Next Article in Journal
Electroacoustic Analysis and Optimization of Needle-Rod Electrodes for Low-Power Impulse Sound Source
Previous Article in Journal
An Accurate Altimetry Method for High-Altitude Airburst Fuze Based on Two-Dimensional Joint Extension Characteristics
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Testing and Evaluation Framework for Indoor Navigation and Positioning Systems

1
China Electronics Standardization Institute, Beijing 100007, China
2
School of Automation Science and Electrical Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
3
Shunde Graduate School, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Foshan 528399, China
4
Department of Energy and Control Engineering, Shanxi Information Industry Technology Research Institute Co., Ltd., Taiyuan 030012, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2025, 25(7), 2330; https://doi.org/10.3390/s25072330
Submission received: 25 January 2025 / Revised: 24 March 2025 / Accepted: 2 April 2025 / Published: 6 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Navigation and Positioning)

Abstract

The lack of a testing framework for various indoor positioning technologies brings huge challenges to the systematic and fair evaluation of positioning systems, which greatly hinders the development and industrialization of indoor positioning technology. In order to solve this problem, this article refers to international standards, such as ISO/IEC 18305, and uses the China Electronics Standardization Institute’s rich experience in indoor positioning technology research and testing to build a universal positioning performance testing and evaluation framework. First, this paper introduces the experimental environment in detail from the aspects of the coordinate system definition, test point selection, building type definition, motion mode definition, and motion trajectory setting. Then, this paper comprehensively measures performance evaluation indicators from dimensions such as the accuracy index, relative accuracy, startup time, fault tolerance, power consumption, size, and cost. Finally, this paper elaborates on the testing methods and processes of positioning precision, accuracy, relative accuracy, floor identification, indoor–outdoor distinction, latency, relative accuracy, success rate, and movement speed tests.
Keywords: indoor positioning systems; performance evaluation; testing; standardization; testing and evaluation indoor positioning systems; performance evaluation; testing; standardization; testing and evaluation

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Z.; Wang, Q.; Wang, W.; Feng, M.; Guo, L. A Testing and Evaluation Framework for Indoor Navigation and Positioning Systems. Sensors 2025, 25, 2330. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25072330

AMA Style

Zhang Z, Wang Q, Wang W, Feng M, Guo L. A Testing and Evaluation Framework for Indoor Navigation and Positioning Systems. Sensors. 2025; 25(7):2330. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25072330

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Zhang, Qu Wang, Wenfeng Wang, Meijuan Feng, and Liangliang Guo. 2025. "A Testing and Evaluation Framework for Indoor Navigation and Positioning Systems" Sensors 25, no. 7: 2330. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25072330

APA Style

Zhang, Z., Wang, Q., Wang, W., Feng, M., & Guo, L. (2025). A Testing and Evaluation Framework for Indoor Navigation and Positioning Systems. Sensors, 25(7), 2330. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25072330

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop