Next Article in Journal
Fine-Grained Building Classification in Rural Areas Based on GF-7 Data
Next Article in Special Issue
AI-Driven Cybersecurity in IoT-Based Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Image-Based Detection and Classification of Malaria Parasites and Leukocytes with Quality Assessment of Romanowsky-Stained Blood Smears
Previous Article in Special Issue
Identifying Tampered Radio-Frequency Transmissions in LoRa Networks Using Machine Learning
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Blockchain-Facilitated Cybersecurity for Ubiquitous Internet of Things with Space–Air–Ground Integrated Networks: A Survey

1
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH 44115, USA
2
School of Reliability and Systems Engineering, Beihang University, 37 Xueyuan Road, Beijing 100191, China
3
School of Computer and Communication Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2025, 25(2), 383; https://doi.org/10.3390/s25020383
Submission received: 24 December 2024 / Revised: 8 January 2025 / Accepted: 9 January 2025 / Published: 10 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue AI-Driven Cybersecurity in IoT-Based Systems)

Abstract

This article presents a systematic review on blockchain-facilitated cybersecurity solutions for Internet of Things (IoT) devices in space–air–ground integrated networks (SAGIN). First, we identify the objectives and the context of the blockchain-based solutions for SAGIN. Although, typically, the blockchain is primarily used to enhance the trustworthiness of some systems or operations, it is necessary to document exactly in what context the blockchain is used that is specific to the IoT and SAGIN. Second, we investigate how blockchain technology is used to achieve the objectives. Again, we want to report the technical details on how blockchain is used in this specific field instead of general discussion. Third, we provide a critique on the technical correctness of the blockchain-based solutions. As we elaborate in this article, there are serious technical issues in the proposed solutions. The most pervasive assumption made in many blockchain-based solutions is that higher-level trustworthiness can be achieved by using any form of blockchain. Fourth, we provide a guideline on when blockchain technology could be useful for IoT and SAGIN and what types of blockchain could be useful to enhance the security of ubiquitous IoT in SAGIN.
Keywords: blockchain; space–air–ground integrated networks (SAGIN); dynamic spectrum management; mobility management; Internet of Things (IoT); smart contract; decentralized consensus; data immutability; security; trust; hyperledger; practical Byzantine fault tolerance (PBFT) blockchain; space–air–ground integrated networks (SAGIN); dynamic spectrum management; mobility management; Internet of Things (IoT); smart contract; decentralized consensus; data immutability; security; trust; hyperledger; practical Byzantine fault tolerance (PBFT)

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, W.; Yang, S.; Luo, X. Blockchain-Facilitated Cybersecurity for Ubiquitous Internet of Things with Space–Air–Ground Integrated Networks: A Survey. Sensors 2025, 25, 383. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25020383

AMA Style

Zhao W, Yang S, Luo X. Blockchain-Facilitated Cybersecurity for Ubiquitous Internet of Things with Space–Air–Ground Integrated Networks: A Survey. Sensors. 2025; 25(2):383. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25020383

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Wenbing, Shunkun Yang, and Xiong Luo. 2025. "Blockchain-Facilitated Cybersecurity for Ubiquitous Internet of Things with Space–Air–Ground Integrated Networks: A Survey" Sensors 25, no. 2: 383. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25020383

APA Style

Zhao, W., Yang, S., & Luo, X. (2025). Blockchain-Facilitated Cybersecurity for Ubiquitous Internet of Things with Space–Air–Ground Integrated Networks: A Survey. Sensors, 25(2), 383. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25020383

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop