather, H.; Rayburg, S.; Rodwell, J. Life Cycle Assessment and Cost Analysis of Mid-Rise Mass Timber vs. Concrete Buildings in Australia. Sustainability 2024, 16, 6465.
  • Victorero, F.; Bustamante, W. Timber Biogenic Carbon Stock in the Urban Environment: Santiago City as a Second Forest. Sustainability 2025, 17, 529.
  • Yıldız, Y.; Şermet, F. A New Approach to Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Reinforced Concrete Buildings Using Laminated Timber. Sustainability 2025, 17, 7690.

References

  1. Röck, M.; Rørvik, P.M.; Steininger, K.W.; Hoxha, E.; Passer, A.; Habert, G.; Saade, M.R.M.; Gustavsen, A. Embodied GHG emissions of buildings—The hidden challenge for effective climate change mitigation. Appl. Energy 2020, 258, 114107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. United Nations Environment Programme; Yale Center for Ecosystems + Architecture. Building Materials and the Climate: Constructing a New Future; UNEP Report; UNEP: Nairobi, Kenya, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pomponi, F.; Moncaster, A. Circular economy for the built environment: A research framework. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 143, 710–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Soust-Verdaguer, B.; García-Martínez, A.; Rey-Álvarez, B.; de Diego, B.; de la Fuente, A.; Röck, M. Data infrastructure for whole-life carbon emissions baselines of buildings in Spain. Energy Build. 2025, 347, 116307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nawarathna, A.; Alwan, Z.; Gledson, B.; Fernando, N. Embodied Carbon as a Material Selection Criterion: Insights from Sri Lankan Construction Sector. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Duan, Z.; Huang, Q.; Zhang, Q. Life cycle assessment of mass timber construction: A review. Build. Environ. 2022, 221, 109320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kumar, V.; Lo Ricco, M.; Bergman, R.D.; Nepal, P.; Poudyal, N.C. Environmental impact assessment of mass timber, structural steel, and reinforced concrete buildings based on the 2021 International Building Code provisions. Build. Environ. 2024, 251, 111195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Andersen, J.H.; Rasmussen, N.L.; Ryberg, M.W. Comparative life cycle assessment of cross laminated timber building and concrete building with special focus on biogenic carbon. Energy Build. 2022, 254, 111604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hoxha, E.; Pittau, F.; Habert, G.; Passer, A. Biogenic carbon in buildings: A critical overview of LCA methods. Build. Cities 2020, 1, 504–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Carpio, M. Timber Construction as a Systemic Pathway Towards Sustainable Built Environments. Sustainability 2026, 18, 2176. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18052176

AMA Style

Carpio M. Timber Construction as a Systemic Pathway Towards Sustainable Built Environments. Sustainability. 2026; 18(5):2176. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18052176

Chicago/Turabian Style

Carpio, Manuel. 2026. "Timber Construction as a Systemic Pathway Towards Sustainable Built Environments" Sustainability 18, no. 5: 2176. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18052176

APA Style

Carpio, M. (2026). Timber Construction as a Systemic Pathway Towards Sustainable Built Environments. Sustainability, 18(5), 2176. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18052176

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop