You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Sustainability
  • Article
  • Open Access

30 December 2021

Design of a Methodological Intervention for Developing Respect, Inclusion and Equality in Physical Education

,
,
and
1
Physical Education and Sport Department, University of Seville, 41013 Seville, Spain
2
Research Group HUM-1061 “Inclusion and Innovation in Physical Education and Sport” (INEFYD), 41013 Seville, Spain
3
Department of Education and Social Psychology, Area of School Organization and Didactics, Pablo de Olavide University, 41013 Seville, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovation in Physical Education, Physical Activity and Sport

Abstract

The following educational intervention proposal arises from the importance of implementing an education based on fostering values through physical education (PE) lessons. PE has certain characteristics that contribute to enhancing learning at a social, affective and psychological level, in addition to promoting adequate physical development. The proposed design is based on Donald Hellison’s personal and social responsibility model (TPSR), whose main objective is to achieve a teaching methodology that can convey values and skills in the lives of youth at risk of exclusion. Different sports modalities are used in the initiation phase, which make up a ten-week teaching unit and in which the game takes the leading role. The application of this program focuses specifically on students in compulsory secondary education, a stage in which significant changes are experienced in many aspects and levels. However, it is completely adaptable to other developmental stages. In this way, the main objective of this work is to create an intervention proposal that aims to promote, following a set of intervention units of sessions, the development of the three main values in which this work is based: respect, equality and inclusion.

1. Introduction

Currently, sport is a great social phenomenon present in the lives of people in contemporary society that provides us with an important tool to influence, in a positive way, the lives of students. The promotion of values through the subject of physical education (PE) could play a very relevant role in different personal and future professional aspects of students.
Sport and physical activity are a magnificent vehicle for sensations, emotions and of those contents and values that society tries to transmit. Inculcating and promoting a life related to sport can bring numerous advantages and future virtues that will develop over the years [1]. Therefore, educational sport is an important tool for the integral formation of the individual and a way for the transmission of cultural values.
It is necessary to provide an education through PE that, on the one hand, helps students to know their own educational needs in a critical and reflective way, in addition to instilling principles and values beyond merely sports learning, while promoting their participation in teaching–learning processes from situations of observation, analysis or cooperation [2].
Research about values that arise from the practice of sports in young people shows that they are a fundamental element in society, helping and improving the quality of life of people in a physical, affective, social, cognitive and of a lifestyle way [1]. Therefore, it is essential to work so that these values have the place and importance they deserve in the education of youth, in order to make them able to transfer the knowledge and skills acquired in the classroom to their daily lives.

1.1. Definition of Values

Before dealing with the development of values in PE lessons in school contexts, it is necessary to know, as a basis, the simplest concept of this study, which is the definition of “values”.
Values are instruments that facilitate the construction of a social world, as well as the individual’s interaction with the social reality in which he or she lives. Their development, from an early age and during the different stages of growth, allows for the construction of a more personal vision of reality and to be influenced by the surrounding environment [3]. They are also considered to be universal and enduring beliefs, in which a behavioral model or ultimate state of existence is personally and socially preferable to another behavioral model or opposite state of existence [4].
Madrigal [5] explains that values make it easier for us to define clear objectives in our lives, making possible the establishment of a mature and balanced relationship with the environment around us, becoming guides that lead to coherent behavior in different situations that may arise. He also states that values are complex and there are studied classifications, although their common purpose is to improve people’s quality of life. Therefore, values are undoubtedly an excellent aspect to be employed in the educational environment.
The literature also emphasizes that “value” is associated with the person and his or her own existence, as it involves his or her conduct, structures and shapes his or her ideas and can also condition feelings. This is influenced by the process of socialization and what is internalized during this process, apart from the attitudes and ideas reproduced in the various socializing instances [6].
The literature affirms and assures that values arise through the emotional association of people, as they are linked to lived experiences and feelings, leaving aside intellectual logic. However, the intellect is not excluded, because sometimes the emotional image of a value is enriched after an intellectual effort [7].

1.2. Values and Physical Education

The presence of values in PE lessons can be a magnificent educational medium, as it brings together a series of special conditions focused on the most demanding objectives of pupils’ education. A school of values is a suitable way for learning how to naturally behave in a social and affective way, contributing to psychological maturity and the harmonious development of the body [8].
Jiménez and Gómez [9] present in one of their studies the main factors that, in their opinion, have an impact on the development of values and attitudes at school. They distinguish two main contexts: the social context and the school context. In the social context there are three influential factors, which are family, media and society. The family is a key player as it is the first environment in which norms, attitudes and values are acquired. In this sense, Prat and Soler [10] argue that schools should be complementary and should in no way replace the role of the family. These three agents, in turn, encompass the school context, in which attitudes and values are mainly influenced by the teacher, the curriculum (including didactic aspects, methodology and assessment) and the class atmosphere.
The teacher’s role and their methodology of teaching students is one of the most important factors, as their formation and awareness of the need to cover transversal contents through their lessons will be key for students to experience a real development of useful values in their daily lives. This is due to the fact that the relationship and the bond that are created, as well as the empathy, the tone of voice used, the communication, the looks, among other aspects, will be decisive in achieving the intended objectives and results [11].
PE is a unique subject that offers students constant interaction with each other. If the right tools are used and applied in the right way, depending on the subjects we work on in the lessons, PE can become an excellent vehicle for transmitting values, attitudes and behavioral habits [12].

