Error in Figure
In the original publication [1], the authors unfortunately made a mistake in Figure 1 as published when configuring and uploading the figures. None of the authors noticed that the figures were unintentionally mixed up in the final proofreading before publication. The authors identified the regrettable mistake and requested that it be rectified, replacing the inappropriate Figure with the correct one. The corrected Figure 1 appears below. The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.
Figure 1.
Axial CT images of the lung at the level of the heart, six ROI placed with the same size at the exact location (A) Normal Control group lung, (B) FIP group showed increased density of lung, (C) FIP and 10 mL/kg % 0.9 NaCl saline (placebo) group showed increased density of lung, (D) FIP and 20 mg/kg gallic acid group showed density of lung closer to the normal group.
Reference
- Kardaş, S.; Çınaroğlu, O.S.; Bora, E.S.; Erbaş, O. Gallic Acid Protects from Sepsis-Induced Acute Lung Injury. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2024, 46, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
