Background: Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) is an effective and minimally invasive treatment for angina pectoris, but its impact on patient’s quality of life has not been extensively studied with specific questionnaires.
Methods: Over a 6 month period, all patients suffering from angina,
[...] Read more.
Background: Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) is an effective and minimally invasive treatment for angina pectoris, but its impact on patient’s quality of life has not been extensively studied with specific questionnaires.
Methods: Over a 6 month period, all patients suffering from angina, planned for elective PTCA, and available for a 6 months follow-up, were included in the study. The specific “Seattle Angina Questionnaire” (SAQ) was administered the day before and 6 months after PTCA. The decision to implant a coronary stent was left to the cardiologist in charge of the procedure.
Results: 112 patients were initially included (39 PTCA and 62 PTCA with stent implantation). There was no difference in gender, age, angina severity and type of coronary lesion between the two groups. Follow-up at 6 months was available for 101 patients (90%). Quality of life was dramatically improved in 4 of 5 SAQ dimensions (physical limitation, angina stability, angina frequency, disease perception,
p < 0.001). Only treatment satisfaction was worse at follow-up then before the procedure (
p = 0.03), in particular satisfaction with received explanations, belief that everything possible was done to treat angina, and global satisfaction. A stent implantation had no impact on these results.
Conclusions: PTCA for ischaemic cardiac disease improved not only physical abilities, but also quality of life dramatically. Dissatisfaction with treatment could be corrected with better information during follow-up. SAQ is easy to use and could be selected as a monitoring instrument.
Full article