1.3. Respect, Equality and Inclusion

The formation of students and the educational system in which they are currently learning can entail a deep and unfinished debate. It is necessary for society to fight to build and promote an education of values that allows students to grow and improve from an optimistic, positive, motivating, non-judgmental and equal framework. With this, it is worth mentioning that PE offers great possibilities to explain and transmit what in a common classroom can go unnoticed, using sport to participate in the development of values, principles and attitudes necessary for the students’ future lives: respect, equality and inclusion.
First, respect is an indispensable value in today’s society that we can all encourage together. It is a value that allows us to learn to be considerate, tolerant and to consider the limitations, fears or insecurities of the people around us. Sport and PE can be an ideal context for students to respect, accept and learn behaviors such as assertiveness, collaboration or personal and social responsibility [13].
Second, equality implies breaking down the social barriers and structural obstacles that, today, still hinder men and women from having a place in society under conditions of real equality at different levels [14]. Its enhancement would be favored in an education free of sexist biases, in which people are treated equally and the perspective of what is conceived as “masculine” and “feminine” changes, so that no mention is made of positions of inferiority or superiority [15]. Generation after generation, numerous prejudices have been transmitted that have led to differences between boys and girls, reflecting an evident underdevelopment of supportive, tolerant and respectful sportive behavior [16]. Thus, fostering this value through PE can encourage this development to be transferred to society, seeking equality, which is undoubtedly everyone’s goal.
Finally, if we refer to the concept of “inclusion” and therefore to an inclusive society, we are discussing the valorization of human diversity, the acceptance of people and the creation of real and fair opportunities for all [17]. It is necessary to differentiate this concept from that of “integration”, which is understood as the incorporation into a group, i.e., to be part of a group, which in this case would be a group of students. It is related to concepts of “introducing”, “involving” or “making part”, which contribute to a group of people.
For the development of the aforementioned values, various interventions have been carried out in the literature with the objective of promoting them separately [18,19,20,21,22,23]. However, the work of Hellison [24] and his teaching personal and social responsibility model (TPSR) must be highlighted, which, through physical activity and sport, aims to bring about significant changes in the values of the participants. Pardo [25], in his doctoral thesis, provides more theoretical and practical information on how to work on the development of values through TPSR. His results show how there were significant changes in relation to factors such as respect, participation, effort or personal autonomy.
This research was based on Donald Hellison’s TPSR [24], as well as on studies investigating its usefulness and its application with significant results, which can be worked on in PE classrooms with secondary school students [22,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38].

1.4. Teaching Personal and Social Responsibility Model

In the 1970s, Donald Hellison, an academic at the University of Illinois (Chicago) and a well-known figure in PE and sports pedagogy, created the TPSR. It arose in the United States, and its main objective was to achieve a teaching methodology that could transmit values and life skills to socially excluded young people. It sought to encourage children to be involved with exercise through a framework of physical activity and both personal and social responsibility. TPSR has four key points: core values, levels of responsibility, program leader responsibilities and daily program format.

1.4.1. Core Values

In employing a program of this nature, it is necessary to describe the four core values that Hellison [24] outlines within the TPSR. The first of the core values is “putting kids first”. It may have various interpretations, but its meaning is linked to helping children to be better people, thus promoting the second pillar, “human decency”, which, together with the promotion of positive relationships, is necessary for the construction of a non-competitive and mutually supportive social framework for all. Thirdly, there is “holistic self-development”. Hellison notes that physical development must take place alongside emotional, social and cognitive development in TPSR. Finally, the last core value is “a way of being”, which seeks to convey that TPSR, more than a way of teaching, is a way of being, both for the teacher who leads the program and for the students, as they must be themselves at all times.

1.4.2. Levels of Responsibility

In TPSR, Hellison [24] distinguishes five levels of responsibility (Table 1), so that young people can take responsibility in PE programs and transfer acquired behaviors from the activity environment to other areas of life.
Table 1. Levels of responsibility.
At each level, the author proposes different strategies that enable the teacher and the student to achieve the objectives set out within each level. These strategic guidelines help, on the one hand, to increase and maintain the motivation of the students, together with the improvement of discipline and on the other hand, to ensure that the knowledge and attitudes worked on and developed are transferred to areas outside a gymnasium. In this work, the first level of responsibility is the one which will be mainly highlighted, as the aim is to promote aspects related to the value of respect in pupils and with strategies that allow, in turn, the complementary development of equality and inclusion.
In Level I, Hellison explains that respect can be defined as the core value of human decency, and its level is accompanied by three components: self-control, the right to peaceful conflict resolution and the right to be included and to have cooperative partners.

1.4.3. Program Leader Responsibilities

Having outlined the core values that make up this project, it is necessary to highlight the methodological pillars that support this intervention program, that is, the program leader responsibilities (Table 2). These should be integrated in each of the proposed sessions [24].
Table 2. Program leader responsibilities.

1.4.4. Daily Program Format

Strategies and methods for implementing the author’s model are also presented, which seek to motivate students and keep them constantly interacting with the proposed program. Independently of the level we want to work on, Hellison [24] proposes a session structure with five components aimed at reinforcing each of the levels (Table 3). The functioning of the PE sessions should follow this structural pattern. In this way, learners are immersed in a routine process that will lead to faster progress in a work format they are familiar with and used to [39].
Table 3. Daily program format.
Once having contemplated the importance of the development of values in the current educational system, the growing lack of values in society and the relevance of sport as a means of transmitting values [24,31,40,41,42,43], the main objective of this work is to design a methodological proposal easily adaptable to different sports and educational levels and development that seeks to jointly promote the values of respect, equality and inclusion through sport and physical activity in young people, within the formal training of compulsory secondary education (CSE), as well as promote their transfer to the daily lives of students. In this way, knowing those values and knowing how to use them in an appropriate way will greatly benefit students in many social aspects and thus promote a lifestyle linked to sport and a healthy and balanced life.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Procedure

This didactic proposal has been designed through the use of different resources to provide the study with a solid scientific basis. First of all, a systematic bibliographic review was carried out to obtain scientific, good-quality literature about the different approaches existing in literature for working on respect, equality and inclusion, in order to know what programs, pedagogical models or ways of developing these values exist and to be able to choose one of them to design this program properly. On the basis of the existing literature found in the bibliographic review, TPSR was chosen. Subsequently, the context of implementation and the target population were analyzed.
Once the educational stage and the characteristics of the students that can generally be found in these educational contexts and target populations were known, a preliminary design was made, including the total duration of the intervention, the materials and spaces required, the possible sports modalities to be worked on, the structure of the sessions and the mechanisms of monitorization and evaluation of the implementation.
After the preliminary program was designed, the literature was reviewed again in order to ensure that the designed program concurred with the main characteristics of TPSR. Finally, an external expert with experience on TPSR in an educational context reviewed the final design.
Each of these phases will be explained below.

2.2. Systematic Review

The search was carried out within different well-known scientific databases in the field of sport and education: Web of Science, SCOPUS, SPORTDISCUS and ERIC, which were accessed via the institutional subscription of the University of Seville through the Spanish Foundation for Science and Technology (FECYT). The goal was to collect scientific articles and works related to values development in PE and the different ways, programs or pedagogical models utilized with each of the values in which this work focuses on (respect, equality and inclusion), in order to provide theoretical support based on empiric, valid results and methods to guide the present proposal.
In these databases, the following keywords were introduced: Sport; Value; Youth; Respect; Equality; Inclusion, crossing them with the Boolean operator AND. Different synonyms and Spanish translations were also utilized with the Boolean operator OR (Table 4 and Table 5). Finally, only the studies directly related to the topic of the present work were selected.
Table 4. Keywords used in the literature search.
Table 5. Search queries employed in the literature search.

2.3. Context Analysis

In the first instance, the intervention is designed to work in schools and would be carried out during PE classes. It is a methodological model designed to develop and promote moral and social values in the students through different sports modalities, working on them in initiation stages, constantly interacting with each other and reflecting on what they experience during the classes.
With regards to the target population of this project, the focus is on students in CSE, where PE classes are taught, generally, two hours a week. The age of the students will range from 11 to 16 years old, the period covered by CSE. During this stage of school (and life, in general), there are significant changes in many aspects of the person, physical, cognitive, affective, social, etc., that can affect the context that surrounds them in their daily lives and in which they develop [44].
One of the reasons why secondary school students should be the protagonists of this intervention program is because, in addition to being in a stage in which they experience difficult changes, there is a need to create useful and appropriate tools to awaken their motivation and carry out an action plan in which they feel they are the protagonists of their learning. It is important to empathize with them, understand them and make them feel part of “something”, of a group in this case, respected and valued as each one of them is as a person, free and comfortable in the environment where they grow day by day, with their peers and with themselves.
The main objective of all sessions should be working on respect, inclusion and equal opportunities, as well as cooperative work among students to develop their knowledge and achieve common goals, regardless of the characteristics of each one.
Regarding the legislative framework that has been taken into account for the development of this proposal, it should be noted, first of all, that the current regulations grant the teaching staff certain flexibility to choose the methodology to be used during their educational interventions, as long as it attends to the nature of the competences indicated in the legal documents presented in the Official State Gazette (Organic Law 3/2020, of 29 December (LOMLOE) and Order ECD/65/2015) [45,46]. If we pay attention to the educational regulations corresponding to the autonomous community of Andalusia, this is specified in a more adjusted form in the Order of 15 January 2021 [47].
Depending on the educational stage in which the proposal is to be carried out, all the curricular elements (objectives, contents, evaluation criteria, learning standards, key competencies, etc.) set forth in the aforementioned documentation must be adapted.

3. Results

This intervention proposal has been designed to work in schools and would be carried out during PE classes. It is a methodological model designed to develop and strengthen moral and social values in students through different sports modalities, working on them in initiation stages, constantly interacting with each other and reflecting on what they experience during the classes.
The model consists of 20 practical sessions of 50 min each one, designed with the aim of developing in the participants the aforementioned values: respect, equality and inclusion.

3.1. Design of the Intervention Proposal

It is necessary to know the educational context in which the methodological proposal is going to be developed, focusing the attention on CSE, an educational stage that completes the basic education of the students.
As explained in previous sections, an intervention proposal based on TPSR, which has the main objective of developing those values considered important by the authors (respect, equality and inclusion) in students, has been designed. The total duration of the intervention is 20 sessions, twice per week, with a length of 50 min each.
At the beginning of the program, before the sessions are carried out, there should be a previous explanation to the students in order to describe what it will consist of and what will be worked on during the time of the intervention. It is necessary to insist on the involvement and participation of the students, without going into much detail about the objectives of the program, so that students’ behaviors can be analyzed under the naturalness and spontaneity of the participants.
After the brief explanation, each student will be given a questionnaire that he/she will have to fill in before starting, as well as at the end of the last session of the intervention. Specifically, the personal and social responsibility questionnaire (PSRQ) by Li et al. [48], in its Spanish version [49], will be used.
The methodological design of the intervention, as mentioned in previous sections, will consist of 20 sessions in which a total of six different sports modalities will be presented. The sports chosen in the proposal of the present work are athletics, volleyball, basketball, soccer, handball, intercrosse and a set of popular and traditional games. Most of them are well known sports and can usually be found in almost every PE syllabus.
A variety of modalities has been chosen that gives the possibility of using spaces usually found in schools. The materials to practice them are also affordable and easily found, which does not pose problems for carrying out the sessions. However, these sports modalities can be adapted and selected according to the needs of each school.
Finally, the evaluation and reflection on the overall functioning of the program has been selected. This will be carried out through tools such as diaries or questionnaires from the students, in addition to the collection of interviews and the recording of some of the sessions, which will collect information about what they have experienced throughout the intervention. On the other hand, field notes taken by the teacher during the sessions will also be useful.
Once the intervention period is over, there will be a large amount of information to evaluate and draw conclusions about the functioning of the proposal and its effectiveness.

3.2. Development of the Didactic Proposal

3.2.1. Objectives

The objectives of this didactic proposal aim to contribute to the development of values in PE lessons through sports practice. Those objectives are:
  • To develop and increase relational and social activities.
  • To make their best abilities available to the group.
  • To improve self-esteem, autonomy and self-confidence.
  • To work as a group, encouraging cooperation towards common goals.
  • To develop a sense of responsibility, collaboration and respect for others.
  • To respect and value others in the practice of these sports.
  • To value the team as a group and participation as a member.
  • Not to allow discrimination on grounds of sex or ability, and to value the recreational nature of the sport.
  • To respect the established rules and regulations, as a way of respecting both their teammates and the teacher.
  • To accept one’s own and others’ possibilities and limitations, as well as to develop self-esteem.
  • To relate and participate in group activities with other people, with attitudes of solidarity and tolerance.

3.2.2. Contents

The contents to be included in the present study are differentiated between three different types, depending on whether they are conceptual (representing knowledge, theoretical aspects or disciplines to be learned), procedural (representing the application to a practical situation of the conceptual material) or attitudinal (referring to the values, attitudes or norms generated by the practice):
  • Conceptual.
    Values education.
    Habits of respectful, inclusive and equal behavior.
    Respectful attitudes towards classmates and the teacher.
    Cooperative work and achievement of common objectives.
    Knowledge of the possibilities and limitations offered by one’s body for the practice of physical and sporting activity.
  • Procedural.
    Adoption of non-discriminatory behavior towards other people.
    Adoption of improvements in self-esteem, autonomy and self-confidence.
    Interest in the practice of sport and its various advantages.
    Development of values and expansion of social and relational activities.
    Acceptance of one’s own and others’ limitations.
    Execution of the technical gestures of these sports.
  • Attitudinal.
    Enjoyment of the motor possibility of one’s own body through sport practice.
    Appreciation of the group as a team and their participation as a member.
    Appreciation of the personal relationships created in the educational sports environment.
    Appreciation of the space and the material used.

3.2.3. Evaluation Criteria

The evaluation of the didactic proposal will be carried out based on the students’ implication. It is important to note that the specific evaluation criteria will be chosen depending on the academic year in which this proposal is implemented, so the legal documents mentioned in Section 2.2 will have to be considered.
In this project, similar to Pardo [25], a personalized document is used for each participant that requires dedication and special attention throughout the intervention: the diaries. The diaries will be documents drawn up by the students. For each session carried out, they should describe the ideas, reflections, emotions and thoughts that arose from their experience in the practice of the different sports modalities. In addition, a self-evaluation section will be added, which addresses behavior and participation during the session.

3.3. Timeframe of the Intervention

The present intervention is designed for a specific period of time. There will be up to 20 sessions (Table 6), which are divided into six different sports modalities, as well as a final section of popular and traditional games.
Table 6. Intervention didactic unit.

3.4. Methodological Strategies

This didactic proposal is oriented to the development of values in the school context, focusing on students in CSE. It is crucial to pursue the active participation of students, promoting motivation and enjoyment of the sports experienced.
In each session, all the contents stated in the syllabus are developed, taking into account the legislative framework previously explained. The structure and functioning of the sessions derive from the structure of the TPSR session: 1. relational time; 2. awareness talk; 3. physical activity plan; 4. group meeting; 5. reflections. All sessions follow the core values and program leader responsibilities of this model, previously explained in Section 1.4. In addition, the specific methodological strategies proposed by Hellison for the different levels of responsibility are used. In the case of the present work, which focuses mainly on level 1 of responsibility, the methodological strategies employed are centered on modifying the rules of the games (adapting the games so that everyone can participate on equal terms) or on the elaboration of groups or teams within the tasks of the session (students have the rule of making the sides fair).
It is necessary to reiterate that each sport is worked in initiation stages, so that the activities are exposed, mostly, in a playful way, using recreational and playful exercises for the promotion of cooperative work and thus of the relationships between students.
Three sessions of each sport should be carried out, with a total length of 50 min, the standard duration of PE classes in the Spanish educational context, as well as the one used by Pardo [25] in his interventions. In addition, it is important to note that all sport modalities in initiation entail a (third) session especially dedicated to adapted and inclusive sport. To facilitate the understanding of these concepts, it is necessary to clarify that there are differences between them. Adapted sport is a tool that allows people with disabilities to participate safely in a particular sport [50]. Inclusive sport, on the other hand, is the practice that enables students with and without disabilities to participate together in a sport [51]. Therefore, in the third session of each modality, there will be several exercises adapted to the specific sport, which aim to make students experience different sensations and empathize with those who have different abilities from them.
An important factor to consider when carrying out an intervention program of these characteristics in PE classes are the conflictive situations and problematic circumstances that could arise, such as exclusion or inequality among them. Because of that, one of the methodological strategies that should be employed throughout the intervention is conflict resolution, which is defined by Ruiz Omeñaca [52] as a cognitive–affective–behavioral process by which a person, or a group, finds or identifies the most appropriate means to deal with the problems that life may present. Hellison [24], for his part, shares in his work a chapter dedicated to the description of different strategies, divided among the levels in which he works, with the aim of solving specific problems and situations in practice. If we focus on the first level of responsibility (respect), which is the main focus of this intervention, there are a number of possible strategies that can be used to remedy lack of participation, exclusion among peers, equality or conflict resolution [24,25]. The different strategies proposed in this work are shown below (Table 7 and Table 8).
Table 7. Strategies for solving conflicts related to individual behaviors.
Table 8. Strategies for solving collective conflicts.
In this proposal, what is intended is that students are able to resolve conflicts and adverse situations, allowing them to be in charge of the conflict resolution process autonomously, reaching common and fair agreements for all, always focusing on attitudes derived from respect, equality and inclusion towards all classmates. Hence, sport will become an essential tool that will allow for the creation of varied situations, always seeking to increase and build attitudes and behaviors appropriate to each of them. The games are also an ideal context for many of the learning processes to take place and are therefore the didactic resource par excellence. The games focused on sports initiation that students will experience throughout the intervention will enable them to experience powerful changes and improvements related to the reduction of their less desirable behaviors and the acquisition of positive habits and behaviors.

3.5. Description of the Sessions

In this section, the functioning of the contents of the three different sessions of the same sport are explained. Only one sport discipline is shown in this section (athletics) (Table 9, Table 10 and Table 11), due to space issues. The other disciplines (the remaining 17 sessions) are utterly explained in the Supplementary Materials Table S1–S17.
Table 9. Session I, Athletics I.
Table 10. Session II, Athletics II.
Table 11. Session III, Athletics III.

4. Discussion and Conclusions

This proposal is the result of the concerns that arise when questioning how important PE is in schools and the many tools it offers us, learning and appreciating how it can contribute to the transmission and development of those essential values of life in students, as they contribute to the integral construction of a person. This work has highlighted the importance of PE in schools and its great capacity to integrate a teaching based on values. A didactic proposal has been designed, which can provide a vast array of benefits to the participants through sports activities. The presence of PE in the school curriculum is necessary, both to motivate students to include sport in their lives and to promote their healthy lifestyle. During PE classes, students are in constant contact with each other, and this situation can be an optimal way to interiorize those positive values, making them able to transfer what they learn to everyday situations and different social contexts, so that they grow up and become responsible, manage their own emotions and feelings and maintain appropriate attitudes in all areas of their lives.
It is a common belief that sport contributes to the acquisition and learning of values and life skills that will make participants able to face their future lives with security [53]. However, participation alone in a sport activity does not mean that those values will be learned [54]. Those benefits might arise when the social context (family, peers and teachers/coaches) contributes to the sportive experience in a proper way [41,42,43,55,56]. Following Theokas et al. [57], both sports and life skills do not rise up alone, but a certain framework must be followed in order to learn, enhance and transfer sports and life skills. This particular framework, according to the literature, should include a proper program climate together with specific contents [31] and a mastery-oriented and caring climate, as well as supportive relationships and opportunities to learn and put into practice values and life skills [43]. In this way, this didactic proposal provides a well-structured framework that meets the previously stated criteria, designed based on a proven and successful pedagogical model such as TPSR [24].
Usually, these programs are not explained in detail or well expounded in the literature, and sometimes it can be difficult for teachers to put them into practice, especially when they do not have much time to research and go in depth into the core of those programs. This proposal has been designed in order to help teachers to easily adapt TPSR to their educational level, with a set of different sports and material that can be utilized in every school and with clear methodological instructions, which will contribute to the development of values in their students.
It should be noted that the responsibility for the functioning and good development of classrooms does not fall mainly and exclusively on the students. The role of the teacher requires the same level of involvement in this type of project [24]. It is essential for the teachers to present vocation, enthusiasm and, above all, the interest and desire to achieve a significant change in the learning and the lives of their students and, in general, in the current education system and society.
Nowadays, a series of undesired behaviors and habits such as competitiveness, consumption, individualism, greed or envy, among others, prevail. Consequently, the world is impacted by the striking “crisis of values” that builds an increasingly less human society with a great lack of motivation, sensitivity, ideals and a lack of critical education in terms of social values [58]. The achievement of the goals of the present proposal could mean a radical change in the lives of students, as they would be able to acquire the capacity to face a world full of complexes and prejudices that society promotes every day.
In this work, guidelines and parameters from the literature have been followed, taking into account previously made research and interventions in order to design the present proposal [19,22,23,24,25,34,59]. Furthermore, an expert with more than five years of expertise in TPSR reviewed the framework of the proposal. In this sense, the authors consider it to be well-founded. However, it has not been carried out, and implementation is a crucial factor on the effectiveness of an intervention [60].
The aim of this work was to design a didactic proposal to help to promote the development of the values of respect, equality and inclusion in CSE through PE, making students reflect on their actions inside and outside the classroom in order to foster transference of those values to other social contexts. The authors believe that this proposal will be helpful for teachers to enhance their teaching in terms of values development, contributing to a better society as long as the methodological framework is followed. Giving students a voice and a leading role in their own learning process, as well as helping them to recognize those behaviors based on respectful attitudes that do not show gender discrimination or discrimination against people with disabilities, will be a useful starting point to promote constructive opinions in pursuit of interiorizing this positive behavior so that it becomes part of students’ daily lives, making them better persons and helping to build a better society.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/su14010390/s1, Table S1: Session 4, Volleyball I; Table S2: Session 5, Volleyball II; Table S3: Session 6, Volleyball III; Table S4: Session 7, Soccer I; Table S5: Session 8, Soccer II; Table S6: Session 9, Soccer III; Table S7: Session 10, Handball I; Table S8: Session 11, Handball II; Table S9: Session 12, Handball III; Table S10: Session 13, Basketball I; Table S11: Session 14, Basketball II; Table S12: Session 15, Basketball III; Table S13: Session 16, Intercrosse I; Table S14: Session 17, Intercrosse II; Table S15: Session 18, Intercrosse III; Table S16: Session 19, Popular and traditional games I; and Table S17: Session 20, Popular and traditional games II.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M.-L. and M.N.P.; methodology, A.M.-L. and M.N.P.; validation, A.M.-L., G.F.-A. and E.L.-M.; formal analysis, A.M.-L.; investigation, A.M.-L. and M.N.P.; resources, G.F.-A.; data curation, G.F.-A.; writing—original draft preparation, M.N.P. and G.F.-A.; writing—review and editing, A.M.-L. and E.L.-M.; visualization, E.L.-M.; supervision, E.L.-M.; project administration, A.M.-L.; funding acquisition, A.M.-L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research has been partially funded by the Innovation and Inclusion in Physical Activity and Sports (INEFYD) research group (HUM-1061).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bailey, R. Physical Education and Sport in Schools: A Review of Benefits and Outcomes. J. Sch. Health 2006, 76, 397–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. De la Torre, E.; Rivera, E. Qué, cómo y para qué educa el deporte. Univ. Granada 2000. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hernández, C. Los valores sociales, un instrumento para el conocimiento social del niño: Su reflejo en la comunicación publicitaria. Infanc. Y Aprendiz. 1986, 9, 109–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rokeach, M. The Nature of Human Values; Free Press: New York, NY, USA, 1973. [Google Scholar]
  5. Madrigal, M.A. La importancia de la formación de valores en alumnos de educación primaria. Rev. Univ. Educ. Infant. 2012, 1, 1–57. [Google Scholar]
  6. Carrera, L.; Eijo, P.; Estany, A.; Gómez, M.T.; Guich, R.; Mir, V.; Ojeda, F.; Planas, T.; Serrats, M.G. Cómo Educar En Valores: Materiales, Textos, Recursos Y Técnicas; Narcea, S.A. de Ediciones: Madrid, Spain, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  7. Puig, J.M. Naturaleza de los Contenidos de Valor; Aula de Innovación Educativa: Barcelona, Spain, 1993; pp. 13–18. [Google Scholar]
  8. Corrales, A. El deporte como elemento educativo indispensable en el área de Educación Física. EmásF Rev. Digit. Educ. Física 2010, 4, 23–36. [Google Scholar]
  9. Jiménez, F.; Gómez, A. Alternativas metodológicas para el desarrollo de valores en la Educación Física y el deporte. In Proceedings of the V Simposium Internacional “Educación Fisica, Deporte y Turismo Activo” (CD), Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain, 1–3 July 2004. [Google Scholar]
  10. Prat, M.; Soler, S. Actitudes, Valores Y Normas En La Educación Física Y El Deporte. Reflexiones Y Propuestas Didácticas; INDE Publicaciones: Barcelona, Spain, 2003; ISBN 9788497290319. [Google Scholar]
  11. Carranza, M.; Mora, J.M. Educación Fisica Y Valores: Educando En un Mundo Complejo. 31 Propuestas Para Los Centros Escolares; Graó: Barcelona, Spain, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  12. Beregüí, B.; Garcés De Los Fayos, E. Valores en el deporte escolar: Estudio con profesores de Educación Física. Cuad. Psicol. Deporte 2007, 7, 89–104. [Google Scholar]
  13. Marín, M.N. La Educacion Fisica a Través De Los Valores Y El Bilingüismo. Rev. Educ. Mot. Investig. 2013, 18, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Venegas, M. La igualdad de género en la escuela. Rev. Sociol. Educ. 2010, 3, 388–402. [Google Scholar]
  15. Baena, A.; Ruiz, P.J. Tratamiento educativo de la coeducación y la igualdad de sexos en el contexto escolar y en espacial en Educación Física. Aula Abierta 2009, 37, 111–122. [Google Scholar]
  16. Alonso, J.A. Coeducación y Educación Física. Sumuntán. Rev. Estud. Sobre Sierra Mágina 2007, 24, 165–179. [Google Scholar]
  17. Rubio, F. Principios De Normalización, Integración E Inclusión. Innovación Exp. Educ. 2009, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  18. Abellán, J.; Sáez-Gallego, N. Los para-deportes como contenido de Educación Física en Primaria: El ejemplo de la Boccia. Didacticae 2017, 2, 134–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Caballero-Blanco, P. Desing, implementation and assessment of an outdoor activities programme to promote personal and social responsibility in professional training students. Cuad. Psicol. Deporte 2015, 15, 179–194. [Google Scholar]
  20. Menéndez-Santurio, J.I.; Fernández-Río, J. Hibridación de los modelos de Educación Deportiva y Responsabilidad Personal y Social: Una experiencia a través de un programa de kickboxing educativo. Retos 2016, 30, 113–121. [Google Scholar]
  21. Miller, S.C.; Bredemeier, B.J.L.; Shields, D.L.L. Sociomoral Education through Physical Education with At-Risk Children. Quest 1997, 49, 114–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Muñoz-Llerena, A.; Hernández-Hernández, E.; García-de-Alcaraz, A.; Caballero-Blanco, P. Personal and Social Responsibility Development in a Volleyball Hybrid Positive Youth Development Program: A Mixed Methods Approach. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 675532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Manzano-Sánchez, D.; Conte-Marín, L.; Gómez-López, M.; Valero-Valenzuela, A. Applying the Personal and Social Responsibility Model as a School-Wide Project in All Participants: Teachers’ Views. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hellison, D. Teaching Personal and Social Responsibility Model; Human Kinetics: Hanover, PA, USA, 2011; ISBN 9780736094702. [Google Scholar]
  25. Pardo, R. La Transmisión de Valores a Jóvenes Socialemente Desfavorecidos a Través de la Actividad Física y el Deporte. Estudio de Múltiple de Casos: Getafe, L´Aquila y Los Ángeles; Universidad Politécnica de Madrid: Madrid, Spain, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  26. Escartí, A.; Gutiérrez, M.; Pascual, C.; Marín, D.; Martínez, C.; Chacón, Y. Enseñando responsabilidad personal y social a un grupo de adolescentes de riesgo: Un estudio «observacional». Rev. Educ. 2006, 341, 373–396. [Google Scholar]
  27. Gordon, B.A. An Examination of an Implementation of the Responsibility Model in a New Zealand Education Programme; Massey University: Auckland, New Zealand, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  28. Hayden, L.A. The Power of a Caring Climate: Assessing the Fidelity of Team Support to Hellison’s Responsibility Model and Student-Athletes Perceived Outcomes of Participating in Team Support; Boston University: Boston, MA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  29. Pozo, P.; Grao-Cruces, A.; Pérez-Ordás, R. Teaching personal and social responsibility model-based programmes in physical education: A systematic review. Eur. Phys. Educ. Rev. 2018, 24, 56–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sánchez-Alcaraz, B.J.; Courel-Ibáñez, J.; Sánchez, C.; Valero-Valenzuela, A.; Gómez-Mármol, A. El modelo de responsabilidad personal y social a través del deporte: Revisión bibliográfica. Retos 2020, 37, 755–762. [Google Scholar]
  31. Escartí, A.; Buelga, S.; Gutiérrez, M.; Pascual, C. El desarrollo positivo a través de la actividad física y el deporte: El programa de responsabilidad personal y social. Rev. Psicol. Gen. Apl. 2009, 62, 45–52. [Google Scholar]
  32. Escartí, A.; Gutiérrez, M.; Pascual, C.; Llopis, R. Implementation of the Personal and Social Responsibility Model to Improve Self-Efficacy during Physical Education Classes for Primary School Children. Int. J. Psychol. Psychol. Ther. 2010, 10, 387–402. [Google Scholar]
  33. Manzano-Sánchez, D.; Valero-Valenzuela, A.; Conde-Sánchez, A.; Chen, M.-Y. Applying the Personal and Social Responsibility Model-Based Program: Differences According to Gender between Basic Psychological Needs, Motivation, Life Satisfaction and Intention to be Physically Active. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Valero-Valenzuela, A.; Camerino, O.; Manzano-Sánchez, D.; Prat, Q.; Castañer, M. Enhancing learner motivation and classroom social climate: A mixed methods approach. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 5272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Caballero Blanco, P.; Delgado Noguera, M.Á.; Escartí, A. Analysis of Teaching Personal and Social Responsibility model-based programmes applied in USA and Spain. J. Hum. Sport Exerc. 2013, 8, 427–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Camerino, O.; Valero-Valenzuela, A.; Prat, Q.; Manzano Sánchez, D.; Castañer, M. Optimizing Education: A Mixed Methods Approach Oriented to Teaching Personal and Social Responsibility (TPSR). Front. Psychol. 2019, 10, 1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Escartí, A.; Gutiérrez, M.; Pascual, C.; Marín, D. Application of Hellison’s Teaching Personal and Social Responsibility Model in Physical Education to Improve Self-Efficacy for Adolescents at Risk of Dropping-out of School. Span. J. Psychol. 2010, 13, 667–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Escartí, A.; Llopis-Goig, R.; Wright, P.M. Assessing the Implementation Fidelity of a School-Based Teaching Personal and Social Responsibility Program in Physical Education and Other Subject Areas. J. Teach. Phys. Educ. 2018, 37, 12–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sánchez-Alcaraz, B.; Gómez-Mármol, A.; Valero, A.; De la Cruz, E.; Díaz, A. El modelo de responsabilidad personal y social a través del deporte como propuesta metodológica para la educación en valores en adolescentes. Espiral. Cuad. Profr. 2016, 9, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  40. Fraser-Thomas, J.L.; Côté, J.; Deakin, J. Youth sport programs: An avenue to foster positive youth development. Phys. Educ. Sport Pedagog. 2005, 10, 19–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Petitpas, A.J.; Cornelius, A.E.; Van Raalte, J.L.; Jones, T. A Framework for Planning Youth Sport Programs That Foster Psychosocial Development. Sport Psychol. 2005, 19, 63–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Weiss, M.R. "Field of dreams:” Sport as a context for youth development. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 2008, 79, 434–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Weiss, M.R.; Wiese-Bjornstal, D.M. Promoting positive youth development through physical activity. Pres. Counc. Phys. Fit. Sports Res. Dig. 2009, 10, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  44. Álvarez, J.M. Características del Desarrollo Psicológico de los Adolescentes. Rev. Digit. Innovación Exp. Educ. 2010, 28, 11. [Google Scholar]
  45. Ministerio de Educación, Ciencia y Deporte. Ley Orgánica 3/2020, de 29 de Diciembre, por la que se Modifica la Ley Orgánica 2/2006, de 3 de Mayo, de Educación; Boletín Oficial del Estado: Madrid, Spain, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  46. Ministerio de Educación, Ciencia y Deporte. Orden ECD/65/2015, de 21 de Enero, por la que se Describen las Relaciones Entre las Competencias, los Contenidos y los Criterios de Evaluación de la Educación primaria, la Educación Secundaria Obligatoria y el Bachillerato; Boletín Oficial del Estado: Madrid, Spain, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  47. Junta de Andalucía. Orden del 15 de Enero de 2021, por la que se Desarrolla el Currículo Correspondiente a la Etapa de Educación Primaria en la Comunidad Autónoma de Andalucía, se Regulan Determinados Aspectos de la Atención a la Diversidad, se Establece la Ordenación de la Evaluación del Proceso de Aprendizaje del Alumnado y se Determina el Proceso de Tránsito entre Distintas Etapas Educativas; Boletín Oficial de la Junta de Andalucía: Seville, Spain, 2021.
  48. Li, W.; Wright, P.M.; Rukavina, P.; Pickering, M. Measuring students’ perceptions of personal and social responsibility and its relationship to intrinsic motivation in urban physical education. J. Teach. Phys. Educ. 2008, 27, 167–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Escartí, A.; Gutiérrez, M.; Pascual, C. Propiedades psicométricas de la versión española del Cuestionario de Responsabilidad Personaly Social en contextos de educación física. Rev. Psicol. Deporte 2011, 20, 119–130. [Google Scholar]
  50. Martínez-Ferrer, J.O. Análisis. Estudio y Protocolización del Proceso de Inclusión del Deporte de Competición de las Personas con Discapacidad en las Federaciones Deportivas Convencionales en el Estado Español. Proyecto de Doctorado Sin Publicar; Universitat Ramon Llull: Barcelona, Spain, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  51. Down España. Deporte inclusivo—«Deporte Para Todos, Ejercicio de Igualdad». Available online: https://www.sindromedown.net/proyecto-down/deporte-inclusivo-deporte-para-todos-ejercicio-de-igualdad/?from=deporte (accessed on 15 November 2021).
  52. Ruiz Omeñaca, J.V. Pedagogía de los Valores en Educación Física; CCS: Madrid, Spain, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  53. Danish, S.J.; Taylor, T.; Fazio, R. Enhancing adolescent development through sport and leisure. In Blackwell Handbook on Adolescence; Adams, G.R., Berzonsky, M., Eds.; Blackwell Publishing: Malden, MA, USA, 2003; pp. 92–108. [Google Scholar]
  54. Coakley, J. Youth Sports. J. Sport Soc. Issues 2011, 35, 306–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Holt, N.L. Positive Youth Development through Sport; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2008; ISBN 9780203944783. [Google Scholar]
  56. Holt, N.L.; Neely, K.C. Positive Youth Development through Sport: A Review. Rev. Iberoam. Psicol. Ejerc. Deporte 2011, 6, 299–316. [Google Scholar]
  57. Theokas, C.; Danish, S.J.; Hodge, K.; Heke, I.; Forneris, T. Enhancing life skills through sport for children and youth. In Positive Youth Development through Sport; Holt, N.L., Ed.; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2008; pp. 71–81. [Google Scholar]
  58. Prat, M. Actitudes, valores y normas en educación física: Reflexiones, problemática y propuestas para su integración en la escuela. Tándem Didáctica Educ. Física 2001, 2, 7–20. [Google Scholar]
  59. García-García, J.; Manzano-Sánchez, D.; Belando-Pedreño, N.; Valero-Valenzuela, A. Personal and Social Responsibility Programme Effects, Prosocial Behaviours, and Physical Activity Levels in Adolescents and Their Families. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Fernández-Gavira, J.; Espada-Goya, P.; Alcaraz-Rodríguez, V.; Moscoso-Sánchez, D. Design of Educational Tools Based on Traditional Games for the Improvement of Social and Personal Skills of Primary School Students with Hearing Impairment. Sustainability 2021, 13, 12644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.